AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. D
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. D
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 71, No. 3, 657-658, March 2000
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Perspectives

Year 2000 dietary guidelines: new thoughts for a new millennium

Gregory D Miller

Nutrition Research, National Dairy Council, Suite 900, Rosemont, IL 60018, E-mail: gregorym{at}rosedmi.com

The US Department of Agriculture and the US Department of Health and Human Services first developed the Dietary Guidelines for Americans in 1980 (1). The dietary guidelines provide advice to healthy Americans on food choices to promote healthy eating and reduce risk of disease. The dietary guidelines were updated in 1985, 1990, and 1995 to ensure their accurate interpretation of the most recent science (24). The 1990 National Nutrition Monitoring and Related Research Act mandates the review of the dietary guidelines every 5 y. The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee was appointed to review the current guidelines and make recommendations for changes for the 2000 edition.

This advisory committee will struggle with many issues while reviewing a myriad of new scientific data related to diet and health. For example, individual risk of chronic disease varies widely and is strongly influenced by genetics. This issue prompted the American Heart Association to remind health professionals in the Dietary Guidelines for Healthy Americans that "...population-wide guidelines do not address the specific needs of all individuals" (5). The current advisory committee must decide which recommendations need to be targeted to the population through the dietary guidelines and which should be promoted to individuals at risk through some other means. Another important issue that should be addressed is the value of segmenting the dietary guidelines by age (6). The 1995 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee "strongly" recommended the development of dietary guidelines for children (7). They suggested that a working group be charged with developing provisional guidelines for children and the supporting peer-reviewed documentation. The US Department of Agriculture targets dietary advice to children through its food guide pyramid for young children (8). In a similar context of age-segmented recommendations, a food guide pyramid was recommended for the elderly (9). The committee will need to rigorously review the available scientific data to develop valid and useful dietary guidelines for Americans.

The American Society for Nutritional Sciences–American Society for Clinical Nutrition Public Information Committee organized a symposium at Experimental Biology ‘99 (held in Washington, DC, on April 19, 1999) to discuss timely scientific issues that the current committee will likely be addressing. Time constraints prevented this symposium from including presentations on all of the controversial nutrition issues the committee will face. Two dietary issues were chosen to be examined more closely with presentations both pro and con. This provided an opportunity to illustrate that there are usually 2 sides to most issues. Sometimes the sides differ greatly and at other times there is only little disagreement.

The first of the issues examined was the need for a dietary guideline for calcium intake. The discussion is presented in the following 2 papers. The second issue, which focused on the current guideline for sodium intake, will be featured in an upcoming issue of the Journal.

Ultimately, the information contained in the dietary guidelines will be transferred to consumers through educational efforts, food and supplement marketing, feeding programs, and policy decisions. Recommendations from the advisory committee will need to be based on sound science rather than on a consensus to ensure that following the dietary guidelines provides benefit without harm (1013). How the dietary guidelines may eventually be applied by consumers must also be considered in the determination of what is recommended and how those recommendations are presented to both heath professionals and the general public. This issue was also addressed at the symposium.

REFERENCES

  1. US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and your health: dietary guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1980.
  2. US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and your health: dietary guidelines for Americans. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1985. (Home and garden bulletin no. 232.)
  3. US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and your health: dietary guidelines for Americans. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1990. (Home and garden bulletin no. 232.)
  4. US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and your health: dietary guidelines for Americans. 4th ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1995. (Home and garden bulletin no. 232.)
  5. Krauss RM, Deckelbaum RJ, Ernst N, et al. Dietary guidelines for healthy Americans, a statement for health professionals from the Nutrition Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation 1996;94:1795–800.[Free Full Text]
  6. Groziak SM, Miller GD. Dietary guidelines for children: where are we heading? J Nutr 1998;128:1836–8.[Free Full Text]
  7. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on the dietary guidelines for Americans, 1995, to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Agriculture. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, 1995.
  8. US Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. The food guide pyramid for young children. World Wide Web: http://www.usda.gov/cnpp/KidsPyra/ (accessed 9 December 1999).
  9. Russell RM, Rasmussen H, Lichtenstein AH. Modified food guide pyramid for people over seventy years of age. J Nutr 1999;129:751–3.[Free Full Text]
  10. Harper AE. Transitions in health status: implications for dietary recommendations. Am J Clin Nutr 1987;45:1094–107.[Free Full Text]
  11. Harper AE. Nutrition standards for today—another view. Nutr Today 1993;28:29–32.
  12. Harper AE. Dietary guidelines in perspective. J Nutr 1996;126(suppl): 1042S–8S.
  13. Miller GD. Introduction. J Nutr 1996;126(suppl):1020S–1S.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. D
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. D


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS