AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilmore, J. H
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilmore, J. H
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wilmore, J. H
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, C.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 70, No. 3, 346-352, September 1999
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communications

Alterations in body weight and composition consequent to 20 wk of endurance training: the HERITAGE Family Study1,2,3

Jack H Wilmore, Jean-Pierre Després, Philip R Stanforth, Stephen Mandel, Treva Rice, Jacques Gagnon, Arthur S Leon, DC Rao, James S Skinner and Claude Bouchard

1 From the Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station; the Physical Activity Sciences Laboratory, Laval University, Québec City, Canada; The Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis; the School of Kinesiology and Leisure Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; and the Department of Kinesiology, Indiana University, Bloomington.

2 Supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants HL45670 (to CB), HL47323 (to ASL), HL47317 (to DCR), HL47327 (to JSS), and HL47321 (to JHW); in part by the Donald B Brown Research Chair in Obesity funded by the Medical Research Council and Roche Canada (CB); by NIH grant MO1-RR000400 to the University of Minnesota Clinical Research Center; and in part by the Henry L Taylor Professorship in Exercise Science and Health Enhancement (ASL).

3 Address reprint requests to JH Wilmore, Department of Health and Kinesiology, 158 Read Building, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4243. E-mail: jwilmore{at}tamu.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Obesity is a major public health problem in the United States. The role of physical activity and formal exercise in controlling body weight has not been clearly determined.

Objective: This study determined the magnitude of change in body weight and composition across sex, race, and age in response to 20 wk of endurance training.

Design: Men and women (n = 557) of various ages (16–65 y) and 2 races (black and white) exercised on cycle ergometers 3 d/wk for a total of 60 exercise sessions starting at 55% of maximal oxygen consumption (O2max) for 30 min/session and building to 75% of O2max for 50 min/session, where it was maintatined during the last 6 wk. Skinfold-thickness measurements, circumferences, body composition (by hydrostatic weighing), and body fat distribution (by computed tomography scan at L4-L5 and the waist-hip ratio) were determined before and after training.

Results: All skinfold-thickness and circumference measures, waist-hip ratio, body mass index, total body mass, fat mass, percentage body fat, and computed tomography scan measures of total, subcutaneous, and visceral abdominal fat decreased with training, whereas total body density and fat-free mass increased. These changes were significant, but small. There were several differences in training response by sex and race, but not by age.

Conclusions: A short-term exercise intervention can induce favorable changes in body composition, but the magnitude of these changes is of limited biological significance. Increasing physical activity likely has a major effect on body-composition and fat distribution characteristics only when it is of a greater magnitude and sustained for much longer periods

Key Words: Body composition • fat mass • fat-free mass • visceral fat • skinfold thicknesses • endurance training • weight control • obesity • HERITAGE Family Study


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In 1990, the US Department of Health and Human Services set a goal of reducing the prevalence of overweight in the United States to not >20% in people aged >=20 y, and not >15% in adolescents 12–19 y of age by the year 2000 (1). These goals were based on an existing prevalence of overweight in the US adult population of 25.4%, with overweight being defined at that time as a body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) >=27.8 for men and >=27.3 for women [second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II) 1976–1980 (2)]. In 1994, Kuczmarski et al (2) reported that the prevalence of obesity in the US, using these same BMI standards, had increased to 33.4% on the basis of initial data from NHANES III obtained between 1988 and 1991. More recent data from NHANES III, obtained between 1988 and 1994, indicate that the prevalence of obesity has increased to nearly 35% for US adults (3). Even more remarkable, the prevalence of overweight in Hispanic women and non-Hispanic black women was 46.7% and 48.6%, respectively (2). Similar data were reported for children and adolescents (4). Of great significance is the fact that the prevalence data remained very consistent between 1960 and 1980, with this big increase occurring after 1980—a trend that is consistent across age, sex, and race.

These data represent a population trend of positive energy balance, because there was an increase in the mean body weight of 3.6 kg between NHANES II (1976–1980) and NHANES III (1988–1991) for men and women (2). This weight gain is attributed to an increasingly sedentary lifestyle, a failure to increase energy expenditure to match energy intake, or both. Less clear, however, is the role that a formal exercise-training program plays in promoting weight loss and the loss of body fat in a previously sedentary population. Several studies have shown losses in total body mass of >10 kg as a result of formal exercise training without dieting over a period <=20 wk (5, 6), whereas others have reported no weight loss with 12 wk of exercise training without dieting (7), or even a weight gain with 12 mo of exercise training without dieting (8). In a recent review of exercise training and weight loss, Wilmore (9) took the average changes in body weight per week from several hundred studies and concluded that the average weight loss over 12 mo of exercise training would amount to only 3.2 kg.

Many of the studies that have investigated the effect of exercise training on weight loss were not well controlled. Some used a moderately active population and most had a small sample size, the latter being heavily influenced by individual variability in response to the exercise stimulus. Consequently, it is not entirely clear how effective exercise training is in free-living people in reducing body weight and favorably altering body composition. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a highly controlled exercise-training stimulus over a period of 20 wk on body weight and composition in a previously sedentary population of >500 participants. These data were obtained as a part of the HERITAGE Family Study.

The HERITAGE Family Study is a large multicenter clinical trial investigating the possible genetic basis for the variability in the responses of physiologic measures and risk factors for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus to endurance exercise training. Details of the aims, experimental design, and measurement protocols of the HERITAGE Family Study were presented in detail in a previous publication (10).


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects
Subjects were recruited from 4 clinical centers [Indiana University (formerly at Arizona State University), Laval University in Québec, the University of Minnesota at Minneapolis, and the University of Texas at Austin]. The Data Coordinating Center is located at Washington University Medical School, St Louis. The HERITAGE Family Study subject population consists of families, including the natural fathers and mothers (less than or equal to65 y of age) and >=3 offspring aged >=17 y of age for white families, and the natural parents and >=2 offspring aged >=17 y of age for black families. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were summarized in detail in a prior publication (10). Specific criteria of importance to this paper included the fact that participants were sedentary at baseline and had a BMI <40. Several participants with BMIs slightly in excess of this value were included in the study if they were considered by the supervising physician at one of the Clinical Centers to be relatively healthy and able to exercise at the intensities and for the durations required in the study. A total of 744 participants finished all HERITAGE testing and training protocols. Of this total, 557 had complete body-composition data and constitute the sample of this study. Their characteristics are presented in Table 1Go. The study protocol had been previously approved by each clinical center's institutional review board and informed consent was obtained from each participant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Physical characteristics of the HERITAGE Family Study subjects1
 
Experimental design
Participants were screened by the clinical center's supervising physician and staff; only those who were previously sedentary, free of preexisting disease, and not taking any medications that would affect any of the outcome variables were allowed to enter the study (10). The following comprehensive battery of tests was administered before subjects started the training program: health, medical, and nutrition questionnaires; maximal and submaximal exercise tests; blood tests for lipids, lipoproteins, and sex steroids; an intravenous-glucose-tolerance test; measurement of resting blood pressure; and body-composition tests. After the initial battery of tests, subjects completed a 20-wk endurance-training program (3 d/wk for a total of 60 exercise sessions) on cycle ergometers that were computer controlled to maintain the participants' heart rates at fixed percentages of their aerobic capacity (O2max). The training program started at 55% of O2max for 30 min/session and gradually increased to 75% of O2max for 50 min/session, where it was maintained during the last 6 wk of training. The test battery was administered again at the conclusion of the training program.

For the body-composition assessment, participants reported to the laboratory >=4 h after eating, having performed no formal exercise in the previous 4 h. The entire anthropometric and body-composition test battery was administered on a single day, except for the computed tomography scan for abdominal visceral adipose tissue, which was usually scheduled for a different day. Participants changed into their bathing suits and voided their bladders and evacuated their bowels, if necessary. Height and weight, hip and waist circumferences, subcutaneous skinfold thicknesses, residual lung volume, and underwater weight were measured. Identical measurement protocols were used pre- and posttraining.

Body-composition assessment and anthropometric methods
Height and body weight were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm and 0.1 kg, respectively, by using a balance-beam scale and a stadiometer. Waist and hip circumferences were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm by using an anthropometric fiber glass tape (model 17-1340-2; Grafco Fiberglass Tape, Grahams-Fields, Inc, Hauppauge, NY). Skinfold-thickness measurements were then obtained at the subscapular, biceps, triceps, midaxillary, suprailiac, abdominal, thigh, and calf skinfold sites by using a Harpenden skinfold caliper (no. 03496-001; Quinton Instruments Co, Bothell, WA). The height, weight, circumference, and skinfold-thickness measurements were taken in accordance with the procedures recommended by Lohman et al (11). All measurements were taken in duplicate. A third measurement was taken if the first 2 measurements differed by a predetermined amount: height by >0.5 cm, weight by >200 g, circumference by >1.0 cm, and skinfold thicknesses by >1.0 mm. When it was necessary to take a third measurement, the 2 closest measurements were averaged. When the third measurement fell equally between the first 2, all 3 were averaged.

Hydrostatic weighing was used to assess body density according to the method of Behnke and Wilmore (12). The subjects was instructed to exhale completely to the point of residual lung volume, at which point a load cell interfaced with a computer was used to obtain the underwater measurement of body weight. Ten measurements were obtained and the 3 highest values were averaged. Residual lung volume was assessed out of the water in a seated position by using the oxygen-dilution principle, as described by Wilmore (13) and modified by Wilmore et al (14), at the Indiana, Minnesota, and Texas clinical centers. A minimum of 2 measurements were obtained and a third measurement was taken if the first 2 differed by >150 mL. An average of the first 2 trials, or the 2 closest trials, was used in the correction for the residual lung volume in the estimation of body density. At the Québec clinical center, residual lung volume was measured in the water by using the helium-dilution technique (15, 16). Percentage body fat was estimated from body density by using the equations of Siri (17) for white men, Lohman (18) for white women, Schutte et al (19) for black men, and Ortiz et al (20) for black women.

Computed tomography methods
Computed axial tomography (CT) was used to provide an estimate of abdominal visceral adipose tissue at the level of the vertebral disc between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae (L4-L5 space) by using either a Siemens Somatom DRH scanner (Erlangen, Germany) or a General Electric model CT 9800 scanner (Waukesha, WI). The general procedures described by Sjöström et al (21) were followed. Participants were clothed only in loose-fitting gowns because restrictive clothing had been determined to alter the distribution of fat. They were examined in the supine position, with their arms stretched above their heads. One scan was performed by using a lateral view radiograph of the skeleton (abdominal area) to establish the position of the L4-L5 space within 1.0 mm. A second scan was then performed at the L4-L5 space (at 125 kV and with a slice thickness of 8 mm). A single, standardized calibration unit was developed by using lard carefully sealed within a plexiglass cylinder. This unit was transported to each clinical center every 6–12 mo to ensure the reliability and consistency of the method between the 4 clinical centers. Pre- and posttraining measurements were conducted at the same time by the same technician to minimize technical error. Total and visceral fat areas were calculated by delineating those areas with an electronic graph pen and then computing the adipose tissue surfaces by using an attenuation range of -30 to -190 Hounsfield units. The subcutaneous abdominal fat area was calculated as the difference between the total and visceral fat areas.

Quality-assurance, quality-control, and statistical methods
Important quality-assurance and quality-control procedures were instituted across all 4 clinical centers, as described by Gagnon et al (22). One or 2 staff members at each clinical center was responsible for all anthropometric, hydrostatic weighing, residual volume, and CT scan measurements, and the same staff member was responsible for both pre- and posttraining measurements on any given subject. A detailed "Manual of Procedures" (MOP) was developed, and staff were required to review, every 6 mo, those sections of the MOP for which they were responsible. Finally, the reproducibility of all anthropometric and body-composition measurements were published (23).

All data were analyzed by using the SAS statistical package (version 6.12; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Data are expressed as means ± SDs except where noted otherwise. A matched-pair t test was used to determine the significance of differences between pre- and posttraining data. A multiple-testing analysis of variance was implemented by using the general linear models procedure to determine the influence of sex, age (children versus parents), and race (blacks versus whites) on the magnitude of change in any given variable. Statistical significance was established at the 0.05 level.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The reproducibility of measurements in this study was very high, as was recently reported (23). This was determined in a separate substudy of 60 participants who were representative of the characteristics of the HERITAGE Family Study subject population for skinfold-thickness measurements, circumferences, height, weight, hydrostatic weight, residual lung volume, and body density, from which percentage body fat, fat mass, and fat-free mass were determined. Participants in this substudy were tested 3 times on separate days under identical conditions over a 3-wk period. Intraclass correlations generally ranged from 0.95 to 0.99 for all variables across the 4 clinical centers. Technical errors and CVs within subjects were also low.

The pre- and posttraining data for the skinfold-thickness variables are presented in Table 2Go. There was a small but significant decrease in skinfold thickness at each of the 8 sites and for the sum of all 8 sites in the total sample. For the 8 sites combined there was a 4.2% decrease posttraining. The largest changes were at the biceps (-5.5%) and suprailiac (-7.1%) sites and the smallest changes were at the calf (-3.0%) and subscapular (-2.3%) sites. The absolute change was independent of the initial size of a given site. When these data were analyzed by sex, race, and age, women and blacks showed no changes at the subscapular site, and blacks showed no change at the midaxillary, abdominal, and calf sites. Whites had greater changes than blacks at the midaxillary and abdominal sites and for the sum of all skinfold-thickness sites. Men had greater changes than women at the suprailiac and abdominal sites, and lesser changes at the thigh site. There was a sex-by-race interaction at the abdominal site, with white women losing 1.0 cm and black women gaining 0.5 cm. Age did not affect the magnitude of change.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Changes in skinfold-thickness measurements pre- to posttraining
 
Pre- and posttraining data for weight and the body-composition variables are presented in Table 3Go. There were small but significant decreases in body weight, BMI, fat mass, and percentage body fat and small but significant increases in whole-body density and fat-free mass for the total sample. Fat mass and percentage fat had the greatest pre- to posttraining changes (>3%). When analyzed by group, women, blacks, and children did not lose weight. Men lost a greater amount of fat than women, but there were no other sex, race, or age differences.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Changes in weight, BMI, and body composition pre- to posttraining
 
The pre- to posttraining data for the CT-determined changes in fat distribution and the surrogate measure of fat distribution, waist-hip ratio, are shown in Table 4Go. There were significant decreases in all measures of fat distribution for the total sample, although the magnitude of the change was generally small. The largest change was in the abdominal visceral adipose tissue (5.9%) and the smallest change was in the waist-hip ratio (0.6%). When analyzed by group, blacks showed no changes in hip circumference or waist-hip ratio. Men had a greater change than did women in abdominal visceral fat, and white women had a greater change (1.2 mm) than black women (0.3 mm) in waist circumference.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Changes in abdominal subcutaneous, visceral, and total fat (L4-L5), and hip and waist circumferences and waist-hip ratio pre- to posttraining
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The HERITAGE Family Study is the largest, well-controlled training study of its kind. Even when the total study population is divided into groups by age, sex, and race, there are still substantial numbers of participants per group. The magnitude of the change in each of the variables we examined was relatively small but significant. In 2 reviews, Wilmore (9, 24) estimated from the existing literature that the average change with a typical exercise intervention over a 6-mo period would be a loss of 1.6 kg total body mass, 2.6 kg fat mass, and 2.9% in percentage body fat, and a gain of 1.0 kg fat-free mass. The changes in the HERITAGE Family Study fall short of these expected changes, even when you convert 26-wk data (6 mo) to 20-wk data. The reasons for this are not entirely obvious.

One of the most unique features of the HERITAGE Family Study is the highly controlled exercise intervention. Each exercise session was monitored by an exercise technician and by computer. For each session, the computer obtained data on exercise heart rate and power output for each minute of exercise. This allowed careful documentation of the total work performed each day, and the grand total for all 60 training sessions. Although there was great variability between participants, the mean power output for all participants over the 60 exercise sessions was {approx}75 W, which is approximately the equivalent of 0.90 L O2 energy expenditure/min above resting levels. Over 60 exercise sessions, at an average of 42 min/session, an average of 2268 L O2 would have been expended ({approx}11340 kcal or 47450 kJ). The expected loss in fat mass would be {approx}1.3 kg, assuming no change in energy intake or in the other components of energy expenditure such as resting metabolic rate (RMR), the thermic effect of food, or spontaneous physical activity. We recently showed that there was no change in RMR after the 20-wk training program (25). Because the actual change in fat mass was only 0.7 kg, there was likely either a compensatory increase in energy intake, a decrease in spontaneous physical activity, or both. Neither was measured in this study, and few studies have attempted to measure these 2 variables because of the imprecision of the available techniques and the time and cost associated with these measures.

The changes in the abdominal visceral fat were small but important from a health perspective (26). Although there is not extensive literature on exercise training and changes in abdominal visceral fat, the results from this study are consistent with those of others and are consistent with expectations based on the loss of total body fat from exercise alone or in combination with diet (27). Both before and after training, men had substantially more abdominal visceral fat than women, whites had more than blacks, and parents had about twice as much as their children. These findings are consistent with those in the research literature (2830).

Women lost less subcutaneous (skinfold) fat than men at 3 of 8 sites, less abdominal visceral fat, and less total fat, which is consistent with the literature (31). It is possible that women are more resistant to weight loss with exercise. In a recent study conducted in our laboratory (HK Byrne and JH Wilmore, unpublished observations, 1997), previously sedentary, moderately overweight women placed on an intense, 6-mo, resistance-training program actually gained total mass and fat mass, even though they were instructed to maintain the same diet and activity pattern that they had before starting the study, other than the formal exercise training during the experimental period. The initial percentage body fat values of these women were similar to those in the present HERITAGE Family Study. It is possible that the moderately overweight women in these 2 studies were restrained eaters before starting the exercise program and felt free to eat whatever they wanted to (ie, unrestrained) once they began formal exercise training.

In summary, the 20-wk endurance exercise-training program of the HERITAGE Family Study resulted in small but significant changes in body composition. It appears that formal exercise training of limited duration, in and of itself, is not a major factor in weight loss, or more specifically, fat loss in free-living adults. It is becoming increasingly clear from the scientific literature that formal exercise training, or simply a physically active lifestyle, makes its major contribution by preventing weight gain, but not by inducing weight loss for those individuals who already have an established pattern of energy intake and expenditure that leads to an overweight or obese state (24). It is also useful as an adjunct to dieting for management of obesity and in helping to maintain lost weight and preserving fat-free mass. Furthermore, long-term exercise habits and larger energy expenditures per exercise session should lead to greater changes in body composition and fat distribution.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank all of the coprincipal investigators, investigators, coinvestigators, local project coordinators, research assistants, and laboratory technicians [see Bouchard et al (10)]. Finally, the HERITAGE consortium is very thankful to those hard-working families whose participation has made these data possible.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Public Health Service. Healthy people 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1990. [US DHHS publication (PHS) 90-50212.]
  2. Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Campbell SM, Johnson CL. Increasing prevalence of overweight among US adults: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1960–1991. JAMA 1994;272:205–11.[Abstract]
  3. Kuczmarski RJ, Carroll MD, Flegal KM, Troiano RP. Varying body mass index cutoff points to describe overweight prevalence among U.S. adults: NHANES III (1988–1994). Obes Res 1997;5:542–8.[Medline]
  4. Troiano RP, Flegal KM, Kuczmarski RJ, Campbell SM, Johnson CL. Overweight prevalence and trends for children and adolescents: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1963 to 1991. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995;149:1085–91.[Abstract]
  5. Hadjiolova I, Mintcheva L, Dunev S, Daleva M, Handjiev S, Balabanski L. Physical working capacity in obese women after an exercise programme for body weight reduction. Int J Obes 1982;6:405–10.[Medline]
  6. Lee L, Kumar S, Leong LC. The impact of five-month basic military training on the body weight and body fat of 197 moderately to severely obese Singaporean males aged 17 to 19 years. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1994;18:105–9.[Medline]
  7. Hagan RD, Upton SJ, Wong L, Whittam J. The effects of aerobic conditioning and/or caloric restriction in overweight men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1986;18:87–94.[Medline]
  8. Hardman AE, Jones PRM, Norgan NG, Hudson A. Brisk walking improves endurance fitness without changing body fatness in previously sedentary women. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992;65:354–9.
  9. Wilmore JH. Increasing physical activity: alterations in body mass and composition. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;63(suppl):456S–60S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Bouchard C, Leon AS, Rao DC, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH, Gagnon J. The HERITAGE Family Study: aims, design, and measurement protocol. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995;27:721–9.[Medline]
  11. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell F, eds. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books, 1988.
  12. Behnke AR, Wilmore JH. Evaluation and regulation of body build and composition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974:20–4.
  13. Wilmore JH. A simplified method for determination of residual lung volumes. J Appl Physiol 1969;27:96–100.[Free Full Text]
  14. Wilmore JH, Vodak PA, Parr RB, Girandola RN, Billing JE. Further simplification of a method for determination of residual lung volume. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1980;12:216–8.[Medline]
  15. Meneely GR, Kaltreider NL. The volume of the lung determined by helium dilution. Description of the method and comparison with other procedures. J Clin Invest 1949;28:129–39.
  16. Motley HL. Comparison of a simple helium closed with the oxygen open-circuit method for measuring residual air. Am Rev Tuberc Pulmon Dis 1957;76:601–15.
  17. Siri WE. Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. In: Brozek J, Henschel A, eds. Techniques for measuring body composition. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, 1961:223–44.
  18. Lohman TG. Applicability of body composition techniques and constants for children and youths. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1986;14:325–57.[Medline]
  19. Schutte JE, Townsend EJ, Hugg J, Shoup RF, Malina RM, Blomqvist CG. Density of lean body mass is greater in blacks than in whites. J Appl Physiol 1984;56:1647–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ortiz O, Russell M, Daley TL, et al. Differences in skeletal muscle and bone mineral mass between black and white females and their relevance to estimates of body composition. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;55:8–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Sjöström L, Kvist H, Cederblad A, Tylén U. Determination of total adipose tissue and body fat in women by computed tomography, 40K and tritium. Am J Physiol 1986;250:E736–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Gagnon J, Province MA, Bouchard C, et al. The HERITAGE Family Study: quality assurance and quality control. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6:520–9.[Medline]
  23. Wilmore JH, Stanforth PR, Domenick MA, et al. Reproducibility of anthropometric and body composition measurements: the HERITAGE Family Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1997;21:297–303.[Medline]
  24. Wilmore JH. Variations in physical activity habits and body composition. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995;19(suppl):S107–12.
  25. Wilmore JH, Stanforth PR, Hudspeth LA, et al. Alterations in resting metabolic rate as a consequence of 20 wk of endurance training: the HERITAGE Family Study. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;68:66–71.[Abstract]
  26. Björntorp P. Visceral obesity: a "civilization syndrome." Obes Res 1993;1:206–22.[Medline]
  27. Ross R. Effects of diet- and exercise-induced weight loss on visceral adipose tissue in men and women. Sports Med 1997;24:55–64.[Medline]
  28. Conway JM, Yanovski SZ, Avila NA, Hubbard VS. Visceral adipose tissue difference in black and white women. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61:765–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Seidell JC, Deurenberg P, Hautvast JGAJ. Obesity and fat distribution in relation to health—current insights and recommendations. World Rev Nutr Diet 1987;50:57–91.[Medline]
  30. Lemieux S, Després JP, Moorjani S, et al. Are gender differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors explained by the level of visceral adipose tissue? Diabetologia 1994;37:757–64.[Medline]
  31. Ballor DL, Keesey RE. A meta-analysis of the factors affecting exercise-induced changes in body weight, fat mass and fat-free mass in males and females. Int J Obes 1991;15:717–26.[Medline]
Received for publication August 31, 1998. Accepted for publication February 24, 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. H. Eckel
Nonsurgical Management of Obesity in Adults
N. Engl. J. Med., May 1, 2008; 358(18): 1941 - 1950.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINEHome page
P. M. Janiszewski, T. J. Saunders, and R. Ross
Themed Review: Lifestyle Treatment of the Metabolic Syndrome
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, April 1, 2008; 2(2): 99 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
S. L. Volpe, H. Kobusingye, S. Bailur, and E. Stanek
Effect of Diet and Exercise on Body Composition, Energy Intake and Leptin Levels in Overweight Women and Men
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2008; 27(2): 195 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
N. Spielmann, A. S. Leon, D. C. Rao, T. Rice, J. S. Skinner, C. Bouchard, and T. Rankinen
CETP genotypes and HDL-cholesterol phenotypes in the HERITAGE Family Study
Physiol Genomics, September 11, 2007; 31(1): 25 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. J. Hautala, A. S. Leon, J. S. Skinner, D. C. Rao, C. Bouchard, and T. Rankinen
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{delta} polymorphisms are associated with physical performance and plasma lipids: the HERITAGE Family Study
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2498 - H2505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
F. A. Basset, D. R. Joanisse, F. Boivin, J. St-Onge, F. Billaut, J. Dore, R. Chouinard, G. Falgairette, D. Richard, and M. R. Boulay
Effects of short-term normobaric hypoxia on haematology, muscle phenotypes and physical performance in highly trained athletes
Exp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 91(2): 391 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
T. A. Lakka, H.-M. Lakka, T. Rankinen, A. S. Leon, D.C. Rao, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, and C. Bouchard
Effect of exercise training on plasma levels of C-reactive protein in healthy adults: the HERITAGE Family Study
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2005; 26(19): 2018 - 2025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. Lee, J. L. Kuk, L. E. Davidson, R. Hudson, K. Kilpatrick, T. E. Graham, and R. Ross
Exercise without weight loss is an effective strategy for obesity reduction in obese individuals with and without Type 2 diabetes
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2005; 99(3): 1220 - 1225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. T. Williams, P. J. Blanche, and R. M. Krauss
Behavioral Versus Genetic Correlates of Lipoproteins and Adiposity in Identical Twins Discordant for Exercise
Circulation, July 19, 2005; 112(3): 350 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
N. G. Boule, S. J. Weisnagel, T. A. Lakka, A. Tremblay, R. N. Bergman, T. Rankinen, A. S. Leon, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, D.C. Rao, et al.
Effects of Exercise Training on Glucose Homeostasis: The HERITAGE Family Study
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2005; 28(1): 108 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
D. J. Cuff, G. S. Meneilly, A. Martin, A. Ignaszewski, H. D. Tildesley, and J. J. Frohlich
Effective Exercise Modality to Reduce Insulin Resistance in Women With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, November 1, 2003; 26(11): 2977 - 2982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Argyropoulos, T. Rankinen, D. R. Neufeld, T. Rice, M. A. Province, A. S. Leon, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, D. C. Rao, and C. Bouchard
A Polymorphism in the Human Agouti-Related Protein Is Associated with Late-Onset Obesity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2002; 87(9): 4198 - 4202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
T. Rice, Y. C. Chagnon, L. Perusse, I. B. Borecki, O. Ukkola, T. Rankinen, J. Gagnon, A. S. Leon, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, et al.
A Genomewide Linkage Scan for Abdominal Subcutaneous and Visceral Fat in Black and White Families: The HERITAGE Family Study
Diabetes, March 1, 2002; 51(3): 848 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Trichopoulou, C. Gnardellis, A. Lagiou, V. Benetou, A. Naska, and D. Trichopoulos
Physical activity and energy intake selectively predict the waist-to-hip ratio in men but not in women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2001; 74(5): 574 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. L Weinsier, G. R Hunter, B. A Gower, Y. Schutz, B. E Darnell, and P. A Zuckerman
Body fat distribution in white and black women: different patterns of intraabdominal and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue utilization with weight loss
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2001; 74(5): 631 - 636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. Garenc, L. Perusse, J. Bergeron, J. Gagnon, Y. C. Chagnon, I. B. Borecki, A. S. Leon, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, D. C. Rao, et al.
Evidence of LPL gene-exercise interaction for body fat and LPL activity: the HERITAGE Family Study
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2001; 91(3): 1334 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
C. Couillard, J.-P. Despres, B. Lamarche, J. Bergeron, J. Gagnon, A. S. Leon, D. C. Rao, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, and C. Bouchard
Effects of Endurance Exercise Training on Plasma HDL Cholesterol Levels Depend on Levels of Triglycerides : Evidence From Men of the Health, Risk Factors, Exercise Training and Genetics (HERITAGE) Family Study
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2001; 21(7): 1226 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. S. Skinner, A. Jaskolski, A. Jaskolska, J. Krasnoff, J. Gagnon, A. S. Leon, D. C. Rao, J. H. Wilmore, and C. Bouchard
Age, sex, race, initial fitness, and response to training: the HERITAGE Family Study
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2001; 90(5): 1770 - 1776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
Y. C. Chagnon, T. Rice, L. Perusse, I. B. Borecki, M.-A. Ho-Kim, M. Lacaille, C. Pare, L. Bouchard, J. Gagnon, A. S. Leon, et al.
Genomic scan for genes affecting body composition before and after training in Caucasians from HERITAGE
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2001; 90(5): 1777 - 1787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. T. Poehlman, R. V. Dvorak, W. F. DeNino, M. Brochu, and P. A. Ades
Effects of Resistance Training and Endurance Training on Insulin Sensitivity in Nonobese, Young Women: A Controlled Randomized Trial
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2000; 85(7): 2463 - 2468.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
T. Rankinen, T. Rice, A. S. Leon, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, D. C. Rao, and C. Bouchard
G protein {beta}3 polymorphism and hemodynamic and body composition phenotypes in the HERITAGE Family Study
Physiol Genomics, February 28, 2002; 8(2): 151 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilmore, J. H
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilmore, J. H
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wilmore, J. H
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS