|
|
||||||||
Protein Summit 2007: Exploring the Impact of High-Quality Protein on Optimal Health |
1 From the Departments of Physical Therapy and Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (DP-J); the Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (EW); the Department of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IL (RDM); the Department of Geriatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR (RRW); the Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (AA); and the Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Germany (MW-P)
ABSTRACT
Obesity, with its comorbidities such as metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases, is a major public health concern. To address this problem, it is imperative to identify treatment interventions that target a variety of short- and long-term mechanisms. Although any dietary or lifestyle change must be personalized, controlled energy intake in association with a moderately elevated protein intake may represent an effective and practical weight-loss strategy. Potential beneficial outcomes associated with protein ingestion include the following: 1) increased satiety—protein generally increases satiety to a greater extent than carbohydrate or fat and may facilitate a reduction in energy consumption under ad libitum dietary conditions; 2) increased thermogenesis—higher-protein diets are associated with increased thermogenesis, which also influences satiety and augments energy expenditure (in the longer term, increased thermogenesis contributes to the relatively low-energy efficiency of protein); and 3) maintenance or accretion of fat-free mass—in some individuals, a moderately higher protein diet may provide a stimulatory effect on muscle protein anabolism, favoring the retention of lean muscle mass while improving metabolic profile. Nevertheless, any potential benefits associated with a moderately elevated protein intake must be evaluated in the light of customary dietary practices and individual variability.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Hochstenbach-Waelen, M. S. Westerterp-Plantenga, M. A. B. Veldhorst, and K. R. Westerterp Single-Protein Casein and Gelatin Diets Affect Energy Expenditure Similarly but Substrate Balance and Appetite Differently in Adults J. Nutr., December 1, 2009; 139(12): 2285 - 2292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Hindlet, A. Bado, P. Kamenicky, C. Delomenie, F. Bourasset, C. Nazaret, R. Farinotti, and M. Buyse Reduced Intestinal Absorption of Dipeptides via PepT1 in Mice with Diet-induced Obesity Is Associated with Leptin Receptor Down-regulation J. Biol. Chem., March 13, 2009; 284(11): 6801 - 6808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tanofsky-Kraff, J. R McDuffie, S. Z Yanovski, M. Kozlosky, N. A Schvey, L. B Shomaker, C. Salaita, and J. A Yanovski Laboratory assessment of the food intake of children and adolescents with loss of control eating Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2009; 89(3): 738 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hochstenbach-Waelen, M. A. Veldhorst, A. G Nieuwenhuizen, M. S Westerterp-Plantenga, and K. R Westerterp Comparison of 2 diets with either 25% or 10% of energy as casein on energy expenditure, substrate balance, and appetite profile Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2009; 89(3): 831 - 838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |