|
|
||||||||
Cardiovascular disease risk |
1 From the Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research and the Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (JPR and ERM); the Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (EDM); and the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA (DvM)
2 Supported by grant no. T32 HL07024 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (to JPR). 3 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to JP Reis, Department of Epidemiology and the Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, 2024 East Monument Street, Suite 2-602, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail: jreis{at}jhsph.edu.
Background:Racial differences in cardiovascular risk factors do not fully explain the higher prevalence of lower-extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in black adults.
Objective:We sought to determine whether any of this excess risk may be explained by vitamin D status, which has been widely documented to be lower in blacks than in whites.
Design:This population-based cross-sectional study included 2987 white and 866 black persons aged
40 y from the 2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PAD was defined as an ankle-brachial pressure index of <0.90 in either leg.
Results:Mean (±SEM) 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations were significantly lower in black than in white adults (39.2 ± 1.0 and 63.7 ± 1.1 nmol/L, respectively; P < 0.001). Adjusted odds ratios for PAD decreased in a dose-dependent fashion with increasing quartiles of 25(OH)D in white adults [1.00 (referent), 0.86, 0.67, and 0.53; P for trend < 0.001]. In black adults, the association was nonlinear; models with cubic splines suggested evidence of greater odds for PAD and a trend for lower odds for PAD at the lowest and highest concentrations of 25(OH)D, respectively. After adjustment for racial differences in socioeconomic status and for traditional and novel risk factors, odds for PAD in black compared with white adults were reduced from 2.11 (95% CI: 1.55, 2.87) to 1.67 (1.11, 2.51). After additional adjustment for 25(OH)D, the odds were further reduced to 1.33 (0.84, 2.10).
Conclusions:Racial differences in vitamin D status may explain nearly one-third of the excess risk of PAD in black compared with white adults. Additional research is needed to confirm these findings.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P. Reis, D. von Muhlen, E. R. Miller III, E. D. Michos, and L. J. Appel Vitamin D Status and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in the United States Adolescent Population Pediatrics, September 1, 2009; 124(3): e371 - e379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |