International Congress on Abnominal Obesity
Am J Clin Nutr 91: 349-356, 2010. First published December 9, 2009; doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28529
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28529
Vol. 91, No. 2, 349-356, February 2010

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/2/349    most recent
ajcn.2009.28529v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zeinstra, G. G
Right arrow Articles by de Graaf, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zeinstra, G. G
Right arrow Articles by de Graaf, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zeinstra, G. G
Right arrow Articles by de Graaf, C.
© 2010 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Offering choice and its effect on Dutch children's liking and consumption of vegetables: a randomized controlled trial1,2,3

Gertrude G Zeinstra, Reint J Renes, Maria A Koelen, Frans J Kok and Cees de Graaf

1 From the Division of Human Nutrition (GGZ FJKCdG)the Department of Communication Science (RJRMAK) Wageningen University Wageningen Netherlands.

2 Supported by GGZ's PhD project, which is funded by the graduate schools VLAG and Mansholt of Wageningen University.

3 Address correspondence to C de Graaf, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, 6700 EV Wageningen, Netherlands E-mail: kees.degraaf{at}wur.nl.

Background: Children's vegetable consumption is below recommended amounts. According to self-determination theory, stimulating children's feelings of autonomy by offering a choice of vegetables may be a valuable strategy to increase their vegetable liking and consumption. The effect of choice-offering on children's vegetable liking and consumption has, to our knowledge, not yet been studied.

Objective: The objective was to investigate whether having a choice between 2 vegetables enhances children's vegetable liking and consumption.

Design: Three hundred three children (age: 4–6 y) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 dinner conditions in a restaurant setting. Two similarly liked vegetables were presented, after which the child had no choice, a premeal choice, or an at-meal choice. Subsequently, the dinner was consumed with one parent present. Comparisons between the 3 conditions regarding children's meal experience, vegetable liking, and vegetable consumption were made by using analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Results: Children's vegetable consumption did not differ (P = 0.54) between the conditions as follows: 56 ± 45 g in the no-choice condition, 51 ± 46 g in the premeal-choice condition, and 49 ± 47 g in the at-meal-choice condition. In the no-choice condition, high-reactant children (who are more sensitive to psychological, persuasive pressure) consumed fewer vegetables (45 ± 42 g) than did low-reactant children (73 ± 43 g; P = 0.04). Vegetable liking was similar in all 3 conditions (P = 0.43). Children appreciated being able to choose in the premeal-choice condition.

Conclusions: A premeal choice between 2 vegetables was appreciated by the children but did not increase their vegetable liking and consumption. The no-choice condition decreased vegetable consumption in high-reactant children. Future research should investigate the effects of choice-offering in the long term and in more familiar eating settings. This trial was registered at controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN03035138.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch PediatricsHome page
Does Offering a Choice of Vegetables Affect Children's Consumption?
Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, February 17, 2010; 2010(217): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]