AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Picarelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Vincenzi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Picarelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Vincenzi, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Picarelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Vincenzi, M.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 74, No. 1, 137-140, July 2001
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

Original Research Communication

Immunologic evidence of no harmful effect of oats in celiac disease1,2,3

Antonio Picarelli1, Marco Di Tola1, Luigi Sabbatella1, Fabiola Gabrielli1, Teresa Di Cello1, Maria Cristina Anania1, Antonio Mastracchio1, Marco Silano1 and Massimo De Vincenzi1

1 From the Department of Clinical Sciences and the Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "La Sapienza;" St Paul Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome.

2 Supported by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità Research Project (Sorveglianza degli effetti nocivi da alimenti: intolleranza ai cereali; article 12 comma 2 D. Leg.vo 502/92).

3 Address reprint requests to A Picarelli, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Rome "La Sapienza," Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico, 155-00161 Rome, Italy. E-mail: a.picarelli{at}flashnet.it.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: It was recently shown that antiendomysial antibodies (EMAs), which are highly sensitive and specific for celiac disease, are produced by intestinal mucosa. Furthermore, EMAs were detected previously in supernatant fluid from cultured duodenal mucosa specimens collected from untreated celiac disease patients and in culture media of biopsy specimens collected from treated celiac disease patients after an in vitro challenge with gliadin. Moreover, it was recently shown in vivo that oats are not toxic to celiac disease patients, suggesting the safety of oats in a gluten free-diet.

Objective: The objective was to better define the controversial role of oats in celiac disease to determine whether oats can be safely included in a gluten-free diet.

Design: We used an in vitro model to test whether oats induce EMA production in supernatant fluid from cultured duodenal mucosa specimens collected from 13 treated celiac disease patients. The biopsy specimens were cultured with and without peptic-tryptic digest (PT) of gliadin and avenin (from oats) and in medium alone. Samples from 5 of the 13 patients were cultured with the C fraction of PT-avenin. Indirect immunofluorescence was used to detect EMAs.

Results: EMAs were detected in specimens from all 13 patients after the challenge with gliadin but not after culture in medium alone. By contrast, no EMAs were detected in any of the specimens cultured with PT-avenin and its C fraction.

Conclusions: Because the in vitro challenge with PT-avenin and its C fraction did not induce EMA production in treated celiac disease patients, it appears that oats have no harmful effect on celiac disease. Therefore, oats can be safely included in a gluten-free diet.

Key Words: Avenin • celiac disease • oats • intestinal mucosa biopsies • antiendomysial antibodies • gluten-free diet


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Celiac disease, defined as permanent intolerance of the small-bowel mucosa to the storage proteins of cereals (1, 2), is one of the most common immunologically mediated gastrointestinal diseases in Europe (3). In this hereditayr disease, an abnormal immune response to gliadin, long considered the pivotal event in the pathogenesis of celiac disease, initiates a cascade of as yet undefined events that lead to the tissue damage typical in celiac disease. Celiac disease is usually diagnosed after histologic examination of duodenal mucosa biopsy specimens. The disease is charcterized by villous flattening with crypt hyperplasia, defined by a villous height–crypt depth ratio <3:1 (4).

The cereal constituents gliadins, secalins, hordeins, and avenins are deleterious to celiac disease patients. Consequently, these patients have been advised to avoid the consumption of cereals containing these substances in their gluten-free diet (GFD) (5). The consumption of oats in the GFD of patients with celiac disease is still controversial (1, 2, 6, 7). However, recent studies suggest that moderate amounts of oats can be included in the GFD of adult celiac disease patients and of patients with dermatitis herpetiformis without adverse effects (8–11).

Because of their high sensitivity and specificity, antiendomysial antibodies (EMAs) and not antigliadin antibodies (AGAs), although the culprit antigen of celiac disease is gliadins, have emerged as an outstanding tool in the screening and follow-up of celiac disease patients (12, 13). Moreover, our previous investigations showed that EMAs are produced by the duodenal mucosa of celiac disease patients (14, 15). These studies showed that EMAs, which are not present in the culture media of biopsy specimens from treated celiac disease patients, are newly produced in these patients after an in vitro challenge with gliadin or its peptides (14, 15). The aim of the present study was to clarify the immunologic effects of oats to determine whether oats can be safely included in a GFD. We carried out this aim by studying cultured duodenal mucosal biopsies collected from treated celiac disease patients consuming a GFD.


   SUBJECTS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients
Twenty adult celiac disease patients (9 men and 11 women aged 27.5 y; range: 18–59 y) in clinical remission were enrolled in the study. All of the patients had duodenal villous atrophy, had inflammatory cells in the lamina propria of the duodenal mucosa, and tested positive for serum EMAs while consuming a gluten-containing diet. The same patients, after consuming a well-controlled GFD for 12 mo, had no clinical symptoms of celiac disease and tested negative for serum EMAs. A second duodenal biopsy was performed in these patients before enrollment in the study. Admission criteria included no histologic signs of mucosal atrophy and no EMAs in undiluted supernatant fluid from biopsy specimens cultured with medium alone. Only 13 of the 20 patients met these criteria.

Thirty patients (15 men and 15 women aged 31.7 y; range: 21–60 y) with gastrointestinal diseases other than celiac disease (n = 21 with gastroesophageal reflux and 9 with ulcers) were enrolled in the study as a control group. Biopsies of duodenal mucosa were obtained from these 30 patients for diagnostic purposes. All procedures followed were in accord with the ethical standards of the responsible institutional committee on human experimentation.

Gliadin and avenin peptides
Peptic-tryptic digests of gliadin (PT-gliadin) and of avenin (PT-avenin) were obtained by enzymatic sequential digestion of prolamine fractions extracted from pure varieties of wheat bread (San Pastore) and oats (Astra) (16, 17). The C fraction of avenin was prepared by using affinity chromatography on Sepharose-6-B-mannan of N-acetylglucosamine (18).

Histologic analysis and biopsy culture
Three duodenal biopsy specimens were obtained from each patient by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. One specimen was submitted to hematoxylin-eosin histologic morphometric analysis to measure the villous height-crypt depth ratio, an index of mucosal atrophy, and to assess the presence of inflammatory cells infiltrating the lamina propria of the duodenal mucosa. A villous height–crypt depth ratio <3:1 was considered to suggest celiac disease. Each of the 2 other duodenal mucosa biopsy specimens was divided into 2 parts and cultured (16) for <=72 h at 37°C as follows: in medium alone, in medium with PT-gliadin (1 g/L), in medium with PT-avenin (2 g/L), and with the C fraction of PT-avenin. Samples from only 5 of the 13 patients were cultured with the C fraction of PT-avenin; samples from the remaining 8 patients were cultured twice with PT-avenin. Supernatant fluid from the cultured biopsy specimens were collected and stored at -70°C until used. Because different samples from the same patient were cultured with and without PT-gliadin or PT-avenin, each subject acted as his or her own internal control.

Time course of in vitro antiendomysial antibody production
At 6, 24, and 48 h, the duodenal biopsy specimens cultured with PT-gliadin were washed in an isotonic sodium chloride solution (0.9%) and then replaced in fresh medium with PT-gliadin.

Viability test
The duodenal biopsy specimens cultured with PT-avenin were subsequently washed in an isotonic sodium chloride solution (0.9%) and then replaced in fresh medium with PT-gliadin (1 g/L) and cultured for an additional 48 h to determine viability, ie, whether the specimens could still synthesize EMAs.

Detection of antiendomysial antibodies
Indirect immunofluorescence analysis was used to determine the presence of EMAs in undiluted culture media and in sera diluted 1:5 with phosphate-buffered saline (16, 19) on cryostat sections of monkey esophagus (Eurospital, Trieste, Italy).


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Detection of antiendomysial antibodies in culture supernatant fluids
All 13 celiac disease patients were tested for EMAs in supernatant fluid from the biopsies cultured with PT-gliadin (Table 1Go). In contrast, no EMAs were detected in supernatant fluid from the biopsies collected from the same patients and cultured with medium alone, PT-avenin, or the C fraction of avenin. Furthermore, no EMAs were detected in supernatant fluid from the biopsies collected from the 30 control patients and cultured with medium alone, PT-gliadin, or PT-avenin.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Number of patients in whom antiendomysial antibodies were produced in supernatant fluid1
 
Time course of in vitro EMA production
EMAs were detected in supernatant fluid from 0 of the 13 patients after 6 h of challenge with PT-gliadin, in 8 of the 13 patients (61.5%) after 24 h of challenge with PT-gliadin, and in all 13 patients after 72 h of challenge with PT-gliadin. In all of the above-mentioned conditions, EMAs were detected in supernatant fluid diluted up to 1:8 with phosphate-buffered saline.

Viability test
In supernatant fluid from all 13 celiac disease patients, no EMAs were detected after 72 h of challenge with PT-avenin, but were newly produced in the same specimens after a subsequent 48-h challenge with PT-gliadin.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
As is well known, cereals (Gramineae) are divided into 4 major groups: Bambusoideae, Pooideae, Panicoideae, and Chloridiodeae. The Pooideae group comprises 2 subgroups: Triticum (wheat, rye, and barley) and Avena (oats) (20). The constituents of wheat (gliadin), rye (secalin), barley (hordein), and oats (avenin) that are injurious to celiac disease patients are the alcohol-soluble protein fractions known as prolamines. The amino acid sequences Pro-Ser-Gln-Gln and Gln-Gln-Gln-Pro are considered the toxic fractions of these prolamines. At least one of these sequences exists in each of the above-mentioned cereals (21).

Although the question of whether to include oats in a GFD has been debated for many years, the effect of oats on the small-intestinal mucosa of celiac disease patients has been analyzed in relatively few studies (Table 2Go). Early observations were based on a small number of patients, mainly children, and were performed by using methods that are no longer considered acceptable for diagnosing celiac disease.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. In vivo studies of the effects of oats in patients with celiac disease or dermatitis herpetiformis1
 
In some previous studies, a large number of adults with celiac disease in remission received an in vivo challenge with oats (8–11). No changes were observed in the mucosal villi architecture and no inflammatory cells had infiltrated the lamina propria; therefore, it was concluded that moderate amounts of oats can be included in a GFD without adverse effects (8–11). In 2 of these studies, sera negative for EMAs confirmed the histologic findings (9, 10).

Previous studies showed that testing for the presence of EMAs in supernatant fluid from cultured duodenal biopsies collected from treated celiac disease patients is suitable indicator of the immunologic effect of gliadin (14, 15). We used this in vitro culture system to test the specific immunologic effect (ie, EMA production) of oats in celiac disease. We showed that EMAs were not detected in the supernatant fluid after only 6 h of culture; however, EMAs were detected after 24 h in 8 of the 13 samples. It is important to note that EMAs were detected in all 13 samples after 72 h of an in vitro challenge with PT-gliadin. Therefore, our data show that the culture time is crucial for EMA production. Moreover, in culture media obtained after the viability test, no EMAs were detected after 72 h of culture with PT-avenin. However, EMAs were produced after an additional challenge of the same specimens with PT-gliadin, suggesting that the EMAs were newly produced at this time and not simply released (14, 15).

Furthermore, our data also suggest that the specimens cultured with PT-avenin were still viable after 72 h and that the absence of EMAs in the supernatant fluid was proof of a nontoxic effect of oats in celiac disease despite the high concentration of oats used (2 g/L) and the long culture time (72 h). The same results were observed after challenge with the C fraction of PT-avenin, which is known to be the toxic fraction of cereal prolamines (18). In agreement with the findings of other studies (8–11), we conclude that oats can be safely included in the GFD of celiac disease patients. In addition, the organ culture system is suitable for testing the toxicity of different cereals in celiac disease patients.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Dicke WK, Weijer HA, van de Kamer JH. Celiac disease. II. The presence in wheat of the factor having a deleterious effect in cases of celiac disease. Acta Paediatr 1953;42:34–42.[Medline]
  2. van de Kamer JH, Weijer HA, Dicke WK. Celiac disease. IV. An investigation into the injurious constituents of wheat in connection with their action on patients with celiac disease. Acta Paediatr 1953; 42:223–31.[Medline]
  3. Catassi C, Ratsch IM, Fabiani E, et al. Celiac disease in the year 2000. Exploring the iceberg. Lancet 1994;343:200–3.[Medline]
  4. Maki M, Collin P. Coeliac disease. Lancet 1997;349:1755–9.[Medline]
  5. Murray JA. The widening spectrum of celiac disease. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:354–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Dissanayake AS, Truelove SC, Whitehead R. Lack of harmful effect of oats on small-intestinal mucosa in celiac disease. Br Med J 1974;4:189–91.
  7. Baker PG, Read AE. Oats and barley toxicity in celiac patients. Postgrad Med J 1976;52:264–8.[Medline]
  8. Janatuinen EK, Pikkarainen PH, Kemppainen TA, et al. A comparison of diet with and without oats in adults with celiac disease. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1033–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Srinivasan U, Leonard N, Jones E, et al. Absence of oats toxicity in adult celiac disease. BMJ 1996;313:1300–1.[Free Full Text]
  10. Hardman CM, Garioch JJ, Leonard JN, et al. Absence of toxicity of oats in patients with dermatitis herpetiformis. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1884–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Janatuinen EK, Kemppainen TA, Pikkarainen PH, et al. Lack of cellular and humoral immunological responses to oats in adults with coeliac disease. Gut 2000;46:327–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ferreira M, Lloyd Davies S, Butler M, Scott D, Clark M, Kumar P. Endomysial antibody: is it the best screening test for celiac disease? Gut 1992;33:1633–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Corrao G, Corazza GR, Andreani ML, et al. Serological screening of celiac disease: choosing the optimal procedure according to various prevalence values. Gut 1994;35:771–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Picarelli A, Maiuri L, Frate A, Greco M, Auricchio S, Londei M. Production of antiendomysial antibodies after in vitro gliadin challenge of small intestine biopsy samples from patients with celiac disease. Lancet 1996;348:1065–7.[Medline]
  15. Picarelli A, Di Tola M, Sabbatella L, et al. 31–43 amino acid sequence of the {alpha}-gliadin induces anti-endomysial antibody production during in vitro challenge. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999;34:1099–102.[Medline]
  16. De Ritis G, Occorsio P, Auricchio S, Gramenzi F, Morisi G, Silano V. Toxicity of wheat flour proteins and protein-derived peptides for in vitro developing intestine from rat fetus. Pediatr Res 1979;13: 1255–61.[Medline]
  17. Auricchio S, De Ritis G, De Vincenzi M, Occorsio P, Silano V. Effect of gliadin peptides prepared from hexaploid and tetraploid wheat on cultures of intestine from rat fetuses and celiac children. Pediatr Res 1982;16:1004–10.[Medline]
  18. De Vincenzi M, Dessì MR, Giovannini C, Maialetti F, Mancini E. Agglutinating activity of wheat gliadin peptide fractions in celiac disease. Toxicology 1995;96:29–35.[Medline]
  19. Maiuri L, Auricchio S, Coletta S, et al. Blockage of T-cell costimulation inhibits T-cell action in celiac disease. Gastroenterology 1998; 115:564–72.[Medline]
  20. Colot V, Bartels D, Thompson R, Flavell R. Molecular characterization of an active LMW glutenin gene and its relation to other wheat and barley prolamin genes. Mol Gen Genet 1989;216:81–90.[Medline]
  21. De Ritis G, Auricchio S, Jones HW, Lew EJL, Bernardin JE, Kasarda DD. In vitro (organ culture) studies of the toxicity of specific A-gliadin peptides in celiac disease. Gastroenterology 1988;94:41–9.[Medline]
Received for publication June 26, 2000. Accepted for publication November 7, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
B. Moron, A. Cebolla, H. Manyani, M. Alvarez-Maqueda, M. Megias, M. d. C. Thomas, M. C. Lopez, and C. Sousa
Sensitive detection of cereal fractions that are toxic to celiac disease patients by using monoclonal antibodies to a main immunogenic wheat peptide
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2008; 87(2): 405 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
C J R Goddard and H R Gillett
Complications of coeliac disease: are all patients at risk?
Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2006; 82(973): 705 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GutHome page
D A van Heel and J West
Recent advances in coeliac disease
Gut, July 1, 2006; 55(7): 1037 - 1046.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nutr Clin PractHome page
J. See and J. A. Murray
Gluten-Free Diet: The Medical and Nutrition Management of Celiac Disease
Nutr Clin Pract, February 1, 2006; 21(1): 1 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GutHome page
E H A Spaenij-Dekking, E M C Kooy-Winkelaar, W F Nieuwenhuizen, J W Drijfhout, and F Koning
A novel and sensitive method for the detection of T cell stimulatory epitopes of {alpha}/{beta}- and {gamma}-gliadin
Gut, September 1, 2004; 53(9): 1267 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GutHome page
L Hogberg, P Laurin, K Falth-Magnusson, C Grant, E Grodzinsky, G Jansson, H Ascher, L Browaldh, J-A Hammersjo, E Lindberg, et al.
Oats to children with newly diagnosed coeliac disease: a randomised double blind study
Gut, May 1, 2004; 53(5): 649 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GutHome page
C Kilmartin, S Lynch, M Abuzakouk, H Wieser, and C Feighery
Avenin fails to induce a Th1 response in coeliac tissue following in vitro culture
Gut, January 1, 2003; 52(1): 47 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
A. Colli, A. Colucci, D. Conte, F. Gomollon, E. Tribole, C. Kupper, M. Pietzak, B. W.M. Spanier, B. Dietz, C. J.J. Mulder, et al.
Celiac Sprue
N. Engl. J. Med., August 8, 2002; 347(6): 446 - 448.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Diabetes Spectr.Home page
S. J. Schwarzenberg and C. Brunzell
Type 1 Diabetes and Celiac Disease: Overview and Medical Nutrition Therapy
Diabetes Spectr, July 1, 2002; 15(3): 197 - 201.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Picarelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Vincenzi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Picarelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Vincenzi, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Picarelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Vincenzi, M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS