AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu-Poth, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kris-Etherton, P. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu-Poth, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kris-Etherton, P. M
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yu-Poth, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kris-Etherton, P. M
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 69, No. 4, 632-646, April 1999
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communications

Effects of the National Cholesterol Education Program's Step I and Step II dietary intervention programs on cardiovascular disease risk factors: a meta-analysis1,2

Shaomei Yu-Poth, Guixiang Zhao, Terry Etherton, Mary Naglak, Satya Jonnalagadda and Penny M Kris-Etherton


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Plasma lipid and lipoprotein responses have been variable in dietary intervention studies.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the National Cholesterol Education Program's Step I and Step II dietary interventions on major cardiovascular disease risk factors using meta-analysis.

Design: MEDLINE was used to select 37 dietary intervention studies in free-living subjects published from 1981 to1997.

Results: Step I and Step II dietary interventions significantly decreased plasma lipids and lipoproteins. Plasma total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol, triacylglycerol, and TC:HDL cholesterol decreased by 0.63 mmol/L (10%), 0.49 mmol/L (12%), 0.17 mmol/L (8%), and 0.50 (10%), respectively, in Step I intervention studies, and by 0.81 mmol/L (13%), 0.65 mmol/L (16%), 0.19 mmol/L (8%), and 0.34 (7%), respectively, in Step II intervention studies (P < 0.01 for all). HDL cholesterol decreased by 7% (P = 0.05) in response to Step II but not to Step I dietary interventions. Positive correlations between changes in dietary total and saturated fatty acids and changes in TC and LDL and HDL cholesterol were observed (r = 0.59, 0.61, and 0.46, respectively; P < 0.001). Multiple regression analyses showed that for every 1% decrease in energy consumed as dietary saturated fatty acid, TC decreased by 0.056 mmol/L and LDL cholesterol by 0.05 mmol/L. Moreover, for every 1-kg decrease in body weight, triacylglycerol decreased by 0.011 mmol/L and HDL cholesterol increased by 0.011 mmol/L. Exercise resulted in greater decreases in TC, LDL cholesterol, and triacylglycerol and prevented the decrease in HDL cholesterol associated with low-fat diets.

Conclusion: Step I and Step II dietary interventions have multiple beneficial effects on important cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Key Words: National Cholesterol Education Program • NCEP Step I diet • NCEP Step II diet • total cholesterol • LDL cholesterol • HDL cholesterol • triacylglycerol • body weight • risk factors • cardiovascular disease • exercise • meta-analysis • humans


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Diet is the first line of therapy for the management of plasma lipids in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The goal of dietary therapy is to reduce elevated total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol concentrations and thereby reduce CVD morbidity and mortality. The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) recommends that dietary therapy be implemented in a stepwise manner. Step I and Step II diets are designed to progressively reduce dietary saturated fatty acids (SFA) and cholesterol and to promote weight loss, if indicated, through diet and exercise. In addition, individuals are encouraged to adopt a healthy lifestyle that includes regular physical activity.

See corresponding editorial on page 581.

Controlled feeding studies have consistently found that a reduction in dietary SFA decreases plasma total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations. In general, a Step I diet decreases plasma total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol by {approx}7–9% compared with the average American diet. A Step II diet has been shown to decrease total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol by 10–20% (1, 2). In controlled feeding studies in which body weight was maintained, low-fat diets often were associated with decreases in HDL cholesterol and increases in triacylglycerol (24). A low HDL-cholesterol concentration and an elevated triacylglycerol concentration are both risk factors for CVD (4). In contrast with these potentially adverse effects of low-fat diets on HDL-cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations, which have been reported in well-controlled clinical feeding studies, a body of evidence from dietary intervention studies conducted in free-living populations has shown that low-fat diets are typically accompanied by weight loss, and often other risk-factor modifications result in a decrease in plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triacylglycerol, and no change in HDL cholesterol (515). Likewise, many free-living populations worldwide consume very-low-fat diets and have a favorable lipid profile, which likely is due to their lifestyle practices, including regular physical activity and maintenance of an ideal body weight (16, 17).

