AJCN EB Program 2010 Early Registration
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Clin Nutr 89: 1334-1342, 2009. First published April 8, 2009; doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.27151
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.27151
Vol. 89, No. 5, 1334-1342, May 2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/5/1334    most recent
ajcn.2008.27151v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cogswell, M. E
Right arrow Articles by Grummer-Strawn, L. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cogswell, M. E
Right arrow Articles by Grummer-Strawn, L. M
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cogswell, M. E
Right arrow Articles by Grummer-Strawn, L. M
© 2009 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Assessment of iron deficiency in US preschool children and nonpregnant females of childbearing age: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–20061,2,3,4

Mary E Cogswell, Anne C Looker, Christine M Pfeiffer, James D Cook, David A Lacher, John L Beard, Sean R Lynch and Laurence M Grummer-Strawn

1 From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Atlanta, GA (MEC and LMG-S); the CDC, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (ACL and DAL); the CDC, National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, GA (CMP); Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS (JDC); Penn State University, University Park, PA (JLB); and the Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia (SRL).

2 This article is dedicated to the memory of John L Beard, who died on February 12, 2009.

3 The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

4 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to ME Cogswell, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Mailstop E-86, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341. E-mail: mcogswell{at}cdc.gov.

Background: A new index to determine body iron promises a simpler approach to monitoring iron deficiency (ID) prevalence.

Objective: Our objective was to compare ID defined as body iron <0 mg/kg and calculated from the log ratio of transferrin receptor to ferritin (the body iron model) to ID defined as ≥2 of 3 abnormal concentrations in ferritin, transferrin saturation, or erythrocyte protoporphyrin (the ferritin model).

Design: We used measures of iron status and inflammation from 486 children aged 1–2 y, 848 children aged 3–5 y, and 3742 nonpregnant females aged 12–49 y from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2006.

Results: ID prevalences (±SE) based on the body iron model in children (1–2 and 3–5 y) and in females (12–19 and 20–49 y) were 14.4 ± 1.9%, 3.7 ± 0.8%, 9.3 ± 1.0%, and 9.2 ± 1.6%, respectively. ID prevalences based on the ferritin model in children (3–5 y) and females (12–19 and 20–49 y) were 4.5 ± 0.9%, 15.6 ± 1.2%, and 15.7 ± 0.8%, respectively. The {kappa} statistics for agreement between the 2 models were 0.5–0.7. Among females (12–49 y) the positive predictive values of ID based on the body iron model and the ferritin model for identifying anemia were 43 ± 3% and 30 ± 2%, respectively, whereas negative predictive values did not differ. C-reactive protein was elevated in 28.8 ± 3.1% of females with ID by the ferritin model but not by the body iron model and in 0% of persons with ID by the body iron model but not by the ferritin model.

Conclusions: The agreement between the 2 indexes was fair to good. Among females, the body iron model produced lower estimates of ID prevalence, better predicted anemia, and appeared to be less affected by inflammation than the ferritin model.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by The American Society for Nutrition