HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zerwekh, J. E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zerwekh, J. E Agricola Articles by Zerwekh, J. E

Blood biomarkers of vitamin D status^1,2,3,4

¹ From the Charles and Jane Pak Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

ABSTRACT

In the past quarter century, more than 50 metabolites of vitamin D have been described. To date, only a few of these have been quantified in blood, but this has widened our understanding of the pathologic role that altered vitamin D metabolism plays in the development of diseases of calcium homeostasis. Currently, awareness is growing of the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in the general population in association with an increased risk of several diseases. However, for many researchers, it is not clear which vitamin D metabolites should be quantified and what the information gained from such an analysis tells us. Only 2 metabolites, namely, 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)₂D], have received the greatest attention. Of these, the need for measuring serum 1,25(OH)₂D is limited, and this metabolite should therefore not be considered as part of the standard vitamin D testing regimen. On the other hand, serum 25(OH)D provides the single best assessment of vitamin D status and thus should be the only vitamin D assay typically performed. Currently, numerous formats exist for measuring serum 25(OH)D concentrations, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. This article reviews the currently available methods for serum 25(OH)D quantitation and considers important issues such as whether both the D₂ and the D₃ forms of the vitamin should be assayed, whether total or free concentrations are most important, and what measures should be taken to ensure the fidelity of the measurements.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M Lenders, H. A Feldman, E. Von Scheven, A. Merewood, C. Sweeney, D. M Wilson, P. D. Lee, S. H Abrams, S. E Gitelman, M. S Wertz, et al. Relation of body fat indexes to vitamin D status and deficiency among obese adolescents Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2009; 90(3): 459 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Reis, D. von Muhlen, E. R. Miller III, E. D. Michos, and L. J. Appel Vitamin D Status and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in the United States Adolescent Population Pediatrics, September 1, 2009; 124(3): e371 - e379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M Seamans and K. D Cashman Existing and potentially novel functional markers of vitamin D status: a systematic review Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2009; 89(6): 1997S - 2008S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E Millen and L. M Bodnar Preface Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2008; 87(4): 1079S - 1079S. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E Millen and L. M Bodnar Vitamin D assessment in population-based studies: a review of the issues Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2008; 87(4): 1102S - 1105S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]