AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chomtho, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fewtrell, M. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chomtho, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fewtrell, M. S
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chomtho, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fewtrell, M. S
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 88, No. 4, 1040-1048, October 2008
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Associations between birth weight and later body composition: evidence from the 4-component model1,2,3

Sirinuch Chomtho, Jonathan CK Wells, Jane E Williams, Alan Lucas and Mary S Fewtrell

1 From the Medical Research Council, Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, University College London

Background: Higher birth weight is associated with higher body mass index, traditionally interpreted as greater fatness or obesity, in later life. However, its relation with individual body-composition components and fat distribution remains unclear.

Objective: We investigated associations between birth weight and later fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), and fat distribution.

Design: Body composition was assessed by the criterion 4-component model in 391 healthy children [mean (±SD) age, 11.7 ± 4.2 y; 188 boys]. FM and FFM were adjusted for height (FMI = FM/height2; FFMI = FFM/height2) and were expressed as SD scores (SDS). Findings were compared between the 4-component and simpler methods.

Results: Birth weight was positively associated with height in both sexes and was significantly positively associated with FFMI in boys, equivalent to a 0.18 SDS (95% CI: 0.04, 0.32) increase in FFMI per 1 SDS increase in birth weight. These associations were independent of puberty, physical activity, social class, ethnicity, and parental body mass index. Birth weight was not significantly related to percentage fat, FMI, or trunk FMI in either sex. Equivalent analyses using simpler methods showed a trend for a positive relation between birth weight and FMI in boys that became nonsignificant after adjusting for confounders.

Conclusions: FFMI in later life in males is influenced by birth weight, a proxy for prenatal growth, but evidence for fetal programming of later FM or central adiposity is weak. Different body-composition techniques and data interpretation can influence results and should be considered when comparing studies.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P. M. Skidmore, A. Cassidy, R. Swaminathan, J B. Richards, M. Mangino, T. D Spector, and A. J MacGregor
An obesogenic postnatal environment is more important than the fetal environment for the development of adult adiposity: a study of female twins
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2009; 90(2): 401 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Nutrition