AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Clin Nutr 89: 1828-1835, 2009. First published April 15, 2009; doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.26919
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.26919
Vol. 89, No. 6, 1828-1835, June 2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/6/1828    most recent
ajcn.2008.26919v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rougé, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rozé, J.-C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rougé, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rozé, J.-C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rougé, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rozé, J.-C.
© 2009 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Oral supplementation with probiotics in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial1,2,3,4

Carole Rougé, Hugues Piloquet, Marie-José Butel, Bernard Berger, Florence Rochat, Laurent Ferraris, Clotilde Des Robert, Arnaud Legrand, Marie-France de la Cochetière, Jean-Michel N'Guyen, Michel Vodovar, Marcel Voyer, Dominique Darmaun and Jean-Christophe Rozé

1 From INRA UMR 1280, Physiologie des Adaptations Nutritionnelles, INRA and University of Nantes, Human Nutrition Research Center, Nantes, France (CR, HP, CDR, DD, and J-CR); INSERM, CIC 0004, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Mère-et-Enfant, CHU de Nantes, France (HP, CDR, AL, and J-CR); Nestec Research Center, Vers-Chez-les-Blancs, Switzerland (BB and FR); EA 4065, Ecosystème Intestinal, Probiotiques, Antibiotiques, Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France (M-JB and LF); EA 3826, Thérapeutiques Cliniques et Expérimentales des Maladies Infectieuses, University of Nantes, France (M-FdlC); Biostatistiques, PIMESP, CHU de Nantes, France (J-MN); the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Institut de Puériculture, Paris, France (M Vodovar and M Voyer).

2 Presented in part at the Pediatric American Societies meeting 2008, E-PAS2008:5630.6.

3 Supported in part by grants from the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC 2004) of the French Ministry of Health and the Délégation à la Recherche Clinique (DRC 2004), CHU de Nantes. CR was the recipient of a doctoral research fellowship from Nestec Research Center (Vers-chez-les-Blanc, Switzerland).

4 Address requests for reprints and correspondence to D Darmaun, UMR 1280, Physiologie des Adaptations Nutritionnelles, Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine, Hotel-Dieu Hospital, HNB-1, 44093 Nantes Cedex 1, France. E-mail: ddarmaun{at}chu-nantes.fr.

Background: Although recent reports suggest that supplementation with probiotics may enhance intestinal function in premature infants, the mechanisms are unclear, and questions remain regarding the safety and efficacy of probiotics in extremely low-birth-weight infants.

Objective: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics on the digestive tolerance to enteral feeding in preterm infants born with a very low or extremely low birth weight.

Design: In a bicentric, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial that was stratified for center and birth weight, 45 infants received enteral probiotics (Bifidobacterium longum BB536 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG; BB536-LGG) and 49 received placebo. The primary endpoint was the percentage of infants receiving >50% of their nutritional needs via enteral feeding on the 14th day of life. A triangular test was used to perform sequential analysis.

Results: The trial was discontinued after the fourth sequential analysis concluded a lack of effect. The primary endpoint was not significantly different between the probiotic (57.8%) and placebo (57.1%) groups (P = 0.95). However, in infants who weighed >1000 g, probiotic supplementation was associated with a shortening in the time to reach full enteral feeding (P = 0.04). Other than colonization by the probiotic strains, no alteration in the composition of intestinal microbiota or changes in the fecal excretion of calprotectin was observed. No colonization by probiotic strains was detected in infants who weighed ≤1000 g, presumably because of more frequent suspensions of enteral feeding, more courses of antibiotic treatment, or both.

Conclusions: Supplementation with BB536-LGG may not improve the gastrointestinal tolerance to enteral feeding in very-low-birth-weight infants but may improve gastrointestinal tolerance in infants weighing >1000 g. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT 00290576.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by The American Society for Nutrition