HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental data All Versions of this Article: 89/3/862    most recent ajcn.2008.26739v1 Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Related articles in AJCN Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Corder, K. Articles by Ekelund, U. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Corder, K. Articles by Ekelund, U. Agricola Articles by Corder, K. Articles by Ekelund, U.

Is it possible to assess free-living physical activity and energy expenditure in young people by self-report?

¹ From the MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, United Kingdom (KC, EMFvS, NJW, and UE); MRC Human Nutrition Research, Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom (AW); and the Department of Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom (PW).

² Supported by The Medical Research Council, United Kingdom. The CHASE study is supported by the Wellcome Trust.

³ Reprints not available. Address correspondence to U Ekelund, MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Box 285, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom. E-mail: ue202{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk.

Background: It is unclear whether it is possible to accurately estimate physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) by self-report in youth.

Objective: We assessed the validity and reliability of 4 self-reports to assess PAEE and time spent at moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) over the previous week in British young people between 4 and 17 y of age.

Design: PAEE and MVPA were derived from the Children's Physical Activity Questionnaire, Youth Physical Activity Questionnaire, and Swedish Adolescent Physical Activity Questionnaire; a lifestyle score indicative of habitual activity was derived from the Child Heart and Health Study in England Questionnaire. These data were compared with criterion methods, PAEE, and MVPA derived from simultaneous measurements by doubly labeled water and accelerometry in 3 age groups: 4–5 y (n = 27), 12–13 y (n = 25), and 16–17 y (n = 24). Validity was assessed by using Spearman correlations and the Bland-Altman method, and reliability was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients.

Results: The strength of association between questionnaire and criterion methods varied (r = 0.09 to r = 0.46). Some questionnaires were able to accurately assess group-level PAEE and MVPA for some age groups, but the error was large for individual-level estimates throughout. Reliability of the Youth Physical Activity Questionnaire and Child Heart and Health Study in England Questionnaire was good (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.64–0.92).

Conclusions: Absolute PAEE and MVPA estimated from these self-reports were not valid on an individual level in young people, although some questionnaires appeared to rank individuals accurately. Age (the outcome of interest) and whether individual or group-level estimates are necessary will influence the best choice of self-report method when assessing physical activity in youth.

Related articles in AJCN:

Can there be a single best measure of reported physical activity?

Richard P Troiano
AJCN 2009 89: 736-737. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. M Steele, E. M. van Sluijs, A. Cassidy, S. J Griffin, and U. Ekelund Targeting sedentary time or moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity: independent relations with adiposity in a population-based sample of 10-y-old British children Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2009; 90(5): 1185 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P Troiano Can there be a single best measure of reported physical activity? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2009; 89(3): 736 - 737. [Full Text] [PDF]