AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lieberman, H. R
Right arrow Articles by Slade, S. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lieberman, H. R
Right arrow Articles by Slade, S. S
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lieberman, H. R
Right arrow Articles by Slade, S. S
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 76, No. 1, 120-127, July 2002
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

Original Research Communication

Carbohydrate administration during a day of sustained aerobic activity improves vigilance, as assessed by a novel ambulatory monitoring device, and mood1,2,3,4,5,6,7

Harris R Lieberman, Christina M Falco and Steven S Slade

1 From the Military Nutrition Division, US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA (HRL, CMF, and SSS).

2 SSS was a United Kingdom Exchange Officer assigned to the US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine and the US Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, Natick, MA.

3 We dedicate this article to the memory of Irwin Taub, a dedicated scientist who will be greatly missed.

4 The views, opinions, and findings in this report are those of the authors and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation.

5 The citation of commercial organization and trade names in this report does not constitute an official Department of the Army endorsement or approval of the products or services of these organizations.

6 Supported by the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC).

7 Address reprint requests to HR Lieberman, Military Nutrition Division, US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760-5007. E-mail: harris.lieberman{at}na.amedd.army.mil.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: The brain requires a continuous supply of glucose to function adequately. During aerobic exercise, peripheral glucose requirements increase and carbohydrate supplementation improves physical performance. The brain's utilization of glucose also increases during aerobic exercise. However, the effects of energy supplementation on cognitive function during sustained aerobic exercise are not well characterized.

Objective: The effects of energy supplementation, as liquid carbohydrate, on cognitive function during sustained aerobic activity were examined.

Design: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-subjects design was used. Young, healthy men (n = 143) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups. The groups received either a 6% (by vol) carbohydrate (35.1 kJ/kg), 12% (by vol) carbohydrate (70.2 kJ/kg), or placebo beverage in 6 isovolumic doses, and all groups consumed 2 meals (3200 kJ). Over the 10-h study, the subjects performed physically demanding tasks, including a 19.3-km road march and two 4.8-km runs, interspersed with rest and other activities. Wrist-worn vigilance monitors, which emitted auditory stimuli (20/h) to which the subjects responded as rapidly as possible, and a standardized self-report mood questionnaire were used to assess cognitive function.

Results: Vigilance consistently improved with supplemental carbohydrates in a dose-related manner; the 12% carbohydrate group performed the best and the placebo group the worst (P < 0.001). Mood-questionnaire results corroborated the results from the monitors; the subjects who received carbohydrates reported less confusion (P = 0.040) and greater vigor (P = 0.025) than did those who received the placebo.

Conclusions: Supplemental carbohydrate beverages enhance vigilance and mood during sustained physical activity and interspersed rest. In addition, ambulatory monitoring devices can continuously assess the effects of nutritional factors on cognition as individuals conduct their daily activities or participate in experiments.

Key Words: Cognition • psychomotor performance • brain • aerobic exercise • glucose • ambulatory monitoring • energy • ergogenic aids • nutritional supplements


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The beneficial effects of acute carbohydrate supplementation on endurance exercise are well documented. Administration of solid or liquid carbohydrates during moderate or intense aerobic activity substantially improves various types of physical performance (1–3). Consumption of carbohydrates before and immediately after exercise is also beneficial (2,4). Supplemental carbohydrates are essential because carbohydrate stores, including muscle glycogen, are rapidly expended by sustained exercise (2). Liquid carbohydrate feeding during <=1 h of moderate or intense exercise (<50% O2max) increases plasma glucose concentrations and prevents depletion of muscle glycogen (1,5). As the duration and intensity of exercise increases, carbohydrate supplementation is of greater benefit.

Much less information is available on the effects of carbohydrates on cognitive performance and mood during endurance exercise. Furthermore, the effects of carbohydrates on mental performance in resting individuals are controversial (6). On the basis of various conflicting physiologic mechanisms and experiments (7–11), carbohydrates can reportedly either enhance or impair cognitive function. Researchers in several laboratories observed that glucose supplementation improves memory, especially in elderly subjects (10,12,13). Others reported that the ability to sustain attention is enhanced in nonexercising subjects who receive carbohydrate supplementation (11,14). However, other studies indicate that carbohydrates, compared with proteins, decrease alertness or that the administration of large meals, regardless of their macronutrient content, is soporific (9,15,16). These discrepancies probably reflect differences in a variety of independent and dependent variables in studies conducted on this topic. Regardless of the effects of carbohydrates on resting individuals, during intense or sustained physical activity, central requirements for energy may be more difficult to sustain because of the substantial increase in the demand for energy in the periphery. The brain is very active metabolically, and, as shown by regional cerebral blood flow studies, exercise also increases its metabolic requirements in certain regions and therefore increases central energy requirements (17). Glucose is the brain's principal energy substrate under normal physiologic and environmental conditions (18). When supplied in a readily digestible form, carbohydrates are clearly the optimal nutrient for sustaining physical performance during periods of rapid energy depletion (2) and are probably the optimal substrate for supporting central metabolic requirements under these conditions.

In this study we continuously examined the influence of liquid carbohydrate supplementation on a critical cognitive function, the ability to maintain vigilance, during sustained periods of high energy expenditure and during rest. Maintaining vigilance requires detecting and responding to stimuli over long periods of time, often against a background of distracting stimulation (19). In addition, the effects of carbohydrate supplements on mood state, including moods that are highly associated with vigilance and maintaining responsiveness to the external environment, were assessed with a standardized questionnaire.


   SUBJECTS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects
The subjects were 143 healthy men from the US Army 2nd Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment, an elite combat unit. The mean (±SD) age, height, weight, and body mass index (in kg/m2) of the subjects were 21 ± 3 y, 178.5 ± 5.4 cm, 78.0 ± 9.0 kg, and 24.9 ± 2.0, respectively. The fitness level of this group, as assessed by the standardized Army fitness test, was well above average in comparison with that of young men in the general population and relative to Army standards (20). The subjects reported that they engaged in aerobic exercise 7.5 ± 2.6 ( ± SD) times/wk. All subjects were stationed at Fort Lewis, Washington, where the study was conducted. Only men participated because current Army regulations do not permit women in combat units. Approval for the study was obtained from the required institutional review boards, and all subjects gave their voluntary, written, informed consent before participating.

General procedure
The study used a double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-subjects design. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: 6% (by vol) carbohydrate (CHO6), 12% (by vol) carbohydrate (CHO12), or placebo. Each subject, regardless of the treatment group to which he was assigned, received an equal fluid volume of the supplemental beverage based on his body weight (36 mL/kg). The week before testing, all subjects participated in a baseline test session during which demographic data were obtained. In addition, the subjects practiced various tests and were given detailed instructions regarding the events of the actual test day.

On the test day, subjects participated in a carefully designed and standardized series of events intended to simulate the physical-demand characteristics of a military mission that Rangers might be required to perform (Table 1Go). The principal aerobic activities were a 19.3-km (12-mi) march with a 17-kg load, most of which was carried in a backpack, and two 4.8-km (3-mi) runs without any load. Interspersed between these activities were 2 meals; various rest periods, including a long rest period during which most of the subjects chose to nap; and live-fire rifle marksmanship exercises. Subjects began the study in staggered groups over a 1-h period, and the march and runs were timed events that the subjects were encouraged to perform as rapidly as possible. The tests were conducted outdoors and the climatic conditions were generally temperate. Light rain showers were occasionally present. Air temperatures ranged from 1°C early in the morning to 14°C later in the day. The relative humidity was 76–83%. The testing was conducted over 3 d.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1 Approximate schedule of events during the test day1
 
Testing began at {approx}0445 (Table 1Go). Subjects were required to fast for 6 h before arrival at the testing site. When the subjects first reported for testing, various measurements, including measurements of body weight, height, and equipment weight, were taken. Subjects were then issued vigilance monitors and the time was recorded. The period from the time the monitors were issued until the start of the 19.3-km road march ({approx}45 min) was taken as a baseline measure of vigilance reaction time. Breakfast and the first dose of the test beverage were then administered. Immediately after eating, the first Profile of Mood States (POMS) mood questionnaire was administered. For each subject, the time from beginning to completing each individual event was recorded. This permitted accurate synchronization of the data collected by each subject's vigilance monitor with his actual participation in every event.

The subjects then began the timed road march, during which they had continuous access to water, which they carried in canteens. At the 6.4- and 12.9-km (4- and 8-mi) points in the march, the subjects received the 2nd and 3rd doses of the appropriate test beverage. The mean (±SD) time to complete the march for all groups was 179 ± 21 min. At the end of the march, the subjects and their equipment were weighed and the fourth dose of the test beverage was administered. The subjects rested for 30 min after the march and then ran 4.8 km in 21 min and 8 s ± 2 min and 26 s ( ± SD). They then participated in a live-fire marksmanship test, and the second POMS questionnaire was administered as they exited the firing range. The subjects then received lunch and the fifth dose of the test beverage and spent the remainder of the 4-h rest period in a heated tent. Thirty minutes before the end of this rest period, subjects were administered the sixth dose of the appropriate test beverage. At the completion of the rest period, subjects performed the final timed 4.8-km run, which was completed in 21 min and 41 s ± 2 min and 31 s ( ± SD). They then completed the final marksmanship assessment and filled out the last POMS questionnaire.

Carbohydrate supplementation and meals
All beverages were initially prepared in dry form and reconstituted at the testing site with bottled spring water. The CHO6 and CHO12 beverages were formulated from maltodextrin (Maltrin QD M500; Grain Processing Corp, Muscatine, Iowa); aspartame; and an unsweetened, lemon-flavored, commercial soft drink mix (Kool-Aid; Kraft General Foods, Inc, White Plains, NY). The placebo drink consisted of the same components without maltodextrin. All treatments were formulated to be identical in taste and appearance, as confirmed by formal, blind taste-testing conducted before the study.

On the test day, the total isovolumic dose of carbohydrate or placebo treatment administered to every subject was 36 mL/kg in 6 equal doses (Table 1Go). The total carbohydrate supplement provided to the CHO6 and CHO12 groups was 2.1 and 4.2 g/kg (35.1 and 70.2 kJ/kg), respectively. At each of the 6 administration times, subjects received body weight–adjusted fluid volumes (6 mL/kg) of 1 of the 3 treatments: 0.35 g carbohydrate/kg body weight as a 6% solution; 0.7 g carbohydrate/kg body weight as a 12% solution; or the nonnutritive, artificially sweetened placebo beverage. The investigators verified that all subjects consumed the entire dose of the beverage when it was administered.

In addition to liquid carbohydrate supplementation, all subjects received breakfast and lunch meals consisting of preprepared foods at specified times (Table 1Go). The meals were selected to be representative of meals typically consumed by young male soldiers. No additional food was available during the study. The breakfast meal (2339 kJ) contained 49% of energy as carbohydrate, 25% as protein, and 26% as fat. On the basis of their self-reports, the subjects consumed, on average, 1770 kJ of the breakfast. The lunch meal (2280 kJ) contained 29% of energy as carbohydrate, 22% as protein, and 48% as fat. On the basis of their self-reports, the subjects consumed, on average, 1430 kJ of the lunch meal. The meals were composed of standard, off-the-shelf ration components and included an entrée and a side dish. The subjects could choose from several available meals. There were no statistically significant differences in meal consumption between the treatment groups.

Cognitive and mood assessment
Vigilance monitors
At the start of testing, subjects were issued ambulatory vigilance and environmental monitors that were custom-designed and -manufactured (21,22). Only a subset of the subjects (n = 93) was issued vigilance monitors because there were not enough monitors to test all the subjects. The monitors were lightweight (68 g) devices somewhat larger than a large wristwatch, which were worn on the nondominant wrist. Each monitor contained an 8-bit microprocessor, 128 kilobytes of RAM (random-access memory), and various sensors that monitored, on a minute-by-minute basis, the subject's cognitive performance and patterns of rest and activity and the ambient environmental conditions. Once programmed, the monitors operated independently on internal battery power for up to 14 d. The monitors were fully programmable, and the data they recorded were retrieved from their internal memory via a custom-designed and -manufactured RS-232 interface with any standard IBM-compatible microcomputer.

Each monitor contained an accelerometer, a thermistor, a light sensor, a microphone, and 2 push buttons to record the response of the subject to stimuli presented by the monitor. The accelerometer assessed the subjects' motor activity, the thermistor continuously monitored the ambient temperature, and the light sensor recorded illumination levels in the range of human spectral sensitivity. The microphone monitored acoustic sound pressure in the environment. Each monitor also contained a tone generator and 3 LEDs (light-emitting diodes). In a series of previous studies (21,22), the monitors were shown to provide reproducible results that were consistent with data collected with the use of conventional environmental and behavioral assessment technologies.

For this study, the monitors were programmed to record activity and all environmental variables every minute. They were also programmed to assess vigilance by emitting an audible tone sequence at random intervals {approx}20 times/h. Initially, the monitor presented a tone, to which the subjects were required to respond by pushing one of the buttons on the monitor. If the subject did not respond to the initial tone, a second, somewhat longer, more salient tone was presented 6 s later. Finally, if the subject failed to respond to the first 2 tones, a third, even longer tone was presented 11 s after the first tone. If a total of 20 s elapsed from the presentation of the first tone without a response by the subject, the monitor recorded the stimulus sequence as missed. An LED on the monitor was illuminated when the tones were emitted, providing a visual cue that a response was expected. In addition to determining whether or not the subject responded to the stimuli, the monitor also recorded, with millisecond accuracy, the time required for the subject to respond (reaction time).

Profile of mood states
Mood states were assessed with the use of the POMS. The POMS is a standardized, 65-item, paper-and-pencil questionnaire that consists of 6 subscales: Tension-Anxiety, Depression-Dejection, Anger-Hostility, Vigor-Activity, Fatigue-Inertia, and Confusion-Bewilderment (23). The subjects were asked to rate each adjective with regard to how they were feeling "right now" on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The POMS has been widely used in nutritional, psychopharmacologic, environmental, and exercise studies and is sensitive to the effects on mood of a variety of food constituents, including amino acids and caffeine (9,24–27). The POMS was administered to each subject once on the baseline assessment day and 3 times on the test day (Table 1Go).

Data analysis
All statistical analyses were performed with the use of SPSS for WINDOWS (version 10; SPSS Inc, Chicago). For the reaction time data from the vigilance monitors, means were calculated across discrete time intervals corresponding to the specific events in which the subjects participated. The events for which data were averaged were the baseline assessment (the time from when the subjects arrived for testing until they began the road march), the road march, the 30-min rest, the first 4.8-km run, the 4-h rest, and the second 4.8-km run. The time intervals were determined individually for each subject on the basis of the log of when he began and finished a particular event. Mean differences in reaction time from the baseline scores were calculated for each event. These data were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), with a between-subjects factor for treatment condition (CHO6, CHO12, or placebo) and a within-subjects factor associated with event (march, 30-min rest, first 4.8-km run, 4-h rest, or second 4.8-km run). An orthogonal component analysis to test for dose-related effects of the carbohydrate treatment was also conducted, as were one-way ANOVAs at each time period. Post hoc analyses across treatment conditions were performed with two-tailed Dunnett's multiple comparison tests. When appropriate, selected results were contrasted with the use of F tests across the time factor for each treatment.

For the 6 subscales of the POMS, descriptive statistics were obtained across treatment groups and multiple assessment times. The mean difference between the pretest baseline POMS collected on the week preceding the test and each of the 3 POMS administered on the test day was derived for each subject. These scores were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVAs, with a between-subjects factor associated with treatment condition (CHO6, CHO12, or placebo) and a within-subjects factor for time of test. An orthogonal components analysis was also conducted to test for dose-response effects. One-way ANOVAs were run for the difference scores at each test time to determine which groups were significantly different at a specific administration of the POMS. When appropriate, post hoc analysis of this data was performed with two-tailed Dunnett's multiple comparison tests.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A vigilance monitor record from a representative subject is shown in Figure 1Go. The various activities in which he participated can be readily distinguished in channels 1 and 2, in which physical activity, which was maximal during the march and the two 4.8-km runs, was recorded. The reaction time of the subject to the auditory stimuli emitted by the monitor is shown in channel 4, clearly indicating the ability of this subject to respond rapidly to the tones during all segments of the study, with the exception of portions of the 4-h rest period. During most of that time period the subjects rested in a dark, warm tent, as confirmed by their lack of physical activity (channels 1–3), the low level of ambient light (channel 5), and the warm temperature (channel 6) (Figure 1Go). Most of the subjects used parts of this rest period as an opportunity to sleep and therefore frequently did not respond to the vigilance monitor stimuli.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. Representative vigilance monitor data from one subject continuously collected over the 10 h of the study. The 7 channels of data that were acquired are labeled individually on the y axis. The activities in which the subject participated, the time of administration of the treatments, and clock hours are indicated on the lowest x axis. Channels 1–3 contain data in which physical motion (acceleration) was sensed, and these data are similar to those of a standard actigraph (activity monitor) (22,28,29). The vertical height of each line plotted on the y axis of channels 1–3 represents the number of movements detected in 1 min. Each channel was optimized to detect motion with different physical characteristics. The first and second channels of activity data varied with regard to the amplitude of the acceleration. The third channel was sensitive to accelerations of longer duration. These variations in recording characteristics were achieved by changing the internal sensitivity of the accelerometer. Channel 4 displays the responses of the subject to the presentation of a sequence of tones at random intervals. The height of each line represents the speed of response to the tone. A line that reaches the top of the graph indicates that the subject did not respond to that stimulus. Channel 5 is the illumination level recorded at the subject's wrist. Channel 6 displays the ambient temperature recorded continuously at the subject's wrist. Channel 7 is a continuous record of ambient sound levels.

 
The mean (±SEM) results from the auditory vigilance testing for each treatment group are shown in Figure 2Go. The results are plotted as the mean difference from baseline across the different activities in which the subjects participated. Difference scores were calculated by subtracting the raw reaction time score for a given activity from the baseline score. Results from the ANOVA conducted on these data showed that carbohydrate treatment had a significant main effect on mean reaction time difference scores (P < 0.001). The subjects who received carbohydrate supplements responded more rapidly to the auditory stimuli emitted by the vigilance monitor than did those who received the placebo beverage. The interaction factor between treatment condition and different activities (road march, 30-min rest, 1st run, 4-h rest, and 2nd run) was also significant (P = 0.019). In addition, when this effect was decomposed using an orthogonal components analysis, there was a significant (P < 0.001) linear, dose-related relation across treatment conditions. One-way ANOVAs to analyze between-group differences during each activity showed that reaction time was faster with carbohydrate treatment than with placebo at every time period (march, P = 0.045; 30-min rest, P = 0.008; run 1, P = 0.005; 4-h rest, P = 0.011; run 2, P < 0.001). The Dunnett's multiple comparison post hoc tests indicated that across all activities the CHO12 group consistently responded more rapidly than did the placebo group (march, P = 0.028; 30-min rest, P = 0.005; run 1, P = 0.003; 4-h rest, P = 0.007; run 2, P = 0.002). The reaction time of the CHO6 group was significantly faster (P = 0.045) than that of the placebo group during the first run, and the difference between the 2 groups was nearly significant (P = 0.056) during the 4-h rest period, as determined by Dunnett's post hoc tests.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Mean (±SEM) differences from baseline in auditory vigilance reaction times over the 10 h of the study. Each subject's vigilance was tested continuously by the ambulatory monitor that he wore on his nonpreferred wrist. Each subject's performance was summed over 5 time periods as indicated in Figure 1Go. Because the values plotted are the differences from baseline values, the higher the number on the y axis, the better the performance. Carbohydrate treatment had a main effect on the difference scores (ANOVA, P < 0.001). The interaction between treatment and time was significant (ANOVA, P = 0.019). When this effect was decomposed after the use of an orthogonal components analysis, there was a linear, dose-related effect across treatment groups (ANOVA, P < 0.001). Based on one-way ANOVAs, reaction time was shorter with carbohydrate treatment than with placebo at every time period (march, P = 0.045; 30-min rest, P = 0.008; run 1, P = 0.005; 4-h rest, P = 0.011; run 2, P < 0.001). Dunnett's post hoc tests indicated that for all activities the CHO12 group responded more rapidly than did the placebo group (march, P = 0.028; 30-min rest, P = 0.005; run 1, P = 0.003; 4-h rest, P = 0.007; run 2, P = 0.002) and that the CHO6 group responded more rapidly than did the placebo group during the first run (P = 0.045).

 
Because there was a significant interaction between the 2 main factors, time and treatment condition (P < 0.019), selected F test contrasts were conducted to compare the results for vigilance performance during the march with those for each subsequent individual activity. These analyses allowed us to determine whether vigilance performance varied significantly over time depending on the treatment group to which a subject was assigned. The analyses indicated that, compared with performance during the march, performance over the course of the day in the placebo group was significantly worse at all time periods, performance in the CHO6 group declined somewhat, and performance in the CHO12 group declined the least (Table 2Go). The only time period in which vigilance performance significantly declined in the CHO12 group was during the long rest period (P < 0.001), when many subjects were sleeping.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2 Mean difference scores (lower numbers indicate worse vigilance performance) and results of post hoc F test contrasts conducted to compare vigilance performance during the march with that during each subsequent time period1
 
Carbohydrate supplementation was also found to have a significant effect on the Confusion and Vigor subscales of the POMS (Figure 3Go). For the Confusion subscale, a significant main effect of treatment was observed (P = 0.040; n = 140): the groups who received carbohydrates reported less confusion than did the placebo group. A significant quadratic component (P = 0.048) was present when the orthogonal components analysis was conducted. The results of one-way ANOVAs for both the second and third POMS administrations showed that the groups who received carbohydrates reported significantly less confusion (P = 0.017 and 0.038, respectively) than did the placebo group. Dunnett's multiple comparison tests indicated that the CHO12 group reported significantly less confusion than did the placebo group at the second and third POMS administrations (P = 0.010 and 0.027, respectively).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. Mean (±SEM) differences from baseline on the Confusion (top) and Vigor (bottom) subscales of the Profile of Mood States. The questionnaire was administered 3 times over the course of the test day. On the plot for confusion, lower numbers on the y axis indicate reduced self-reported confusion. A main effect of carbohydrate treatment was observed (ANOVA, P = 0.040): both the 6% and 12% carbohydrate groups (CHO6 and CHO12) reported less confusion than did the placebo group. A quadratic component was associated with carbohydrate dose when the orthogonal components analysis was conducted (ANOVA, P = 0.048). The results of one-way ANOVAs for both the second and third POMS administrations showed that the subjects who received carbohydrates reported significantly less confusion (P = 0.017 and 0.038, respectively) than did those who received placebo and that the CHO12 group reported significantly less confusion than did the placebo group (P = 0.010 and 0.027, respectively, Dunnett's post hoc tests). On the plot for vigor, higher numbers on the y axis indicate increased levels of self-reported vigor. There was a main effect of carbohydrate treatment (ANOVA, P = 0.025): self-reported vigor was higher in the subjects who received carbohydrates than in those who received placebo. There was a linear orthogonal component associated with carbohydrate dose (ANOVA, P = 0.008). The results of one-way ANOVAs indicated that there were significant differences between the groups who received carbohydrates and the placebo group in self-reported vigor at the second and third administrations of the POMS (P = 0.008 and 0.045, respectively). Post hoc Dunnett's tests for the second and third administrations of the POMS indicated that the CHO6 group reported significantly more vigor than did the placebo group (P = 0.005 and 0.025, respectively).

 
For the Vigor subscale of the POMS, the overall ANOVA indicated that there was a significant main effect of treatment condition (P = 0.025): self-reported vigor was significantly higher in the groups who received carbohydrates than in the placebo group. There was also a significant linear component (P = 0.008) associated with carbohydrate dose. One-way ANOVAs for the between-group differences on the Vigor subscale at each test administration indicated that there were significant differences between the groups who received carbohydrates and the placebo group in self-reported vigor at the second and third administrations of the POMS (P = 0.008 and 0.045, respectively). Post hoc Dunnett's tests of the vigor data from the second and third administration of the POMS indicated that the CHO6 group reported significantly more vigor than did the placebo group (P = 0.005 and 0.025, respectively). There were no significant effects of the carbohydrate treatment on any of the other subscales of the POMS.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
This double-blind study, conducted over 10 h, provided 6 isovolumic doses of a liquid carbohydrate beverage to the CHO6 and CHO12 groups for a total dose of 35.1 and 70.2 kJ/kg, respectively. A control group received a placebo beverage that was indistinguishable from the treatment beverage. All groups received equivalent fluid volumes based on individual body weight. The subjects consisted of a large sample of fit, young male volunteers. All subjects participated in an identical, scripted and monitored, sequence of activities, including sustained aerobic activities. The subjects' cognitive state was continuously monitored with the use of a unique ambulatory vigilance monitoring device and a standardized mood questionnaire.

The results from the vigilance task show that a key cognitive function associated with maintaining alertness was significantly improved by administration of supplemental carbohydrate. These effects were significantly dose-related, as confirmed by an orthogonal components test. Optimal cognitive (vigilance) performance was present in the CHO12 group, the worst was in the placebo group, and the CHO6 group was intermediate (Figure 2Go). For the CHO12 group, the effects of carbohydrates on vigilance were present throughout the study: during the march (a period of sustained moderate aerobic activity), during both runs (periods of intense aerobic activity), and during the 2 rest periods.

Over the course of the study day, as shown by the contrasts conducted to compare the march with subsequent activities, vigilance performance in the placebo group declined significantly at every time period (Table 2Go). However, the only period of significant reduction in vigilance in the CHO12 group was during the rest period, when subjects were napping. The CHO6 group had an intermediate level of decline in vigilance over the course of the day. This indicates that the energy depletion that was occurring in the placebo group resulted in degraded vigilance performance, which was partially mitigated by the administration of a 6% carbohydrate beverage and almost completely prevented by administration of a 12% carbohydrate beverage.

The effects of carbohydrates on confusion, as assessed by the POMS, were similar to the effects on vigilance. Confusion at the second and third administrations of the POMS was significantly less in the subjects who received carbohydrates than in those who received placebo (Figure 3Go). These effects were also dose-related, with the CHO12 group having the greatest improvement. Vigor, as assessed by the POMS, was significantly greater in the subjects who received carbohydrates than in those who received placebo. Overall, this study shows that supplemental energy, in the form of liquid carbohydrate, has substantial beneficial effects on cognitive states during periods of high energy use. Vigilance, measured continuously with the vigilance monitor, and 2 moods closely associated with vigilance, confusion and vigor, were affected in the same positive manner by carbohydrates at multiple time periods. The POMS Confusion and Vigor subscales are established indicators of poor cognitive performance that assess cognitive states closely related to alertness (30).

Many mechanisms could explain the observed effects of carbohydrate energy supplements on vigilance and mood during aerobic exercise and during the periods of the study when the subjects were recovering from physical activity. One mechanism is an increase in plasma glucose available to the brain and therefore a generalized increase in brain metabolic activity. During exercise and recovery, brain requirements for glucose increase while plasma glucose is decreasing (1,31). The additional carbohydrates provided may have acted directly on the brain to prevent a reduction in the synthesis of various metabolites and neurotransmitters and may therefore have protected the brain from the consequences of an energy deficit.

In nonexercising animals, certain aspects of memory are enhanced when supplemental glucose is provided (32). In humans, glucose or treatments that increase plasma glucose enhance memory function (10,12,13). However, the effects of glucose or carbohydrates on vigilance and related functions in nonexercising humans have not been established (6). Both increased and decreased alertness and vigilance have been reported after carbohydrate administration in nonexercising subjects (11,14,15,24). The time of day, the macronutrient composition of meals, the test population characteristics, and the behavioral tests used may explain the differences between the studies (6,9,12,15,33). Of particular importance may be whether within-study comparisons are made across isoenergetic treatment groups. Studies that provide additional energy to some subjects should not be compared with those that examine differences in macronutrients while holding energy constant.

A critical factor determining the effects that carbohydrates have on alertness could be the energy status of the subject. In rested subjects who were fed a large lunch meal, increases in drowsiness were observed regardless of its composition (16). However, studies conducted on subjects who were tested in the morning, when energy stores are most depleted, suggest that a breakfast meal is critical for optimal cognitive performance (12,34). Our study resembles these breakfast studies in some respects, because although our subjects received breakfast, their energy expenditure was very high; thus, consumption of carbohydrates reversed an energy deficit. Children who exercise in the morning may be particularly susceptible to the adverse effects on cognitive function of skipping breakfast because they have less readily available energy stores than adults.

The increased alertness and responsiveness to stimuli that we observed could be the result of changes in a particular neurotransmitter system resulting from carbohydrate supplementation. For example, brain serotonin may be involved in regulating fatigue, particularly in exercising individuals (35,36). The role of serotonin in regulating alertness, sleep, and vigilance is controversial, and it has been reported to increase and decrease alertness, depending perhaps on the subtype of receptor affected (37,38). In resting subjects, carbohydrates increase peripheral tryptophan (7,8) and consequently brain serotonin, which is synthesized from tryptophan (39). When tryptophan is given to nonexercising individuals, it increases sleepiness (40,41). However, it has been reported that carbohydrates do not elevate plasma tryptophan in humans engaged in sustained exercise, and it has been hypothesized that carbohydrates will therefore have beneficial effects on centrally mediated fatigue (42). Tryptophan administration has also been reported to improve athletic performance (43) and to reduce pain sensitivity (40), suggesting that increased brain serotonin may be beneficial in exercising individuals. These issues will not be resolved until additional neurochemical studies are conducted in animals and studies that image brain serotonergic pathways during aerobic exercise are conducted in humans.

It has been suggested that the decreased muscle glycogen associated with sustained exercise and the subsequent degradation in physical performance may be responsible for increased accidents that occur during athletic activities such as downhill skiing (44). Although this is a viable hypothesis, it is also possible, on the basis of the results of the present study, that athletic accidents during periods when acute energy intake is not optimal occur because of impaired cognitive function. Decreased vigilance and increased confusion are not conducive to optimal physical performance in sports or other activities that require attention to difficult-to-detect stimuli and making critical decisions. The central fatigue hypothesis has typically been used to explain degradation in physical performance that cannot be accounted for by peripheral factors (45–47). Additional studies of the mechanisms responsible for the interactions between cognitive and peripheral factors during periods of moderate and high energy expenditure are necessary.

The present study suggests that supplementation with carbohydrates enables individuals to maintain optimal cognitive function when they are engaged in sustained physical activity. Individuals participating in many athletic activities and occupational duties, such as firefighting or construction, may benefit from the positive cognitive effects of carbohydrate supplementation. Other macronutrients that rapidly provide usable energy could also be beneficial under these conditions, provided that such macronutrients do not produce an imbalance in other key factors, such as amino acids, that are necessary for optimal brain function or produce adverse peripheral side effects.

Previously, it was not possible to continuously assess the cognitive function of individuals engaged in sustained high levels of physical activity, although anecdotal reports by athletes suggest that adverse changes in cognitive processing occur under such conditions. The availability of new technologies, such as the vigilance monitor used in this study, may permit a systematic evaluation of the effect of acute and chronic nutritional interventions on human cognitive function in naturalistic environments (21,22).


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Irwin Taub (deceased) and Teresa Skibiniski of the US Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, Natick, MA, designed and formulated the carbohydrate drinks, and their assistance was critical for the conduct of this study. We are grateful for the excellent assistance provided by Christopher Amendola, Cory Baker-Fulco, Specialist Nicholas DellaRocco, Julie D'Esposito, James Georgelis, Amy Marchetti, Susan McGraw, Sergeant DeAngelious Morrison, Phil Niro, Shivaun Roach, Karen Speckman, William Tharion, Sergeant Bryan Thorpe, and Staff Sergeant Roberta Worsham. In addition, we especially thank the members of 2nd Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment, who volunteered for this study and participated in it with so much enthusiasm. We also acknowledge the exceptional support of their Commanders and other leaders.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Costill DL. Carbohydrates for exercise: dietary demands for optimal performance. Int J Sports Med 1988;9:1–18.[Medline]
  2. Coyle EF. Timing and method of increased carbohydrate intake to cope with heavy training, competition and recovery. J Sports Sci 1991; 9:29–52.
  3. Ivy JL. Role of carbohydrate in physical activity. Clin Sports Med 1999;18:469–84.[Medline]
  4. Sherman WM, Peden CM, Wright DA. Carbohydrate feedings 1 h before exercise improves cycling performance. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;54: 866–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Koivisto VO, Harkonen M, Karone S, et al. Glycogen depletion during prolonged exercise: influence of glucose, fructose or placebo. J Appl Physiol 1985;58:731–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bellisle F, Blundell JE, Dye L, et al. Functional food science and behaviour and psychological functions. Br J Nutr 1998;80:S173–S93.
  7. Fernstrom JD, Wurtman RJ. Brain serotonin content: physiological regulation by plasma neutral amino acids. Science 1972;178:414–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lieberman HR, Caballero B, Finer N. The composition of lunch determines afternoon tryptophan ratios in humans. J Neural Transm 1986;65:211–7.
  9. Lieberman HR, Spring B, Garfield GS. The behavioral effects of food constituents: strategies used in studies of amino acids, protein, carbohydrate and caffeine. Nutr Rev 1986;44(suppl):61–70.
  10. Korol DL, Gold PE. Glucose, memory, and aging. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67(suppl):764S–71S.[Abstract]
  11. Benton D, Owens DS, Parker PY. Blood glucose influences memory and attention in young adults. Neuropsychologia 1994;2:595–607.
  12. Benton D, Parker PY. Breakfast, blood glucose, and cognition. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67(suppl):772S–8S.[Abstract]
  13. Kaplan RJ, Greenwood CE, Winocur G, Wolever TMS. Cognitive performance is associated with glucose regulation in healthy elderly persons and can be enhanced with glucose and dietary carbohydrates. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:825–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Siebert G, Gessner B, Klasser M. Energy supply of the central nervous system. Bibl Nutr Dieta 1986;21:1–26.
  15. Spring B, Chiodo J, Bowen DJ. Carbohydrates, tryptophan, and behavior: a methodological review. Psychol Bull 1987;102:234–56.[Medline]
  16. Smith A, Leekam S, Ralph A, McNeill G. The influence of meal composition on post-lunch changes in performance efficiency and mood. Appetite 1988;10:195–203.[Medline]
  17. Ide K, Secher NH. Cerebral blood flow and metabolism during exercise. Prog Neurobiol 2000;61:397–414.[Medline]
  18. Evans M, Amiel SA. Carbohydrates as a cerebral metabolic fuel. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 1998;11(suppl):99–102.
  19. Hygge S. Heat and performance. In: Jones DM, Smith AP, eds. Handbook of human performance. Vol 1. New York: Academic Press, 1992; 79–104.
  20. US Department of the Army. Physical fitness training. Washington, DC: US Department of the Army, 1992. (Field manual no. 21-20.)
  21. Lieberman HR, Coffey BP. New techniques for the assessment of mental performance in the field. In: Carlson-Newberry S, Costello R, eds. Emerging technologies for nutrition research: potential for assessing military performance capability. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997:533–49.
  22. Lieberman HR, Coffey BP. Preliminary findings from a new device for monitoring performance and environmental factors in the field. In: Friedl K, Lieberman HR, Bray GA, eds. Current progress in military neuroscience research: countermeasures for battlefield stressors. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 2000:126–59.
  23. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppelman LE. Edits manual for the profile of mood states. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1992.
  24. Lieberman HR, Corkin S, Spring BJ, Wurtman, RJ, Growdon, JH. The effects of dietary neurotransmitter precursors on human behavior. Am J Clin Nutr 1985;42:366–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Banderet LE and Lieberman HR. Treatment with tyrosine, a neurotransmitter precursor, reduces environmental stress in humans. Brain Res Bull 1989;22:759–62.[Medline]
  26. Amendola CA, Gabrieli JDE, Lieberman HR. Caffeine's effects on performance and mood are independent of age and gender. Nutr Neurosci 1998;1:269–80.
  27. Warber JP, Patton JF, Tharion WJ, Zeisel SH, Lieberman HR. The effects of choline supplementation on performance. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2000;10:170–81.[Medline]
  28. Lieberman HR, Wurtman JJ, Teicher MH. Circadian rhythms of activity in healthy young and elderly humans. Neurobiol Aging 1989;10:259–65.[Medline]
  29. Tryon WW. Activity measurement in psychology and medicine. New York: Plenum Press, 1991.
  30. Shukitt-Hale B, Banderet LE, Lieberman HR. Elevation-dependent symptom, mood, and performance changes produced by exposure to hypobaric hypoxia. Int J Aviat Psychol 1998;8:319–34.[Medline]
  31. Ide K, Horn A, Secher NH. Cerebral metabolic response to submaximal exercise. J Appl Physiol 1999;87:1604–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. McNay EC, Fries TM, Gold PE. Decreases in rat extracellular hippocampal glucose concentration associated with cognitive demand during a spatial task. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:2881–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Smith A, Kendrick A, Maben A, Salmon J. Effects of breakfast and caffeine on cognitive performance, mood and cardiovascular functioning. Appetite 1994;22:39–55.[Medline]
  34. Pollitt E, Cueto S, Jacoby ER. Fasting and cognition in well- and undernourished schoolchildren: a review of three experimental studies Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67(suppl):779S–84S.[Abstract]
  35. Newsholme EA, Acworth IN, Blomstrand E. Amino acids, brain neurotransmitters and a functional link between muscle and brain that is important in sustained exercise. In: Benzi G, ed. Advances in myochemistry. London: John Libbey Eurotext, 1989:127–33.
  36. Davis JM, Alderson NL, Welsh RS. Serotonin and central nervous system fatigue: nutritional considerations. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72(suppl): 573S–8S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Portas CM, Bjorvatn B, Ursin R. Serotonin and the sleep/wake cycle: special emphasis on microdialysis studies. Prog Neurobiol 2000; 60:13–5.[Medline]
  38. Gallopin T, Fort P, Eggermann E, et al. Identification of sleep-promoting neurons in vitro. Nature 2000;404:992–5.[Medline]
  39. Fernstrom MH, Fernstrom JD. Brain tryptophan concentrations and serotonin synthesis remain responsive to food consumption after the ingestion of sequential meals. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61:312–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Lieberman HR, Corkin S, Spring BJ, Growden H, Wurtman RJ. Mood, performance, and pain sensitivity: changes induced by food constituents. J Psychiatr Res 1982-1983;17:135–45.
  41. Hartmann E. Effects of L-tryptophan on sleepiness and on sleep. J Psychiatr Res 1982-1983;17:107–13.
  42. Davis JM, Bailey SP, Woods JA, Galiano FJ, Hamilton M, Bartoli WP. Effects of carbohydrate feedings on plasma free-tryptophan and branched-chain amino acids during prolonged cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992;65:513–9.
  43. Segura R, Ventura JL. Effect of L-tryptophan supplementation on exercise performance. Int J Sports Med 1988;9:301–5.[Medline]
  44. Ericksson E, Hygaard E, Saltin B. Physiological demand in downhill skiing. Phys Sportsmed 1977;12:35–9.
  45. El-Sayed MS, Balmer J, Rattu AJ. Carbohydrate ingestion improves endurance performance during a 1 h simulated cycling time trial. J Sports Sci 1997;15:223–30.[Medline]
  46. Hollge J, Kunkel M, Ziemann U, Tergau F, Geese R, Reimers CD. Central fatigue in sports and daily exercises. A magnetic stimulation study. Int J Sports Med 1997;18:614–7.[Medline]
  47. Kent-Braun JA. Central and peripheral contributions to muscle fatigue in humans during sustained maximal effort. Eur J Appl Physiol 1999; 80:57–63.
Received for publication April 18, 2001. Accepted for publication August 7, 2001.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. N. Cheuvront, R. Carter III, M. A. Kolka, H. R. Lieberman, M. D. Kellogg, and M. N. Sawka
Branched-chain amino acid supplementation and human performance when hypohydrated in the heat
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2004; 97(4): 1275 - 1282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lieberman, H. R
Right arrow Articles by Slade, S. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lieberman, H. R
Right arrow Articles by Slade, S. S
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lieberman, H. R
Right arrow Articles by Slade, S. S

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS