HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lamartiniere, C. A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lamartiniere, C. A Agricola Articles by Lamartiniere, C. A

Protection against breast cancer with genistein: a component of soy^1,2,3

¹ From the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

² Presented at the 17th Ross Research Conference on Medical Issues, held in San Diego, February 22–24, 1998.

³ Address reprint requests to CA Lamartiniere, Volker Hall 124, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35294. E-mail: coral.lamartiniere{at}ccc.uab.edu.

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN RATS SUMMARY REFERENCES

 
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Because genetics is believed to account for only 10–15% of breast cancer cases, the environment, including nutrition, is thought to play a significant role in predisposing women to this cancer. Studies of Asian women suggest that those who consume a traditional diet high in soy products have a low incidence of breast cancer, but that among emigrants to the United States, the second generation, but not the first, loses this protection. These findings suggest a possible common mechanism of action for breast cancer protection from early, specific nutritional exposure. Genistein, an isoflavone found in soy, has been reported to have weak estrogenic and antiestrogenic properties, to be an antioxidant, to inhibit topoisomerase II and angiogenesis, and to induce cell differentiation. In studies of the mammary glands of immature rats, we showed that genistein up-regulates the expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor shortly after treatment, which may be responsible for the increased cell proliferation seen at that age. We hypothesize that the early genistein action promotes cell differentiation that results in a less active epidermal growth factor signaling pathway in adulthood that, in turn, suppresses the development of mammary cancer. We speculate that breast cancer protection in Asian women consuming a traditional soy-containing diet is derived from early exposure to soybean products containing genistein. We believe that early events are essential for the benefits of cancer protection.

Key Words: Genistein • breast cancer • soy • epidermal growth factor receptor • women • isoflavones

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN RATS SUMMARY REFERENCES

 
Cancer of the breast is the most common cancer in women. More than 50% of breast cancers occur in developed countries; high-risk areas include North America and Europe, whereas Asia has the lowest risk. Risk factors are nulliparity, late age at first pregnancy, late natural menopause, exposure to ionizing radiation, and inheritance of mutations in specific genes, including BRAC1 and BRAC2 (1). Because genetics is believed to account for only 10–15% of all breast cancer cases (2), the environment, including chemicals, nutrition, and lifestyle, is thought to play a significant role in predisposing women to this disease. In general, epidemiologic studies do not support a relation between total dietary fat intake and breast cancer (3, 4). A closer look at the relative amounts of fatty acid intake, however, suggests that consumption of n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (which include lineolic and arachidonic acids) is correlated with breast cancer incidence (4). Conversely, eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids, both of which are n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids concentrated in fish oils, may confer protection against breast cancer. Other studies suggest that olive oil, an essentially monounsaturated oil, may have beneficial effects for both cardiovascular health and protection against breast cancer (5). Except for reports that women aged 15–19 y are more susceptible to ionizing radiation (6, 7), epidemiologic studies of the role of environmental chemicals in causing breast cancer have yielded conflicting results (8).

Findings that radiation can cause cancer during adolescence (6, 7) and that early but not late pregnancy protects against breast cancer (1) suggest that events early in a woman's life are crucial for predisposing her to, or protecting her from, breast cancer. Such findings are consistent with the development of the breast and the differentiation of breast cells; although most developmental changes occur perinatally, the mammary tissue continues to undergo maturation even during early adulthood. In rats, at birth and during the first week postpartum, the mammary gland is composed of a single primary or main lactiferous duct that branches into 3–5 secondary ducts (9). During the second week, further sprouting of ducts occurs up to the sixth generation. This sprouting of ducts markedly increases the density of terminal end buds, which reach their maximum number during puberty. Terminal end buds are the growing fringe of the mammary gland, with lateral buds branching dichotomously to form branches more proximal to the nipple. A portion of the terminal end buds differentiates in response to each estrous cycle, giving rise to alveolar buds that comprise lobules.

Laboratory studies have confirmed the role of early exposure to estrogen and progesterone in causing differentiating effects on the mammary tissue and in reducing subsequent susceptibility to chemically induced mammary cancer (10, 11). But do we really want to advocate early pregnancy or early use of estrogens to protect against breast cancer? Are other alternatives available to achieve the same end?

In 1991 Lee et al (12) reported that Asian women who consumed a traditional diet (high in soy products) had a low incidence of breast cancer. Yuan et al (13), however, reported no protection against breast cancer from soy consumption. In a third investigation, Wu et al (14) reported a correlation between tofu intake and a reduced rate of mammary cancer in a population-based case-control study of breast cancer among Chinese American, Japanese American, and Filipino American women. Adjustment for migration rates showed that the second generation, but not the first, lost this protection (15). This finding suggests that there may be a common mechanism of action for protection against breast cancer from early, specific nutritional exposure and from exposure to hormones of pregnancy early in life.

	EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN RATS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN RATS SUMMARY REFERENCES

 
In 1992, while investigating the potential developmental toxicity of diethylstilbestrol, we observed that neonatal diethylstilbestrol treatment reduced the incidence of spontaneous development of mammary tumors (16). Because we did not wish to advocate the use of this synthetic estrogen to protect against breast cancer, we investigated the potential of other agents to exert a similar chemopreventive effect without exposing women to significant toxicity. One such agent was genistein, an isoflavone found in soy; genistein has been reported to have weak estrogenic and antiestrogenic properties, to be an antioxidant, to inhibit topoisomerase II and angiogenesis, and to induce cell differentiation (17).

We found that neonatal injections of genistein suppressed the development of dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary adenocarcinomas in rats (18, 19). The DMBA was administered on day 50 postpartum. Neonatal treatment reduced the incidence and number of tumors per rat, and later studies showed that genistein administered only before puberty also produced a protective effect against DMBA-induced mammary cancer (20).

To understand the way in which genistein exerts this chemoprotective effect, we investigated mammary gland morphology and cell differentiation. We found that genistein resulted in early mammary gland development and more terminal end buds in 21-d-old rats. By the time of DMBA treatment (day 50 postpartum), however, mammary gland sizes were similar in control and genistein-treated animals. Furthermore, neonatal and prepubertal genistein treatments resulted in fewer terminal end buds and more lobules at day 50 postpartum. Bromodeoxyuridine incorporation studies showed that 50-d-old rats treated neonatally or before puberty with genistein had less cell proliferation in the terminal end buds. Thus, it appears that the direct action of genistein in immature rats was to stimulate cell proliferation in the mammary glands and to enhance mammary gland maturation. Lobules are the most differentiated terminal ductal structures, indicating a more mature gland and a more differentiated compartment. Terminal end buds are the least differentiated terminal ductal structures and the most susceptible to chemical carcinogens (9). Hence, a reduction in the number of terminal end buds means fewer susceptible targets for the chemical carcinogen. From these results (17–20) we conclude that genistein exerts its chemoprotective effect by enhancing differentiation, a process previously observed with the hormones of pregnancy (10, 11).

We recently completed an investigation of the potential of feeding genistein to rats perinatally at physiologic concentrations to protect against DMBA-induced mammary cancer in their offspring. We found that 25 and 250 mg genistein/kg diets (AIN-76A; Harlan Texland, Madison, WI) reduced the number of mammary tumors by 20% and 50%, respectively (21). These data are consistent with our earlier data from studies using pharmacologic doses of genistein (17–20). Thus, it appears that perinatal exposure of rats to physiologic concentrations of genistein can exert a permanent protective effect against breast cancer.

Giving genistein to prepubertal rats increased uterine weights at day 21 postpartum, but at day 50 there was no significant difference between treated and control rats in uterine weight (21). Thus, genistein also mimics an estrogen in the uterus. In addition, inhibition of tyrosine kinases by genistein has been reported in vitro (22) but not in vivo.

The epidermal growth factor (EGF) signaling pathway functions via tyrosine kinase action. Recently, we investigated the potential of genistein to modulate the EGF receptor in the rat prostate and found that it could inhibit the expression of the receptor mass but not of the specific tyrosine phosphorylation of the receptor (23). Hence, we thought that the same effect might occur in the rat mammary gland. However, using reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction as well as western blot analysis we found that prepubertal genistein treatment up-regulated the expression of the EGF receptor messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein in mammary glands of 21-d-old female rats (24). On the other hand, analysis for EGF receptor mRNA and protein in mammary glands of 50-d-old animals showed no change from treatment with genistein before puberty. On further analysis (by immunohistochemical methods), we found that in 50-d-old rats treated prepubertally with genistein, EGF receptor expression was specifically reduced in the epithelial cells of the terminal end buds in comparison with the rest of the mammary gland. The mechanism of action of genistein appears to be different in the mammary gland of female rats than in the prostate of male rats, but the end effect is similar: reduced EGF receptor mass in the target tissue of adult animals, an effect that could alter signal transduction, mammary gland differentiation, and cell proliferation.

Because the perinatal period is the most sensitive for developmental and reproductive tract alterations, we investigated a variety of measures in animals exposed to genistein from conception until 21 d postpartum (21). We found no significant effect on the rate of fertility in dams fed 25 or 250 mg genistein/kg diet. In addition, in the offspring there was no significant effect on the number of males or females, anogenital distances, time of vaginal opening or testes descent, body weights at all ages, or the percentage of time spent in the phases of the estrous cycle or of follicular development. Histomorphologic analysis did not show any significant alterations of the female reproductive tract (ovaries, uteri, and vagina). We conclude that perinatal exposure of rats to physiologic concentrations of genistein does not cause any significant toxicity.

	SUMMARY

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN RATS SUMMARY REFERENCES

 
We showed that the direct action of genistein in mammary glands of immature rats is to up-regulate the expression of the EGF receptor mass shortly after treatment. This may be the mechanism responsible for the increased cell proliferation seen at that age. We hypothesize that the early genistein action promotes cell differentiation, resulting in a less active EGF-signaling pathway in adulthood that, in turn, suppresses the development of mammary cancer. We speculate that breast cancer protection in Asian women consuming a traditional soycontaining diet is derived from early exposure to soybean products containing genistein. We believe that early events are essential for cancer-protection benefits.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN RATS SUMMARY REFERENCES

 

1. Food, nutrition, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington, DC: World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research, 1997.
2. Colditz GA, Frazier AL. Models of cancer show that risk is set by events of early life: prevention efforts must shift focus. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1995;4:567–71.[Abstract]
3. Willett WC, Hunter DJ, Stampfer MJ, et al. Dietary fat and fiber in relationship to risk for breast cancer: an 8-year follow-up. JAMA 1992;268:2037–44.[Abstract]
4. Rose DP. Dietary fatty acids and prevention of hormone-responsive cancer. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1997;216:224–33.[Abstract]
5. Trichopoulou A, Lagiou P. Worldwide patterns of dietary lipids intake and health implications. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;66(suppl):961S–4S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Boice JD, Monson RR. Breast cancer in women after repeated fluoroscopic examinations of the chest. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;59:863–7.
7. McGregor DH, Land CE, Choi K, et al. Breast cancer incidence among atomic bomb survivors, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. J Natl Cancer Res 1977;59:799–811.
8. Adami H-O, Lipworth L, Titus-Ernstoff L, et al. Organochlorine compounds and estrogen-related cancers in women. Cancer Causes Control 1995;6:551–66.[Medline]
9. Russo J, Russo IH. DNA labeling index and structure of the rat mammary gland as determinants of its susceptibility to carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1978;61:1451–9.
10. Grubbs CJ, Farnell DR, Hill DL, McDonough KC. Chemoprevention of N-nitroso-N-methylurea-induced mammary cancers by pretreatment with 17ß-estradiol and progesterone. J Natl Cancer Inst 1985;74:927–31.
11. Russo J, Wilgus G, Russo IH. Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. I. Differentiation of the mammary gland as determinant of tumor incidence and type of lesion. Am J Pathol 1979;96:721–36.[Abstract]
12. Lee HP, Gourley L, Duffy SW, Esteve J, Lee J, Day NE. Dietary effects on breast cancer risk in Singapore. Lancet 1991;337:1197–200.[Medline]
13. Yuan J-M, Wang Q-S, Ross RK, et al. Diet and risk of breast cancer in Shanghai and Tianjin, China. Br J Cancer 1995;71:1353–8.[Medline]
14. Wu AH, Ziegler RG, Horn-Ross PL, et al. Tofu and risk of breast cancer in Asian-Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996;5:901–6.[Abstract]
15. Ziegler RG, Hoover RN, Hildeshein RN, et al. Migration patterns and breast cancer risk in Asian-American women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:1819–27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Lamartiniere CA, Holland MB. Neonatal diethylstilbestrol prevents spontaneously developing mammary tumors. In: Li JJ, Nandi S, Li SA, eds. Hormonal carcinogenesis. New York: Springer Verlag, 1992:305–8.
17. Lamartiniere CA, Murrill WB, Manzolillo PA, et al. Genistein alters the ontogeny of mammary gland development and protects against mammary cancer in rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1997;217:358–64.[Abstract]
18. Lamartiniere CA, Moore J, Holland MB, Barnes S. Neonatal genistein chemoprevents mammary carcinogenesis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1995;208:120–3.[Abstract]
19. Lamartiniere CA, Moore JB, Brown NM, et al. Genistein suppresses mammary cancer in rats. Carcinogenesis 1995;16:2833–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Murrill WB, Brown NM, Manzolillo PA, et al. Prepubertal genistein exposure suppresses mammary cancer and enhances gland differentiation in rats. Carcinogenesis 1996;17:1451–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Fritz WA, Coward L, Wang J, Lamartiniere CA. Dietary genistein: perinatal mammary cancer prevention, bioavailability and toxicity testing in the rat. Carcinogenesis 1998;19:2151–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Akiyama T, Ishida J, Nakagawa S, et al. Genistein, a specific inhibitor of tyrosine-specific protein kinases. J Biol Chem 1987;262:5592–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Dalu A, Haskell JF, Coward L, Lamartiniere CA. Genistein, a component of soy, inhibits the expression of the EGF and ErbB/Neu receptors in the rat dorsolateral prostate. Prostate 1998;37:36–43.[Medline]
24. Brown NM, Wang J, Cotroneo MS, et al. Prepubertal genistein treatment modulates TGF, EGF, and EGF-receptor mRNAs and proteins in the rat mammary gland. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1998;144:149–65.[Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Farag, D. V. Huhman, R. A. Dixon, and L. W. Sumner Metabolomics Reveals Novel Pathways and Differential Mechanistic and Elicitor-Specific Responses in Phenylpropanoid and Isoflavonoid Biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula Cell Cultures Plant Physiology, February 1, 2008; 146(2): 387 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S Rivlin Keeping the young-elderly healthy: is it too late to improve our health through nutrition? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2007; 86(5): 1572S - 1576S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Rice and S. A Whitehead Phytoestrogens and breast cancer -promoters or protectors? Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 995 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. J. Wang, J. Chen, X. Jia, V. H. Tam, and M. Hu Disposition of Flavonoids via Enteric Recycling: Structural Effects and Lack of Correlations between in Vitro and in Situ Metabolic Properties Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2006; 34(11): 1837 - 1848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. I. Fenton and N. G. Hord Stage matters: choosing relevant model systems to address hypotheses in diet and cancer chemoprevention research Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2006; 27(5): 893 - 902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Schauer, D. Zamir, and A. R. Fernie Metabolic profiling of leaves and fruit of wild species tomato: a survey of the Solanum lycopersicum complex J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2005; 56(410): 297 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. R. Eason, M. C. Velarde, L. Chatman Jr, S. R. Till, Y. Geng, M. Ferguson, T. M. Badger, and R. C. M. Simmen Dietary Exposure to Whey Proteins Alters Rat Mammary Gland Proliferation, Apoptosis, and Gene Expression during Postnatal Development J. Nutr., December 1, 2004; 134(12): 3370 - 3377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Piersen Phytoestrogens in Botanical Dietary Supplements: Implications for Cancer Integr Cancer Ther, June 1, 2003; 2(2): 120 - 138. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. A. Dixon and L. W. Sumner Legume Natural Products: Understanding and Manipulating Complex Pathways for Human and Animal Health Plant Physiology, March 1, 2003; 131(3): 878 - 885. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-J. Liu, J. W. Blount, C. L. Steele, and R. A. Dixon Bottlenecks for metabolic engineering of isoflavone glycoconjugates in Arabidopsis PNAS, October 29, 2002; 99(22): 14578 - 14583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. I. Block, A. Constantinou, L. Hilakivi-Clarke, C. Hughes, D. Tripathy, J. A. Tice, K. Block, and K. Block Point-Counterpoint: Soy Intake for Breast Cancer Patients Integr Cancer Ther, March 1, 2002; 1(1): 90 - 100. [PDF]

				T. M. Badger, M. J. J. Ronis, R. Hakkak, J. C. Rowlands, and S. Korourian The Health Consequences of Early Soy Consumption J. Nutr., March 1, 2002; 132(3): 559S - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. TOSETTI, N. FERRARI, S. DE FLORA, and A. ALBINI Angioprevention': angiogenesis is a common and key target for cancer chemopreventive agents FASEB J, January 1, 2002; 16(1): 2 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. H. Ju, C. D. Allred, K. F. Allred, K. L. Karko, D. R. Doerge, and W. G. Helferich Physiological Concentrations of Dietary Genistein Dose-Dependently Stimulate Growth of Estrogen-Dependent Human Breast Cancer (MCF-7) Tumors Implanted in Athymic Nude Mice J. Nutr., November 1, 2001; 131(11): 2957 - 2962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lamartiniere, C. A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lamartiniere, C. A Agricola Articles by Lamartiniere, C. A