AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston & Online Sept 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Versleijen, M. W
Right arrow Articles by Wanten, G. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Versleijen, M. W
Right arrow Articles by Wanten, G. J
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Versleijen, M. W
Right arrow Articles by Wanten, G. J
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 87, No. 3, 539-547, March 2008
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Immune function and leukocyte sequestration under the influence of parenteral lipid emulsions in healthy humans: a placebo-controlled crossover study1,2

Michelle W Versleijen1, Wim J Oyen1, Hennie M Roelofs1, Sjenet E van Emst–de Vries1, Peter H Willems1, Jan B Jansen1 and Geert J Wanten1

1 From the Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (MWV, HMR, JBJ, and GJW), Nuclear Medicine (WJO), and Biochemistry (SEvE-dV and PHW), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Background:It remains unclear whether immune modulation by lipids contributes to the high risk of infectious complications that is associated with the use of parenteral nutrition. Although mixed long- and medium-chain triacylglycerol (LCT-MCT)–containing emulsions, but not pure LCT emulsions, activate neutrophils and impair crucial leukocyte functions in vitro, in vivo studies have failed to corroborate these findings.

Objectives:The present investigation was conducted to evaluate the effects of LCT and LCT-MCT on immune function in healthy humans and to assess whether the lack of in vivo effects results from sampling errors due to extravascular sequestration of activated neutrophils.

Design:Saline, LCT-MCT, and LCT emulsions were administered intravenously for 4.5 h to 12 healthy volunteers in a randomized crossover design. Plasma triacylglycerol concentrations were clamped at a clinically relevant concentration of 3–5 mmol/L. Leukocyte population counts and neutrophil activation were assessed before and after infusion. Leukocyte sequestration was evaluated by monitoring the distribution of Technetium-99m–labeled autologous leukocytes during infusions.

Results:Whereas LCT exerted no greater effects than did saline, LCT-MCT significantly decreased lymphocyte counts. However, no evidence for neutrophil activation was found with either lipid. Moreover, the clearance of radiolabeled leukocytes from the liver, spleen, and lungs was not altered by any lipid, which suggested that lipid emulsions do not induce leukocyte sequestration.

Conclusions:Short-term infusion of LCT-MCT (but not LCT) to healthy humans modulates leukocyte population counts but, in clear contrast with the in vitro situation, does not induce neutrophil activation. These disparate findings cannot be explained by MCT-induced leukocyte sequestration.

Key Words: Total parenteral nutrition • lipid emulsion • immune modulation • neutrophil activation • leukocyte sequestration • healthy humans




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
G. J. Wanten
Letter to the Editor
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, July 1, 2009; 33(4): 450 - 450.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Nutrition