Many primary and secondary intervention studies have evaluated how different intervention strategies to reduce the risk of CVD, including diet modification, affect various CVD risk factors in free-living subjects. In general, the responses in these intervention studies have been quite variable. For example, some studies have shown that dietary intervention and other risk-factor modifications often accompanied by weight loss reduce plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, as well as triacylglycerol, but increase or have no significant effects on HDL cholesterol (515). Other intervention studies, however, found that low-fat diets resulted in an increase in plasma triacylglycerol and a decrease in HDL cholesterol (1822). Thus, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of different dietary interventions on major CVD risk factors in healthy and high-risk subjects by conducting a meta-analysis.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Selection of studies
MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD) and the references in the papers we identified were used to search all published dietary intervention studies related to cholesterol lowering or reduction of other CVD risk factors in free-living subjects. Thirty-seven (515, 1843) intervention studies published between 1981 and 1997 were selected for the present meta-analysis. The following criteria were used for inclusion of a dietary intervention trial: 1) the study was designed to lower blood cholesterol concentrations or to decrease body weight for the primary purpose of preventing CVD; 2) the investigators used a randomized design; 3) a Step I diet (in all intervention groups: <=30% of total energy as fat, <=10% of energy as SFA, and <=300 mg dietary cholesterol/d), a Step II diet (<=7% of energy as SFA and <=200 mg dietary cholesterol/d), or both were part of the dietary intervention; 4) the subjects were free-living, prepared their own food, and were counseled by dietitians or other professionals about implementing low-fat diets; and 5) the intervention lasted >=3 wk to stabilize plasma cholesterol concentrations.

Statistical analysis
Changes in plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triacylglycerol after Step I and Step II dietary interventions were assessed. Effects of exercise and body weight were evaluated. In addition, effects of baseline plasma total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triacylglycerol concentrations on lipid responses were also analyzed. We also examined the relation between changes in body weight and changes in dietary fat and energy consumption. All analyses were done by using the SAS statistical package (44).

In each study, plasma lipid concentrations after dietary intervention were compared with lipid concentrations in the control groups as well as with baseline lipid concentrations. Changes in plasma lipid concentrations and in dietary fat or cholesterol were calculated by using the difference between a treatment group and a control group or differences between intervention and baseline values in the intervention groups. Analysis of variance was used to compare the effects of Step I with those of Step II dietary interventions and the effects of interventions including exercise with those not including exercise. Correlations between changes in plasma lipid concentrations (both absolute and percentage changes) and changes in total fat and SFA intakes (as a percentage of total daily energy intake) and changes in dietary cholesterol (mg/d) and changes in body weight (kg) were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis.

Changes in plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triacylglycerol in response to changes in body weight and in dietary total fat, SFA, and cholesterol were evaluated by regression analysis. In each study, the differences in plasma lipid concentrations between intervention and control groups (or between baseline and intervention values) were used as dependent variables and the differences in dietary total fat, SFA, and cholesterol as independent variables. Changes in body weight in the intervention groups were used as a covariable in the regression analysis. Both bivariate and multiple regression analyses were conducted. Bivariate regression analysis included the change ({Delta}) in 1 independent variable ({Delta}TF, {Delta}SFA, or {Delta}cholesterol) and 1 covariable ({Delta}BW); multiple regression analysis included the change in 2 independent variables ({Delta}TF and {Delta}cholesterol or {Delta}SFA and {Delta}cholesterol) and 1 covariable ({Delta}BW). The equations are as follows:


(1)


(2)

where BW is body weight and TF is total fat. The coefficients 1, ß2, and ß3) were estimated by least-squares regression.

Changes in body weight in response to changes in dietary total fat intake were tested by regression analysis and Pearson correlation analysis. In the regression analysis, the change in body weight after intervention was used as a dependent variable and the change in total fat intake was used as an independent variable. The regression equation is as follows:


(3)

Correlation between change in body weight and change in fat was evaluated using the Pearson correlation analysis conducted with and without using subject number as a weight factor from each study.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The present meta-analysis included 37 intervention studies (515, 1843) in which there were 9276 subjects in intervention groups and 2310 subjects in control groups. The study designs varied remarkably; some were sequential studies but most were randomized, parallel-arm studies. The dietary interventions ranged from vegetarian diets providing <10% of energy as fat, <6% of energy as SFA, and <100 mg cholesterol/d to a Step I diet providing <=30% of energy as fat, <10% of energy as SFA, and <=300 mg cholesterol/d. The diet compositions and study designs of the interventions are summarized in Table 1Go; 8 studies evaluated the effects of diet on body weight. Despite the differences in experimental design and populations studied, total cholesterol decreased by 2–25% as a result of dietary and other risk-factor interventions. Lipid concentration data from 30 studies before and after intervention are summarized in Table 2Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Summary of study designs and diet composition in 37 intervention studies1
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Lipid concentrations before and after interventions in 30 studies1
 
Twenty-one intervention studies included both men and women, 9 studies included only men, and 7 studies included only women. Nineteen studies included a control group in which subjects maintained their habitual lifestyle and food consumption throughout the study. Dietary information was estimated by using either a 24-h food recall or 3–7-d food records; a food-frequency questionnaire was also used in some studies. Some studies did not report complete dietary information. For example, 3 Step I (5, 10, 26) and 2 Step II (32, 33) dietary interventions did not report baseline energy, total fat, SFA, and cholesterol intakes (Table 1Go). The length of intervention ranged from 3 wk to 4 y. Intervention intensity was moderate to high and 13 studies included an exercise intervention.

