AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darmon, N.
Right arrow Articles by Drewnowski, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Darmon, N.
Right arrow Articles by Drewnowski, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Darmon, N.
Right arrow Articles by Drewnowski, A.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 87, No. 5, 1107-1117, May 2008
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


PERSPECTIVE

Does social class predict diet quality?1,2,3

Nicole Darmon1 and Adam Drewnowski1

1 From INRA, UMR1260, Nutriments Lipidiques et Prévention des Maladies Métaboliques, Marseille, France (ND); INSERM, U476, Marseille, France (ND); Univ Aix-Marseille 1, Faculté de Médecine, IPHM-IFR 125, Marseille, France (ND); and the University of Washington Center for Obesity Research and the Nutritional Sciences Program, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (AD)

ABSTRACT

A large body of epidemiologic data show that diet quality follows a socioeconomic gradient. Whereas higher-quality diets are associated with greater affluence, energy-dense diets that are nutrient-poor are preferentially consumed by persons of lower socioeconomic status (SES) and of more limited economic means. As this review demonstrates, whole grains, lean meats, fish, low-fat dairy products, and fresh vegetables and fruit are more likely to be consumed by groups of higher SES. In contrast, the consumption of refined grains and added fats has been associated with lower SES. Although micronutrient intake and, hence, diet quality are affected by SES, little evidence indicates that SES affects either total energy intakes or the macronutrient composition of the diet. The observed associations between SES variables and diet-quality measures can be explained by a variety of potentially causal mechanisms. The disparity in energy costs ($/MJ) between energy-dense and nutrient-dense foods is one such mechanism; easy physical access to low-cost energy-dense foods is another. If higher SES is a causal determinant of diet quality, then the reported associations between diet quality and better health, found in so many epidemiologic studies, may have been confounded by unobserved indexes of social class. Conversely, if limited economic resources are causally linked to low-quality diets, some current strategies for health promotion, based on recommending high-cost foods to low-income people, may prove to be wholly ineffective. Exploring the possible causal relations between SES and diet quality is the purpose of this review.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Nutrition