AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, L.
Right arrow Articles by Makrides, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, L.
Right arrow Articles by Makrides, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, L.
Right arrow Articles by Makrides, M.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 88, No. 1, 70-76, July 2008
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Selenium status of term infants fed selenium-supplemented formula in a randomized dose-response trial1,2,3

Lynne Daniels, Robert A Gibson, Karen Simmer, Peter Van Dael and Maria Makrides

1 From the Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia (LD); the Child Health Research Institute, based at Flinders Medical Centre and Women's and Children's Hospital (RAG and MM), School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health (MM), and School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, (RAG), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; the University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia (KS); and the Nestlé Research Centre, Vers-chez-les Blanc, Lausanne, Switzerland (PVD)

Background: The optimal form and dose of selenium supplementation required to achieve indicators of selenium status equivalent to those in breastfed infants are unclear.

Objective: The objective was to evaluate the effect of fortifying infant formula (6 µg Se/L) with 2 concentrations of selenate (7 and 15 µg/L) on biochemical indicators of selenium status and growth at 16 wk in term infants.

Design: A randomized dose-response trial was conducted in 3 groups of term infants fed formula with different selenium concentrations [6 µg/L, F+0 (control); 13 µg/L, F+7; and 21 µg/L, F+15] and in a parallel breastfed reference group (BF; 11 ± 2 µg Se/L).

Results: One hundred sixty-one (47% males) infants completed the 16-wk study. Baseline plasma selenium was 0.3 ± 0.1 µmol/L. At 16 wk, plasma selenium had increased in all groups (P < 0.001) and was greater (P < 0.01) in the F+7 and F+15 groups and lower (P < 0.05) in the F+0 group than in the BF group. Plasma glutathione peroxidase increased in the F+15 group, decreased in the F+0 group, and, at 16 wk, was lower in the F+0 group than in the other groups (all P < 0.05). Erythrocyte selenium and glutathione peroxidase decreased in all groups (P < 0.05), but the magnitude of the change was greater in the F+0 than in the F+15 group (P < 0.05). There was no effect of selenium supplementation on growth.

Conclusions: Selenate fortification of formula resulted in an increase in plasma indicators of selenium status relative to indicators observed in infants fed low-selenium-containing formula. Although the erythrocyte indicators decreased in all groups, the 21-µg/L dose (F+15 group) resulted in a smaller decrease and in higher erythrocyte selenium than did the standard formula. Supplementation of low-selenium formula to provide a net selenium concentration close to that found in the breast milk of US women (18 µg/L) may be justified.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Nutrition