Mean baseline total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol concentrations were between 4.84 and 6.88 mmol/L (x ± SE: 6.04 ± 0.53 mmol/L) and 3.05 and 4.55 mmol/L (4.01 ± 0.46 mmol/L), respectively, except in the study of Hjermann et al (5) in which subjects had higher baseline concentrations of total cholesterol (8.47 mmol/L) and LDL cholesterol (6.78 mmol/L). Mean baseline HDL-cholesterol concentrations were between 0.72 and 1.72 mmol/L (1.24 ± 0.23 mmol/L) and triacylglycerol concentrations were between 0.85 and 2.51 mmol/L (1.67 ± 0.46 mmol/L). Most studies had more than one endpoint blood collection. Some studies (24, 25, 30, 34) did not have complete plasma lipid data. For example, 2 studies (24, 30) did not report plasma LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triacylglycerol concentrations and 1 study (25) did not report baseline plasma lipid concentrations (Table 2Go). A total of 59 dietary intervention groups yielded 59 data points for the regression and correlation analyses.

Comparison of the effects of Step I and Step II dietary interventions on plasma lipids
Plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triacylglycerol, and total cholesterol:HDL cholesterol all decreased after both Step I and Step II dietary interventions, by 0.63 ± 0.06 mmol/L (10%), 0.49 ± 0.05 mmol/L (12%), 0.04 ± 0.02 mmol/L (1.5%), 0.17 ± 0.04 mmol/L (8%), and 0.50 ± 0.11 (10%), respectively, after the Step I dietary interventions (P < 0.01 for all, except for HDL cholesterol ) and by 0.81 ± 0.12 mmol/L (13%), 0.65 ± 0.09 mmol/L (16%), 0.09 ± 0.03 mmol/L (7%), 0.19 ± 0.14 mmol/L (8%), and 0.34 ± 0.12 (7%), respectively, after the Step II dietary intervention studies (P < 0.01 for all). The Step II dietary intervention resulted in greater decreases in plasma total cholesterol (P < 0.05), LDL cholesterol (P < 0.05), HDL cholesterol (P = 0.13), triacylglycerol (P = 0.37), and total cholesterol:HDL cholesterol (data not shown) than did the Step I dietary intervention (Figure 1Go). When analyses were weighted by the number of subjects in each study, plasma total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triacylglycerol concentrations decreased by 21%, 21%, 13%, and 33%, respectively, after Step II dietary interventions. Plasma total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triacylglycerol concentrations decreased by 8%, 8%, and 10%, respectively, after Step I dietary interventions; HDL cholesterol increased by 2%. Decreases in plasma lipids and lipoproteins were much greater after the Step II dietary interventions than after Step I dietary interventions (P < 0.001). Interestingly, plasma lipid and lipoprotein responses of males and females were comparable after both Step I and Step II dietary interventions (data not shown), with one notable exception. The decrease in HDL cholesterol was greater in women (0.10 mmol/L, 6.8%) than in men (0.03 mmol/L, 2.2%) (P < 0.05) after the Step II intervention. In addition, triacylglycerol concentrations tended to increase in women by 0.01 mmol/L (2.4%) and 0.07 mmol/L (5.4%) and decrease in men by 0.21 mmol/L (10.4%) and 0.03 mmol/L (1.5%), respectively, after Step I and Step II dietary interventions. In addition, most lipid responses were comparable after interventions lasting <6 mo and those after interventions lasting >6 mo (data not shown). The only exception was that HDL-cholesterol concentrations decreased by 0.09 mmol/L (6.4%) and by 0.13 mmol/L (9.7%), respectively, after Step I and Step II interventions lasting <6 mo and increased by 0.03 mmol/L (4.7%) after Step I interventions and decreased by only 0.01 mmol/L (0.5%) after Step II interventions lasting >6 mo (P < 0.05).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Changes ({Delta}) in plasma lipids and lipoproteins after National Cholesterol Education Program Step I and Step II dietary interventions. *Significantly different from Step I, P < 0.05. TC, total cholesterol; TG, triacylglycerol.

 
Effects of dietary fat and SFAs and body weight on plasma lipids
Changes in plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol were significantly correlated (by Pearson correlation analyses) with changes in dietary total fat (Figure 2Go) and SFA (Figure 3Go). The correlation between the change in plasma triacylglycerol and the change in dietary fat and SFA was not significant. Changes in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triacylglycerol (both absolute and percentage changes) were significantly correlated with changes in dietary cholesterol (Table 3Go). When Pearson correlation analyses were weighted by the number of subjects in each study, all correlation coefficients were significant.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Correlation between change ({Delta}) in dietary total fat and change in plasma lipids and lipoproteins. Pearson correlation coefficients are significant for plasma total cholesterol (TC, –—– •; r = 0.61, P < 0.0001), LDL cholesterol (– – – {blacktriangleup}; r = 0.63, P < 0.0001), and HDL cholesterol (– • • – {triangleup}; r = 0.41, P < 0.001), but not for triacylglycerol (•••••••• {circ}; r = 0.19, P = 0.47).

 


View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Correlation between change ({Delta}) in dietary saturated fatty acids and change in plasma lipids and lipoproteins. Pearson correlation coefficients are significant for plasma total cholesterol ( –—– •; r = 0.70, P < 0.0001), LDL cholesterol (– – – {blacktriangleup}; r = 0.70, P < 0.0001), and HDL cholesterol (– • • – {triangleup}; r = 0.41, P < 0.001), but not for triacylglycerol (•••••••• {circ}; r = 0.36, P = 0.06).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Correlation between changes in dietary total fat (TF), saturated fatty acids (SFA), and cholesterol and changes in plasma lipids and lipoproteins1
 
The regression coefficients of dietary fat, SFA, and cholesterol were significant for changes in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triacylglycerol by bivariate regression analysis with the change in body weight as a covariable (Table 4Go). For example, every 1% decrease in energy from dietary total fat decreased total cholesterol by 0.06 mmol/L (0.9%), LDL cholesterol by 0.042 mmol/L (1.04%), and HDL cholesterol by 0.01 mmol/L (0.79%). The regression analysis showed that changes in body weight significantly affected plasma HDL-cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations. For example, with dietary total fat as a variable and body weight as a covariable, every 1-kg increase in body weight increased plasma triacylglycerol by 0.041 mmol/L (1.14%) and decreased HDL cholesterol by 0.01 mmol/L (0.83%). The regression coefficients of body weight for changes in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were not significant (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Bivariate regression analysis: plasma lipids and lipoproteins in response to changes ({Delta}) in dietary total fat (TF), saturated fatty acids (SFA), or cholesterol, with the change in body weight (BW) as a covariable1
 
Multiple regression analyses have shown that dietary total fat and SFA had significant effects on plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol (Table 5Go). For example, every 1% decrease in energy from dietary SFA resulted in a decrease in total cholesterol by 0.056 mmol/L (0.77%), LDL cholesterol by 0.05 mmol/L (1.07%), and HDL cholesterol by 0.012 mmol/L (0.6%). Dietary cholesterol had significant effects on total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and possibly triacylglycerol, but not on HDL cholesterol. The regression coefficients of dietary total fat and SFA for {Delta}triacylglycerol were not significant. Body weight change was shown again to have significant effects on HDL cholesterol and triacylglycerol. With every 1-kg decrease in body weight, plasma triacylglycerol concentrations decreased by 0.011–0.012 mmol/L (0.77–0.87%), whereas HDL-cholesterol concentrations increased by 0.011 mmol/L ({approx}1%) (Table 5Go). The regression coefficients for body weight change and changes in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were not significant (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Multiple regression analysis: plasma lipids and lipoproteins in response to changes in dietary total fat (TF), saturated fatty acids (SFA), and cholesterol with the change in body weight (BW) as a covariable1
 
Pearson correlation analyses showed that body weight change was positively correlated with changes in plasma triacylglycerol concentrations (r = 0.35, P < 0.01) and negatively correlated with HDL-cholesterol concentrations (r = -0.38, P < 0.02) in Step I and Step II dietary intervention studies. The correlations between body weight change and changes in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were significant only when the analyses were weighted by the number of subjects in each study: r = 0.49 (P = 0.001) and r = 0.49 (P = 0.002), respectively.

Effects of exercise on plasma lipids
In the present study, we included 14 intervention groups with exercise and 45 intervention groups without exercise. Analysis of variance showed that exercise had significant effects on plasma lipids and lipoproteins. Plasma total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triacylglycerol concentrations decreased by 0.60 ± 0.06, 0.47 ± 0.05, 0.06 ± 0.02, and 0.11 ± 0.04 mmol/L, respectively, in intervention groups without exercise and decreased by 0.78± 0.13, 0.56 ± 0.12, 0.01 ± 0.04, and 0.35 ± 0.12 mmol/L in intervention groups with exercise (Figure 4Go). Exercise groups had a greater decrease than nonexercise groups in plasma total cholesterol (13% compared with 10%), LDL cholesterol (15% compared with 11%), and triacylglycerol (17% compared with 5.2%), but no significant change in HDL cholesterol was observed between exercise and nonexercise groups. When the analyses were weighted by a subject number from each study, the exercise groups had as much as a 3-fold greater decrease in total cholesterol (by 1.27 compared with 0.43 mmol/L, 21% compared with 7%) and LDL cholesterol (by 0.83 compared with 0.29 mmol/L, 21% compared with 7%), a 5-fold greater decrease in triacylglycerol (by 0.77 compared with 0.11 mmol/L, 33% compared with 6%), and a 10-fold smaller decrease in HDL-cholesterol concentrations (by 0.015 compared with 0.145 mmol/L, 0.02% compared with 5.1%) (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons) than the nonexercise groups.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Effects of exercise on plasma total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), and triacylglycerol (TG). *Significantly different from no exercise, P < 0.05.

 
Correlation between baseline lipids and lipoproteins and responses to intervention
Pearson correlation coefficients showed that the changes in LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triacylglycerol were significantly correlated with the baseline concentrations of these lipids (Figure 5Go). The change in total cholesterol was not correlated with the baseline concentration (Figure 5Go). However, if baseline total cholesterol concentrations were <6.2 mmol/L, the change in total cholesterol was significantly correlated with baseline concentrations (r = 0.591, P < 0.001). In contrast, no relation was observed in subjects with an initial total cholesterol concentration >6.2 mmol/L (data not shown). A similar relation was observed for LDL cholesterol (data not shown). Thus, it appears that individuals with marked elevations in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were less responsive to dietary interventions than were mildly to moderately hypercholesterolemic individuals.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Correlation between changes ({Delta}) in plasma total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), and triacylglycerol (TG) and their baseline values. r = Pearson correlation coefficient.

 
Effects of dietary fat and energy intake and exercise on body weight
Dietary fat had a significant effect on body weight. The change in body weight after intervention was highly correlated with the change in dietary total fat (Figure 6Go) as well as with the change in energy intake. The change in dietary fat was related to the change in energy intake. Regression analysis showed that the change in dietary fat had a significant effect on the change in body weight.


(4)



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Correlation between changes ({Delta}) in body weight and changes in dietary total fat and energy intake and between changes in energy intake and dietary total fat. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) are significant for all correlations.

 
The regression equation revealed that for every 1% decrease in energy as total fat, there was a 0.28-kg decrease in body weight. The effect of change in total fat on weight loss explained 57% of the total variance.

Diet intervention with exercise resulted in significantly greater weight loss than diet intervention without exercise. Body weight decreased by 5.66 ± 0.77 kg in intervention groups with exercise and by 2.79 ± 0.31 kg in intervention groups without exercise (Figure 7Go). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in dietary fat between intervention groups with and without exercise (-11.6 ± 1.9% compared with -10.0 ± 0.7% of total energy, P > 0.05). Thus, the effect of change in dietary fat on body weight was independent of the effect of exercise.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Effects of diet and diet plus exercise interventions on weight loss. *Significantly different from diet alone, P < 0.0001.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
T. Al-Sarraj, H. Saadi, M. C. Calle, J. S. Volek, and M. L. Fernandez
Carbohydrate Restriction, as a First-Line Dietary Intervention, Effectively Reduces Biomarkers of Metabolic Syndrome in Emirati Adults
J. Nutr., September 1, 2009; 139(9): 1667 - 1676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINEHome page
A. S. Leon and U. G. Bronas
Dyslipidemia and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: Role of Lifestyle Approaches for Its Management
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, July 1, 2009; 3(4): 257 - 273.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
American Diabetes Association
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2009
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2009; 32(Supplement_1): S13 - S61.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
W. Demark-Wahnefried, T. J. Polascik, S. L. George, B. R. Switzer, J. F. Madden, M. T. Ruffin IV, D. C. Snyder, K. Owzar, V. Hars, D. M. Albala, et al.
Flaxseed Supplementation (Not Dietary Fat Restriction) Reduces Prostate Cancer Proliferation Rates in Men Presurgery
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2008; 17(12): 3577 - 3587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Due, T. M Larsen, H. Mu, K. Hermansen, S. Stender, and A. Astrup
Comparison of 3 ad libitum diets for weight-loss maintenance, risk of cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: a 6-mo randomized, controlled trial
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2008; 88(5): 1232 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
L. Mosca, H. Mochari, M. Liao, A. H. Christian, D. J. Edelman, B. Aggarwal, and M. C. Oz
A Novel Family-Based Intervention Trial to Improve Heart Health: FIT Heart: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, November 1, 2008; 1(2): 98 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Due, T. M Larsen, K. Hermansen, S. Stender, J. J Holst, S. Toubro, T. Martinussen, and A. Astrup
Comparison of the effects on insulin resistance and glucose tolerance of 6-mo high-monounsaturated-fat, low-fat, and control diets
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2008; 87(4): 855 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
R. D. Bloom and M. F. Crutchlow
New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in the Kidney Recipient: Diagnosis and Management Strategies
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(Supplement_2): S38 - S48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
American Diabetes Association
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2008
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2008; 31(Supplement_1): S12 - S54.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
American Diabetes Association
Nutrition Recommendations and Interventions for Diabetes: A position statement of the American Diabetes Association
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2008; 31(Supplement_1): S61 - S78.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. Berglund, M. Lefevre, H. N Ginsberg, P. M Kris-Etherton, P. J Elmer, P. W Stewart, A. Ershow, T. A Pearson, B. H Dennis, P. S Roheim, et al.
Comparison of monounsaturated fat with carbohydrates as a replacement for saturated fat in subjects with a high metabolic risk profile: studies in the fasting and postprandial states
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2007; 86(6): 1611 - 1620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
Y. Ruixing, F. Qiming, Y. Dezhai, L. Shuquan, L. Weixiong, P. Shangling, W. Hai, Y. Yongzhong, H. Feng, and Q. Shuming
Comparison of demography, diet, lifestyle, and serum lipid levels between the Guangxi Bai Ku Yao and Han populations
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 2673 - 2681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINEHome page
M. J. Franz
Themed Review: Lifestyle Interventions Across the Continuum of Type 2 Diabetes: Reducing the Risks of Diabetes
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, October 1, 2007; 1(5): 327 - 334.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. A Ello-Martin, L. S Roe, J. H Ledikwe, A. M Beach, and B. J Rolls
Dietary energy density in the treatment of obesity: a year-long trial comparing 2 weight-loss diets
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1465 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. G Rasmussen, T. M Larsen, P. K Mortensen, A. Due, and A. Astrup
Effect on 24-h energy expenditure of a moderate-fat diet high in monounsaturated fatty acids compared with that of a low-fat, carbohydrate-rich diet: a 6-mo controlled dietary intervention trial
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 1014 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
M. J. Franz and J. Wylie-Rosett
The 2006 American Diabetes Association Nutrition Recommendations and Interventions for the Prevention and Treatment of Diabetes
Diabetes Spectr, January 1, 2007; 20(1): 49 - 52.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
American Diabetes Association
Nutrition Recommendations and Interventions for Diabetes: A position statement of the American Diabetes Association
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2007; 30(suppl_1): S48 - S65.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
American Diabetes Association
Nutrition Recommendations and Interventions for Diabetes-2006: A position statement of the American Diabetes Association.
Diabetes Care, September 1, 2006; 29(9): 2140 - 2157.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. Estruch, M. A. Martinez-Gonzalez, D. Corella, J. Salas-Salvado, V. Ruiz-Gutierrez, M. I. Covas, M. Fiol, E. Gomez-Gracia, M. C. Lopez-Sabater, E. Vinyoles, et al.
Effects of a Mediterranean-Style Diet on Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Randomized Trial
Ann Intern Med, July 4, 2006; 145(1): 1 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
F. L Crowe, C M. Skeaff, T. J Green, and A. R Gray
Serum fatty acids as biomarkers of fat intake predict serum cholesterol concentrations in a population-based survey of New Zealand adolescents and adults.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2006; 83(4): 887 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. Lefevre and C. Champagne
Reply to D Giugliano and K Esposito
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2006; 83(4): 921 - 922.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. M. Carroll, E. J. DePeters, and M. Rosenberg
Efficacy of a Novel Whey Protein Gel Complex to Increase the Unsaturated Fatty Acid Composition of Bovine Milk Fat
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2006; 89(2): 640 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
American Heart Association, S. S. Gidding, B. A. Dennison, L. L. Birch, S. R. Daniels, M. W. Gilman, A. H. Lichtenstein, K. T. Rattay, J. Steinberger, N. Stettler, et al.
Dietary Recommendations for Children and Adolescents: A Guide for Practitioners
Pediatrics, February 1, 2006; 117(2): 544 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
I. Strychar
Diet in the management of weight loss
Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 3, 2006; 174(1): 56 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. Fletcher, K. Berra, P. Ades, L. T. Braun, L. E. Burke, J. L. Durstine, J. M. Fair, G. F. Fletcher, D. Goff, L. L. Hayman, et al.
Managing Abnormal Blood Lipids: A Collaborative Approach
Circulation, November 15, 2005; 112(20): 3184 - 3209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, S. S. Gidding, B. A. Dennison, L. L. Birch, S. R. Daniels, M. W. Gilman, A. H. Lichtenstein, K. T. Rattay, J. Steinberger, N. Stettler, et al.
Dietary Recommendations for Children and Adolescents: A Guide for Practitioners: Consensus Statement From the American Heart Association
Circulation, September 27, 2005; 112(13): 2061 - 2075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J.A. Iestra, D. Kromhout, Y.T. van der Schouw, D.E. Grobbee, H.C. Boshuizen, and W.A. van Staveren
Effect Size Estimates of Lifestyle and Dietary Changes on All-Cause Mortality in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: A Systematic Review
Circulation, August 9, 2005; 112(6): 924 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. A. Varady and P. J. H. Jones
Combination Diet and Exercise Interventions for the Treatment of Dyslipidemia: an Effective Preliminary Strategy to Lower Cholesterol Levels?
J. Nutr., August 1, 2005; 135(8): 1829 - 1835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. DiabetesHome page
The American Diabetes Association, the North American Association for the Study of Ob, and and the American Society for Clinical Nutrition
Weight Management Using Lifestyle Modification in the Prevention and Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Rationale and Strategies
Clin. Diabetes, July 1, 2005; 23(3): 130 - 136.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. S. Volek, M. J. Sharman, and C. E. Forsythe
Modification of Lipoproteins by Very Low-Carbohydrate Diets
J. Nutr., June 1, 2005; 135(6): 1339 - 1342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. H Wu, F. Z Stanczyk, C. Martinez, C.-C. Tseng, S. Hendrich, P. Murphy, S. Chaikittisilpa, D. O Stram, and M. C Pike
A controlled 2-mo dietary fat reduction and soy food supplementation study in postmenopausal women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2005; 81(5): 1133 - 1141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. G. Kennedy, C. D. MacLean, B. Littenberg, P. A. Ades, and R. G. Pinckney
The Challenge of Achieving National Cholesterol Goals in Patients With Diabetes
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2005; 28(5): 1029 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. K. Roberts and R. J. Barnard
Effects of exercise and diet on chronic disease
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2005; 98(1): 3 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
Z. T. Bloomgarden
Diet and Diabetes
Diabetes Care, November 1, 2004; 27(11): 2755 - 2760.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. T Gerhard, A. Ahmann, K. Meeuws, M. P McMurry, P B. Duell, and W. E Connor
Effects of a low-fat diet compared with those of a high-monounsaturated fat diet on body weight, plasma lipids and lipoproteins, and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2004; 80(3): 668 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. Klein, N. F Sheard, X. Pi-Sunyer, A. Daly, J. Wylie-Rosett, K. Kulkarni, and N. G Clark
Weight management through lifestyle modification for the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes: rationale and strategies. A statement of the American Diabetes Association, the North American Association for the Study of Obesity, and the American Society for Clinical Nutrition
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2004; 80(2): 257 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. Klein, N. F. Sheard, X. Pi-Sunyer, A. Daly, J. Wylie-Rosett, K. Kulkarni, and N. G. Clark
Weight Management Through Lifestyle Modification for the Prevention and Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Rationale and Strategies: A statement of the American Diabetes Association, the North American Association for the Study of Obesity, and the American Society for Clinical Nutrition
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2004; 27(8): 2067 - 2073.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
P G Kopelman and C Grace
New thoughts on managing obesity
Gut, July 1, 2004; 53(7): 1044 - 1053.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
K. Meksawan, D. R. Pendergast, J. J. Leddy, M. Mason, P. J. Horvath, and A. B. Awad
Effect of Low and High Fat Diets on Nutrient Intakes and Selected Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Sedentary Men and Women
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2004; 23(2): 131 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. Desroches, J.-F. Mauger, L. M. Ausman, A. H. Lichtenstein, and B. Lamarche
Soy Protein Favorably Affects LDL Size Independently of Isoflavones in Hypercholesterolemic Men and Women
J. Nutr., March 1, 2004; 134(3): 574 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. L Pelkman, V. K Fishell, D. H Maddox, T. A Pearson, D. T Mauger, and P. M Kris-Etherton
Effects of moderate-fat (from monounsaturated fat) and low-fat weight-loss diets on the serum lipid profile in overweight and obese men and women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2004; 79(2): 204 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. Ros
Dietary cis-monounsaturated fatty acids and metabolic control in type 2 diabetes
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2003; 78(3): 617S - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. P Mensink, P. L Zock, A. D. Kester, and M. B Katan
Effects of dietary fatty acids and carbohydrates on the ratio of serum total to HDL cholesterol and on serum lipids and apolipoproteins: a meta-analysis of 60 controlled trials
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2003; 77(5): 1146 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
M. J. Franz
So Many Nutrition Recommendations--Contradictory or Compatible?
Diabetes Spectr, January 1, 2003; 16(1): 56 - 63.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
M J Franz, H Warshaw, A E Daly, J Green-Pastors, M S Arnold, and J Bantle
Evolution of diabetes medical nutrition therapy
Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2003; 79(927): 30 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. A Bray, J. C Lovejoy, M. Most-Windhauser, S. R Smith, J. Volaufova, Y. Denkins, L. de Jonge, J. Rood, M. Lefevre, A. L Eldridge, et al.
A 9-mo randomized clinical trial comparing fat-substituted and fat-reduced diets in healthy obese men: the Ole Study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2002; 76(5): 928 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
M. J. Franz
2002 Diabetes Nutrition Recommendations: Grading the Evidence
The Diabetes Educator, September 1, 2002; 28(5): 756 - 766.
[PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
G. A. Bray, J. C. Lovejoy, S. R. Smith, J. P. DeLany, M. Lefevre, D. Hwang, D. H. Ryan, and D. A. York
The Influence of Different Fats and Fatty Acids on Obesity, Insulin Resistance and Inflammation
J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2488 - 2491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
H. J. Roy, M. M. Most, A. Sparti, J. C. Lovejoy, J. Volaufova, J. C. Peters, and G. A. Bray
Effect on Body Weight of Replacing Dietary Fat with Olestra for Two or Ten Weeks in Healthy Men and Women
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2002; 21(3): 259 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. H. Lichtenstein, L. M. Ausman, S. M. Jalbert, M. Vilella-Bach, M. Jauhiainen, S. McGladdery, A. T. Erkkila, C. Ehnholm, J. Frohlich, and E. J. Schaefer
Efficacy of a Therapeutic Lifestyle Change/Step 2 diet in moderately hypercholesterolemic middle-aged and elderly female and male subjects
J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2002; 43(2): 264 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
H. Bendixen, A. Flint, A. Raben, C.-E. Hoy, H. Mu, X. Xu, E. M. Bartels, and A. Astrup
Effect of 3 modified fats and a conventional fat on appetite, energy intake, energy expenditure, and substrate oxidation in healthy men
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2002; 75(1): 47 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. J. Franz, J. P. Bantle, C. A. Beebe, J. D. Brunzell, J.-L. Chiasson, A. Garg, L. A. Holzmeister, B. Hoogwerf, E. Mayer-Davis, A. D. Mooradian, et al.
Evidence-Based Nutrition Principles and Recommendations for the Treatment and Prevention of Diabetes and Related Complications
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2002; 25(1): 148 - 198.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. H Glew, M. Williams, C. A Conn, S. M Cadena, M. Crossey, S. N Okolo, and D. J VanderJagt
Cardiovascular disease risk factors and diet of Fulani pastoralists of northern Nigeria
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2001; 74(6): 730 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. G Rowley, Q. Su, M. Cincotta, M. Skinner, K. Skinner, B. Pindan, G. A White, and K. O'Dea
Improvements in circulating cholesterol, antioxidants, and homocysteine after dietary intervention in an Australian Aboriginal community
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2001; 74(4): 442 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
L. Hooper, C. D Summerbell, J. P T Higgins, R. L Thompson, N. E Capps, G. D. Smith, R. A Riemersma, and S. Ebrahim
Dietary fat intake and prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review
BMJ, March 31, 2001; 322(7289): 757 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Raben, J. J Holst, J. Madsen, and A. Astrup
Diurnal metabolic profiles after 14 d of an ad libitum high-starch, high-sucrose, or high-fat diet in normal-weight never-obese and postobese women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2001; 73(2): 177 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. W. Erdman Jr
Soy Protein and Cardiovascular Disease : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Nutrition Committee of the AHA
Circulation, November 14, 2000; 102(20): 2555 - 2559.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P. M Kris-Etherton, C. L Pelkman, G. Zhao, T. A Pearson, Y. Wan, and T. D Etherton
Reply to P Marckmann
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2000; 72(3): 854 - 856.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P. Marckmann and A. Astrup
Fatty diets are unhealthy--even those based on monounsaturates
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2000; 72 (3): 853 - 854.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. Yu-Poth, T. D. Etherton, C. C. Reddy, T. A. Pearson, R. Reed, G. Zhao, S. Jonnalagadda, Y. Wan, and P. M. Kris-Etherton
Lowering Dietary Saturated Fat and Total Fat Reduces the Oxidative Susceptibility of LDL in Healthy Men and Women
J. Nutr., September 1, 2000; 130(9): 2228 - 2237.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Oberman
Hypertriglyceridemia and Coronary Heart Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2000; 85(6): 2098 - 2105.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. H Lindquist, B. A Gower, and M. I Goran
Role of dietary factors in ethnic differences in early risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2000; 71(3): 725 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu-Poth, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kris-Etherton, P. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu-Poth, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kris-Etherton, P. M
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yu-Poth, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kris-Etherton, P. M


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS