AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yetley, E. A
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yetley, E. A
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yetley, E. A
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 88, No. 2, 558S-564S, August 2008
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


Vitamin D and Health in the 21st Century: an Update

Assessing the vitamin D status of the US population1,2,3,4

Elizabeth A Yetley

1 From the Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

ABSTRACT

This article describes the information currently available in the National Nutrition Monitoring System that is relevant to assessing the vitamin D status of US population groups, the strengths and limitations of this information, and selected results of vitamin D nutritional status assessments. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) provides information on vitamin D intakes only from 1988 to 1994. NHANES collected information on supplement use and circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations from 1988 through current surveys. The National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference started providing limited data on the vitamin D content of foods in 2002 and continues to update these values. The Food Label and Package Survey provides 2006–2007 label information on vitamin D fortification of marketed foods. Despite limitations in the available data and controversies about appropriate criteria for evaluating vitamin D status among population groups, we can make some useful comparisons of vitamin D status among life-stage groups. In general, males have higher vitamin D intakes and 25(OH)D concentrations than do females. Children tend to have higher vitamin D status than adults. The increasing use of multivitamin-mineral dietary supplements in younger to older adults is not associated with a corresponding increase in serum 25(OH)D concentrations. In general, leaner individuals have higher circulating concentrations of 25(OH)D and supplement use than do heavier individuals. Finally, non-Hispanic whites tend to have higher vitamin D status than do non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P. M Brannon, E. A Yetley, R. L Bailey, and M. F. Picciano
Overview of the conference "Vitamin D and Health in the 21st Century: an Update"
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2008; 88(2): 483S - 490S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
F. R Greer
25-Hydroxyvitamin D: functional outcomes in infants and young children
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2008; 88(2): 529S - 533S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Nutrition