|
|
||||||||
Supplements |
1 From the Center for Health Research and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Loma Linda University, CA.
2 Supported by NIH grants nos. 2 R01 CA14703-15A2, 1 R01 AG08961-01A2, and 2 R01 HL26210-01.
3 Address reprint requests to GE Fraser, Loma Linda University, School of Public Health, Nichol Hall Room 2008, Loma Linda, CA 92350. E-mail: gfraser{at}sph.llu.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3 times/wk compared with vegetarians], significant protective associations between nut consumption and fatal and nonfatal IHD in both sexes (RR
0.5 for subjects who ate nuts
5 times/wk compared with those who ate nuts <1 time/wk), and reduced risk of IHD in subjects preferring whole-grain to white bread. The lifetime risk of IHD was reduced by
31% in those who consumed nuts frequently and by 37% in male vegetarians compared with nonvegetarians. Cancers of the colon and prostate were significantly more likely in nonvegetarians (RR of 1.88 and 1.54, respectively), and frequent beef consumers also had higher risk of bladder cancer. Intake of legumes was negatively associated with risk of colon cancer in nonvegetarians and risk of pancreatic cancer. Higher consumption of all fruit or dried fruit was associated with lower risks of lung, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. Cross-sectional data suggest vegetarian Seventh-day Adventists have lower risks of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and arthritis than nonvegetarians. Thus, among Seventh-day Adventists, vegetarians are healthier than nonvegetarians but this cannot be ascribed only to the absence of meat.
Key Words: Seventh-day Adventists vegetarians diet ischemic heart disease cancer longevity mortality cardiovascular disease coronary artery disease diabetes arthritis lung cancer prostate cancer colon cancer pancreatic cancer cancer prevention nuts beef meat
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20% were meat eaters who ate meat <1 time/wk and
30% ate no meat products. However, most ate dairy products and eggs and few ate vegan diets. Of the meat-eating Seventh-day Adventists, about half ate meat as frequently as did other Californians. Hence, there is an opportunity to compare different dietary patterns within the Seventh-day Adventist group. Because the nutrient intake profile of Seventh-day Adventists is closer to that recommended by a number of professional bodies than is the diet of average Americans, several publications have compared the health experiences of Seventh-day Adventists to those of non-Adventists (13). Generally, Seventh-day Adventists had lower mortality from cancer, heart disease, and diabetes than did non-Adventists living in the same communities. For this report, we summarized findings associating the use of different foods to risk of cancer, ischemic heart disease (IHD), and other diseases within a Seventh-day Adventist population enrolled in a large cohort study (19761988).
| SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
25 y, who were then mailed a detailed lifestyle questionnaire in 1976. Among non-Hispanic whites, the rate of response to the lifestyle questionnaire exceeded 75%, whereas among other ethnic groups, the response rates were considerably lower. Cancer incidence among 34198 non-Hispanic white subjects was monitored for a total of 6 y of follow-up. The dietary questionnaire used the food-frequency method and included questions relating to 51 different foods or food groups. The most common format was a sequence of 8 frequency categories, as follows: never, <1 time/mo, 12 times/mo, 12 times/wk, 1 time/d, and >1 time/d. Because there is some interest in comparing the risk for disease in vegetarian and nonvegetarian Seventh-day Adventists, 3 categories of dietary habits were defined. These were vegetarian, those who ate no fish, poultry, or meat (29.5%); semivegetarian, those who ate fish and poultry, but <1 time/wk (21.2%); and nonvegetarian, referring to the remaining subjects (49.2%). Only 23% of Seventh-day Adventists are vegans.
A surveillance program to detect new cancer and IHD cases was conducted, consisting of annual mailings to every member of the cohort requesting information on any hospitalization in the previous 12-mo period of follow-up. If a hospitalization was reported, the name and address of the hospital was recorded and permission to review the resulting medical record was obtained. Adventist Health Study personnel reviewed all medical records for evidence of a cancer or IHD diagnosis; pertinent portions of the records were microfilmed to allow confirmation of the diagnosis by senior medical personnel. All electrocardiograms were microfilmed and coded (5), and cardiac enzyme results were abstracted to a special form. The information taken from the microfilmed hospital records needed to include appropriate histology reports in order for a diagnosis of cancer to be made. Follow-up conducted in this fashion was complete for the hospitalizations of 97% of the cohort.
Computerized record linkage (6) was also used to detect new cancer cases in areas of California that had population-based tumor registries (the Cancer Surveillance Program in Los Angeles County and the Resource for Cancer Epidemiology registry in the San Francisco Bay Area). In addition, computerized matching with state death tapes and the National Death Index was used to identify fatal cases.
A diagnosis of nonfatal myocardial infarction was confirmed if the international diagnostic criteria (7) were met. In summary, these criteria require a diagnostic series of electrocardiographic changes or elevation of cardiac enzyme concentrations plus either prolonged cardiac pain or static electrocardiographic abnormalities. Fatal IHD was also defined by the international diagnostic criteria (7), as either "definite fatal myocardial infarction" or "other definite fatal IHD." For a diagnosis of definite fatal myocardial infarction, death had to occur within 28 d of a myocardial infarction confirmed by hospital records as described above, or fresh myocardial infarction had to be recorded at autopsy. Other definite fatal IHD required International Classification of Diseases (8) codes 410414 as the underlying or immediate cause of death on the death certificate, provided there were no other likely lethal causes on the certificate. In addition, for this diagnosis it was necessary to have either a history of IHD, autopsy findings of severe coronary disease, or symptoms compatible with an ischemic cause of death.
Persons lost to follow-up accounted for only 3% of the population and all of these subjects contributed some person-years. Of the persons lost to follow-up, 8.5% were current smokers, 27.7% were past smokers, and 63.8% had never smoked. There was a modestly higher percentage of current smokers in this group, but the effect on the total data set would have been small.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
4.25 times/wk, and most of the meat was beef. The vegetarian Seventh-day Adventists consumed more tomatoes, legumes, nuts, and fruit, but much less coffee, donuts, and eggs. Nonvegetarian Seventh-day Adventists were much less likely to prefer whole-grain bread and also consumed alcoholic beverages 20 times more frequently than their vegetarian counterparts. Thus, when comparing the health experiences of vegetarian and nonvegetarian Seventh-day Adventists, we cannot initially infer that any effects are due to differences in meat consumption. Multivariate analyses can be used to test hypotheses relating to single foods or food groups.
|
|
|
2-fold greater in the nonvegetarians than the vegetarians, and the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatism was
50% greater (Table 6
|
|
3 times/wk had a 2.31-fold greater risk than did the vegetarian men (P < 0.0001). However, no associations were found between beef consumption and fatal IHD in women. In addition, no associations of significance were found when nonfatal definite myocardial infarction was the endpoint (9). We have previously shown that the age at which a person becomes a vegetarian is an important predictor of IHD mortality in men, but this was less clearly seen in women (10).
|
50% of the risk of those who ate nuts
1 time/wk (Figure 2
|
5 times/wk had lifetime risks of 18.7% and 17%, respectively (P < 0.05), which is
31% lower (12). Similarly, nonvegetarian men had a lifetime risk of 34% whereas vegetarian men had a risk of only 21.3% (P < 0.05), which is 37.4% lower.
During the follow-up period of the cohort study, cases of incident cancers at many sites were documented. Because each type of cancer may have its own associations with dietary habits, each must be analyzed separately. The data provided the opportunity for analyses with satisfactory statistical power for several common cancers such as breast, prostate, and colon cancers, but even after 180000 person-years of observation for other sites, the power was less than optimal. Nevertheless, even for some of these latter sites, a number of provocative results were found, several of which achieved statistical significance. Associations of cancer risk with vegetarian status (adjusted for age, sex, and smoking habits where appropriate) are shown in Table 7
for the more common cancers. Both colon and prostate cancer were significantly more common among the nonvegetarian Seventh-day Adventists.
|
0.03) and after further multivariate evaluation, the lower risk in vegetarians appeared to be associated with higher consumption of dried fruits (P < 0.05) and perhaps tomatoes and lower consumption of fish (14). Although the results for tomatoes and fish did not quite achieve statistical significance (P < 0.10), there were impressive dose-response associations for these foods.
The risk of incident colon cancer was increased by 88% in nonvegetarian compared with vegetarian Seventh-day Adventists (P < 0.003). On multivariate analysis (15), independent associations were seen with both red and white meats (Table 8
); these data indicate that both red meat and white meat consumption increase the risk of colon cancer. It was also noted that legume consumption appeared to have a protective effect against colon cancer, but interacted with meat consumption in an interesting way. Legume consumption
3 times/wk compared with <1 time/wk was associated with much lower relative risk of colon cancer (0.33; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.83), but only among Seventh-day Adventists who ate red meat. In addition, the positive association between colon cancer risk and red meat consumption (relative risk = 2.68; 95% CI: 1.24, 5.78) was only seen in those who consumed legumes infrequently.
|
A strong inverse association was found between fruit consumption and risk of lung cancer in this largely nonsmoking population (17) (Figure 3
). This association was found after cigarette smoking history, age, and sex were adjusted for, and occurred for both of the main histologic subtypes. Mills et al (18) have also evaluated the effect of diet on risk of incident bladder cancer. Despite a small number of cases, those consuming meats
3 times/wk compared with <3 times/wk had a >2-fold increase in risk (P < 0.01) after adjustment for cigarette smoking history, age, sex, and a number of other variables.
|
1 time/wk) counterparts (P < 0.001), and a similar comparison in men showed a 3.21-y difference in longevity (P < 0.001). | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is important to note that vegetarians may have lower disease risk because of their lack of meat consumption, but it is equally possible that this protection could be due to increased consumption of fruits, vegetables, or nuts. Upon multivariate analysis, the latter often appeared to be the case. It is now well-known that vegetables, fruit, grains, and nuts contain phytosterols and unsaturated fats that lower blood cholesterol concentrations. These same foods contain dietary fiber, which also lowers blood cholesterol and may protect against colon cancer (20). In addition, the content of a number of antioxidant substances (eg, tocopherols, ascorbate, carotenoids, saponins, and flavonoids) may reduce the risk of heart disease by preventing the oxidation of LDL cholesterol, and may also reduce the risk of cancer by preventing oxidative damage to nucleic acids and other cellular components (21). A variety of indoles and isothiocyanates that are present in or formed from cruciferous vegetables activate phase II enzymes that can help detoxify carcinogenic substances and may also inhibit phase I enzymes that convert procarcinogens to carcinogens (22).
In contrast, meat products contain no dietary fiber and often contain substantial quantities of cholesterol and saturated fats that raise LDL-cholesterol concentrations. Meats do not contain significant amounts of phytochemicals, although small quantities may be found in meats as a consequence of the animals having eaten plants. Moreover, there is some evidence that the process of heating and cooking meats, particularly if there is any burning, may form compounds such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic amines that are carcinogenic (23, 24). Consumption of meat has also been shown to increase fecal content of potentially carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds (25). Thus, our results are largely in keeping with findings from basic research.
Although there is wide variation, it should be noted that the average Seventh-day Adventist vegetarian does not consume a low-fat diet. Estimates from our 1976 studies of Seventh-day Adventists showed that the average fat consumption was 100.5 g/d in vegetarians and 102.2 g/d in nonvegetarians. The difference between these groups was in the type of fat consumed; the ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fats was 0.83 in the vegetarians and 0.63 in the nonvegetarians. Thus, the improved health experience of Seventh-day Adventists as a whole and particularly vegetarian Seventh-day Adventists has not required a low-fat diet, but rather the relative avoidance of saturated, primarily animal fats in favor of diets emphasizing vegetables, fruit, nuts, and grains. Preliminary data suggest that very-low-fat diets such as those consumed by vegans do not clearly reduce total or cause-specific mortality (26) below the rates seen in the more liberal vegetarians, although more evidence is needed.
Our findings that vegetarian dietary habits were associated with reduced prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and arthritis invite further exploration but may be partially explained by the lower prevalence of obesity among vegetarians. The findings shown in Table 6
resulted from cross-sectional analyses, which often have the weakness of an indeterminate direction of any causal relation. Could the onset of hypertension, diabetes, or arthritis have spuriously caused these associations by causing Seventh-day Adventists with these conditions to change their diets from vegetarian to nonvegetarian? This seems very unlikely. In the Seventh-day Adventist tradition, the onset of poor health typically leads individuals to move toward the recommended vegetarian dietary habits, which would then tend to weaken any causal associations. Hence it seems probable that the observed associations are causal, and if so, almost certainly in the direction suggesting that the diet or associated factors caused the differences in disease frequencies. Previously published data suggest that mortality associated with diabetes mellitus is considerably lower in California Seventh-day Adventists compared with non-Adventists, as well as for vegetarian compared with nonvegetarian Seventh-day Adventist men (27).
The apparent marked difference between men and women in the effect of beef consumption on risk of fatal IHD is of interest, but may be due in part to chance. Note that for women consuming beef
3 times/wk, our result allows for the possibility of a relative risk of 1.56 within the 95% CI, despite the best estimate of 0.76. Relevant to this is the recent pooled analysis of vegetarian cohort studies (26) that included this study and did show a significant hazardous effect for nonvegetarian women, although it was not as strong as that seen in men. It has been argued that risk of IHD in women is at least as responsive to lower blood HDL cholesterol concentrations as in men, but less responsive to LDL cholesterol concentrations (28, 29) than in men, and that HDL concentrations drop further in women than men on a low-fat diet (3032). HDL concentrations are a little lower in Seventh-day Adventists than non-Adventists (3336), probably because of the trend toward vegetarian, modestly lower-fat diets. However, the decrement in HDL cholesterol concentrations for Seventh-day Adventist women is small and the large sex difference in HDL concentrations is maintained in Seventh-day Adventists.
In summary, it is clear that for cancers of the colon and prostate, and fatal heart disease in men, vegetarian Seventh-day Adventists have an advantage over their nonvegetarian counterparts. This is probably also true for risks of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and arthritis. Moreover, these effects are related to both the reduced consumption of meat and the increased intake of fruit, vegetables, grains, and nuts by the vegetarians. Making comparisons within this special population reduces the likelihood of confounding by other nondietary factors. The absence of tobacco and the limited use of alcohol in this population also reduce the likelihood of confounding. To reach a better understanding of the roles of individual food groups and nutrients in this population, particularly with regard to specific cancers, will require the study of larger Seventh-day Adventist cohorts using improved dietary instruments.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Lanza, T. J. Hartman, P. S. Albert, R. Shields, M. Slattery, B. Caan, E. Paskett, F. Iber, J. W. Kikendall, P. Lance, et al. High Dry Bean Intake and Reduced Risk of Advanced Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence among Participants in the Polyp Prevention Trial J. Nutr., July 1, 2006; 136(7): 1896 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Jiang, D. R. Jacobs Jr., E. Mayer-Davis, M. Szklo, D. Herrington, N. S. Jenny, R. Kronmal, and R. G. Barr Nut and Seed Consumption and Inflammatory Markers in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2006; 163(3): 222 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Kritchevsky A Review of Scientific Research and Recommendations Regarding Eggs J. Am. Coll. Nutr., December 1, 2004; 23(suppl_6): 596S - 600S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tangvoranuntakul, P. Gagneux, S. Diaz, M. Bardor, N. Varki, A. Varki, and E. Muchmore Human uptake and incorporation of an immunogenic nonhuman dietary sialic acid PNAS, October 14, 2003; 100(21): 12045 - 12050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sabate The contribution of vegetarian diets to health and disease: a paradigm shift? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2003; 78(3): 502S - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R Jacobs Jr and L. M Steffen Nutrients, foods, and dietary patterns as exposures in research: a framework for food synergy Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2003; 78(3): 508S - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. N Singh, J. Sabate, and G. E Fraser Does low meat consumption increase life expectancy in humans? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2003; 78(3): 526S - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. E. Ziccarelli and T. K. Basu An in Vivo Study of the Antioxidant Potentials of a Plant Food Concentrate J. Am. Coll. Nutr., August 1, 2003; 22(4): 277 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Venti and C. S. Johnston Modified Food Guide Pyramid for Lactovegetarians and Vegans J. Nutr., May 1, 2002; 132(5): 1050 - 1054. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. Feldman The Scientific Evidence for a Beneficial Health Relationship Between Walnuts and Coronary Heart Disease J. Nutr., May 1, 2002; 132(5): 1062S - 1101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Anderson, S. S. Teuber, A. Gobeille, P. Cremin, A. L. Waterhouse, and F. M. Steinberg Walnut Polyphenolics Inhibit In Vitro Human Plasma and LDL Oxidation J. Nutr., November 1, 2001; 131(11): 2837 - 2842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bardelli, D. P. Cahill, G. Lederer, M. R. Speicher, K. W. Kinzler, B. Vogelstein, and C. Lengauer Carcinogen-specific induction of genetic instability PNAS, April 5, 2001; (2001) 81082898. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Kritchevsky and D. Kritchevsky Egg Consumption and Coronary Heart Disease: An Epidemiologic Overview J. Am. Coll. Nutr., October 1, 2000; 19(90005): 549S - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Barr and T. M. Broughton Relative Weight, Weight Loss Efforts and Nutrient Intakes among Health-Conscious Vegetarian, Past Vegetarian and Nonvegetarian Women Ages 18 to 50. J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2000; 19(6): 781 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. N. Ames Cancer prevention and diet: Help from single nucleotide polymorphisms PNAS, October 26, 1999; 96(22): 12216 - 12218. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J Key, G. E Fraser, M. Thorogood, P. N Appleby, V. Beral, G. Reeves, M. L Burr, J. Chang-Claude, R. Frentzel-Beyme, J. W Kuzma, et al. Mortality in vegetarians and nonvegetarians: detailed findings from a collaborative analysis of 5 prospective studies Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 1999; 70(3): 516S - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H Haddad, J. Sabate, and C. G Whitten Vegetarian food guide pyramid: a conceptual framework Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 1999; 70(3): 615S - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bardelli, D. P. Cahill, G. Lederer, M. R. Speicher, K. W. Kinzler, B. Vogelstein, and C. Lengauer From the Cover: Carcinogen-specific induction of genetic instability PNAS, May 8, 2001; 98(10): 5770 - 5775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |