AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simonen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Miettinen, T. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simonen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Miettinen, T. A
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Simonen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Miettinen, T. A
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 72, No. 1, 82-88, July 2000
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communications

Introducing a new component of the metabolic syndrome: low cholesterol absorption1,2,3,4

Piia Simonen, Helena Gylling, Alan N Howard and Tatu A Miettinen

1 From the Department of Medicine, the Division of Internal Medicine, University of Helsinki, and Downing College, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

2 Presented in abstract form at the 11th International Symposium on Atherosclerosis, 5–9 October 1997, Paris (Atherosclerosis 1997;134:32).

3 Supported by grants from Helsinki University Central Hospital, the Finnish Diabetes Research Association, and The Howard Foundation, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

4 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to TA Miettinen, Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, PO Box 340, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: tatu.a.miettinen{at}helsinki.fi.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Weight reduction is the recommended treatment of obese type 2 diabetes, but the effects of weight reduction on cholesterol metabolism are poorly understood.

Objective: We investigated glucose, cholesterol, and lipoprotein metabolism at baseline and 2 y after weight reduction in obese patients with type 2 diabetes consuming an isoenergetic diet.

Design: Sixteen subjects were randomly chosen to consume a very-low-energy or low-energy diet for 3 mo, after which they consumed a weight-maintenance diet for up to 2 y. Cholesterol absorption and metabolism, LDL and HDL kinetics, and variables of glucose metabolism were studied at baseline and 2 y.

Results: Baseline serum sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) was significantly related to cholesterol absorption efficiency, and serum glucose and insulin concentrations were associated with cholesterol synthesis. After 2 y, body weight was reduced by 6 ± 1 kg (P < 0.01), body mass index by 6% (P < 0.05), and blood glucose by 14% (P < 0.01); the ratio of serum SHBG to insulin increased by 66% (P < 0.05). Serum and VLDL, LDL, and HDL triacylglycerol were significantly reduced by 13–24%. Despite unchanged serum concentrations of cholesterol, cholesterol absorption efficiency and the ratio of serum plant sterols to cholesterol—indicators of cholesterol absorption—increased by 28% (P < 0.01) and 20–31% (P < 0.05 for both), respectively; the fractional removal of LDL apolipoprotein B decreased. Fecal excretion of cholesterol as neutral sterols decreased significantly by 11%. Changes in body weight were significantly negatively correlated with changes in ratios of cholesterol to serum plant sterols and cholestanol.

Conclusions: Baseline cholesterol absorption and synthesis were related to respective serum SHBG, glucose, and insulin values. Weight reduction increased cholesterol absorption and improved variables of glucose metabolism. These results suggest that low cholesterol absorption and high synthesis may be part of the insulin resistance syndrome.

Key Words: Cholesterol absorption • cholesterol synthesis • insulin resistance • sex hormone binding globulin • plant sterols • lathosterol • obesity • type 2 diabetes • weight loss


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Obesity is an important health problem in Western countries. In adults, overweight increases the risk of death from any cause, especially from cardiovascular diseases (1). In addition, obesity contributes to the development of several long-term diseases, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease (CAD) (2). Indeed, the risk of CAD in type 2 diabetes is estimated to be higher (2- to 4-fold) than that in nondiabetic populations (3). Hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia, and overweight contribute to accelerated atherogenesis in diabetes (4, 5).

Alterations in lipoprotein metabolism in type 2 diabetes were described in detail previously (68), but the metabolism of cholesterol and bile acids has been less well characterized. It is known from earlier studies that cholesterol absorption can be low in persons with type 2 diabetes (9, 10), and serum plant sterols—indicators of cholesterol absorption efficiency (11)—are also low in persons with type 2 diabetes (9, 12) as well as in subjects with high-normal blood glucose concentrations (13). Bile acid and cholesterol synthesis and cholesterol excretion as neutral sterols are higher in patients with type 2 diabetes than in healthy populations (9, 10, 1417). However, there have been no studies conducted to determine how cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism are interrelated and how cholesterol metabolism is associated with insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Weight reduction is the primary means of treatment in overweight diabetic subjects. It is not known, however, whether long-term weight reduction affects cholesterol absorption and metabolism in these subjects. To this end, the aims of this study were 1) to investigate in obese type 2 diabetic subjects whether cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism are related to serum variables of glucose metabolism at baseline, and 2) to study the effects of weight reduction on glucose, cholesterol, and lipoprotein metabolism during a prolonged follow-up.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Study population
The study group consisted of 16 patients (13 men and 3 women) with a recent diagnosis (<2 y) of type 2 diabetes (fasting blood glucose >= 7.0 mmol/L) with a mean (±SEM) age of 52.3 ± 1.8 y and a body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) > 30 (Table 1Go). Exclusion criteria were insulin therapy, diabetic microangiopathy, hepatic or thyroid disease, unstable angina pectoris or myocardial infarction, or invasive CAD treatment in the previous year. All women were postmenopausal and none had received hormone replacement therapy. All subjects gave informed consent and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Weight, BMI, and serum glucose, insulin, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and lipid concentrations at baseline and 2 y after weight reduction (follow-up) in obese patients with type 2 diabetes1
 
Baseline data
The subjects were randomly assigned to one of two 3-mo weight-reduction regimens: a very-low-energy diet (VLED group; n = 10) or a low-energy diet (LED group; n = 6). At baseline, there were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, serum lipids, serum sterols, or variables of cholesterol metabolism between the 2 groups. In the VLED and LED groups, respectively, 8 and 2 patients received diet therapy, 1 and 2 patients took glibenclamide, and 1 and 2 patients took both glibenclamide and biguanide. The distribution of BMI, serum glucose, serum sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), serum lipids, serum sterols, and variables of cholesterol metabolism did not differ between those who took and did not take glucose medication (eg, mean SHBG of 22.7 ± 4.8 and 25.1 ± 3.9 nmol/L, respectively). Four patients in the VLED group and 2 in the LED group took a combination of ß-blockers and calcium channel–blocking agents; 3 patients in the LED group took ß-blockers only. The use of these medications was maintained during the study.

Methods
The 2-y study consisted of 3 periods: the run-in, weight-reduction, and weight-maintenance periods. During the run-in period, which lasted 6 wk, baseline metabolic studies were completed while the subjects consumed an ad libitum diet at home. During the weight-reduction period, which lasted for 3 mo, the VLED group ingested daily 3 servings of a VLED (97 kJ/d, Cambridge Diet; Howard Foundation, Cambridge, United Kingdom). One serving provided 14.2 g protein, 15.0 g carbohydrates, 2.7 g fat, and essential minerals, trace nutrients, and vitamins. Hypoglycemia treatment was discontinued in the VLED group. The LED group was advised to consume a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet. In the LED group, the dose of glibenclamide was adjusted so that blood glucose concentrations were <7.0 mmol/L and biguanide use was discontinued.

The weight-maintenance period continued from 4 mo until 2 y in both groups. The diets were individually tailored by the dietitian so that the daily energy balance was zero. Hemoglobin and blood pressure measurements were made and an electrocardiogram and liver, thyroid, and kidney function tests were performed.

During the isoenergetic phases at the beginning and end of the study, blood glucose, serum insulin, and SHBG—an indicator of insulin resistance (18)—were measured and metabolic and kinetic studies were performed. The subjects kept a food record for 7 d, from which the proportions of the dietary constituents were calculated (19). Additionally, subjects were given a capsule containing ( ± SEM) 76.5 ± 0.323 Bq (4500 ± 19 decays/min) 4-[14C]cholesterol, 196.99 ± 0.714 Bq (11588 ± 42 decays/min) 22,23-[3H]ß-sitosterol, and 200 mg Cr2O3 3 times daily with their regular meals during this 7-d period. Stool was collected on the last 3 d of the week. Turnover studies of serum LDL and HDL were performed for 2 wk after the stool collection was completed. During this time, serum lipids; lipoproteins; apolipoprotein (apo) A-I, A-II, and B; and noncholesterol sterols were analyzed 4 times from serum samples collected after a 12-h fast.

Serum total and free cholesterol, triacylglycerol, phospholipids, and apo A-I, A-II, and B were measured with commercial kits (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; Wako Chemicals, Neuss, Germany; and Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland). Serum lipoproteins were separated by ultracentrifugation into the following density classes: VLDL, <1.006 kg/L; IDL, 1.006–1.019 kg/L; LDL, 1.019–1.063 kg/L; and HDL, 1.063–1.210 kg/L (20). Serum insulin was analyzed by radioimmunoassay and serum SHBG by fluoroimmunoassay with commercial kits (Pharmacia & Upjohn, Uppsala, Sweden; and Wallac, Turku, Finland).

Serum sterols were determined by gas-liquid chromatography from nonsaponifiable serum on a 50-m long SE-30 capillary column (21) (Ultra 1; Hewlett-Packard, Wilmington, DE). The procedure measures total cholesterol and noncholesterol sterols, including cholesterol precursors ({Delta}8-cholestenol, desmosterol, and lathosterol), reflecting cholesterol synthesis (11, 22, 23), and plant sterols (campesterol and sitosterol) and cholestanol, reflecting cholesterol absorption (11, 24).

Elimination of cholesterol from the body and cholesterol absorption efficiency were determined from the 3-d stool samples. Cholesterol absorption efficiency was calculated by subtracting the ratio of 14C to 3H in the stool samples from that in the diet (25), and Cr2O3 measurements (26) were applied to the measurement of fecal flow. Fecal cholesterol as fecal neutral sterols (cholesterol, coprostanol, and coprostanone), bile acids, and plant sterols were quantitated by gas-liquid chromatography (2729).

For the kinetic studies, 50 mL plasma was drawn and autologous LDL and HDL were separated by serial preparative ultracentrifugation (for 44 h at 10°C and 321 984 x g). Apo A-I was isolated from HDL as described previously (30). Apo A-I was iodinated with 125I and LDL apo B was iodinated with 131I by using a modification of the iodine-monochloride method (31, 32). Three days before injection, the subjects started to take peroral potassium iodide. Approximately 1 mg of the labeled autologous LDL apo B and apo A-I was mixed with 5% human serum albumin, filtered, and injected simultaneously. The total amount of radioactivity did not exceed 2220 Bq (60 µCi).

After the injection, 10-mL blood samples were collected and counted for 14 d. Die-away curves were constructed for [131I]LDL and [125I]HDL. The fractional catabolic rates (FCRs) for LDL apo B and HDL apo A-I were determined by using a 2-pool model. The transport rate was calculated by multiplying the FCR by the pool size. Pool size was calculated by multiplying the plasma apo concentrations by plasma volume, which was calculated to be 4.5% of body weight. LDL apo B and HDL apo A-I were measured twice in postinjection samples and their mean values were used to calculate the transport rate.

Cholesterol synthesis was calculated as the difference between the fecal steroids (neutral and acidic) of cholesterol origin and dietary cholesterol. Biliary secretion was calculated as the total intestinal cholesterol pool minus dietary cholesterol. To eliminate the effect of changing lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations during the entire study period, noncholesterol sterol values were standardized and expressed as 102 x mmol/mol cholesterol, ie, in proportions or ratios to serum total cholesterol.

Statistics
The hypothesis was tested with paired t tests, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, and analysis of variance by using BMDP statistical software (SPSS Inc, Chicago). Logarithmic transformations were used with skewed distributions. Assuming that the obtained reduction in weight would be 5 kg and the {alpha} level was <0.05, a sample size of 16 would give a statistical power of 0.80 (33).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Baseline findings
The subjects were markedly overweight (BMI: 31.7 ± 0.6) and had moderately elevated serum cholesterol and triacylglycerol and low HDL-cholesterol concentrations (Table 1Go). Serum and metabolic variables were not significantly different between men and women or between treatment groups; therefore, the 16 subjects were analyzed in aggregate. For example, LDL-cholesterol, triacylglycerol, blood glucose, serum SHBG, and cholesterol synthesis values in women and men were 2.82 ± 0.72 and 3.28 ± 0.19 mmol/L, 3.58 ± 2.07 and 3.59 ± 0.54 mmol/L, 7.7 ± 0.9 and 8.5 ± 0.7 mmol/L, 18.7 ± 5.5 and 26.1 ± 3.7 nmol/L, and 21.1 ± 2.3 and 16.4 ± 0.9 mg•kg-1•d-1, respectively.

Two-year follow-up
All 16 subjects completed the study without side effects. After the follow-up, the mean body weight was 6 ± 1 kg lower than that at baseline (Table 1Go), the changes ranging from -18 to 1 kg. The daily intakes of energy, cholesterol, and plant sterols (in mg/kg body wt) did not differ significantly from baseline, but fat intake was significantly lower than baseline (Table 2Go). Blood glucose was reduced by 14% (P < 0.01), serum insulin decreased only slightly, and serum SHBG concentrations tended to increase, but not significantly so. The ratio of serum SHBG to insulin increased significantly, by 66% (Table 1Go). Free and esterified cholesterol and phospholipids were practically unchanged in serum and lipoproteins. However, triacylglycerol concentrations decreased significantly in serum and VLDL, LDL, and HDL decreased by 25%, 27%, 15%, and 13%, respectively, resulting in decreased triacylglycerol-cholesterol ratios: from 5.1 to 4.5 (P < 0.01) in VLDL, from 9.8 to 8.0 (P < 0.001) in LDL, and from 21.4 to 16.8 (P < 0.01) in HDL. The ratio of triacylglycerol to apo B in LDL decreased by 16 ± 3% (P < 0.001). The kinetic studies showed that the FCR for LDL apo B decreased significantly, whereas the transport rate for LDL apo B and HDL apo A-I kinetics did not change significantly (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Dietary variables at baseline and 2 y after weight reduction (follow-up) in obese patients with type 2 diabetes1
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. LDL and HDL kinetics at baseline and 2 y after weight reduction (follow-up) in obese patients with type 2 diabetes1
 
Cholesterol absorption efficiency increased by 28% and the absolute amount of cholesterol absorbed increased by 23% (Table 4Go). Cholesterol absorption efficiency increased in 13 subjects, did not change in 1 subject, and decreased in 2 subjects. Bile acid and cholesterol synthesis did not change significantly, despite significantly decreased fecal neutral steroid excretion. The proportions of plant sterols in serum increased significantly, by 20–31%; cholesterol precursor–sterol ratios tended to decrease correspondingly.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Cholesterol absorption and metabolism at baseline and 2 y after weight reduction (follow-up) in obese patients with type 2 diabetes1
 
Correlations at baseline and 2 y
At baseline, blood glucose correlated with bile acid and cholesterol synthesis (Table 5Go) and with serum insulin (r = 0.558, P < 0.05). Serum insulin also correlated with fecal neutral steroids and cholesterol synthesis. Serum SHBG was associated with basal body weight and cholesterol absorption efficiency, but not with blood glucose or serum insulin.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Correlation coefficients at baseline and 2 y after weight loss (follow-up) in obese patients with type 2 diabetes
 
After weight reduction, the above correlations were not significant, but serum SHBG was significantly related to the proportions of campesterol (r = 0.669, P < 0.05), cholestanol, and sitosterol in serum (Figure 1Go) and inversely to serum triacylglycerol. Blood glucose was inversely related to the proportion of cholestanol in serum. In addition, changes from baseline in campesterol, cholestanol, and sitosterol were related to reductions in body weight (Figure 2Go).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Correlation between sex hormone binding globulin concentrations and serum sitosterol proportion at 2 y (n = 16). r = 0.779, P < 0.001. For campesterol and cholestanol, the respective values are r = 0.661 (P < 0.01) and r = 0.516 (P = 0.05).

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Correlation between changes ({Delta}) in weight and changes in the proportion of campesterol in serum at 2 y (n = 16). r = -0.582, P < 0.05. For sitosterol and cholestanol, the respective values are r = -0.647 (P < 0.05) and r = -0.418 (NS).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The original findings of the present study were as follows: 1) serum variables reflecting glucose metabolism and insulin resistance were related to variables reflecting cholesterol absorption and synthesis in obese patients with type 2 diabetes, and 2) cholesterol absorption (ie, absolute or relative absorption or plant sterols and cholestanol in serum) markedly improved after weight reduction such that diminished excretion of cholesterol in feces as neutral sterols was balanced by increased absorption. Accordingly, weight reduction tended to normalize cholesterol metabolism, even though cholesterol synthesis still remained higher and absorption remained lower than normal (11). Insulin resistance seems to be associated with disturbances in cholesterol absorption and metabolism even in normolipidemic individuals.

Serum total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations did not change significantly after the 2-y follow-up, probably because increased cholesterol absorption provided more cholesterol to the liver from the intestine, reducing slightly the removal (FCR) of LDL apo B. It can be assumed that VLDL production, which is elevated in type 2 diabetes (15), decreased slightly after weight reduction, which probably contributed to the lower triacylglycerol content in the VLDL, LDL, and HDL fractions.

Weight reduction in type 2 diabetes improves hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance (34), which was observed in the present study on the basis of serum glucose, insulin, and SHBG concentrations, the latter of which is assumed to be a valid indicator of insulin resistance (18). The serum SHBG concentration was not related to glucose and insulin concentrations, but it was significantly positively correlated with cholesterol absorption efficiency and with serum plant sterol and cholestanol concentrations after weight reduction, reflecting cholesterol absorption. The inverse associations between SHBG and variables of cholesterol synthesis were not significant (r = -0.364, P < 0.1). Weight reduction was inversely correlated with the proportion of sitosterol, campesterol, and cholestanol in serum and with the absorption efficiency of cholesterol, but not with changes in blood glucose or variables of cholesterol synthesis. These associations suggest that cholesterol absorption efficiency and insulin resistance were interrelated and that the efficacy of cholesterol absorption was an inverse indicator of insulin resistance.

It can be assumed that elimination of overweight could normalize cholesterol absorption and, accordingly, normalize cholesterol metabolism in obese patients with diabetes. It is not known, however, whether decreased absorption of cholesterol is exclusively due to obesity or whether diabetes itself is a contributing factor. We showed earlier that cholesterol absorption was lower and cholesterol synthesis was higher in moderately overweight (BMI: 26.5) persons with type 2 diabetes than in nondiabetic control subjects of similar ages and BMIs (9). In addition, our preliminary results in obese subjects with and without diabetes suggest that cholesterol absorption is lower in diabetic persons (35). This suggests that diabetes or insulin resistance might be more important than obesity.

A lower cholesterol absorption efficiency was described previously in hypertriglyceridemic subjects with type 1 and 2 diabetes than in normal control subjects (10), in a mildly overweight type 2 diabetic population than in control subjects (9), and even in subjects with a high-normal glucose concentration than in those with low-normal glucose concentrations (13). It appears that increasing glucose concentrations and increasing insulin resistance are continuous variables with decreasing cholesterol absorption and increasing cholesterol synthesis. In a more recent study, plasma insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon were related to absolute but not to relative cholesterol absorption (36).

Increasing insulin resistance and obesity could change the intestinal cholesterol pool or the absorption mechanism of intestinal mucosa. Obese subjects effectively synthesize cholesterol, which increases cholesterol secretion through the biliary tract into the intestine, expanding the intestinal cholesterol pool (37). The large intestinal cholesterol pool dilutes dietary cholesterol and the marker sterols used to measure absorption and could reduce absorption efficiency. In the present study, cholesterol absorption efficiency increased after weight reduction, with no change in the intestinal cholesterol pool (Table 4Go), and serum plant sterols and cholestanol increased proportionately with weight loss (Figure 2Go), suggesting that improved insulin resistance, in combination with only slightly decreased body weight, enhanced mucosal capacity to absorb cholesterol and sterols. When cholesterol absorption is low, hepatic cholesterol synthesis is up-regulated, and when more cholesterol is absorbed from the intestine and transported to the liver, cholesterol synthesis and LDL receptor activity are diminished (reduced FCR for LDL apo B). Cholesterol synthesis was high in most (9, 10, 1417) but not all (38) studies of type 2 diabetes including nonobese and obese subjects, and decreased when patients became euglycemic (14, 39). On the other hand, low absorption efficiency and high cholesterol synthesis was observed in overweight nondiabetic subjects (40) and BMI was inversely related to cholesterol absorption efficiency (41), suggesting that obesity itself results in a hyperinsulinemic state and alters cholesterol metabolism. Accordingly, the present study showed that low cholesterol absorption efficiency may be part of the insulin resistance syndrome.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Stevens J, Cai J, Pamuk ER, Williamson DF, Thun MJ, Wood JL. The effect of age on the association between body-mass index and mortality. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Pi-Sunyer FX. Medical hazards of obesity. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:655–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD, Wentworth D. Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Diabetes Care 1993;16: 434–44.[Abstract]
  4. National Institutes of Health. Consensus development conference statement. Health implications of obesity. Ann Intern Med 1985; 103:1073–7.
  5. National Institutes of Health. Consensus development conference on diet and exercise in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1987;10:639–44.[Medline]
  6. Howard BV. Lipoprotein metabolism in diabetes mellitus. J Lipid Res 1987;28:613–28.[Medline]
  7. Ginsberg HN. Lipoprotein physiology in non-diabetic and diabetic states. Relationship to atherogenesis. Diabetes Care 1991;14:839–55.[Abstract]
  8. Stern MP, Haffner SM. Dyslipidemia in type II diabetes. Implications for therapeutic intervention. Diabetes Care 1991;14:1144–59.[Abstract]
  9. Gylling H, Miettinen TA. Cholesterol absorption, synthesis, and LDL metabolism in NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1997;20:90–5.[Abstract]
  10. Briones ER, Steiger DL, Palumbo PJ, et al. Sterol excretion and cholesterol absorption in diabetics and nondiabetics with and without hyperlipidemia. Am J Clin Nutr 1986;44:353–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Miettinen TA, Tilvis RS, Kesäniemi YA. Serum plant sterols and cholesterol precursors reflect cholesterol absorption and synthesis in volunteers of a randomly selected male population. Am J Epidemiol 1990;131:20–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sutherland WH, Scott RS, Lintott CJ, Robertson MC, Stapely SA, Cox C. Plasma non-cholesterol sterols in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Horm Metab Res 1992;24:172–5.[Medline]
  13. Strandberg TE, Salomaa V, Vanhanen H, Miettinen TA. Associations of fasting blood glucose with cholesterol absorption and synthesis in nondiabetic middle-aged men. Diabetes 1996;45:755–61.[Abstract]
  14. Bennion LJ, Grundy SM. Effects of diabetes mellitus on cholesterol metabolism in man. N Engl J Med 1977;296:1365–71.[Abstract]
  15. Abrams JJ, Ginsberg H, Grundy SM. Metabolism of cholesterol and plasma triglycerides in nonketotic diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1982;31:903–10.[Abstract]
  16. Andersen E, Hellström P, Hellström K. Cholesterol and bile acid metabolism in middle-aged diabetics. Diabete Metab 1986;12:261–6.[Medline]
  17. Naoumova RP, Cummings MH, Watts GF, et al. Acute hyperinsulinaemia decreases cholesterol synthesis less in subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus than in non-diabetic subjects. Eur J Clin Invest 1996;26:332–40.[Medline]
  18. Haffner SM. Sex hormone-binding protein, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance and noninsulin-dependent diabetes. Horm Res 1996;45:233–7.[Medline]
  19. Knuts L-R, Rastas M, Haapala P. Micro-Nutrica version 1.0. Helsinki: National Pensions Institute, 1991.
  20. Lipid Research Clinics Program. Manual of laboratory operations, lipid research clinic program. Washington, DC: Lipid Research Clinics Program, 1974:51–9. (DHEW publication no. NIH/75-628.)
  21. Miettinen TA, Koivisto P. Non-cholesterol sterols and bile acid production in hypercholesterolaemic patients with ileal bypass. In: Paumgartner G, Stiehl A, Gerok W, eds. Bile acids and cholesterol in health and disease. Boston: MTP Press, 1983:183–7.
  22. Miettinen TA. Detection of changes in human cholesterol metabolism. Ann Clin Res 1970;2:1–21.
  23. Miettinen TA. Serum methyl sterols and their distribution between major lipoprotein fractions in different clinical conditions. Ann Clin Res 1971;3:264–71.[Medline]
  24. Tilvis RS, Miettinen TA. Serum plant sterols and their relation to cholesterol absorption. Am J Clin Nutr 1986;43:92–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Crouse JR, Grundy SM. Evaluation of a continuous isotope feeding method for measurement of cholesterol absorption in man. J Lipid Res 1978;19:967–71.[Abstract]
  26. Bolin DW, King RP, Klosterman EW. A simplified method for the determination of chromic oxide (Cr2O3) when used as an index substance. Science 1952;116:634–5.[Free Full Text]
  27. Miettinen TA. Gas-liquid chromatographic determination of fecal neutral sterols using a capillary column. Clin Chim Acta 1982;124:245–8.[Medline]
  28. Miettinen TA, Ahrens EH Jr, Grundy SM. Quantitative isolation and gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of total dietary and fecal neutral steroids. J Lipid Res 1965;6:411–24.[Abstract]
  29. Grundy SM, Ahrens EH Jr, Miettinen TA. Quantitative isolation and gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of total fecal bile acids. J Lipid Res 1965;6:397–410.[Abstract]
  30. Gylling H, Vega GL, Grundy SM. Physiologic mechanisms for reduced apolipoprotein A-I concentration associated with low levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol. J Lipid Res 1992;33:1527–39.[Abstract]
  31. McFarlane AS. Efficient trace-labeling of proteins with iodine. Nature 1958;182:53.[Medline]
  32. Bilheimer DW, Eisenberg S, Levy RI. The metabolism of very low density lipoproteins. I. Preliminary in vitro and in vivo observations. Biochim Biophys Acta 1972;260:212–21.[Medline]
  33. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. 1st ed. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991.
  34. Henry RR, Gumbiner B. Benefits and limitations of very low-calorie diet therapy in obese NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1991;14:802–23.[Abstract]
  35. Simonen P, Gylling H, Miettinen TA. Insulin resistance contributes in lowering cholesterol absorption efficiency in obesity. Atherosclerosis 1999;144(suppl):61 (abstr).
  36. Bosner MS, Lange LG, Stenson WF, Ostlund RE. Percent cholesterol absorption in normal women and men quantified with dual stable isotopic tracers and negative ion mass spectrometry. J Lipid Res 1999;40:302–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Grundy SM. Dietary and drug regulation of cholesterol metabolism in man. Lipid pharmacology. Vol 8. New York: Academic Press Inc, 1976:127–59.
  38. Saudek CD, Brach E. Cholesterol metabolism in diabetes mellitus. The effect of insulin on cholesterol balance. Diabetes 1978;27: 1059–64.[Abstract]
  39. Scoppola A, Testa G, Frontoni S, et al. Effects of insulin on cholesterol synthesis in type II diabetes patients. Diabetes Care 1995;18:1362–9.[Abstract]
  40. Miettinen TA. Cholesterol production in obesity. Circulation 1971;44:842–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Miettinen TA, Kesäniemi YA. Cholesterol absorption: regulation of cholesterol synthesis and elimination and within-population variations of serum cholesterol levels. Am J Clin Nutr 1989;49:629–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication August 3, 1999. Accepted for publication December 17, 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Santosa, I. Demonty, A. H. Lichtenstein, J. M. Ordovas, and P. J. H. Jones
Single nucleotide polymorphisms in ABCG5 and ABCG8 are associated with changes in cholesterol metabolism during weight loss
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 2607 - 2613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. L. Garcia-Otin, M. Cofan, M. Junyent, D. Recalde, A. Cenarro, M. Pocovi, E. Ros, and F. Civeira
Increased Intestinal Cholesterol Absorption in Autosomal Dominant Hypercholesterolemia and No Mutations in the Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor or Apolipoprotein B Genes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2007; 92(9): 3667 - 3673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. Muscari, S. Antonelli, G. Bianchi, G. Cavrini, S. Dapporto, A. Ligabue, C. Ludovico, D. Magalotti, G. Poggiopollini, M. Zoli, et al.
Serum C3 Is a Stronger Inflammatory Marker of Insulin Resistance Than C-Reactive Protein, Leukocyte Count, and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate: Comparison study in an elderly population
Diabetes Care, September 1, 2007; 30(9): 2362 - 2368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. E. Strandberg, R. S. Tilvis, K. H. Pitkala, and T. A. Miettinen
Cholesterol and Glucose Metabolism and Recurrent Cardiovascular Events Among the Elderly: A Prospective Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): 708 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
A. Bhargava
Fiber Intakes and Anthropometric Measures are Predictors of Circulating Hormone, Triglyceride, and Cholesterol Concentrations in the Women's Health Trial
J. Nutr., August 1, 2006; 136(8): 2249 - 2254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. R. Tannock, K. D. O'Brien, R. H. Knopp, B. Retzlaff, B. Fish, M. H. Wener, S. E. Kahn, and A. Chait
Cholesterol Feeding Increases C-Reactive Protein and Serum Amyloid A Levels in Lean Insulin-Sensitive Subjects
Circulation, June 14, 2005; 111(23): 3058 - 3062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
V. W. Lau, M. Journoud, and P. J. Jones
Plant sterols are efficacious in lowering plasma LDL and non-HDL cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic type 2 diabetic and nondiabetic persons
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2005; 81(6): 1351 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
G D Kolovou, K K Anagnostopoulou, and D V Cokkinos
Pathophysiology of dyslipidaemia in the metabolic syndrome
Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2005; 81(956): 358 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
H. Gylling, M. Hallikainen, J. Pihlajamaki, J. Agren, M. Laakso, R. A. Rajaratnam, R. Rauramaa, and T. A. Miettinen
Polymorphisms in the ABCG5 and ABCG8 genes associate with cholesterol absorption and insulin sensitivity
J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1660 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
H. Gylling, J. A. Tuominen, V. A. Koivisto, and T. A. Miettinen
Cholesterol Metabolism in Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes, September 1, 2004; 53(9): 2217 - 2222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
T. A. Miettinen, H. Gylling, J. Tuominen, P. Simonen, and V. Koivisto
Low Synthesis and High Absorption of Cholesterol Characterize Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2004; 27(1): 53 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
L. Berglund and D. Hyson
Cholesterol Absorption and the Metabolic Syndrome: A New Look at an Old Area
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2003; 23(8): 1314 - 1316.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
R. H. Knopp, B. Retzlaff, B. Fish, C. Walden, S. Wallick, M. Anderson, K. Aikawa, and S. E. Kahn
Effects of Insulin Resistance and Obesity on Lipoproteins and Sensitivity to Egg Feeding
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2003; 23(8): 1437 - 1443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
H. Gylling and T. A. Miettinen
Inheritance of cholesterol metabolism of probands with high or low cholesterol absorption
J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2002; 43(9): 1472 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
P. P. Simonen, H. K. Gylling, and T. A. Miettinen
Diabetes Contributes to Cholesterol Metabolism Regardless of Obesity
Diabetes Care, September 1, 2002; 25(9): 1511 - 1515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. M. Ballantyne, A. G. Olsson, T. J. Cook, M. F. Mercuri, T. R. Pedersen, and J. Kjekshus
Influence of Low High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Elevated Triglyceride on Coronary Heart Disease Events and Response to Simvastatin Therapy in 4S
Circulation, December 18, 2001; 104(25): 3046 - 3051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simonen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Miettinen, T. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simonen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Miettinen, T. A
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Simonen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Miettinen, T. A


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS