AJCN EB Program 2010 Early Registration
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohkawara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tabata, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ohkawara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tabata, I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ohkawara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tabata, I.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 87, No. 5, 1268-1276, May 2008
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Twenty-four–hour analysis of elevated energy expenditure after physical activity in a metabolic chamber: models of daily total energy expenditure1,2,3

Kazunori Ohkawara, Shigeho Tanaka, Kazuko Ishikawa-Takata and Izumi Tabata

1 From the Health Promotion and Exercise Program, National Institute of Health and Nutrition, Tokyo, Japan

Background: The Institute of Medicine proposed that 15% of energy expenditure (EE) as excess post-exercise oxygen consumption should be added to additional physical activity energy expenditure ({Delta}PAEE) to estimate total EE. However, the magnitude of elevated post–physical activity energy expenditure (EPEE) under normal daily living conditions has not been examined.

Objective: We examined the effects of EPEE on 24-h EE by modeling standard living conditions in a metabolic chamber.

Design: Eleven Japanese men completed three 24-h metabolic chamber measurements: a control day (C-day), a day with high-frequency moderate-intensity physical activity (M-day), and a day with high-frequency vigorous-intensity physical activity (V-day).

Results: Mean (± SD) 24-h EE for the C-day, the M-day, and the V-day was 2228 ± 143 kcal, 2816 ± 197 kcal, and 2813 ± 163 kcal, respectively. No significant difference was observed in 24-h EE between an M-day and a V-day. Mean EPEEs on the M-day and the V-day did not significantly contribute to increasing 24-h EE. Relative EPEEs to {Delta}PAEEs were 6.2 ± 13.9% (M-day) and 5.1 ± 9.2% (V-day). However, EPEE/24-h EE was negatively correlated with maximal oxygen uptake on the V-day (r = –0.68, P = 0.02), although no significant correlation between these variables was observed on the M-day (r = –0.41, P = 0.21).

Conclusions: These results suggest that EPEE has a small effect on 24-h EE in the course of normal daily activities, findings that do not support the proposition by the Institute of Medicine for estimating TEE. However, persons with low physical fitness levels could enhance EE as EPEE by increasing vigorous-intensity daily physical activity.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Nutrition