|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION |
1 From the Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia (GD and SLB); the Centre of Physical Activity Across the Lifespan, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia (GAN); the Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology/Allergology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland (PE); the Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, and the Commonwealth Institute, Canberra, Australia (RT); and the Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Western Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (RMD).
2 Supported by the Commonwealth Education Trust (United Kingdom) and the Commonwealth Institute (Australia). RMD was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Career Development Award (ID 425849), and SLB was supported by an NHMRC Career Development Award (ID 229320). 3 Address requests for reprints and correspondence to G Ducher, Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia. E-mail: gaele.ducher{at}deakin.edu.au.
Background: The influence of adiposity on upper-limb bone strength has rarely been studied in children, despite the high incidence of forearm fractures in this population.
Objective: The objective was to compare the influence of muscle and fat tissues on bone strength between the upper and lower limbs in prepubertal children.
Design: Bone mineral content, total bone cross-sectional area, cortical bone area (CoA), cortical thickness (CoTh) at the radius and tibia (4% and 66%, respectively), trabecular density (TrD), bone strength index (4% sites), cortical density (CoD), stress-strain index, and muscle and fat areas (66% sites) were measured by using peripheral quantitative computed tomography in 427 children (206 boys) aged 7–10 y.
Results: Overweight children (n = 93) had greater values for bone variables (0.3–1.3 SD; P < 0.0001) than did their normal-weight peers, except for CoD 66% and CoTh 4%. The between-group differences were 21–87% greater at the tibia than at the radius. After adjustment for muscle cross-sectional area, TrD 4%, bone mineral content, CoA, and CoTh 66% at the tibia remained greater in overweight children, whereas at the distal radius total bone cross-sectional area and CoTh were smaller in overweight children (P < 0.05). Overweight children had a greater fat-muscle ratio than did normal-weight children, particularly in the forearm (92 ± 28% compared with 57 ± 17%). Fat-muscle ratio correlated negatively with all bone variables, except for TrD and CoD, after adjustment for body weight (r = –0.17 to –0.54; P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Overweight children had stronger bones than did their normal-weight peers, largely because of greater muscle size. However, the overweight children had a high proportion of fat relative to muscle in the forearm, which is associated with reduced bone strength.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |