AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luke, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luke, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. S
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Luke, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. S
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 75, No. 6, 1045-1050, June 2002
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Activity energy expenditure and adiposity among black adults in Nigeria and the United States1,2,3

Amy Luke, Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu, Charles N Rotimi, Helen Iams, Dale A Schoeller, Abedowale A Adeyemo, Terrence E Forrester, Rainford Wilks and Richard S Cooper

1 From the Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Loyola University School of Medicine, Maywood, IL (AL, RAD-A, CNR, HI, and RSC); the Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison (DAS); the University College Hospital, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria (AAA); and the Tropical Medicine Research Institute, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston, Jamaica (TEF and RW).

2 Supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (HL 45508, DK30031, and DK26678) and by an endowment from the William G Potts Estate, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine.

3 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to A Luke, Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Loyola University School of Medicine, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153. E-mail: aluke{at}lumc.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: The prevalence of obesity is higher among populations in industrialized than in developing countries.

Objective: We sought to compare the relations of activity energy expenditure (AEE) with adiposity and weight change in 2 black populations with different levels of obesity.

Design: Total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) and resting energy expenditure (REE) were measured and AEE was calculated in 58 Nigerian and 34 US black women and men. Weight was remeasured after >= 1 y in a subset of participants. AEE adjusted for body size and TDEE adjusted for REE were calculated with the use of the residual regression method. The cross-sectional relations between percentage body fat and activity were modeled by using regression analysis, and longitudinal relations between weight change and adjusted energy expenditure variables were calculated.

Results: Women and men from the United States weighed more, had more body fat, and had higher levels of TDEE, REE, and AEE than did those from Nigeria. Cross-sectionally, AEE was negatively associated with adiposity after adjustment for body size and age (P < 0.001), regardless of site. Between 60% and 80% of the variance in adiposity was explained by AEE or TDEE. REE, AEE, and TDEE adjusted for body size and age were negatively correlated with weight change among Nigerian women but not men.

Conclusions: The significant difference observed in mean adiposity between Nigerians and US blacks was not explained by differences in AEE. However, a low AEE was an important determinant of high percentages of body fat in black adults and was associated with increased weight gain in Nigerian women.

Key Words: Obesity • energy expenditure • developing countries • Nigeria • blacks • African Americans • United States


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The prevalences of overweight and obesity have increased dramatically over the past few decades in most industrialized countries (1, 2). During the same time period, many developing countries have undergone an economic transition from societies characterized by subsistence agriculture to increased urbanization and industrialization. This transition is typically accompanied by changes in food supply, type of physical activity, level of physical activity, sanitation, and access to health care (3, 4), followed by a relative increase in obesity and its attendant chronic diseases (5).

Obesity is the result of an imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure. Research into mechanisms has been hampered by the difficulty in making direct measurement of these quantities. Cross-sectional studies have often, though not consistently, documented an inverse relation between physical activity expenditure and adiposity (610). Longitudinal studies that examined the relation between total or activity energy expenditure (AEE) and obesity have also yielded inconsistent results (1113). Until recently, there had been no studies documenting trends in energy expenditure in a population that had undergone a major economic or nutritional transition. Migration studies offer the best opportunity to study the relations between environmental factors (eg, energy expenditure) and health outcomes as populations move from one environment to another (14, 15). The number of such large-scale population movements is relatively small, and it is difficult to track individuals during the actual course of these migrations; however, contrasts can be made between related populations living in different environments. Esparza et al (16), for example, recently reported different levels of total energy expenditure and physical activity among 2 separate populations of Pima Indians. The Pimas living a traditional lifestyle in northwest Mexico had both higher energy expenditures and lower levels of adiposity than did the Pima Indians living in Arizona.

The African diaspora, a consequence of the forced migration of Africans to the Western Hemisphere between the 16th and 19th centuries, provides another possibility to examine the influence of environment on obesity prevalence. Similarly to the Pima Indians of Arizona and northwest Mexico, the prevalences of obesity and the associated chronic diseases are much higher among populations of West African origin currently living in the United States than in those residing in West Africa (1719). For black populations living in the Caribbean and the United Kingdom, obesity and its sequelae are on the rise, particularly among women, with rates intermediate between those in Africa and those in the United States (2023).

In this study we directly measured energy expenditure and body composition in Nigerians and African Americans to compare populations that share genetic ancestry yet live under different social and economic conditions. The study of populations with very different mean levels of adiposity provides a much broader range of exposure across which to examine the relations between body composition and components of energy expenditure than might be possible in any one cultural setting.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Recruitment of participants
Ongoing community-based studies of hypertension provided the sampling frame for participants in Maywood, IL, and in the rural community of Igbo-Ora and the city of Ibadan, both in Nigeria. The parent study, the International Collaborative Study on Hypertension, has recruited >20000 individuals in West Africa, the Caribbean, and the United States in the past 10 y for cross-sectional surveys and longitudinal studies of hypertension (20). Recruitment of participants for the parent study was based on the probability proportional to size sampling method (24). In brief, after identification of appropriate geographic subunits (ie, housing compounds in Nigeria and city blocks in the United states), a random sample was generated, proportional to the size of the subunit, and all eligible participants were approached to participate in the study.

Participants between the ages of 18 and 55 y were randomly selected from the parent study enrollees. All participants were free of significant medical illnesses [including thyroid disorders, coronary heart disease, osteoarthritis, and acute infection (eg, malaria)] and were not engaged in any weight-loss practices. All participants from both the urban and rural communities of Nigeria were of Yoruba ethnicity, whereas in the United States the participants were self-identified as being of African ancestry.

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine (Maywood, IL) and the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Written, informed consent was obtained from all participants; in Nigeria, the informed consent document was translated into and presented in Yoruba.

Energy expenditure measurements
Total daily energy expenditure
The doubly labeled water (DLW) method was described in detail elsewhere (25). The DLW measurement period lasted 14 d for the US participants but only 10 d for the Nigerian participants because of uncertainty concerning the rate of water turnover in the tropics. Deuterium and 18O elimination rates were calculated by the 2-point method with the use of isotopic enrichment relative to baseline and the time difference between the third postdose and the final urine samples (26). The mean (±SD) ratio of deuterium to 18O dilution spaces for both sites combined was 1.035 ± 0.017, which agrees well with previously published data (27). The food quotient used for determining total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) (28) was based on site-specific dietary analyses (29; E Choboso, unpublished observations, 1994) and varied by site: 0.90 in Nigeria and 0.85 in the United States.

Resting energy expenditure
All measurements of resting energy expenditure (REE) were made by using the same protocol and indirect calorimetry system in both sites, ie, the DeltaTrac II metabolic monitor (SensorMedics, Anaheim, CA). All REE measurements were made in health clinics on an outpatient basis after participants had fasted from 2200 the previous evening. The measurement rooms were thermoneutral relative to the respective environments (ie, an ambient temperatures of 28°C in Nigeria and of 23°C in the United States); both sites were at approximately sea level. In all participants, measured REE was stable (<10% variability) for 20–30 min. REE was calculated from inspired oxygen and expired carbon dioxide according to the modified Weir equation with the use of data from the last 20–30 min of the measurement period and was expressed as MJ/d (30).

Methanol burn tests showed the instrument to be accurate to within ±2%. A total of 52 duplicate measurements were made on participants and staff on separate days up to 18 mo apart with a resulting CV of 3.3%. The instrument was calibrated for barometric pressure in both sites. Three of the Nigerian participants were not available for measurement of REE; therefore, their values were predicted from the Cunningham equation with the use of fat-free mass (FFM) derived from isotope dilution (31); the correlation between measured and predicted REE was high in the other Nigerian participants (r = 0.96).

Activity energy expenditure
AEE (in MJ/d) was calculated as

(1)
The term "0.1 x TDEE" represents the estimated 10% of TDEE expended as the thermic effect of food (32). The physical activity level (PAL) was calculated as the ratio of TDEE to REE (33).

Body composition and anthropometry
Body composition was measured by using the isotope-dilution method and was carried out concurrently with the DLW procedure. The isotope-dilution method is based on the dilution principle and was described in detail elsewhere (34). Total body water was calculated for each isotope and the 2 values were averaged. FFM was calculated by dividing the average total body water by a hydration constant (0.73) (35). Fat mass (FM) was calculated as the difference between body weight and FFM.

Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg with a calibrated portable electronic digital scale while participants were shoeless and wearing light clothing. Height was measured against a vertical wall with a wooden headboard and was recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm while the patients were shoeless. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2). The participants returned to each clinic after >=1 y for follow-up measurement of weight. Weight change was calculated as the difference between weight at follow-up and weight at the initial examination. Sex-specific analyses were conducted because we strongly suspected that weight changes would be significantly different between the men and women at follow-up.

Statistical methods
Statistical analyses were undertaken to define the relations between adiposity, expressed as percentage body fat, and components of energy expenditure among black adults from 2 sites. No one statistical method for the expression and comparison of AEE between populations is universally accepted; therefore, AEE was adjusted for body size in 3 ways: 1) AEE divided by body weight (in kJ•kg body wt-1•d-1) (36, 37), 2) AEE adjusted for body weight with the use of the residuals from the regression of AEE on weight (MJ/d) (38), and 3) TDEE adjusted for REE with the use of the residual regression method (8, 16). Mean values for these adjusted variables were compared between populations. Within-sex comparisons of mean characteristics were also made between the 2 sites by using two-way analysis of variance with a test for interaction.

The cross-sectional relations between adiposity and components of the energy budget were determined by using two multivariate regression models. Percentage body fat was the dependent variable in both of the models tested. In model 1, AEE and weight were the primary independent covariates, with dummy variables included for sex and site. In model 2, the independent covariates were TDEE and REE. We also tested for an interaction between sex and TDEE or AEE in each model. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the strength of association between weight change and AEE adjusted for body weight or TDEE adjusted for REE. All statistical analyses were carried out with the use of STATA for WINDOWS (version 6.0; Stata, College Station, TX) (39).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Participants included 58 adults from Nigeria (28 women and 30 men) and 34 from the United States (22 women and 12 men) (Table 1Go). Compared with the US women, the Nigerian women weighed significantly less and had a significantly mean lower BMI, FFM, FM, and percentage body fat. This pattern was consistent among the men; the Nigerians had a significantly lower mean height, weight, BMI, FFM, and FM. Percentage body fat did not differ significantly between the Nigerian and US men.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Participant characteristics by site and sex1
 
As expected, mean unadjusted REE, AEE, and TDEE were significantly higher in the United States than in the Nigerian participants of both sexes (Table 1Go) because the US participants had larger body sizes than did the Nigerians. PALs did not differ significantly between sites in either the women or the men. After adjustment for body size and age, all of the differences in unadjusted mean energy expenditure variables observed between the 2 sites disappeared (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Energy expenditure variables adjusted for body size and age by site and sex1
 
Cross-sectionally, AEE adjusted for body weight and age was a significant negative predictor of adiposity (P < 0.001) (Table 3Go). A regression model including age, sex, weight, and AEE explained 77% of the variance observed in percentage body fat. A similar model, after controlling for the additional effect of REE, explained 66% of the variance observed with TDEE, which was also a negative determinant of adiposity (P < 0.05) (Table 4Go). The cross-sectional association between AEE divided by body weight and percentage body fat in the men and women from both sites is illustrated in Figure 1Go. In each of the models, sex was a significant covariate (P < 0.001), alone explaining between 20% and 35% of the variance in adiposity. The difference in percentage body fat between men and women was constant across the range of AEEs, ie, men and women had the same slope of change in adiposity per unit of AEE (or TDEE) but at different absolute levels. The two-factor (sex and site) analysis of variance conducted to clarify the sex-specific effects showed a significant (P < 0.001) main effect of site for REE, AEE, and TDEE and of sex for REE and TDEE. The site x sex interaction was not significant, however, for any of the unadjusted or adjusted energy expenditure measures.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Regression coefficients for model describing the relation between percentage body fat and activity energy expenditure (AEE) adjusted for body size and age1
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4 Regression coefficients for model describing the relation between percentage body fat and total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) adjusted for resting energy expenditure (REE) and age
 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Cross-sectional relations between percentage body fat and activity energy expenditure adjusted for body size (AEE/body weight) among black women ({blacktriangleup}; n = 28) and men ({triangleup}; n = 30) from Nigeria and black women (•; n = 22) and men ({circ}; n = 12) from the United States. The lines represent the regression equations for the women ( ––– ) and men (– – –) from both sites combined. Overall equation: percentage body fat = -0.14 AEE + 14.6 sex + 25.5, where r2 = 0.61, root mean squared error = 7.3%, male sex = 0, and female sex = 1.

 
Weight change data were collected from 59 individuals with a mean follow-up of 1.5 y (range: 1.0–3.0 y). The mean length of follow-up did not differ significantly between sites. The mean (±SD) weight change per year in Nigeria was 0.1 ± 1.9 kg (women: 0.4 ± 1.9 kg/y, n = 23; men: -0.2 ± 1.9 kg/y, n = 24) and that in the United States was 1.2 ± 2.5 kg/y (women: 1.0 ± 0.8 kg/y, n = 5; men: 1.4 ± 3.7 kg/y, n = 5). Although the return rate for follow-up in the United States was less than optimal, participants had not been recruited with the intent of follow-up after the initial study.

Because of the very small number of observations from the United States, only the data from Nigeria were used in the longitudinal analysis. Significant sex differences were observed between weight change and the adjusted energy expenditure variables (Table 5Go). Short-term weight change (ie, weight change per year) was negatively correlated with REE, AEE, and TDEE adjusted for body size and age in Nigerian women. Weight change was negatively correlated with AEE divided by body weight in the women. Because of the small sample size, the only significant association among the women was that between weight change and REE adjusted for FFM and age. Among the Nigerian men, however, no significant associations were observed between the energy expenditure variables and weight change. We acknowledge that statistical testing did not show a significant sex x site interaction; therefore, the findings related to weight change in the subgroup of Nigerian women may have been due to chance. Nonetheless, a strong prior expectation, based on knowledge of population effects, suggests that the pattern of weight change in women may be different from that in men.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5 Pearson correlation coefficients (and 95% CIs) for the relations between weight change per year and energy expenditure variables adjusted for body size and age in Nigerian women and men1
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A strong inverse cross-sectional relation between AEE adjusted for body weight and adiposity was observed between 2 populations of West African origin. Weaker but consistently inverse associations were observed between weight change per year and adjusted REE, AEE, and TDEE among women but not men in Nigeria. Although mean differences in body size and adiposity between the 2 population samples were not explained by differences in AEE, these data support the idea that low levels of physical activity are important in explaining the high levels of body fat in both Nigeria and the United States.

The lack of significant differences in energy expenditure measures between the 2 sites was surprising because the socioeconomic environment and types of physical activity varied greatly between the 2 populations in these sites. Although the Nigerian sample represented both urban and rural populations, none of the measured variables were significantly different between the urban tradespeople and the rural agriculturalists. Both groups have much less access to mechanization than do persons in the United States; therefore, it was expected that AEE, however defined, would be higher in Nigeria. However, this outcome was not observed. In fact, no significant differences between the Nigerian and US cohorts were observed for any of the various energy expenditure variables measured.

These findings are in contrast with those of Esparza et al (16), who reported significantly higher levels of energy expenditure and lower levels of body fat among Pima Indians living a traditional lifestyle in rural Mexico than in Pima Indians living in the United States. This difference in energy expenditure between the 2 groups of Pima Indians was consistent regardless of whether physical activity expenditure was expressed as TDEE adjusted for FFM or REE, as AEE adjusted for body weight, or as PAL. The findings among the Pima Indians support the concept that as populations move from traditional agriculture to a more Western and mechanized lifestyle, AEE decreases and in turn results in an increase in the incidence of obesity; however, our data do not support this finding. The findings of the present study suggest that obesity, at least at the population level, is probably due to many factors, including levels of AEE, dietary patterns, and the composition of diets. In addition, closer study of activity patterns and physical fitness may yield information on the relation between physical activity and obesity at the population level not provided by this DLW study. A larger sample size may also provide more information.

Although the energy expenditure data presented herein did not differ significantly from data derived from comparable studies in which DLW was used to measure energy expenditure in white and black participants from Western societies (6, 33, 40, 41), the mean PAL values for the Nigerian sample in the present study were lower than those measured in a Gambian population, particularly in men (42, 43). Although one-half of our Nigerian sample consisted of rural farmers and the DLW measurements were taken at 3 separate times throughout the year—after the rainy season (harvesting), during the early rainy season (planting and tending crops), and during the dry season (clearing of land)—the PAL values did not differ significantly by season. The mean PAL in Nigerian men was 1.70 compared with 3.02 in male agricultural laborers in the Gambia. However, the measured energy expenditure level may not have represented the usual energy expenditure of the Gambian men because they had been engaged in experimental tests of work performance at the time the measurements were made (43). The Gambian and Nigerian women had much more comparable mean PAL values: 1.86 and 1.78, respectively. Unlike the reports from the Gambia, population mean weight did not differ significantly by season and there was no evidence of a "hungry" season (42; A Adeyemo, A Luke, unpublished observations, 1998–2000). These studies indicate that physical activity expenditures differ throughout developing countries as they do elsewhere, depending on the occupations of the population studied.

Few longitudinal studies of the effect of physical activity on naturally occurring weight change in free-living humans have been published. Of the few such studies that have been published, the analytic methods used and the conclusions reached by each have differed. In a longitudinal study of prepubescent white children, no relations between weight change and adjusted TDEE, REE, or AEE were observed (13). In contrast, lower TDEEs and REEs were shown to predispose adult Pima Indians to greater weight gain (11). In the present study, the very small number of longitudinal observations in the US sample led us to analyze the Nigerian data separately. The energy covariates were consistently negative in the models tested, suggesting that short-term weight change in black adults is associated with low levels of energy expenditure. As more and longer longitudinal studies of weight change are conducted, this association should become clearer.

In conclusion, the present study provides evidence that energy expended in physical activity is strongly associated with adiposity among populations of West African origin and may predict weight gain in individuals. Investigation of additional environmental factors, such as types and patterns of activity, physical fitness levels and diet, will be necessary, however, to elucidate the causes of the different prevalences of obesity across societies.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Kuczmarski RJ. Prevalence of overweight and weight gain in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;55(suppl):495S–502S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Popkin BM, Paeratakul S, Zhai F, Ge K. A review of dietary and environmental correlates of obesity with emphasis on developing countries. Obes Res 1995;2(suppl):S145–53.
  3. Vorster HH, Bourne LT, Venter CS, Oosthuizen W. Contribution of nutrition to the health transition in developing countries: a framework for research and intervention. Nutr Rev 1999;57:341–9.[Medline]
  4. Popkin BM. Urbanization, lifestyle changes and the nutrition transition. World Dev 1999;27:1905–16.
  5. Drewnowski A, Popkin BM. The nutrition transition: new trends in the global diet. Nutr Rev 1997;55:31–43.[Medline]
  6. Schulz LO, Schoeller DA. A compilation of total daily energy expenditures and body weights in healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;60:676–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Rising R, Harper IT, Fontvielle AM, Ferraro RT, Spraul M, Ravussin E. Determinants of total daily energy expenditure: variability in physical activity. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;59:800–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Westerterp KR, Goran MI. Relationship between physical activity related energy expenditure and body composition: a gender difference. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1997;21:184–8.[Medline]
  9. DeLany JP, Harsha DW, Kime JC, Kumler J, Melancon L, Bray GA. Energy expenditure in lean and obese prepubertal children. Obes Res 1995;3(suppl):67–72.
  10. Treuth MS, Figueroa-Colon R, Hunter GR, Weinsier RL, Butte NF, Goran MI. Energy expenditure and physical fitness in overweight vs non-overweight prepubertal girls. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998;22:440–7.[Medline]
  11. Ravussin E, Gautier JF. Metabolic predictors of weight gain. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999;23(suppl):37–41.
  12. Levine JA, Eberhardt L, Jensen MD. Role of nonexercise thermogenesis in resistance to fat gain in humans. Science 1999;283:212–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Goran MI, Shewchuk R, Gower BA, Nagy TR, Carpenter WH, Johnson RK. Longitudinal changes in fatness in white children: no effect of childhood energy expenditure. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67:309–16.[Abstract]
  14. Burkitt DP. Some diseases characteristic of modern western civilization. Clin Radiol 1973;24:271–80.[Medline]
  15. Ward RH. Socio-cultural and genetic influences on the response of blood pressure to migration. Am J Phys Anthropol 1984;62:91–105.
  16. Esparza J, Fox C, Harper IT, et al. Daily energy expenditure in Mexican and USA Pima Indians: low physical activity as a possible cause of obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:55–9.[Medline]
  17. Kaufman JS, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Rotimi CN, McGee DL, Cooper RS. Obesity and hypertension prevalence in populations of African origin. Epidemiology 1996;7:398–405.[Medline]
  18. Luke A, Durazo-Arvizu R, Rotimi C, et al. Relation between body mass index and body fat in black population samples from Nigeria, Jamaica and the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:620–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Forrester T, Wilks R, Bennett F, et al. Obesity in the Caribbean. In: The origins and consequences of obesity. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley and Son, 1996:17–31.
  20. Cooper R, Rotimi C, Ataman S, et al. The prevalence of hypertension in seven populations of West African origin. Am J Public Health 1997;87:160–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Cooper R, Rotimi C, Kaufman JS, et al. Prevalence of NIDDM among populations of the African diaspora. Diabetes Care 1997;20:343–8.[Abstract]
  22. Cooper RS, Rotimi CN, Ward R. The puzzle of hypertension in African Americans. Sci Am 1999;280:56–63.[Medline]
  23. Forrester T, Cooper RS, Weatherall D. Emergence of Western diseases in the tropical world: the experience with chronic cardiovascular diseases. Br Med Bull 1998;54:463–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Lemeshow S, Robinson D. Surveys to measure programme coverage and impact: a review of the methodology used in the expanded programme on immunization. World Health Stat Q 1985;38:65–75.[Medline]
  25. Schoeller DA, Ravussin E, Schutz Y, Acheson KJ, Baertschi P, Jequier E. Energy expenditure by doubly labeled water: validation in humans and proposed calculation. Am J Physiol 1986;250:R823–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Schoeller DA, Taylor PB. Precision of the doubly labeled water method using the two-point calculation. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1987; 41C:215–23.[Medline]
  27. Racette SB, Schoeller DA, Luke AH, Shay K, Hnilicka J, Kushner RF. Relative dilution spaces of 2H- and 18O-labeled water in humans. Am J Physiol 1994;267:E585–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Black AE, Prentice AM, Coward WA. Use of food quotients to predict respiratory quotients for the doubly-labelled water method of measuring energy expenditure. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1986;40C:381–91.[Medline]
  29. Phillips PG. The metabolic cost of common West African agricultural activities. J Trop Med 1954;57:12–20.
  30. Weir JBV. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol 1949;109:1–9.
  31. Cunningham JJ. Body composition as a determinant of energy expenditure: a synthetic review and a proposed general prediction equation. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;54:963–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Reed GW, Hill JO. Measuring the thermic effect of food. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;63:164–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Black AE, Coward WA, Cole TJ, Prentice AM. Human energy expenditure in affluent societies: an analysis of 574 doubly-labelled water measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr 1996;50:72–92.[Medline]
  34. Schoeller DA, Kushner RF, Taylor PB, Dietz WH, Bandini LG. Measurement of total body water: isotope dilution techniques. In: Roche AF, ed. Body composition in youths and adults. Report of the Sixth Ross Conference on Medical Research. Columbus, OH: Ross Laboratories, 1985:24–39.
  35. Wang Z, Deurenberg P, Wang W, Pietrobelli A, Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB. Hydration of fat-free body mass: review and critique of a classic body-composition constant. Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 69:833–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Maffeis C, Schutz Y, Schena F, Zaffanello M, Pinelli L. Energy expenditure during walking and running in obese and nonobese prepubertal children. J Pediatr 1993;123:193–9.[Medline]
  37. Rogers DM, Olson BL, Wilmore JH. Scaling for the VO2-to body size relationship among children and adults. J Appl Physiol 1995; 79:958–67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Willett W, Stampfer MJ. Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses. Am J Epidemiol 1986;124:17–27.[Free Full Text]
  39. Stata. Version 6.0. College Station, TX: Stata Press, 1998.
  40. Gannon B, DiPietro L, Poehlman ET. Do African Americans have lower energy expenditure than Caucasians? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:4–13.[Medline]
  41. Carpenter WH, Fonong T, Toth MJ, et al. Total daily energy expenditure in free-living older African-Americans and Caucasians. Am J Physiol 1998;274:E96–101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Singh J, Prentice AM, Diaz E, et al. Energy expenditure of Gambian women during peak agricultural activity measured by the doubly-labeled water method. Br J Nutr 1989;62:315–29.[Medline]
  43. Diaz E, Goldberg GR, Taylor M, et al. Effects of dietary supplementation on work performance in Gambian Laborers. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;53:803–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication August 15, 2000. Accepted for publication June 21, 2001.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Harding, A. Teyhan, M. J Maynard, and J K. Cruickshank
Ethnic differences in overweight and obesity in early adolescence in the MRC DASH study: the role of adolescent and parental lifestyle
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2008; 37(1): 162 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J J. Snodgrass, W. R Leonard, L. A Tarskaia, and D. A Schoeller
Total energy expenditure in the Yakut (Sakha) of Siberia as measured by the doubly labeled water method.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2006; 84(4): 798 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. A. McVeigh, S. A. Norris, N. Cameron, and J. M. Pettifor
Associations between physical activity and bone mass in black and white South African children at age 9 yr
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2004; 97(3): 1006 - 1012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. Luke, A. Adeyemo, H. Kramer, T. Forrester, and R. S. Cooper
Association Between Blood Pressure and Resting Energy Expenditure Independent of Body Size
Hypertension, March 1, 2004; 43(3): 555 - 560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. M Byrne, R. L Weinsier, and G. R Hunter
Reply to MA Pereira et al
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2002; 76(5): 1141 - 1142.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luke, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luke, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. S
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Luke, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. S


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS