AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Krauss, R. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Krauss, R. M
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Williams, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Krauss, R. M
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 70, No. 6, 949-950, December 1999
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Editorials

Low-fat diets, lipoprotein subclasses, and heart disease risk1,2

Paul T Williams and Ronald M Krauss

1 From the Department of Molecular Medicine, Life Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Donner Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.

See corresponding article on page 992.

2 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to RM Krauss, EO Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Department of Molecular and Nuclear Medicine, Life Science Division, Donner Laboratory, Room 459, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720-0001. E-mail: rmkrauss{at}lbl.gov.

Current dietary guidelines emphasize reductions in dietary fat, particularly saturated fat, for the hygienic control of plasma lipoproteins. This recommendation is based on abundant scientific evidence showing that low-fat diets reduce plasma cholesterol, particularly LDL. The low rate of heart disease in cultures that traditionally eat low-fat diets is manifest. However, low-fat diets also reduce plasma concentrations of HDL cholesterol (1). This leads to the obvious question of whether reductions in both atherogenic LDL cholesterol and antiatherogenic HDL cholesterol translate into reduced heart disease risk in normolipidemic men and women.

In this issue, Berglund et al (2) examine the effects of feeding low-fat diets on HDL subclasses in a multiracial, multigenerational sample of normolipidemic men and women. Their study, carefully designed and successfully implemented, assessed the effect of the diets on HDL2- and HDL3-cholesterol concentrations and on their percentage distribution within 5 HDL subclasses. Switching from an average American diet to the American Heart Association Step I diet reduced both HDL2- and HDL3-cholesterol concentrations. The HDL-subclass distribution shifted toward smaller particles, with reductions in the percentage area for HDL2b and increases in the percentage area for HDL3a, HDL3b, and HDL3c. These changes in the distribution of HDL subclasses suggest a less antiatherogenic HDL profile with consumption of a low-fat diet.

These results from the Dietary Effects on Lipoproteins and Thrombogenic Activities (DELTA) Study are consistent with those of an earlier study involving 105 men (3). When the men switched from a 6-wk high-fat to a low-fat diet in a crossover study, HDL2a, HDL2b, and HDL3a concentrations decreased significantly. In contrast with measurements of HDL subclasses in the DELTA Study, this earlier study did not measure the relative area of the HDL subclasses, but rather the absolute area (assumed to be proportional to plasma concentrations). Expression of the areas as percentages necessarily causes an inverse correlation between the larger and smaller subclasses, which may have obscured reductions within the HDL2a and HDL3a regions in the DELTA Study. As recognized by the authors, the apparent inconsistency between HDL3 responses (which decreased with the low-fat diet) and HDL3a, HDL3b, and HDL3c responses (which increased with the low-fat diet) may have been due to technical differences in the subclass measurements. In cross-sectional samples, variations in plasma HDL3-cholesterol concentrations tend to be correlated with electrophoretic measurements of HDL2a, HDL2b, and HDL3a, but not with HDL3b (4).

Although Berglund et al suggest that reductions in LDL particle number may offset any potential negative effect of a reduction in overall HDL, HDL2-cholesterol, or HDL2b concentrations, this benefit may not apply to all individuals. Although the DELTA Study investigators showed that HDL and other lipoprotein responses to low-fat diets did not differ significantly by sex, age, or race, in this and other studies, considerable interindividual variation in responses was observed (1356). Among the traits known to increase the magnitude of the LDL-cholesterol response to low-fat diets are genotype, such as the presence of the apo E4 isoform, and other factors leading to higher baseline LDL-cholesterol concentrations (67). Another phenotype that can affect the response of both LDL and HDL to low-fat diets is variation in LDL particle size profiles (35). A predominance of small, dense LDL particles (LDL subclass pattern B) is associated with higher triacylglycerol concentrations and a 3-fold increased risk of coronary artery disease when compared with the alternative, pattern A (8). Men expressing the LDL pattern B with consumption of a high-fat diet show significant diet-induced decreases in both LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein (apo) B, suggesting a decrease in the number of LDL particles and possibly a relatively more favorable effect on coronary heart disease (CHD) risk (5). In contrast, those expressing LDL pattern A do not show a decrease in apo B concentrations. The men with LDL pattern A also show smaller decreases in LDL cholesterol and greater decreases in HDL2b than do men with LDL pattern B men when consuming low-fat diets, and nearly twice the estimated increase in CHD risk assessed by the Framingham score (Figure 1Go). Moreover, a subset of low-risk, pattern A men convert to pattern B when switched from a high-fat to a low-fat diet (3). Reduced LDL particle size in these men was associated with decreases in HDL2b and increases in plasma triacylglycerol concentrations, suggesting that these lipoprotein responses may be linked metabolically (3). It is not known which of the various lipoprotein indexes used in these studies provides the best prediction of risk of developing coronary artery disease, but overall the results suggest that high-risk individuals, such as those with elevated LDL-cholesterol concentrations or small, dense LDL particles, or both, may be the most appropriate candidates for diets low in total fat (eg, providing much less than 30% of energy), whereas the apparently adverse metabolic changes with such diets may be of particular concern to those individuals who have lipoprotein profiles indicating a low risk of CHD while consuming their usual diets.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Mean (±SE) percentage changes in estimated 10-y coronary heart disease risk (10) when 105 healthy normolipidemic men (5) switched from a diet providing 45% of energy as fat to a diet providing 24% of energy as fat, by LDL-subclass pattern. The increase in projected risk was significant in the total sample and in men with LDL pattern A (P < 0.001).

 
Another important consideration in assessing the metabolic response to diets low in total and saturated fat is the influence of the nutrients that are substituted for fat. In particular, it has been shown that increased carbohydrate intakes lead to increases in plasma triacylglycerol and accompanying reductions in HDL cholesterol, LDL particle size, and insulin sensitivity. The type of carbohydrate may also be important. Thus, the influence of low-fat diets on CHD risk is dependent on both the overall nutrient composition of such diets and the interindividual differences in response to these nutrients.

REFERENCES

  1. Stone NJ, Nicolosi RJ, Kris-Etherton P, Ernst ND, Krauss RM, Winston M. AHA conference proceedings. Summary of the scientific conference on the efficacy of hypocholesterolemic dietary interventions. American Heart Association. Circulation 1996;94:3388–91.[Free Full Text]
  2. Berglund L, Oliver EH, Fontanez N, et al. HDL-subpopulation patterns in response to reductions in dietary total and saturated fat intakes in healthy subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;70:992–1000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Williams PT, Krauss RM, Vranizan KM, Stefanick ML, Wood PD, Lindgren FT. Associations of lipoproteins and apolipoproteins with gradient gel electrophoresis estimates of high density lipoprotein subfractions in men and women. Arterioscler Thromb 1992;12:332–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Williams PT, Dreon DM, Krauss RM. Effects of dietary fat on high-density-lipoprotein subclasses are influenced by both apolipoprotein E isoforms and low-density-lipoprotein subclass patterns. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61:1234–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Dreon DM, Fernstrom HA, Miller B, Krauss RM. Low-density lipoprotein subclass patterns and lipoprotein response to a reduced-fat diet in men. FASEB J 1994;8:121–6.[Abstract]
  6. Schaefer EJ. Effects of dietary fatty acids on lipoproteins and cardiovascular disease risk: summary. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65(suppl):1655S–6S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Krauss RM. Understanding the basis for variation in response to cholesterol-lowering diets. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65:885–6.[Free Full Text]
  8. Austin MA, Breslow JL, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Willett WC, Krauss RM. Low-density lipoprotein subclass patterns and risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA 1988;260:1917–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Krauss RM, Burke DJ. Identification of multiple subclasses of plasma low density lipoproteins in normal humans. J Lipid Res 1982;23:97–104.[Abstract]
  10. Anderson KM, Wilson PW, Odell PM, Kannel WB. An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. Circulation 1991;83:356–62.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
O. A Matvienko, D. S Lewis, M. Swanson, B. Arndt, D. L Rainwater, J. Stewart, and D L. Alekel
A single daily dose of soybean phytosterols in ground beef decreases serum total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in young, mildly hypercholesterolemic men
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2002; 76(1): 57 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. U Almario, V. Vonghavaravat, R. Wong, and S. E Kasim-Karakas
Effects of walnut consumption on plasma fatty acids and lipoproteins in combined hyperlipidemia
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2001; 74(1): 72 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Krauss, R. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Krauss, R. M
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Williams, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Krauss, R. M


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS