| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Original Research Communications |
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Objective: We evaluated the kinetics of protein metabolism in obese, prepubertal children in the static phase of obesity.
Design: In this cross-sectional study, 9 obese children (
± SE: 44 ± 4 kg, 30.9 ± 1.5% body fat) were compared with 8 lean (28 ± 2 kg ,16.8 ± 1.2% body fat), age-matched (8.5 ± 0.2 y) control children. Whole-body nitrogen flux, protein synthesis, and protein breakdown were calculated postprandially over 9 h from 15N abundance in urinary ammonia by using a single oral dose of [15N]glycine; resting energy expenditure (REE) was assessed by indirect calorimetry (canopy) and body composition by multiple skinfold-thickness measurements.
Results: Absolute rates of protein synthesis and breakdown were significantly greater in obese children than in control children ( ± SE: 208 ± 24 compared with 137 ± 14 g/d, P < 0.05, and 149 ± 20 compared with 89 ± 13 g/d, P < 0.05, respectively). When these variables were adjusted for fat-free mass by analysis of covariance, however, the differences between groups disappeared. There was a significant relation between protein synthesis and fat-free mass (r = 0.83, P <0.001) as well as between protein synthesis and REE (r = 0.79, P < 0.005).
Conclusions: Obesity in prepubertal children is associated with an absolute increase in whole-body protein turnover that is consistent with an absolute increase in fat-free mass, both of which contribute to explaining the greater absolute REE in obese children than in control children.
Key Words: Energy metabolism • resting metabolic rate • protein metabolism • whole-body protein turnover • protein synthesis • fat-free mass • obesity • children
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
The postabsorptive resting metabolic rate of obese children was explored previously by several investigators (6–8). When expressed as an absolute value, the rate of resting energy expenditure (REE) was found to be greater in obese than in nonobese children or adolescents (6–8), confirming results observed in obese adolescents (9) and obese adults (10). The small increase in fat-free mass (FFM) accompanying the large inflation in adipose tissue in obese children explains the greater REE in these children than in lean children. However, this constitutes an explanation based on a purely static concept. Whole-body protein turnover is a dynamic process and an important energy-requiring process because of the high ATP consumption involved in the formation of peptide bonds during protein synthesis. For example, the process of whole-body protein turnover in infants aged 1 y may explain more than one-third of their REE; in adults, whole-body protein turnover may explain about one-fifth of the REE (11). The extent to which this dynamic, high-energy-cost process contributes to the higher REE of obese children compared with lean children remains to be investigated. As far as we are aware, little information exists on the magnitude of whole-body protein turnover in obese children and its relation to FFM and REE. To provide a more thorough picture of the extent to which the metabolic changes associated with adult obesity appear early in life, we studied energy and protein metabolism in prepubertal, obese children and compared these results with those obtained in nonobese children of the same mean age and height.
|
SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
). Obesity was defined as a BMI higher than the 97th percentile of the reference value for age and sex based on a French sample of children (12). Nonobese children were selected on the basis of a BMI less than or equal to the 97th percentile of the reference values for age and sex (range: 5th to 92nd percentile).
|
Physical characteristics
Anthropometric measurements (weight, height, and skinfold thicknesses) were made by the same investigator. Height was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm with a standardized, wall-mounted height board. Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg with a standard physician's beam scale with the child dressed only in light underwear and without shoes. BMI was calculated as weight divided by height squared (kg/m2). Skinfold thicknesses were measured at 4 sites (biceps, triceps, suprailium, and subscapula) in triplicate to the nearest millimeter with a Harpenden skinfold caliper (CMS Weighing Equipment Ltd, London). The formula derived by Deurenberg et al (14) was used to calculate percentage body fat from the sum of the 4 skinfold thicknesses. Body fat mass was obtained by multiplying body weight by percentage body fat. FFM was calculated by subtracting body fat from body weight.
Experimental design
The study lasted for 10 h, during which time the children were under constant medical supervision. During this period, REE was measured 5 times: once before the first meal (preprandial) and 4 times postprandially.
On the days preceding the study, the children consumed unrestricted diets. The day before the test, they did not perform any intense physical exercise. On the day of the test, the children arrived by car at the Department of Pediatrics at 
0730 in a fasting state, having not consumed a meal after 2000 the day before. After the children had rested for 30 min on a hospital bed in a comfortable, temperature-controlled environment, continuous respiratory exchange measurement was initiated by indirect calorimetry. During each of the five 30-min indirect calorimetry measurement periods [ie, at 0800 (before the first meal) and at 1030, 1300, 1530, and 1800 (postprandially)], the children rested quietly and watched cartoons. Throughout the REE measurement, an investigator observed the child to make sure that he or she remained motionless and was relaxed during the entire respiratory exchange measurement. Special efforts were made to prevent extra body movements or hyperventilation because the former increase REE and the latter engenders a rise in respiratory quotient. One child was excluded from the study because of hyperventilation that led to respiratory quotients systematically >1.0 in all measurement periods.
Resting energy expenditure
REE was assessed by respiratory gas exchange over sequential periods of 30 min as described previously (6). The average REE value was calculated in the postprandial phase (4 nonconsecutive measurements) because protein metabolism was also assessed postprandially. An open-circuit, computerized indirect calorimeter (Deltatrac TM; Datex Division, Helsinki) connected to a transparent hood system was used. Before each measurement, the instrument was calibrated with a mixture of 2 gases (95.2% O2 and 4.8% CO2). Rates of oxygen consumption (
O2) and carbon dioxide production (CO2) were calculated and printed out at 1-min intervals. Energy expenditure was derived from O2 and CO2 by using classic equations (15). To ensure a steady state in REE, the mean of the last 20 min of measurements was taken.
Test meals
Four small meals were provided to the children on the day of the study and were eaten under supervision at 0830, 1100, 1330, and 1600. Each meal consisted of cheese, popcorn, a protein concentrate (Power Play; Wander-Novartis, Bern, Switzerland), French biscuits (Petit Beurre; Christie & Brown and Co, Paris), and a drink with sugar added. Total energy intake during the experimental period was equivalent to the baseline postabsorptive REE. The total calculated metabolizable energy value of the 4 meals averaged 5509 ± 223 kJ (1317 ± 53 kcal) in obese and 4406 ± 192 kJ (1053 ± 46 kcal) in nonobese children. Fifteen percent of energy was derived from protein (49.0 ± 2.0 g in obese children and 39.1 ± 1.7 g in nonobese children), 30% from fat (44.1 ± 1.8 g in obese children and 35.0 ± 1.5 g in nonobese children), and 55% from carbohydrate (182.2 ± 7.4 in obese children and 146.4 ± 6.5 g in nonobese children).
Assessment of protein turnover
A single dose of [15N]glycine [a nonradioactive isotope, 100 mg, 99 atom% (one); Amersham International, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom] was given orally (diluted in water and added to the drink provided with the first meal). Urine was collected before the first meal, before the [15N]glycine dose to assess background isotopic abundance, and during the 9-h period after administration of [15N]glycine. The volume of each urine sample was measured and the sample was immediately acidified with a solution of 6 mol HCl/L to a pH of 1.5 and frozen at -20°C.
The rate of protein turnover was estimated from the isotopic enrichment of urinary ammonia after the single oral dose of [15N]glycine. Details of the method were described previously by Fern et al (16, 17). The 15N enrichment of ammonia was corrected for background isotopic 15N abundance in urine (typically 0.366 atom%) as measured in the first predose urine sample.
The rate of whole-body nitrogen flux (Q) was calculated from the equation given by Waterlow et al (18), with use of ammonia as the end product:
|
| (1) |
Protein synthesis and breakdown were derived from the following expression:
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
Note that the difference between S and B is mathematically equivalent to nitrogen balance and does not depend on the administration of the 15N tracer. Nitrogen balance, however, gives no information about rates of protein synthesis and breakdown. A factor of 6.25 was used to convert amount of nitrogen to amount of protein. Miscellaneous nitrogen losses (eg, through sweat and feces) were considered to be negligible.
Biochemical analysis
Urinary ammonia was measured by an enzymatic method as described by Kun and Kearney (19). Total urinary nitrogen excretion was determined by the Kjeldahl method (Autoanalyzer; Technicon, Tarrytown, NY).
Stable-isotope analysis
The stable-isotope method was based on trials by Preston and McMillan (20) with minor modifications. Briefly, after each urine sample (10–15 mL) was neutralized to a pH of 6.0 ± 0.1 with 5 mol NaOH/L, ammonia nitrogen was isolated by using a cationic exchange resin (Ag 50W x 8; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). After the supernate was discarded and after the resin was washed several times with purified water, ammonia was extracted with 1.5 mL of 2.5 mol KHSO4/L and analyzed for 15N enrichment after combustion (Roboprep CN; Europa Scientific, Crewe, United Kingdom) with a continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Tracermass; Europa Scientific). A 5%-urea solution was used as an internal standard.
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as means ± SEMs. Unpaired t tests were used to compare the physical characteristics of obese and nonobese children. Statistical differences between the 2 groups as well as between postabsorptive and postprandial states within each group were assessed by analysis of variance. Adjusted values were obtained by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with FFM as the covariate. Correlations between variables were determined by Pearson product-moment linear correlation analysis. The SAS statistical package (version 6.0; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) was used for statistical analyses.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
After meal ingestion, REE increased in both obese and nonobese children: in absolute values, it was higher in the obese group than in the nonobese group (5820 ± 52 compared with 4732 ± 10 kJ/d; P < 0.005). When the values were normalized per kg FFM, however, postprandial energy expenditure was not significantly different between groups (196.4 ± 5 compared with 201.8 ± 0.4 kJ• kg FFM-1• d-1). Expressed as a percentage increase over postabsorptive energy expenditure (premeal baseline), the postprandial rise in energy expenditure in obese children (5.0 ± 1.0%) was slightly lower than that in nonobese children (7.6 ± 1.4%), but not significantly so.
Nitrogen flux, whole-body protein synthesis, and whole-body protein breakdown
The rate of whole-body protein turnover, expressed as an absolute value, was significantly higher in obese children than in nonobese children: the rate of nitrogen flux averaged 42.7 ± 3.8 g/d in the obese children compared with 29.4 ± 2.5 g/d in the nonobese children (Figure 1). Similarly, rates of whole-body protein synthesis and breakdown were significantly greater in obese children (208 ± 24 and 149 ± 20 g/d, respectively) than in nonobese children (137 ± 14 and 89 ± 13 g/d, respectively). When the values were expressed per kg FFM, the rate of protein breakdown remained significantly greater in obese children than in nonobese children (5.0 ± 0.5 compared with 3.7 ± 0.4 kJ• kg FFM-1• d-1; P < 0.05). However, this mode of expression assumes that the relation between whole-body protein synthesis (or protein breakdown) and FFM has a zero intercept, which was not the case. When the values were adjusted for FFM, with FFM as a covariate, no significant differences in either whole-body protein synthesis (176 compared with 172 g/d in obese and nonobese children, respectively) or whole-body protein breakdown (127 compared with 114 g/d in obese and nonobese children, respectively) were observed.
|
|
| (5) |
|
| (6) |
The magnitude of whole-body protein synthesis was also associated with both FFM (r = 0.83, P <0.001) and REE (r = 0.79 , P < 0.005):
|
| (7) |
|
| (8) |
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Some methodologic aspects of the present study require comment. The accuracy of the assessment of body composition in children may be challenged because the equation used to estimate percentage body fat from skinfold thicknesses (although intended for prepubertal children) may be subject to error in obese children. To address this issue, body-composition differences between groups were recalculated on the basis of triceps skinfold thickness (in mm). As expected, the differences between the groups were maintained.
The method we used to estimate protein turnover also requires comment. As in our previous studies of children (21), pregnant women (22), and the elderly (23), we used the 15N end product method based on [15N]ammonia to assess protein turnover because this allowed us to obtain an estimate without blood sampling (an advantage when investigating children). The basic assumption of the end product method is that the fraction of the isotope dose excreted in ammonia is the same as the excretion of unlabeled nitrogen in the end product when the end product is expressed as a fraction of the flux.
The rate of protein turnover derived from urea is generally higher than that from ammonia. These differences have been attributed to differences in the site of synthesis: urea is synthesized in the liver, whereas ammonia is synthesized in the kidney (17). An important issue is whether the end product method can accurately detect small differences in turnover rates among individuals. Using a single dose of [15N]glycine, as in the present study, Fern et al (16) reported an average reproducibility of the method in adults of 6.7%; this is 10 times less than the difference in whole-body protein breakdown between the 2 groups in the present study.
The results of this study show that the absolute rates of whole-body protein turnover (nitrogen flux), whole-body protein synthesis, and whole-body protein breakdown were significantly higher in obese, prepubertal children than in their lean counterparts. The difference between obese and nonobese children in nitrogen flux (45%) and protein synthesis (52%) was substantially greater than the difference in REE (26%) or the difference in FFM (27%). Note that protein synthesis largely exceeded protein breakdown in the present study (Figure 1
) because the measurements were made under postprandial conditions, during which there is apparent protein storage. The reverse would have been observed in the postabsorptive phase.
We are not aware of any previous studies in prepubertal children for comparison, although several studies that used different methodologic approaches (24) were performed in obese adults who were in the static phase of obesity (25–28), who were dieting (29–32), or who had concomitant type 2 diabetes with or without exogenous insulin administration (33, 34). The effect of insulin resistance in obese subjects has also been studied (35). Only one study was performed in obese adolescents (36). Taken together, these experimental studies showed that whole-body nitrogen flux, protein synthesis, and protein breakdown were greater in obese persons (including those with type 2 diabetes) than in nonobese, nondiabetic persons. Our study confirms these results in prepubertal children. Note, however, that the mode of expression of protein turnover used in the above studies varied; in some studies, values were reported in absolute terms (g/d), whereas in others they were expressed per unit body weight (g/kg) or per unit FFM (g/kg FFM) or were statistically adjusted for FFM by ANCOVA.
As for energy expenditure, the type of normalization (ie, per kg FFM or per kg body wt) will affect the conclusions of studies when obese persons are compared with a nonobese group. For example, in our study, when protein metabolism values were expressed per kg FFM, only protein breakdown was significantly greater in obese than in nonobese children. This confirms the results of experimental studies performed previously in adults (26, 27). When the values were adjusted for FFM by ANCOVA, however, the difference in protein breakdown disappeared. The small sample size in the present study as well as the heterogeneity of the groups associated with the methodologic issues raised above may have resulted in insufficient statistical power to detect a difference between the groups.
Rates of REE and the size of the FFM were the 2 major variables significantly associated with whole-body protein flux, whole-body protein synthesis, and whole-body protein breakdown. Our interpretation of these results is that the absolute increase in FFM (including muscle mass) in obese children may engender a greater absolute protein turnover, although the protein turnover of the adipose tissue, still unknown at the present time, may somehow contribute to this value. Protein turnover is rapid in visceral tissues (such as the liver and gastrointestinal tract); thus, it is likely that the greater amount of substrates ingested by obese children to maintain their obesity (in the static phase) as well as the general elevation in substrate flux engender greater protein turnover in the splanchnic bed in particular.
In a previous study of carbohydrate metabolism in obese, prepubertal children (37), we reported a net decrease in glycogen breakdown that indicated a sparing of endogenous glycogen. We hypothesized that this was due to decreased glycogen turnover at an early age. The presence of an absolute increase in whole-body protein synthesis and breakdown concomitant with a decrease in glycogen breakdown constitutes indirect evidence of a dissociative effect in the disturbance of substrate metabolism. Whether a differential sensitivity of the action of insulin on protein compared with carbohydrate metabolism is operative in children, as elegantly shown in adults (35, 38, 39), remains to be seen.
In conclusion, the salient feature of the present study was that an absolute increase in protein metabolism, in particular whole-body protein synthesis and breakdown, was observed in obese children concomitant with an absolute rise in energy expenditure. This corroborates results described previously in obese adults. However, when protein and energy metabolism were adjusted for differences in FFM between the obese and nonobese children, the difference disappeared. It is hoped that subsequent studies will explore protein turnover in individual tissues to better understand which tissues contribute to explaining the net absolute increase in whole-body protein synthesis and breakdown in obesity.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Supported by the International Foundation for the Promotion of Nutrition Research and Nutrition Education (ISFE), Basel, Switzerland, and by a grant (to CMR-M) from the Stiftung zur Förderung der Ernährungs-Forschung in der Schweiz (Swiss Foundation for Nutritional Research).
3 Address reprint requests to Y Schutz, Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lausanne, 7 rue du Bugnon, CH-1005 Lausanne, Switzerland. E-mail: Yves.schutz{at}i.physiol.unil.ch.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Derumeaux-Burel, M. Meyer, L. Morin, and Y. Boirie Prediction of resting energy expenditure in a large population of obese children Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2004; 80(6): 1544 - 1550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P DeLany, G. A Bray, D. W Harsha, and J. Volaufova Energy expenditure in African American and white boys and girls in a 2-y follow-up of the Baton Rouge Children's Study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2004; 79(2): 268 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Lazzer, Y. Boirie, A. Bitar, C. Montaurier, J. Vernet, M. Meyer, and M. Vermorel Assessment of energy expenditure associated with physical activities in free-living obese and nonobese adolescents Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2003; 78(3): 471 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P DeLany, G. A Bray, D. W Harsha, and J. Volaufova Energy expenditure in preadolescent African American and white boys and girls: the Baton Rouge Children's Study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2002; 75(4): 705 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J Stensel, F.-P. Lin, and A. M Nevill Resting metabolic rate in obese and nonobese Chinese Singaporean boys aged 13-15 y Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2001; 74(3): 369 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. R. Hunter, C. J. Wetzstein, D. A. Fields, A. Brown, and M. M. Bamman Resistance training increases total energy expenditure and free-living physical activity in older adults J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2000; 89(3): 977 - 984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
) and obese (
) prepubertal children. *,
Significantly different from nonobese children: *P < 0.05, 
