AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston & Online Sept 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alles, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Hautvast, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alles, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Hautvast, J. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Alles, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Hautvast, J. G.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 69, No. 5, 980-991, May 1999
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communications

Effect of transgalactooligosaccharides on the composition of the human intestinal microflora and on putative risk markers for colon cancer1,2,3

Martine S Alles, Ralf Hartemink, Saskia Meyboom, Jan L Harryvan, Katrien MJ Van Laere, Fokko M Nagengast and Joseph GAJ Hautvast


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Nondigestible oligosaccharides have been claimed to benefit the health of the colon by selectively stimulating the growth of bifidobacteria and by decreasing the toxicity of the colon contents.

Objective: We compared the effect of 2 doses of transgalactooligosaccharides and a placebo on the composition and activity of the intestinal microflora in 18 women and 22 men.

Design: Strictly controlled experimental diets were supplied to 3 intervention groups in a parallel design. The study was divided into 2 consecutive 3-wk periods during which each participant consumed a run-in diet followed by an intervention diet that differed only in the amount of transgalactooligosaccharides: 0 (placebo), 7.5, and 15 g/d. Breath samples and fecal samples were collected at the end of both the run-in and intervention periods.

Results: Apparent fermentability of transgalactooligosaccharides was 100%. The highest dose of transgalactooligosaccharides significantly increased the concentration of breath hydrogen by 130% (P < 0.01) and the nitrogen density of the feces by 8.5% (P < 0.05). The number of bifidobacteria increased after both placebo and transgalactooligosaccharides ingestion, but the differences between these increases were not significantly different. Transgalactooligosaccharides did not significantly affect bowel habits; stool composition; the concentration of short-chain fatty acids or bile acids in fecal water; the concentration of ammonia, indoles, or skatoles in feces; fecal pH; or the composition of the intestinal microflora.

Conclusion: We conclude that transgalactooligosaccharides are completely fermented in the human colon, but do not beneficially change the composition of the intestinal microflora, the amount of protein fermentation products in feces, or the profile of bile acids in fecal water.

Key Words: Transgalactooligosaccharides • fermentation • stool composition • bifidobacteria • microflora • short-chain fatty acids • bile acids • ammonia • phenols • colon cancer • humans • Netherlands


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The recent commercialization of nondigestible oligosaccharides as food ingredients has triggered much research on their role in colonic health. Nondigestible oligosaccharides naturally occur in various edible food plants such as onions and leeks (1). Because they are not hydrolyzed by enzymes in the human small intestine, they reach the colon almost intact. Oligosaccharides are relatively small molecules. In a previous study we showed that fructooligosaccharides, added to the diet of young, healthy subjects, are fully fermented by the colonic microflora (2).

Colonic fermentation is the anaerobic process in which carbohydrates and proteins are metabolized by the intestinal microflora. End products of fermentation are substrate dependent. Fermentation of carbohydrates mainly leads to the production of gases; the short-chain fatty acids acetate, butyrate, and propionate; and sometimes lactate or ethanol. Protein fermentation increases the production of branched-chain fatty acids isobutyrate and isovalerate, phenolic compounds, and ammonia (3, 4). The colonic fermentative activity is regulated by the amount and type of substrate that enters the colon, such as endogenous compounds and undigested food components (4). It seems likely that the composition of the diet influences the activity of the intestinal microflora.

Transgalactooligosaccharides are produced from lactose by enzymatic transgalactosylation. The oligomers are linear and consist of lactose and several galactose molecules with ß-1,6 or ß-1,4 linkages (5). Transgalactooligosaccharides are not hydrolyzed by human small-intestinal ß-galactosidase and will pass undigested into the colon (5). Tanaka et al (6) reported in 1983 that administration of transgalactooligosaccharides leads to an increase in breath-hydrogen excretion because of its nondigestibility. Moreover, they showed that transgalactooligosaccharides might stimulate the growth of resident bifidobacterial strains (6). Ten years later, these results were confirmed by the studies of Ito et al (7, 8) and Bouhnik et al (9).

Bifidobacteria may comprise up to one-quarter of the gut flora of healthy adults (10). They have a role in controlling the pH of the large intestine through the production of lactic and acetic acids. A low pH might restrict the growth of many potential pathogens and putrefactive bacteria (10, 11) and might both depress the formation of secondary from primary bile acids and enhance the precipitation of bile acids (1215). It thus seems of great importance to identify food components that have a potential for increasing the number of indigenous bifidobacteria.

Most studies looking at the effects of transgalactooligosaccharides on bifidobacteria used a linear study design and did not exclude possible time and placebo effects. Also, the focus was always on the composition of the intestinal flora and not on possible colon cancer risk markers such as stool weight (16), bile acids (17, 18), and putrefactive products (1921). We used a controlled feeding trial to study the effect of 2 doses of transgalactooligosaccharides compared with the effects of a placebo on the composition of the intestinal microflora, the saccharolytic and proteolytic activities of the bacteria, and the profile of bile acids in fecal water.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects
Volunteers were recruited via advertisements in local newspapers and posters mounted in public buildings in Wageningen. The experiment was preceded by a screening procedure that included completion of a health questionnaire, blood and urine analyses, a transgalactooligosaccharides tolerance test, and a lactose breath test. Sixty-three volunteers started with the screening procedure. Five volunteers withdrew before the start of the study.

To be eligible for inclusion in the study, subjects had to be aged 18–75 y; have a stable body weight; have no history of gastrointestinal or gallbladder disorders; have not used antibiotics or laxatives in the 12 mo before the experiment; have had no surgery in the 12 mo before the experiment; have no complaints of diarrhea, obstipation, or abdominal pain; not be using any medication known to affect gastrointestinal function; have a serum cholesterol concentration <7.0 mmol/L; have a serum triacylglycerol concentration <2.5 mmol/L; have normal hemocytometric values; and have normal urinary values for protein, glucose, and pH. Five volunteers were excluded because they did not meet the biomedical inclusion criteria.

A breath-lactose test was performed to exclude hydrogen responders to lactose. Subjects came to the department after an overnight fast and consumed a drink containing 50 g lactose. Breath samples were taken before and at 30-min intervals after the lactose drink was ingested; a total of 7 samples were taken. An increase in breath hydrogen of 15 ppm above baseline was used as an exclusion criterion. Twelve volunteers showed hydrogen responses to lactose, probably because of lactase deficiency, and were excluded from the study. Subjects were challenged with a single dose of 10 g transgalactooligosaccharides to check for possible intolerance. None of the volunteers showed any signs of intolerance or discomfort and none were excluded because of intolerance. Forty-one volunteers (19 women and 22 men) entered the study.

The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Division of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology. The protocol and aims of the study were explained fully to the volunteers, who gave their informed, written consent. The food was provided at no cost during the experiment and the volunteers received a small financial reward after successfully completing the study.

Design
The 6-wk study had a parallel design. The subjects were divided into 3 treatment groups. All groups started with the same run-in diet for 3 wk. For the next 3 wk, they switched to an intervention diet that differed for each of the 3 groups: a diet high in transgalactooligosaccharides (aimed to be 15 g/d, high-TOS group), a diet low in transgalactooligosaccharides (aimed to be 7.5 g/d, low-TOS group), or a diet with no transgalactooligosaccharides (placebo group). At the end of the run-in and intervention periods, fecal samples and breath samples were collected. The volunteers were divided into 3 start groups. Each start group started the intervention 1 wk after the other so that the laboratory would be able to adequately process the fresh fecal samples sent to the laboratory. The interventions were equally distributed over the start groups.

Diets
Before the trial, trained dietitians used a questionnaire to ask the subjects about their habitual diets (22, 23). This allowed us to estimate the habitual energy intake of the subjects. The questionnaires were coded and the diets were formulated by using the Netherlands Food Composition Table (24). The study diets were formulated at 21 levels of energy intake, ranging from 7.5 to 17.5 MJ/d, so that each subject received a diet that met his or her energy needs. Body weights were recorded 3 times weekly and energy intake was adjusted when necessary to maintain a stable weight. The diets consisted of conventional foods, and 21different menus were provided over each 3-wk period. The nutrient composition of each diet was similar, except for the oligosaccharides. The diets were rich in protein, mainly animal protein ({approx}76%), and low in fiber.

The transgalactooligosaccharides (Elix'or) were provided by Borculo Whey Products, Borculo, Netherlands. Fruit juices, which were also part of the run-in diets, were used as a vehicle for the interventions and were divided over 3 portions of 150 g each and consumed with each meal. Three mixtures were made to add to the juices. The high-TOS mixture was composed of a transgalactooligosaccharide syrup that consisted of 75% dry matter, of which 62% was transgalactooligosaccharides with a degree of polymerization of 2 (32% nondigestible disaccharides), 3 (35%), 4 (23%), 5 (8%), or >5 (2%). The remaining dry matter consisted of 20% lactose and 18% monosaccharides (mainly glucose). For the low-TOS mixture, we used less transgalactooligosaccharide syrup; therefore, we added extra glucose and lactose to equalize the amount of nonoligosaccharide components in the syrup. The placebo mixture consisted of only glucose and lactose, in amounts equal to those in the high-TOS and low-TOS mixtures.

Approximately 90% of the subjects' energy intake was from supplied foods; the remaining 10% was from products chosen by the subjects from a prepared list of non-fiber-containing foods. All foods supplied to the subjects were color coded to keep them unaware of which intervention they were receiving. Foods were supplied at the Department of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology, Wageningen Agricultural University, Netherlands. On weekdays at noon, hot meals were consumed at the department. For all other meals on weekdays, food was packaged and provided daily. Food for consumption on the weekend and guidelines for its preparation were provided on Fridays.

Subjects were urged not to change their selection of free-choice items throughout the study and to maintain their usual smoking habits. The participants kept diaries in which they recorded their frequency of defecation, any sign of illness, gastrointestinal complaints, medications used, menstrual cycle phase, the free-choice food items consumed, and any deviations from their usual diet and lifestyle behavior.

Duplicate portions of the diets and the juices were collected every day for an imaginary participant with a daily energy intake of 11 MJ, stored at -20°C, pooled weekly, and analyzed after the study. Records of the free-choice items were coded and their energy and nutrient content were combined with the analyzed values of the food supplied.

Thirty barium-impregnated grains (Radio-Opaque Pellets; TD Medical, Eindhoven, Netherlands) were swallowed daily together with the meals in the last 10 d of the run-in and intervention periods and were counted in the fecal samples. Stool recovery was estimated by using the following formula: (30 x weight of the pooled feces)/(the number of barium-impregnated-grains in the pooled feces).

Data collection and analytic procedures
Data collection
In the last week of the run-in and intervention periods, 2 breath samples were taken on 2 consecutive days just before lunch. In the last week of the run-in and intervention periods, volunteers came to the department twice to defecate. A button on the study toilet was pressed immediately after defecation and a light and buzzer warned the analyst that a fresh sample was ready to be handled. The temperature of the feces was recorded and within 5 min after defecation, a sample weighing {approx}10 g was weighed and transported into an anaerobic cabinet. The remainder of the sample was immediately deep-frozen on dry ice to stop fermentation and then stored at -80°C. Complete stool collections were made during the last weekend (2.5 d) of the run-in and intervention periods; subjects collected all stools and stored them immediately on dry ice.

Breath-hydrogen concentrations
End-expiratory breath samples and ambient air samples were collected in plastic, 60-mL syringes (Plastipak; Becton Dickinson, Dublin). Within 2 h after collection, the hydrogen concentration was measured by using a standard electrochemical cell (exhaled hydrogen monitor; Gas Measurement Instruments Ltd, Renfreq, Scotland). The cell was calibrated with a standard gas (100 ppm H2) in air. Volunteers refrained from smoking in the hour before sampling.

Preparation of stool samples
All fecal samples (stools collected at the department plus stools collected at home) from a single subject from each 3-wk period were pooled. All fecal samples were X-rayed (Optimus M200; Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands) before analysis to determine the number of barium-impregnated grains. The samples were then thawed overnight at 4°C, weighed, and homogenized in a bowl and mixer. The dry weight of the feces was estimated by drying a portion at 80°C in an oven (model E45; Heraeus, Hanau, Germany) to constant weight. One portion was used to prepare the aqueous fraction of stool and centrifuged at 26000 x g for 90 min at 4°C (MSE; Scientific Instruments, Crawley, United Kingdom). Fecal water was carefully removed and stored at -20°C until analyzed for short-chain fatty acids and bile acids. The pH was measured in both the fecal homogenate and fecal water with a digital pH meter (CD 620; WPA Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom). One portion of the mixed feces was freeze-dried, ground, and kept in a dry environment until analyzed for nitrogen and transgalactooligosaccharides. The remaining feces were stored at -20°C until analyzed for ammonia, indoles, and skatole.

Transgalactooligosaccharides in feces and juices
Transgalactooligosaccharides were measured in duplicate samples of 125 mg freeze-dried feces resuspended in 2.4 mL distilled water. D-Galacturonic acid (100 µL, 1.25 g/L) was added as an internal standard before extraction. The mixture was vortex mixed, heated for 15 min at 100°C, and then centrifuged at 10000 x g and 20°C. The supernate was analyzed by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography (Dionex BV, Breda, Netherlands) on a Spectra-Physics system (San Jose, CA) equipped with a Carbopac PA-1 column (4 x 250 mm; Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA). The eluent was monitored with a Dionex PED detector in the pulsed amperometric detection mode. Elution was performed with a flow rate of 1 mL/min and a linear sodium acetate gradient of 0–0.2 mol/L in 0.1 mol NaOH/L for 30 min.

The fruit juices were centrifuged at 10000 x g and 20°C and the supernate was analyzed with high-performance anion-exchange chromatography, under conditions similar to those mentioned above, to estimate the concentration of transgalactooligosaccharides. The elution profile and the areas under the peaks of transgalactooligosaccharides were compared with those of a water solution with known quantities of transgalactooligosaccharides (Elix'or). The detection limit for the transgalactooligosaccharides in fecal water and juice was 10 mg/L.

Short-chain fatty acids and bile acids in fecal water
Concentrations of short-chain fatty acids in fecal water were measured in duplicate as described by Tangerman and Nagengast (25) by using a gas chromatograph (model CP 9001; Chrompack, Middelburg, Netherlands) and a column packed with 10% SP1200 silicone stationary phase and 1% H3PO4 on an 80–100 Chromosorb W acid-washed instrument (Chrompack). An internal standard was added to all samples before analysis (15 mmol 2-ethylbutyric acid/L in 100% formic acid). Samples from each subject were analyzed within one run.

For the analyses of bile acids, 150 µL fecal water was freeze-dried and prepared according to Glatz et al (26), with a few minor modifications. Samples were analyzed on a capillary fused silica column (length: 30 m; internal diameter: 0.25 mm) coated with CP-Sil-19 CB with a film thickness of 0.25 mm (Chrompack, Bergen op Zoom, Netherlands) by using a Hewlett-Packard (Palo Alto, CA) gas chromatograph (model 5890, series II) and flame ionization detector. The initial pressure of the carrier gas (hydrogen) was 90 kPa. Splitless injection was performed by using a liquid sampler (HP 7673; Hewlett-Packard). To cover the wide range of concentrations, injection volumes varied from 0.5 to 2.5 µL. In addition, the concentrations of the calibration solutions were adapted according to the injection volume. The initial oven temperature was 150°C, which was raised to 225°C immediately after injection and increased gradually to 245°C at a rate of 1°C/min. The final temperature (275°C) was maintained for 40 min. The temperature of the injection port was 300°C and of the detector was 275°C. Each bile acid sample was calibrated by using 7 standard solutions with increasing concentrations. The calibrations were bracketed, ie, 2 calibration sets were measured (one before and one after sampling) to eliminate system drift. The average result was applied to the sample calculations. Calculations were performed by using the internal standard method: the area response of the peak of interest was compared with the area response of the internal standard peak (nor-DCA), yielding the area response ratio. The area response ratio, plotted against the amount ratio, resulted in a linear calibration curve, enabling calculations of the amount of each bile acid. Samples from one subject were analyzed within one run. The CV within runs was 10% for concentrations <10 µmol/L and 5% for concentrations >=10 µmol/L.

Fecal nitrogen, ammonia, indoles, and skatoles
Ammonia was extracted from 5 g homogenized feces with 20 mL perchloric acid (1 mol/L) and then the pH was set to 7.0 ± 0.1 with 5 mol KOH/L. A commercial test kit (Ammonia UV-method, catalog no. 1112732; Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) was used to determine the concentration of ammonia. Total nitrogen was measured in freeze-dried feces by the Kjeldahl method (Kjeltec Autosampler System, 1035 Analyzer; Tecator Ltd, Bristol, United Kingdom). Indoles and skatoles were extracted from 5 g homogenized feces with 50 mL methanol. The mixture was homogenized with an ultra-turrax (Janke en Kunkel, Zoetermeer, Netherlands) and then filtered through a glass microfiber filter (E Merck BV, Amsterdam) before being analyzed. Analyses were performed in duplicate by using HPLC with ultraviolet absorption detection according to the method described by Wilkens (27).

Microbiological analyses
Microbiological analyses of each sample were done within 3 h of defecation at the Department of Food Science, Division of Food Microbiology, Wageningen Agricultural University. All analyses and preparations were done in an anaerobic chamber (H2:CO2:N2, 10:10:80; 21°C; SHK050H; Hoekloos, Rotterdam, Netherlands) unless stated otherwise. Feces were diluted (10-1) in 70 mL of a solution of buffered peptone water, Tween 80 (1 g/L; Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis), and cysteine (0.5 g/L), and then homogenized by using an ultra-turrax. Aliquots of 1 mL were diluted in reduced physiologic peptone water in decimal steps. From each of the dilutions, 0.03 mL was plated in duplicate onto selective media. All media were kept >=24 h in the anaerobic chamber before being used.

Nutrient agar was used to determine total aerobes (Oxoid CM 3; Basingstoke, United Kingdom) with dilutions of 10-2 to 10-5. For Escherichia coli, eosine methylene blue agar (Oxoid CM 69; Basingstoke) was used with dilutions of 10-2 to 10-5. Total anaerobes were counted on Fecal Reinforced Clostridial Agar, which consisted of 38 g Reinforced Clostridial Medium/L (Oxoid CM 149; Basingstoke), 1% Hemine solution (H2250, 0.5 g/L; Sigma Chemical Co), 0.02% phylloquinone solution (0.5% in 95% ethanol; Bufa Pharmaceuticals, Uitgeest, Netherlands), 18 g Oxoid L13 agar/L (Basingstoke), and 100 mL fecal extract. Fecal extract was prepared by mixing equal volumes of swine feces and buffered peptone water (Oxoid CM 509; Basingstoke) to which cysteine {bullet}HCl (1 g/L) and Tween 80 (P1754, 10 g/L) were added. The mixture was homogenized and sterilized. Dilutions of 10-6 to 10-8 were used. Sulfite-reducing clostridia (mainly Clostridium perfringens) were counted on perfringens agar base and supplement (CSA, Oxoid CM 587, SR 47, and SR 88; Basingstoke) by using dilutions of 10-3 to 10-7. For lactobacilli, LAMVAB medium was used (28) with dilutions of 10-2 to 10-7. Bifidobacteria were counted on raffinose bifidobacterium agar by using dilutions of 10-4 to 10-7 (29). All dilutions were plated in duplicate.

Plates with a 6-cm diameter (Greiner, Kremsmünster, Austria) were used. All plates were incubated at 37°C for 1–4 d. Nutrient agar and eosine methylene blue agar were incubated aerobically; all other media were incubated anaerobically. After incubation, colonies were counted according to colony morphology. Counts from duplicate plates were averaged. The quality of the media and the incubation technique for each batch was checked by plating in duplicate selected test bacteria on the plates. Anaerobic conditions were controlled by using anaerobic indicator strips. All visible colony morphologies were tested microscopically to determine the selectivity of the media.

Statistical analyses
The average values of each endpoint variable in the feces and breath from both the run-in and intervention periods for each subject were calculated and used to determine the differences between intervention and run-in diets. Differences were checked for normality by visually inspecting the normal probability plots (univariate procedure). Bacterial counts were log transformed to fit a normal distribution. The significance of the differences between the interventions was assessed by analysis of variance without interactions by using a model with subject (general linear models procedure). Adding the start group to this model did not contribute to significance; thus, there were no significant effects of time.

If there was a significant difference between treatments (P < 0.05), group means were compared by using Dunnett's test. This method encompasses a downward adjustment of the significance limit for multiple testing. Our strategy for controlling a type II error was based on our main outcome variable: bifidobacterial counts. A pilot experiment was performed before the study to assess the within-subject variation of bacterial counts (after they were log transformed), which was 5% for bifidobacteria (data not shown).

The present study was designed to detect a 7% increase in bifidobacterial counts with 80% confidence after correction for the placebo treatment, which is about half the effect observed by Bouhnik et al (9). We used data from the literature and from former studies at our department to estimate the variances for the other variables and used these to predict detectable responses to transgalactooligosaccharides. The variation in effect of the treatments was calculated and used to estimate the detectable effect of the treatment for a given probability (30). The statistical analysis package SAS (version 6.09; Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Inc, Cary, NC) was used to perform the statistical analyses.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The characteristics of the subjects who completed the study are given in Table 1Go. One female subject withdrew in the first week of the experiment because of personal reasons; data from this subject were excluded from analyses. All other subjects completed the study. Some volunteers in the low-TOS and high-TOS groups reported flatulence, but there were no reports of problems with the palatability of the diets or the juices.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Subject characteristics1
 
Initial energy intakes were adjusted in 21 of the volunteers to maintain stable body weights. The mean daily intakes of energy and the composition of the diets, as determined by chemical analyses of duplicate diets and juices plus calculated contribution of free-choice items, are given in Table 2Go. Energy supplied by the free-choice items did not differ significantly between the dietary regimens and accounted for 11.2% of total energy (range: 7.7–14.4%). There were no significant differences between the run-in and intervention periods or between treatment groups in intakes of energy, protein, carbohydrate, fat, and fiber. The low-TOS diet provided a mean of 8.5 g transgalactooligosaccharides/d and the high-TOS diet 14.4 g transgalactooligosaccharides/d.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Daily dietary intake during the study1
 
Breath-hydrogen concentrations
Individual changes in breath-hydrogen concentration between the intervention and run-in periods are given in Figure 1Go. The mean change (intervention minus run-in) was significantly higher (P < 0.01) in the high-TOS group than in the placebo group (95% CI: 1.8, 11.2 ppm). There were no significant differences between the low-TOS and placebo groups.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Individual changes in breath-hydrogen concentrations in the placebo (high-protein, low-fiber diet), low-TOS (high-protein, low-fiber diet supplemented with 8.5 g transgalactooligosaccharides/d), and high-TOS (high-protein, low-fiber diet supplemented with 14.4 g transgalactooligosaccharides/d) groups. Breath samples were taken twice at the end of the run-in period and twice at the end of the intervention period.

 
Bowel habits and stool composition
Data on bowel habits, fecal weight, fecal nitrogen density, and fecal pH are given in Table 3Go. There was no fecal excretion of transgalactooligosaccharides with any of the interventions. Transgalactooligosaccharide consumption did not significantly affect reported stool frequency, percentage of fecal dry matter, fecal weight, or fecal pH. There was a significant increase in fecal nitrogen density in the high-TOS group after correction for placebo, but not in the low-TOS group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Bowel habits and fecal weight, nitrogen density, and pH1
 
Short-chain fatty acids and bile acids in fecal water
Total short-chain fatty acid concentrations in fecal water did not differ significantly between the 3 groups (Table 4Go). The pH of fecal water and concentrations of acetate, propionate, butyrate, and the sum of isobutyrate, valerate, isovalerate, and caproate were also not significantly different between groups. The molar ratio of acetate to propionate to butyrate was {approx}62:19:10 in all 3 groups. The total daily excretion of short-chain fatty acids was {approx}13 mmol/d. There were no significant differences in the excretion of short-chain fatty acids between the 3 groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Concentration of short-chain fatty acids and pH of fecal water1
 
Total concentrations of bile acids in fecal water decreased after intervention in all 3 groups, but there were no significant differences between groups (Table 5Go). The ratio of hydrophobic (mono + dihydroxy) to hydrophilic (keto + trihydroxy) bile acids was not affected significantly by the interventions. Secondary bile acids made up {approx}85% of total bile acids in all 3 groups; (iso)deoxycholic acid was the most abundant bile acid. The total excretion of bile acids was {approx}70 µmol/d. There were no significant differences in the excretion of bile acids between the 3 groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Concentration of primary and secondary bile acids in fecal water1
 
Ammonia, indoles, and skatoles in feces
Mean fecal concentrations of ammonia, indoles, and skatoles did not change significantly after transgalactooligosaccharide consumption (Table 6Go). The excretion of ammonia was {approx}85 mg/d and was not significantly different between the 3 groups. The excretion of indoles was 3 mg/d and of skatoles 1.3 mg/d; there were no significant differences between the groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6. Fecal concentration of ammonia, indoles, and skatoles1
 
Intestinal microflora
The mean temperature of all samples for bacteriological analyses was 32.2°C. The temperature of 4 samples was <29.2°C (mean temperature minus 2 SD).These samples were small and probably cooled down more quickly than the others. No sample was excluded from analyses because of a low temperature. Fecal bacteria counts were not affected significantly by the interventions. Control strains grew well on all media batches, indicating that the media did not inhibit growth. No oxygen leaks were detected.

There was a significant increase in the amount of bifidobacteria in the placebo (P < 0.025), low-TOS (P < 0.05), and high-TOS (P < 0.05) groups. The differences between these changes were not significant (Table 7Go). Mean changes (and 95% CIs) in fecal bacterial counts in the 3 groups are shown in Figure 2Go. The ratio of bifidobacteria to the total amount of anaerobic bacteria was {approx}10 and was not affected significantly by the interventions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 7. Fecal bacterial counts1
 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Mean changes (and 95% CIs) in fecal bacterial counts in the placebo (high-protein, low-fiber diet), low-TOS (high-protein, low-fiber diet supplemented with 8.5 g transgalactooligosaccharides/d), and high-TOS (high-protein, low-fiber diet supplemented with 14.4 g transgalactooligosaccharides/d) groups. There were no significant differences between groups. CFU, colony forming units.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our findings showed that transgalactooligosaccharides, although fully fermented in the large intestine, did not beneficially affect putative risk markers of colon cancer or change significantly the composition of the intestinal microflora. To our knowledge, this is the first placebo-controlled feeding trial of transgalactooligosaccharide fermentation in humans.

Dietary intake, compliance with treatment, fecal sampling, and statistical power
We believe that the lack of effect on the main outcome variables cannot be explained by differences in dietary intake, noncompliance of the volunteers, inappropriate sampling and analysis of feces, or insufficient statistical power. We carefully controlled the energy contents and nutrient compositions of the diets during the study: there were no significant differences between the run-in and intervention periods or between the diets of the 3 groups. We conclude that differences in dietary intakes were negligible throughout the study and could not have affected the outcome.

The oligosaccharides used were dissolved in fruit juices. One of the 3 daily servings was consumed with a hot meal at our department. The other 2 servings were consumed outside the department; however, compliance was near 100% based on inspection of the juice bottles. Therefore, we excluded the possibility that noncompliance of the volunteers affected the results.

We carefully handled and stored the fecal samples that were used for measuring the composition of the intestinal microflora to minimize exposure to oxygen (3134). All fecal samples were transported into an anaerobic cabinet within 5 min of defecation and bifidobacterial counts agreed with those in other fecal flora studies (79, 3537). We conclude that the fecal sampling in our study was done carefully and could not have affected the results in any negative way.

The variance in bifidobacteria in the present study was somewhat lower (4.8%) than we had anticipated (ie, 5%), probably because of the controlled diet. The protocol provided an 80% chance of detecting a 6.0% increase in the amount of bifidobacteria after correction for placebo. We conclude from this a posteriori power analysis that the actual effect of transgalactooligosaccharides on bifidobacteria is probably <6.0%.

For most other outcome variables we were able to detect effects of <=20% (range: 2.8–18.8%) with 80% confidence. The within-subject variation of fecal lactobacilli and bile acids was large (25% and 50%, respectively), as we had anticipated on the basis of previous studies (38). We had no data on the variation of indoles and skatoles seen in other studies; however, it appeared to be high (30% and 40%, respectively). For lactobacilli, bile acids, indoles, and skatoles, a treatment-induced effect of 30–60% was detectable with the present study design. The detectable effects in our study were largely as we had anticipated and we therefore excluded the possibility that an insufficient power influenced our main outcomes.

Apparent fermentability and gaseous response
No transgalactooligomers were recovered from any of the fecal samples. Although it cannot be excluded that transgalactooligosaccharides are degraded to some extent in the stomach or small intestine, we know from in vitro experiments that oligosaccharides are acid-stable and are not hydrolyzed by human intestinal enzymes (N Asp, unpublished observations, 1994). It is thus likely that all the transgalactooligosaccharides in our study were fermented by bacteria in the colon. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing such complete fermentation of transgalactooligosaccharides on the basis of the content of oligomers in the feces.

Bacterial degradation of transgalactooligosaccharides was reflected by the production of breath hydrogen. In the high-TOS group, breath-hydrogen concentrations increased by 130%, whereas there was no increase in the placebo group. There was no significant difference in breath-hydrogen concentrations between the low-TOS and placebo (95% CI: -7.5, 5.5 ppm) groups. Other dietary fibers might have masked the effect in the low-TOS group. We excluded hydrogen responders to lactose from our study, but we did not check for nonhydrogen producers. Possible nonhydrogen producers might have decreased the effect of transgalactooligosaccharides on mean hydrogen concentrations.

Hydrogen production in response to transgalactooligosaccharides was found previously in both rats (3941) and humans (6). Bouhnik et al (9) compared hydrogen excretion in humans after 1 d of transgalactooligosaccharide consumption (10 g/d) with excretion after 7, 14, and 21 d. They observed a lower hydrogen response with time, possibly because the microflora adapted to the substrate.

Bowel habits and stool composition
We did not observe any significant effects of transgalactooligosaccharides on the reported frequency of defecation, daily fecal weight, or fecal dry matter. We did show a significant effect on the nitrogen density of the fecal dry matter with the high-TOS intervention. We hypothesized that transgalactooligosaccharides would increase bacterial proliferation and thereby increase bacterial mass (4244). We found a significant increase of 6.3% in the nitrogen density of the fecal dry matter after the high-TOS intervention, which increased nitrogen excretion by 0.12 g/d after correction for placebo. This increase was likely due to an increase in bacterial mass (37, 42, 4547). The additional 0.12 g N excreted is equivalent to {approx}1.9 g bacterial solids (48) and 9.5 g wet stool (42). The subsequent theoretical changes in fecal wet weight and fecal dry matter due to the increased bacterial mass were probably too small to detect.

Short-chain fatty acids and bile acids in fecal water
Transgalactooligosaccharides did not significantly affect fecal pH or the concentrations of short-chain fatty acids or bile acids in fecal water. Our data do not allow firm conclusions about the effect of transgalactooligosaccharides on the production of short-chain fatty acids in fecal water or on the pH of the colon contents. When hydrogen is produced, most bacteria simultaneously produce short-chain fatty acids (4). Macfarlane et al (49), in an autopsy study of victims of sudden death, found high amounts of short-chain fatty acids in the proximal colon and lower amounts toward the end of the gastrointestinal tract. They attributed this finding to rapid absorption of these acids by the colonic mucosa. As oligosaccharides are rapidly fermented, possibly to a large extent in the proximal colon, neither fecal pH nor the fecal concentration of short-chain fatty acids is a good indicator of saccharolytic activity. Other researchers also failed to show any effects of fermentable carbohydrates on short-chain fatty acids or fecal pH (2, 12, 38, 44, 50). Of the total amount of short-chain fatty acids, 62% was acetate, 19% was propionate, and 10% was butyrate. These proportions are in the same range as reported previously (12, 37, 38, 51) and did not differ significantly between the 3 groups.

We were unable to show any effects of transgalactooligosaccharides on the concentration of bile acids in fecal water. We hypothesized that acidification of the colon contents, as a result of oligosaccharide fermentation, would lead to precipitation of the soluble deconjugated bile acids (5254) and to suppression of the bacterial conversion of primary to secondary bile acids (54, 55). This would lead to lower concentrations of bile acids and a smaller ratio of hydrophobic to hydrophilic bile acids in the aqueous phase of feces, resulting in a bile acid profile with smaller cytolytic capacity (56). With a low-fiber diet, the production of acids by fermentation processes is probably low. The amount of fermentable transgalactooligosaccharides added to the low-fiber diet used in the present study might not have been sufficient to achieve the acidification necessary for the expected effects on bile acids. Because of the high within-subject variation, only large effects on the concentration of bile acids were detectable with our study design, which allowed us to show effects of 60% with 90% confidence and of 50% with 80% confidence. Although such effects have been shown by others, who used different dietary treatments (12, 14, 57), we might have missed possible smaller effects.

Ammonia, indoles, and skatoles in feces
Transgalactooligosaccharides did not lower fecal concentrations of the protein degradation products ammonia, indoles, and skatoles. We hypothesized that transgalactooligosaccharides would decrease protein fermentation products by depressing protein fermentation (44, 58) and by stimulating the use of ammonia as a nitrogen source in bacterial growth (46, 58, 59). We did not observe a decrease in the fecal concentrations of the protein degradation products ammonia, indoles, and skatoles or in the concentration short-chain fatty acids that originate from bacterial breakdown of amino acids (3, 60). Ito et al (8, 61) and Djouzi and Andrieux (39) showed a decrease in one or more of the above-mentioned variables. Ito et al (8) showed a 37.2% decrease in the concentration of indoles after Japanese men consumed a diet supplemented with 2.5 g transgalactooligosaccharides/d for 3 wk. The power of detecting such an effect in our study was 80%.

We chose to use a background diet with a relatively high protein content (16%) to increase the protein fermentation of dietary proteins (62). We thus expected to increase the chance of showing inhibiting effects of transgalactooligosaccharides on protein fermentation. Levrat et al (46) compared the effects of the fermentable carbohydrate inulin on protein fermentation in rats fed high- or moderate-protein diets. They showed that inulin in the diets increased the use of ammonia as a source of bacterial growth. This effect was most prominent when the dietary protein content was moderate and not high. In high-protein diets, the fecal ammonia concentration is determined by uremia and a high flux of urea from plasma to the colon (46, 47). We conclude that transgalactooligosaccharides have no significant effects on protein fermentation when used as a supplement in high-protein diets.

Intestinal microflora
We did not observe any significant effects of transgalactooligosaccharides on the composition of the intestinal microflora in a placebo-controlled feeding trial. It was striking that bifidobacterial counts increased by 4% during the study, independently of the treatment. The differences in increases in bifidobacterial counts between the placebo and transgalactooligosaccharide-supplemented groups were not significant. If a placebo group had not been used, the conclusion would have been that transgalactooligosaccharides selectively increase bifidobacteria in the gut. We cannot explain the increase in bifidobacterial counts throughout the study. The background diets were the same and the fecal samples were collected and analyzed in the same way for all 3 groups. None of the other bacteria counted increased during the study. Moreover, test bacteria were analyzed every week and showed no tendency to rise during the study. We hypothesized that the bifidobacteria might have adapted to the high-protein, low-fiber background diet. It is known from animal studies that sudden extreme changes in diet can have profound effects on the composition of the intestinal microflora. The flora will adapt gradually to the changes in substrate supply (63). There was a nonsignificant rise in lactobacilli in both the low-TOS (by 14%) and high-TOS (by 10%) groups, which we were unable to detect because of the large variation. Other researchers have shown that certain nondigestible oligosaccharides selectively stimulate the growth of bifidobacteria in the large intestine. In many of these studies, linear study designs were used and measurements were made before and after the treatment (8, 9, 35, 37). Our results indicate the importance of a placebo treatment to exclude the possible effects of time, placebo, and unknown factors.

Our volunteers were healthy and were not necessarily selected for having low bifidobacterial counts. Consumption of the transgalactooligosaccharide-supplemented high-protein, low-fiber diets did not significantly effect the composition of the intestinal flora. However, it may be that diet-induced changes on intestinal microflora are unlikely to occur when there is a stable and healthy balance of the microfloral population in the intestine.

Conclusions
We conclude that transgalactooligosaccharides, as a supplement to a Western diet, are completely fermented in the colon of healthy individuals, but do not beneficially affect the composition of the intestinal microflora or the putative risk markers of colon cancer. We believe that the lack of such an effect on the main outcome variables of our study (ie, composition and activity of the intestinal microflora) was not explained by differences in dietary intakes, noncompliance of the volunteers, inappropriate sampling of feces, or insufficient statistical power. It is possible that transgalactooligosaccharides might have such a beneficial effect in other study populations (eg, persons with low bifidobacterial counts) or when used as a supplement to a background diet different from the one we used in this study.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are indebted to the volunteers for participating in the study and are most grateful to Els Siebelink and Karin Roosemalen for coordinating the kitchen work; to Rut Luttikhuis, Wytske Nutma, Henny Rexwinkel, Olga van Aalst, Mieke Beemsterboer, and Jannet Grave for their help in conducting the experiment; to Joke Barendse for medical care; and to Alfred Bonte, Janny Bos, Mark Dignum, Robert Hovenier, Truus Kosmeyer, Frans Schouten, Albert Tangerman, and Hermien Tolboom for helping with the analyses.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 From the Division of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology, Wageningen Agricultural University, Netherlands; the Division of Food Science, Wageningen Agricultural University, Netherlands; and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital St Radboud, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

2 Supported by the Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fishery; the Dutch Dairy Foundation on Nutrition and Health; AVEBE, Netherlands; Nutreco, Netherlands; and ORAFTI, Belgium.

3 Address reprint requests to MS Alles, Friesland Coberco Research, Harderwijkerstraat 41006, PO Box 87, NL-7400 AB Deventer, Netherlands. E-mail: ms.alles{at}fcdf.nl.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Loo JV, Coussement P, De Leenheer L, Hoebregs H, Smits G. On the presence of inulin and oligofructose as natural ingredients in the western diet. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1995;35:525–52.[Medline]
  2. Alles MS, Hautvast JGAJ, Nagengast FM, Hartemink R, Van Laere MKJ, Jansen JBMJ. Fate of fructo-oligosaccharides in the human intestine. Br J Nutr 1996;76:211–21.[Medline]
  3. MacFarlane GT, MacFarlane S. Factors affecting fermentation reactions in the large bowel. Proc Nutr Soc 1993;52:367–73.[Medline]
  4. Cummings JH, MacFarlane GT. The control and consequences of bacterial fermentation in the human colon. J Appl Bacteriol 1991;70:443–59.[Medline]
  5. Burvall A, Asp N, Dahlqvist A. Oligosaccharide formation during hydrolysis of lactose with "Saccharomyces lactis" lactase—part 3: digestibility by human intestinal enzymes in vitro. Food Chem 1980;5:189–94.
  6. Tanaka R, Takayama H, Mortomi M, et al. Effects of administration of TOS and Bifidobacterium breve 4006 on the human fecal flora. Bifidobacteria Microflora 1983;2:17–24.
  7. Ito M, Deguchi Y, Miyamori A, et al. Effects of administration of galactooligosaccharides on the human faecal microflora, stool weight and abdominal sensation. Microb Ecol Health Dis 1990;3:285–92.
  8. Ito M, Deguchi Y, Matsumoto K, Kimura M, Onodera N, Yajima T. Influence of galactooligosaccharides on the human fecal microflora. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 1993;39:635–40.
  9. Bouhnik Y, Flourié B, D'Agay-Abensour L, et al. Administration of transgalactooligosaccharides increases fecal bifidobacteria and modifies colonic fermentation metabolism in healthy humans. J Nutr 1997;127:444–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Modler HW, McKellar RC, Yaguchi M. Bifidobacteria and bifidogenic factors. Can Inst Food Sci Technol J 1990;23:29–41.
  11. Gibson GR, Wang X. Regulatory effects of bifidobacteria on the growth of other colonic bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol 1994;77:412–20.[Medline]
  12. Munster IPV, Tangerman A, Nagengast FM. Effect of resistant starch on colonic fermentation, bile acid metabolism, and mucosal proliferation. Dig Dis Sci 1994;39:834–42.[Medline]
  13. Rafter JJ, Eng VWS, Furrer R, Medline A, Bruce WR. Effects of calcium and pH on the mucosal damage produced by deoxycholic acid in the rat colon. Gut 1986;27:1320–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Nagengast FM, Hectors MPC, Buys WAM, Tongeren JHMV. Inhibition of secondary bile acid formation in the large intestine by lactulose in healthy subjects of two different age groups. Eur J Clin Invest 1988;18:56–61.[Medline]
  15. Hofmann AF, Mysels KJ. Bile acid solubility and precipitation in vitro and in vivo: the role of conjugation, pH, and Ca2+ ions. J Lipid Res 1992;33:617–26.[Abstract]
  16. Cummings JH, Bingham SA, Heaton KW, Eastwood MA. Fecal weight, colon cancer risk, and dietary intake of nonstarch polysaccharides (dietary fibre). Gastroenterology 1992;103:1783–9.[Medline]
  17. Reddy BS, Engle A, Simi B, Goldman M. Effect of dietary fiber on colonic bacterial enzymes and bile acids in relation to colon cancer. Gastroenterology 1992;102:1475–82.[Medline]
  18. Lapré JA, van der Meer R. Diet-induced increase of colonic bile acids stimulates lytic activity of fecal water and proliferation of colonic cells. Carcinogenesis 1992;13:41–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Clinton SK, Bostwick DG, Olson LM, Mangian HJ, Visek WJ. Effects of ammonium acetate and solium cholate on N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine-induced colon carcinogenesis of rats. Cancer Res 1988;48:3035–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Prior RL, Topping DC, Visek WJ. Metabolism of isolated chick small intestinal cell. Effects of ammonia and various salts. Biochemistry 1974;13:178–83.[Medline]
  21. Lin H, Visek WJ. Large intestinal pH and ammonia in rats: dietary fat and protein interactions. J Nutr 1991;121:832–43.
  22. Feunekes GIJ, van Staveren WA, Graveland F, de Vos J, Burema J. Reproducibility of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess the intake of fats and cholesterol in the Netherlands. Int J Food Sci Nutr 1995;46:117–23.[Medline]
  23. Feunekes GIJ, Van Staveren WA, De Vries JHM, Burema J, Hautvast JGAJ. Relative and biomarker-based validity of a food-frequency questionnaire estimating the intake of fats and cholesterol. Am J Clin Nutr 1993;58:489–96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Anonymous. Nevo table 1996. Nederlands voedingsstoffenbestand. (Dutch nutrient database.) The Hague: The Netherlands Bureau for Food and Nutrition Education, 1996 (in Dutch).
  25. Tangerman A, Nagengast FM. A gas chromatographic analysis of fecal short-chain fatty acids, using the direct injection method. Anal Biochem 1996;236:1–8.[Medline]
  26. Glatz JFC, Schouten FJM, den Engelsman G, Katan MB. Quantitative determination of neutral steroids and bile acids in human feces by capillary gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of total fecal bile acids. In: Beynen AC, Geelen MJH, Katan MB, Schouten JA, eds. Cholesterol metabolism in health and disease: studies in the Netherlands. 1st ed. Wageningen: Ponsen & Looijen, 1985:103–12.
  27. Wilkins CK. Analysis of indole and skatole in porcine gut contents. Int J Food Sci Technol 1990;25:313–7.
  28. Hartemink R, Domenech VR, Rombouts FM. LAMVAB—a new selective medium for the isolation of lactobacilli from faeces. J Microbiol Methods 1997;29:77–84.
  29. Hartemink R, Kok BJ, Weenk GH, Rombouts FM. Raffinose-Bifidobacterium (RB) agar, a new selective medium for bifidobacteria. J Microbiol Methods 1996;27:33–43.
  30. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. 8th ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1989.
  31. Bollongue J. Technical problems related to in vitro study of colon flora. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997;32:14–6.
  32. Haffejee IE. Cow's milk-based formula, human milk, and soya feeds in acute infantile diarrhea: a therapeutic trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1990;10:193–8.[Medline]
  33. Alles MS. The effect of non-digestible oligosaccharides on composition and activity of the intestinal microflora. In: Hartemink R, ed. Proceedings of the international symposium on non-digestible oligosaccharides: healthy food for the colon? Wageningen, Netherlands: Graduate Schools VLAG and WIAS, 1997:79–89.
  34. Crowther JS. Transport and storage of faeces for bacteriological examination. J Appl Bacteriol 1971;34:477–83.[Medline]
  35. Buddington RK, Williams CH, Chen SC, Witherly SA. Dietary supplement of neosugar alters the fecal flora and decreases activities of some reductive enzymes in human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;63:709–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Guerin-Danan C, Chabanet C, Pedone C, et al. Milk fermented with yogurt cultures and Lactobacillus casei compared with yogurt and gelled milk: influence on intestinal microflora in healthy infants. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67:111–7.[Abstract]
  37. Gibson GR, Beatty ER, Wang X, Cummings JH. Selective stimulation of bifidobacteria in the human colon by oligofructose and inulin. Gastroenterology 1995;108:975–82.[Medline]
  38. Heijnen M-LA, van Amelsvoort JMM, Deurenberg P, Beynen AC. Limited effect of consumption of uncooked (RS2) or retrograded (RS3) resistant starch on putative risk factors for colon cancer in healthy men. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67:322–31.[Abstract]
  39. Djouzi Z, Andrieux C. Compared effects of three oligosaccharides on metabolism of intestinal microflora in rats inoculated with a human faecal flora. Br J Nutr 1997;78:313–24.[Medline]
  40. Meslin JC, Andrieux C, Sakata T, et al. Effects of galactooligosaccharides and bacterial status on mucin distribution in mucosa and on large intestine fermentation in rats. Br J Nutr 1993;69:903–12.[Medline]
  41. Campbell JM, Fahey GC, Wolf BW. Selected indigestible oligosaccharides affect large bowel mass, cecal and fecal short-chain fatty acids, pH and microflora in rats. J Nutr 1997;127:130–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Stephen AM, Cummings JH. The microbial contribution to human faecal mass. J Med Microbiol 1980;1345:45–56.
  43. Hill MJ. Bacterial fermentation of complex carbohydrate in the human colon. Eur J Cancer Prev 1995;4:353–8.[Medline]
  44. Alles MS, Katan MB, Salemans JMJI, et al. Bacterial fermentation of fructooligosaccharides and of resistant starch in patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;66:1286–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Mortensen PB. The effect of oral-administered lactulose on colonic nitrogen metabolism and excretion. Hepatology 1992;16:1350–6.[Medline]
  46. Levrat M, Rémésy C, Demigné C. Influence of inulin on urea and ammonia nitrogen fluxes in the rat cecum: consequences on nitrogen excretion. J Nutr Biochem 1993;4:351–6.
  47. Younes H, Garleb K, Behr S, Rémésy C, Demigné C. Fermentable fibers or oligosaccharides reduce urinary nitrogen excretion by increasing urea disposal in the rat cecum. J Nutr 1995;125:1010–6.
  48. Stanier RY, Adelber EA, Ingraham JL. General microbiology. 4th ed. London: MacMillan, 1979.
  49. Macfarlane GT, Gibson GR, Cummings JH. Comparison of fermentation reactions in different regions of the human colon. J Appl Bacteriol 1992;72:57–64.[Medline]
  50. Philips J, Muir JG, Birkett A, et al. Effect of resistant starch on fecal bulk and fermentation-dependent events in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62:121–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Cummings JH. Short chain fatty acids in the human colon. Gut 1981;22:763–79.[Free Full Text]
  52. Fini A, Roda A. Chemical properties of bile acids. IV. Acidity constants of glycine-conjugated bile acids. J Lipid Res 1987;28:755–9.[Abstract]
  53. Bruce WR. Recent hypotheses for the origin of colon cancer. Cancer Res 1987;47:4237–42.[Free Full Text]
  54. Munster IPV, Nagengast FM. The role of carbohydrate fermentation in colon cancer prevention. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;200:80–6.
  55. Christl SU, Bartram HP, Paul A, Kelber E, Scheppach W, Kasper H. Bile acid metabolism by colonic bacteria in continuous culture: effects of starch and pH. Ann Nutr Metab 1997;41:45–51.[Medline]
  56. Lapré JA, Vries HTD, Termont DSML, Kleibeuker JH, Vries EGEd, Meer RVD. Mechanism of the protective effect of supplemental dietary calcium on cytolytic activity of fecal water. Cancer Res 1993;53:248–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. van Faassen A, van den Bogaard AE, Hazen MJ, Geerlings P, Hermus RJ, Janknegt RA. Effects of calcisorb on fecal bile acids and fatty acids in human volunteers. Dig Dis Sci 1996;41:2319–25.[Medline]
  58. Mortensen PB, Holtug K, Bonnén H, Clausen MR. The degradation of amino acids, proteins, and blood to short-chain fatty acids in colon is prevented by lactulose. Gastroenterology 1990;98:353–60.[Medline]
  59. Birkett A, Muir J, Phillips J, Jones G, O'Dea K. Resistant starch lowers fecal concentrations of ammonia and phenols in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;63:766–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Rasmussen HS, Holtug K, Mortensen PB. Degradation of amino acids to short-chain fatty acids in humans. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988;23:178–82.[Medline]
  61. Ito M, Kimura M, Deguchi Y, Miyamori-Watabe A, Tajima T, Kan T. Effects of transgalactosylated disaccharides on the human intestinal microflora and their metabolism. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 1993;39:279–88.
  62. Gibson JA, Sladen GE, Dawson AM. Protein absorption and ammonia production: the effects of dietary protein and removal of the colon. Br J Nutr 1976;35:61–5.[Medline]
  63. Koopman J. Kolonisatie resistentie van het maagdarmkanaal. (Colonic resistance of the alimentary tract.) Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 1984;109:1017–26 (in Dutch).[Medline]
Received for publication June 30, 1998. Accepted for publication November 4, 1998.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
F. Depeint, G. Tzortzis, J. Vulevic, K. I'Anson, and G. R Gibson
Prebiotic evaluation of a novel galactooligosaccharide mixture produced by the enzymatic activity of Bifidobacterium bifidum NCIMB 41171, in healthy humans: a randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled intervention study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 785 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
P. Biggs, C. M. Parsons, and G. C. Fahey
The Effects of Several Oligosaccharides on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibilities, and Cecal Microbial Populations in Young Chicks
Poult. Sci., November 1, 2007; 86(11): 2327 - 2336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
P. Biggs and C. M. Parsons
The Effects of Several Oligosaccharides on True Amino Acid Digestibility and True Metabolizable Energy in Cecectomized and Conventional Roosters
Poult. Sci., June 1, 2007; 86(6): 1161 - 1165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
J. Snart, R. Bibiloni, T. Grayson, C. Lay, H. Zhang, G. E. Allison, J. K. Laverdiere, F. Temelli, T. Vasanthan, R. Bell, et al.
Supplementation of the diet with high-viscosity Beta-glucan results in enrichment for lactobacilli in the rat cecum.
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 1, 2006; 72(3): 1925 - 1931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
K. P. Geboes, V. De Preter, A. Luypaerts, B. Bammens, P. Evenepoel, Y. Ghoos, P. Rutgeerts, and K. Verbeke
Validation of lactose[15N,15N]ureide as a tool to study colonic nitrogen metabolism
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): G994 - G999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
Y. Bouhnik, L. Raskine, G. Simoneau, E. Vicaut, C. Neut, B. Flourie, F. Brouns, and F. R Bornet
The capacity of nondigestible carbohydrates to stimulate fecal bifidobacteria in healthy humans: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-response relation study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2004; 80(6): 1658 - 1664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
G. W. Tannock, K. Munro, R. Bibiloni, M. A. Simon, P. Hargreaves, P. Gopal, H. Harmsen, and G. Welling
Impact of Consumption of Oligosaccharide-Containing Biscuits on the Fecal Microbiota of Humans
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., April 1, 2004; 70(4): 2129 - 2136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. R. Smiricky-Tjardes, C. M. Grieshop, E. A. Flickinger, L. L. Bauer, and G. C. Fahey Jr.
Dietary galactooligosaccharides affect ileal and total-tract nutrient digestibility, ileal and fecal bacterial concentrations, and ileal fermentative characteristics of growing pigs
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2003; 81(10): 2535 - 2545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. Duggan, J. Gannon, and W A. Walker
Protective nutrients and functional foods for the gastrointestinal tract
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2002; 75(5): 789 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
R. M. Satokari, E. E. Vaughan, A. D. L. Akkermans, M. Saarela, and W. M. de Vos
Bifidobacterial Diversity in Human Feces Detected by Genus-Specific PCR and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2001; 67(2): 504 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. W Rizkalla, J. Luo, M. Kabir, A. Chevalier, N. Pacher, and G. Slama
Chronic consumption of fresh but not heated yogurt improves breath-hydrogen status and short-chain fatty acid profiles: a controlled study in healthy men with or without lactose maldigestion
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2000; 72(6): 1474 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alles, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Hautvast, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alles, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Hautvast, J. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Alles, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Hautvast, J. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS