AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Clin Nutr 89: 51-57, 2009. First published December 3, 2008; doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.26802
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.26802
Vol. 89, No. 1, 51-57, January 2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/1/51    most recent
ajcn.2008.26802v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mutch, D. M
Right arrow Articles by Clément, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mutch, D. M
Right arrow Articles by Clément, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mutch, D. M
Right arrow Articles by Clément, K.
© 2009 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Needle and surgical biopsy techniques differentially affect adipose tissue gene expression profiles1,2,3

David M Mutch, Joan Tordjman, Véronique Pelloux, Blaise Hanczar, Corneliu Henegar, Christine Poitou, Nicolas Veyrie, Jean-Daniel Zucker and Karine Clément

1 From the INSERM, Nutriomique U872 Team 7, Paris, France (DMM, JT, VP, BH, CH, CP, J-DZ, and KC); the Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France (DMM, JT, VP, BH, CH, CP, J-DZ, and KC); the Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France (DMM, JT, VP, BH, CH, CP, Z-DZ, and KC); the Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Nutrition and Endocrinology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France (CP and KC); and the Université Paris Descartes, Surgery Department, Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France (NV).

2 Supported by Paris 6 University (Bonus Quality Research) and by the Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris/Direction de la Recherche Clinique (CRC P050318), and a grant from the European Community 7th framework program: ADAPT "Adipokines as Drug Targets to combat Adverse effects of excess ADipose Tissue" project (grant agreement 201100). DMM is funded by the European Community [DiOGenes – Diet, genes and obesity (contract FP6-513946)].

3 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to DM Mutch, University of Guelph, Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1. E-mail: dmutch{at}uoguelph.ca or dmmutch_sci{at}hotmail.com.

Background: Adipose tissue gene expression analysis in humans now provides a tremendous means to discover the physiopathologic gene targets critical for our understanding and treatment of obesity. Clinical studies are emerging in which adipose gene expression has been examined in hundreds of subjects, and it will be fundamentally important that these studies can be compared so that a common consensus can be reached and new therapeutic targets for obesity proposed.

Objective: We studied the effect of the biopsy sampling methods (needle-aspirated and surgical) used in clinical investigation programs on the functional interpretation of adipose tissue gene expression profiles.

Design: A comparative microarray analysis of the different subcutaneous adipose tissue sampling methods was performed in age-matched lean (n = 19) and obese (n = 18) female subjects. Appropriate statistical (principal components analysis) and bioinformatic (FunNet) functional enrichment software were used to evaluate data. The morphology of adipose tissue samples obtained by needle-aspiration and surgical methods was examined by immunohistochemistry.

Results: Biopsy techniques influence the gene expression underlying the biological themes currently discussed in obesity (eg, inflammation, extracellular matrix, and metabolism). Immunohistochemistry experiments showed that the easier to obtain needle-aspirated biopsies poorly aspirate the fibrotic fraction of subcutaneous adipose tissue, resulting in an underrepresentation of the stroma-vascular fraction.

Conclusions: The adipose tissue biopsy technique is an important caveat to consider when designing, interpreting, and, most important, comparing microarray experiments. These results will have crucial implications for the clinical and physiopathologic understanding of human obesity and therapeutic approaches.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. Aron-Wisnewsky, J. Tordjman, C. Poitou, F. Darakhshan, D. Hugol, A. Basdevant, A. Aissat, M. Guerre-Millo, and K. Clement
Human Adipose Tissue Macrophages: M1 and M2 Cell Surface Markers in Subcutaneous and Omental Depots and after Weight Loss
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2009; 94(11): 4619 - 4623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by The American Society for Nutrition