HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental data Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Related articles in AJCN Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Rudnicka, A. R Articles by Strachan, D. P PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rudnicka, A. R Articles by Strachan, D. P Agricola Articles by Rudnicka, A. R Articles by Strachan, D. P

Effect of breastfeeding and sociodemographic factors on visual outcome in childhood and adolescence^1,2,3

¹ From the Division of Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom (ARR, CGO, and DPS), and the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free Hospital, University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom (MR and MEJW)

Background: It has been suggested that early life factors, including breastfeeding and birth weight, program childhood myopia.

Objective: We examined the relation of reduced unaided vision (indicative of myopia) in childhood and adolescence with infant feeding, parental education, maternal age at birth, birth weight, sex, birth order, and socioeconomic status.

Design: Three British cohorts recruited infants born in 1946 (n = 5362), 1958 (n = 18 558), and 1970 (n = 16 567). Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for unaided vision of 6/12 or worse at ages 10–11 and 15–16 y from each cohort were pooled by using fixed-effects meta-analyses.

Results: The prevalence of reduced vision ranged from 4.4% to 6.5% at 10–11 y and from 9.4% to 11.4% at 16 y, with marginally higher levels in later cohorts. Breastfeeding declined across successive cohorts (65%, 43%, and 22% in those breastfed for >1 mo, respectively). Pooled ORs showed no associations between infant feeding and vision after adjustment at either age. Parental education (OR: 1.48, high versus low education; 95% CI: 1.23, 1.79), maternal age (OR: 1.10, per 5-y increase; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.17), birth weight (OR: 0.85, per 1-kg rise; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.95), number of older siblings (OR: 0.89, per older sibling; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.94), and sex (OR: 1.10, girls versus boys; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.23) were related to adverse visual outcome in childhood. Stronger associations were observed in adolescence, except that the association with birth weight was null.

Conclusions: Infant feeding does not appear to influence visual development. Consistent associations of reduced vision with parental education, sex, maternal age, and birth order suggest that other environmental factors are important for visual development and myopia in early life.

Related articles in AJCN:

Infant feeding and vision

William C Heird
AJCN 2008 87: 1120. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. C Heird Infant feeding and vision Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1120 - 1120. [Full Text] [PDF]