HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 89/1/1    most recent ajcn.2008.26792v1 Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mattes, R. D Articles by Popkin, B. M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mattes, R. D Articles by Popkin, B. M Agricola Articles by Mattes, R. D Articles by Popkin, B. M

Nonnutritive sweetener consumption in humans: effects on appetite and food intake and their putative mechanisms^1,2,3

¹ From the Department of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN (RDM), and the Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (BMP).

² Supported by PHS grant no. 1 R01 DK 063185 and the USDA HATCH grant 0172514/INDO0840-55 (to RM) and grants R01-HD39183, R01-HD041375, and R01 HD030880 (to BP).

³ Reprints not available. Address correspondence to BM Popkin, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, 123 W Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27516. E-mail: popkin{at}unc.edu.

Nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS) are ecologically novel chemosensory signaling compounds that influence ingestive processes and behavior. Only about 15% of the US population aged >2 y ingest NNS, but the incidence is increasing. These sweeteners have the potential to moderate sugar and energy intakes while maintaining diet palatability, but their use has increased in concert with BMI in the population. This association may be coincidental or causal, and either mode of directionality is plausible. A critical review of the literature suggests that the addition of NNS to non-energy-yielding products may heighten appetite, but this is not observed under the more common condition in which NNS is ingested in conjunction with other energy sources. Substitution of NNS for a nutritive sweetener generally elicits incomplete energy compensation, but evidence of long-term efficacy for weight management is not available. The addition of NNS to diets poses no benefit for weight loss or reduced weight gain without energy restriction. There are long-standing and recent concerns that inclusion of NNS in the diet promotes energy intake and contributes to obesity. Most of the purported mechanisms by which this occurs are not supported by the available evidence, although some warrant further consideration. Resolution of this important issue will require long-term randomized controlled trials.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. D. Brownell, T. Farley, W. C. Willett, B. M. Popkin, F. J. Chaloupka, J. W. Thompson, and D. S. Ludwig The Public Health and Economic Benefits of Taxing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages N. Engl. J. Med., October 15, 2009; 361(16): 1599 - 1605. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Celentano Increased Fruit and Vegetable Intake May Reduce the Nutrition-Related Health Disparities in African Americans American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, May 1, 2009; 3(3): 185 - 187. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. E. Straznicky, G. W. Lambert, M. T. McGrane, K. Masuo, T. Dawood, P. J. Nestel, N. Eikelis, M. P. Schlaich, M. D. Esler, F. Socratous, et al. Weight Loss May Reverse Blunted Sympathetic Neural Responsiveness to Glucose Ingestion in Obese Subjects With Metabolic Syndrome Diabetes, May 1, 2009; 58(5): 1126 - 1132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A Forshee, M. L Storey, and P. A Anderson Reply to VS Malik et al Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 439 - 440. [Full Text] [PDF]