HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fouillet, H. Articles by Tomé, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fouillet, H. Articles by Tomé, D. Agricola Articles by Fouillet, H. Articles by Tomé, D.

Urea-nitrogen production and salvage are modulated by protein intake in fed humans: results of an oral stable-isotope-tracer protocol and compartmental modeling^1,2,3,4

¹ From INRA, CNRH-IdF, UMR914 Nutrition Physiology and Ingestive Behavior, F-75005 Paris, France (HF, BJ, CB, FM, CG, and DT) and AgroParisTech, CNRH-IdF, UMR914 Nutrition Physiology and Ingestive Behavior, F-75005 Paris, France (HF, BJ, CB, FM, CG, and DT) and the Department of Gastroenterology, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny, France (RB)

Background: The influence of protein source on postprandial urea kinetics is poorly understood, despite its nutritional significance with respect to nitrogen homeostasis. Furthermore, traditional tracer infusion studies underestimate acute postprandial change in urea kinetics.

Objective: We investigated postprandial, non–steady state urea kinetics and their modulation by qualitative and quantitative factors of protein intake by the combined use of robust clinical data on nitrogen postprandial distribution and mathematical modeling.

Design: In healthy subjects standardized to a normal protein intake for 7 d, dietary and total nitrogen kinetics were measured for 8 h in plasma proteins, body, and urinary urea after the ingestion of a ¹⁵N-labeled milk (n = 8), soy (n = 8), or wheat (n = 8) protein meal. In subjects who received the soy protein meal, these postprandial measurements were repeated after a further 7-d adaptation to a high protein intake. A 4-compartment model was developed to calculate from these data the postprandial kinetics of production, urinary excretion, and intestinal hydrolysis of urea nitrogen from both dietary and endogenous sources.

Results: Urinary urea excretion was not influenced by the protein source in the meal but was influenced by the protein level in the diet. By contrast, urea production and hydrolysis were higher when ingesting plant versus animal protein, together with a higher efficiency of urea hydrolysis (50–60% versus 25% of the urea produced being hydrolyzed, respectively).

Conclusions: We conclude that urea hydrolysis is an acute nitrogen-sparing mechanism that can counterbalance a postprandial higher urea production, and the efficiency of this recycling is higher when the usual protein intake is lower.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. G. Bergen and G. Wu Intestinal Nitrogen Recycling and Utilization in Health and Disease J. Nutr., May 1, 2009; 139(5): 821 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]