AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenbaum, M.
Right arrow Articles by Leibel, R. L
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenbaum, M.
Right arrow Articles by Leibel, R. L
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rosenbaum, M.
Right arrow Articles by Leibel, R. L
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 88, No. 4, 906-912, October 2008
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Long-term persistence of adaptive thermogenesis in subjects who have maintained a reduced body weight1,2,3

Michael Rosenbaum, Jules Hirsch, Dympna A Gallagher and Rudolph L Leibel

1 From the Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons–New York Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY (MR, DAG, and RLL), Rockefeller University, New York, NY (JH), and St Luke's–Roosevelt Hospital Medical Center, New York, NY (DAG)

Background: After weight loss, total energy expenditure—in particular, energy expenditure at low levels of physical activity—is lower than predicted by actual changes in body weight and composition. An important clinical issue is whether this reduction, which predisposes to weight regain, persists over time.

Objective: We aimed to determine whether this disproportionate reduction in energy expenditure persists in persons who have maintained a body-weight reduction of ≥10% for >1 y.

Design: Seven trios of sex- and weight-matched subjects were studied in an in-patient setting while receiving a weight-maintaining liquid formula diet of identical composition. Each trio consisted of a subject at usual weight (Wtinitial), a subject maintaining a weight reduction of ≥10% after recent (5–8 wk) completion of weight loss (Wtloss-recent), and a subject who had maintained a documented reduction in body weight of >10% for >1 y (Wtloss-sustained). Twenty-four-hour total energy expenditure (TEE) was assessed by precise titration of fed calories of a liquid formula diet necessary to maintain body weight. Resting energy expenditure (REE) and the thermic effect of feeding (TEF) were measured by indirect calorimetry. Nonresting energy expenditure (NREE) was calculated as NREE = TEE – (REE +TEF).

Results: TEE, NREE, and (to a lesser extent) REE were significantly lower in the Wtloss-sustained and Wtloss-recent groups than in the Wtinitial group. Differences from the Wtinitial group in energy expenditure were qualitatively and quantitatively similar after recent and sustained weight loss.

Conclusion: Declines in energy expenditure favoring the regain of lost weight persist well beyond the period of dynamic weight loss.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Nutrition