AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, A. L
Right arrow Articles by Nuudi, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, A. L
Right arrow Articles by Nuudi, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, A. L
Right arrow Articles by Nuudi, L.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 87, No. 2, 332-338, February 2008
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Ability of new octapolar bioimpedance spectroscopy analyzers to predict 4-component–model percentage body fat in Hispanic, black, and white adults1,2,3

Ann L Gibson1, Jason C Holmes1, Richard L Desautels1, Lyndsay B Edmonds1 and Laura Nuudi1

1 From Barry University, Miami Shores, FL

Background: New, vertical, 8-electrode bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) analyzers provide detailed body-composition and nutritional information within 2 min. This is the first report on BIS's accuracy in predicting relative fatness [percentage body fat (%BF)] in a heterogeneous sample according to a multicomponent model criterion.

Objective: We compared %BF measurements from 2 BIS devices with those from a multicomponent model in a sample of Hispanic, black, and white adults.

Design: Equal numbers of apparently healthy men and women (n = 75 of each) from each racial-ethnic group, diverse in body mass index and age, volunteered. Reference %BF (%BF4C) was computed by using a 4-component (4C) model with total bone mineral content obtained from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, body density from underwater weighing with measured residual lung volume, and total body water from traditional BIS. Estimations from InBody 720 (%BF720) and InBody 320 (%BF320) BIS analyzers were validated against %BF4C.

Results: The %BF720 (r = 0.85, SEE = 5.19%BF) and %BF320 (r = 0.84, SEE = 5.17%BF) correlations were significant (P < 0.05) in the men; main effects were nonsignificant. Correlations for %BF720 (r = 0.88, SEE = 4.85%BF) and %BF320 (r = 0.89, SEE = 4.82%BF) also were significant in the women (P < 0.05); there was a main effect for method but not race-ethnicity. There were no sex-specific overestimations or underestimations at the extremes of the distributions.

Conclusions: BIS estimates of %BF4C were well correlated in men and women. There were no significant methodologic differences in the men. The %BF4C was significantly underestimated by %BF720 and %BF320 in the women.

Key Words: Bioimpedance spectroscopy • BIS • multicomponent model • percentage body fat • %BF • adults • men • women







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Nutrition