AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Temple, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, L. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Temple, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, L. H
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Temple, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, L. H
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 87, No. 5, 1121-1127, May 2008
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Overweight children find food more reinforcing and consume more energy than do nonoverweight children1,2,3

Jennifer L Temple1, Christina M Legierski1, April M Giacomelli1, Sarah-Jeanne Salvy1 and Leonard H Epstein1

1 From the University at Buffalo, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Behavioral Medicine, Buffalo, NY

Background:The reinforcing value of food is a reliable index of motivation to eat and energy intake. Obese adults find food more reinforcing than do nonobese adults.

Objective:The present study was designed to assess whether the relative reinforcing value of food differs as a function of weight status in 8–12-y-old children and whether the relative reinforcing value of food differs depending on the types of available nonfood alternatives.

Design:The reinforcing value of pizza (experiment 1) or snack foods (experiment 2) was measured on progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement in nonoverweight and overweight children. Experiment 2 also compared the relative reinforcing value of food and 2 nonfood alternatives: time to spend playing a hand-held video game or time to spend reading magazines or completing word searches or mazes.

Results:In both experiments, overweight children found food more reinforcing and consumed more energy than did their leaner peers. In experiment 2, the relative reinforcing value of food versus sedentary activity was higher in overweight children, but lower in nonoverweight children, regardless of the type of alternative activity available.

Conclusions:These results show that overweight children find food more reinforcing than do nonoverweight children. This individual difference was replicated in different experiments using different types of foods and food alternatives. These studies provide support for studying food reinforcement as a factor associated with overweight and obesity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. L Temple, A. M Bulkley, R. L Badawy, N. Krause, S. McCann, and L. H Epstein
Differential effects of daily snack food intake on the reinforcing value of food in obese and nonobese women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2009; 90(2): 304 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. Hill, J. Saxton, L. Webber, J. Blundell, and J. Wardle
The relative reinforcing value of food predicts weight gain in a longitudinal study of 7-10-y-old children
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2009; 90(2): 276 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. H Epstein, J. L Robinson, J. L Temple, J. N Roemmich, A. L Marusewski, and R. L Nadbrzuch
Variety influences habituation of motivated behavior for food and energy intake in children
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2009; 89(3): 746 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Nutrition