| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Original Research Communication |
1 From the Food Composition Laboratory, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD (RJP); the Laboratory of Membrane Biochemistry and Biophysics (JRH, YL, and NS) and the Laboratory of Clinical Studies (PR and NS), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and the Nutrition Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD (SG and GLB).
2 Address reprint requests to RJ Pawlosky, Laboratory of Membrane Biochemistry and Biophysics, NIAAA, Room 114, 12420 Parklawn Drive, Rockville, MD 20852. E-mail: bpawl{at}mail.nih.gov.
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Objective: It was theorized that the fat content of a fish-based diet would inhibit the kinetics of the in vivo metabolism of n-3 fatty acids compared with a beef-based diet.
Design: A compartmental model was used to determine the coefficients of the kinetic rate constants from the plasma concentration time curves of pentadeuterated (d5) 18:3n-3, 20:5n-3, 22:5n-3, and 22:6n-3 of 10 subjects who subsisted on 3 diets with different long-chain PUFA contents. For 3 wk, subjects reported their food intake from their usual diets and then consumed a beef-based diet for 3 wk and then a fish-based diet for an additional 3 wk. Subjects consumed 1 g d5-18:3n-3 ethyl ester at weeks 3, 6, and 9. Blood was drawn over 168 h and the plasma analyzed for fatty acids. The coefficients of the kinetic constants of n-3 fatty acid metabolism and the percentage utilization of the substrates were determined.
Results: Across all diets, < 1% of plasma 18:3n-3 was utilized for long-chain PUFA synthesis. There was a 70% reduction in the value of the rate constant coefficient that regulated transfer of the isotope from the 22:5n-3 compartment to 22:6n-3 when the fish-based diet was compared with the beef-based diet. The turnover rate of plasma d5-22:6n-3 also decreased.
Conclusions: The primary effect of a fish-based diet on the kinetics of n-3 metabolism involves processes that inhibit the synthesis of 22:6n-3 from 22:5n-3. These processes may involve a system of feedback control mechanisms responsive to the plasma concentration of 22:6n-3Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:–72.
Key Words: Fatty acid kinetics • 
-linolenic acid • n-3 fatty acids • docosahexaenoic acid • compartmental model • isotope tracer • fish diet
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
-linolenic acid (18:3n-3), which is found in limited quantities in plant seed oils (14). However, because of low utilization, the biosynthesis of long-chain PUFAs from 18:3n-3 appears to be a minor pathway in humans (15). In contrast, eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3) may be well utilized for synthesis of other long-chain PUFAs such as docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3) (15). Previously, we described a compartmental modeling procedure that was used to determine the coefficients of the in vivo rate constants of n-3 fatty acid metabolism in human subjects subsisting on a well-controlled beef-based diet (15). This analysis has now been extended to determine the kinetic rate constants in 10 subjects who were maintained on 3 distinct diets, each with a different fat content. The hypothesis tested was that a diet with relatively high amounts of long-chain PUFAs (fish-based diet) would lower the in vivo rate constants of n-3 fatty acid metabolism in adult humans.
The subjects were tested 3 times: initially during the self-selected dietary phase and twice while they subsisted on each of the experimental diets. During the final week of each trial period, the subjects consumed an isotope tracer of -linolenate, and the plasma was analyzed periodically for endogenous and labeled fatty acids. The coefficients of the kinetic rate constants of n-3 fatty acid metabolism during the 3 dietary trial periods were determined from an analysis of the isotopic data by using the WinSAAM (Windows Simulation and Analysis Modeling; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) program. The endogenous concentrations of the n-3 fatty acids together with the kinetic constants were used to calculate the flux of each of the fatty acids through the plasma compartments.
|
SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Protocol
During the first 2-wk period of the study, the subjects kept accurate records of the foods and beverages they had consumed each day. The nutritional content (eg, energy, protein, and carbohydrate), including the estimated fatty acid content of the individual diets, were computed by using the Minnesota Data Systems software developed by the Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, MN (FOOD DATABASE version 6A and NUTRIENT DATABASE version 21). During the second 3-wk period of the study, the subjects received a beef-based diet that consisted of roast beef or tenderloin cuts of meat and hamburger patties given on alternating days. During the final 3 wk, the subjects received a fish-based diet that included salmon, tuna, and turkey breast. Dietary macronutrients were calculated by using the US Department of Agriculture nutrient data bank (Handbook no. 8, rev 11). However, the fatty acid composition of the 2 experimental diets was determined directly by using gas chromatography–flame ionization detection (GC-FID) , and is provided in Table 1. All meals during the experimental diet phases of the study were prepared and served in the metabolic research kitchen of the Clinical Center. Food sources were consistent throughout the study.
Oral ingestion of the deuterium-labeled fatty acids occurred at the beginning of the third, sixth, and ninth weeks after the study began, and blood samples were obtained at baseline (0 h) and at intervals (8, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 168 h) over the following week. Subjects were admitted as inpatients, fasted overnight, and then received 1 g of the labeled fatty acid ethyl ester blended into low-fat (1% fat) yogurt before consuming a standardized morning meal. The isotope used was pentadeuterated -linolenate ethyl ester (d5-17, 17, 18, 18, 18, 18:3n-3; Cambridge Isotope Laboratory, Andover, MA). A standardized lunch was provided 4 h later to ensure uniform absorption of the tracer. The subjects reported to the clinic for all subsequent blood drawings. Blood (40 mL) was drawn under fasting conditions (except for the 8-h sample) from the forearm into a plastic tube containing sodium citrate as an anticoagulant. The blood was placed on ice and then separated immediately into platelet-poor plasma by centrifugation at 3000 rpm (1800 x g) for 10 min at 4 °C in a clinical centrifuge. Plasma was transferred into a separate tube and frozen at -80 °C until analyzed.
Formulation and analysis of the experimental diets
Either beef or fish (the fish-based diet also included skinless turkey) provided the major source of dietary fat in the experimental diets. The only other significant sources of fat were olive oil and butter. The Harrison-Benedict equation was used to calculate each subject’s energy requirements. The calculations were compared with the subject’s self-selected food-record data, and, if necessary, the energy content of the metabolic diets was adjusted to satisfy energy demands. The weights of the subject were monitored during the study, and individual energy intake was adjusted to maintain a weight change of < 1 kg. During the 2 experimental dietary periods, the subjects were counseled to not eat or drink any additional foods or beverages other than those provided by the research kitchen. No alcoholic beverages or smoking were allowed.
The fatty acid contents of the alternating menus were analyzed directly. The foods from an entire day’s menu were combined in a commercial 2-L blender and homogenized; aliquots were obtained and lipids were extracted by using the Folch method (16). Analysis of the fatty acid methyl esters by GC-FID is described below.
Plasma lipid extraction, preparation of fatty acid methyl esters, and analysis by GC-FID
The protocols used to extract lipids from the plasma and to prepare the fatty acid methyl esters were previously reported (15). After derivatization, the fatty acid methyl esters were extracted into hexane, and the pooled extracts were concentrated to 50 µL under nitrogen and analyzed by GC-FID. Samples were analyzed with a model HP-5890 gas chromatograph with flame ionization detector (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE) according to previously published procedures (15). The concentrations of the individual fatty acids were calculated by using the peak area counts in comparison with the internal standard.
Analysis of labeled fatty acids with GC-MS
The procedures used for the derivatization of the plasma lipids and for the analysis with quadrupole GC-mass spectrometry (MS) (HP 5989; Agilent Technologies) were previously reported (17). The pentafluorobenzyl esters of the plasma fatty acids (1 µL) were injected onto a 60-m FFAP-bonded phase capillary column (internal diameter: 0.25 mm; film thickness: 0.25 mm; Quadrex Corp, New Haven, CT) into a quadrupole GC-MS. Data were acquired in the selected ion mode, monitoring the M-PFB anion of the fatty acids, and converted to the absolute quantity of the deuterium-labeled metabolite by reference to the concentration of an internal standard (17).
Compartmental analysis of n-3 fatty acid metabolism
The compartmental model used to determine the coefficients of the kinetic rate constants for n-3 fatty acid metabolism were recently described, and a diagram of the model is presented in Figure 1 (15). The model consists of 5 compartments for which isotope data were obtained. The fractional transfer rates determined from the model represent the kinetics of labeled fatty acids from their plasma pool concentrations alone and may only be an indirect assessment of liver kinetics. The rate equations from which the kinetic parameters are derived are defined by a set of differential equations that correspond to the flux of the labeled fatty acids through their respective compartments.
Fractional transfer rates, flow rates, percentages, and turnover
The rate parameters that pertain to the metabolism of n-3 fatty acids are briefly described below. The fractional transfer rate, L(I,J), is defined as the fraction of substrate transferred from compartment J to product compartment I. The units are in hours. The flow rate of fatty acid, R(I,J), from compartment J to compartment I is obtained by multiplying the endogenous mass of the unlabeled fatty acid (MJ) in compartment J by L(I,J) and is given in µg/h. The percentage of isotope that is transferred from J to I is given as P(I,J) and is given as a percentage. P(I,J) represents the fraction of isotope that remains in the metabolic pathway as opposed to isotope that is taken up by tissues or that is irreversibly lost from the compartment. The half-life (t1/2) of the n-3 fatty acids in the plasma is an indication of fatty acid turnover. The t1/2 values were calculated from the summation of the fractional transfer rates for each fatty acid leaving the individual compartments: t1/2 = ln2/
L(I,J) + L(0,J). The units are in hours and represent the disappearance rate of the fatty acid from each compartment. Mean values of these parameters were calculated for subjects consuming each of the 3 diets, and variances are reported as the group SD.
Model limits and constraints
Because the caloric intakes from the diets for each subject during the 3 trial periods were known and the dietary fatty acid composition had either been experimentally determined or calculated from each subject’s food records, the daily n-3 fatty acid intake for each subject could be estimated, and upper and lower n-3 fatty acid intake limits were assigned.
The plasma steady state fatty acid concentrations were determined for each subject at each of the blood sampling time points (Table 2). During the self-selected dietary period, the mean plasma concentration of the fatty acids was used to represent the steady state mass of the endogenous substrate (MJ) available for biosynthesis. Inasmuch as the 2 standardized diets minimized the variability of dietary PUFA intake, little difference (± 5%) was observed in the plasma concentrations of individual n-3 fatty acids in each subject during the experimental dietary periods. Therefore, each subject’s mean concentration of the plasma n-3 fatty acids across the 168-h period represented the steady state mass of the endogenous substrate (MJ). These values were held constant.
Model calculations and errors
The initial estimates of L(I,J) and P(I,J) of isotope transferred for this compartmental model were derived by using the WinSAAM program from the concentration-time curves that were generated from the experimental isotopic data. Values assigned to the kinetic parameters were then adjusted to compensate for individual variances in the plasma data until the model prediction gave the best fit to the experimental determinants. Final values were determined by using the program’s iterative nonlinear least-squares routine. The error model for this analysis included the assumptions of independence, constant variance, and normal distribution about zero. Data points were weighted by assigning a fractional SD of 0.1 to each measurement, which is consistent with the error associated with these analyses.
Statistical analysis
For comparison of the effects of the 2 experimental diets on n-3 fatty acid metabolism, individual kinetic rate constants and other in vivo parameters were analyzed as paired observations from individual subjects. Differences were determined by using Student’s t test. For all kinetic parameters, a P value 
0.05 was considered significant. Mean (± SD) values of the kinetic parameters are also reported.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Compartmental model
The compartmental model shown in Figure 1
is a simplification of the physiologic reality in that each rate constant L(I,J) reflects several steps of metabolism that occur within the liver hepatocyte and also incorporates a transport step of fatty acids from the liver to the plasma. Two 18:3n-3 compartments are included in the model, one for the isotope administration and gastrointestinal tract and the second for the appearance of the fatty acid in the plasma. The individual model-determined kinetic parameter estimates for L(I,J) in Table 4 are the in vivo constants of n-3 fatty acid metabolism for each subject during each of the 3 dietary periods. In some cases, a residual amount of isotope was present in the n-3 fatty acid compartment at the 0-h time point. These residues were the result of a prior dose of the label that the subjects had ingested. When present, the isotopes were integrated into the model so that the initial conditions reflected the availability of the labeled substrates at early time points.
|
In general, the concordant values observed in several of the mean kinetic constants L(I,J) suggest that the experimental procedures were well performed and that the metabolism of the labeled fatty acids was consistent across the 3 trials (Table 5). However, differences in 2 of the mean rate constant coefficients was observed. The values for L(5,4) and L(0,5) were both lower while subjects subsisted on the fish-based diet. A lower value for L(5,4) (beef-based diet: 0.0266 ± 0.008 h; fish-based diet: 0.0086 ± 0.012 h) reflects a reduction in the quantity of the isotope that was transferred between the 22:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 compartments. Also, a lower value for L(0,5) (beef-based diet: 0.0935 ± 0.008 h; fish-based diet: 0.0358 ± 0.025 h) indicates a reduced turnover rate of 22:6n-3, as evidenced by an increase in the t1/2 of 22:6n-3 in the plasma (beef-based diet: 13 ± 5 h; fish-based diet: 41 ± 12 h).
|
, a difference in the flow rate of a fatty acid R(I,J) results from an interaction of the individual kinetic constant (Table 4) and changes in the steady state concentration (Table 2), which are responsive to variations in dietary PUFAs (Table 1). During the period when subjects were maintained on the fish-based diet, a greater amount of 18:3n-3 exited the biosynthetic pathway R(0,2) (beef-based diet: 2.45 x 105 ± 9.37 x 105 µg/h; fish-based diet: 3.69 x 105 ± 1.54 x 105 µg/h; P < 0.05) compared with the beef-based dietary period. Similarly, a greater amount of mass of 20:5n-3 was transferred to 22:5n-3 R(4,3) (beef-based diet: 325 ± 68 µg/h; fish-based diet: 613 ± 154 µg/h; P < 0.01). This was primarily due to a greater dietary intake of 20:5n-3 during the fish-based diet (Table 1), which gave rise to a greater steady state concentration of 20:5n-3 (Table 2). However, during the same dietary period, there was a sharp reduction in the amount of mass of 22:5n-3 transferred to 22:6n-3 R(5,4) (beef-based diet: 751 ± 277 µg/h; fish-based diet: 244 ± 43 µg/h).
|
|
|
. The percentage of 18:3n-3 destined for synthesis of 20:5n-3, P(3,2), appeared to be lower during the fish-based dietary period than during the beef-based dietary period; however, this difference was not significant (self-selected diet: 0.2%; beef-based diet: 0.2%; fish-based diet: 0.1%). While the subjects were sustained on the fish-based diet, the percentage of 22:5n-3 that was utilized for synthesis of 22:6n-3, P(5,4), was lower than that synthesized during the beef diet, which was consistent with changes in the kinetic constants (beef-based diet: 56%; fish-based diet: 26%). |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
can be used to calculate the mean synthesis rates of n-3 fatty metabolism in these subjects during the different dietary trials. While subjects were sustained on the beef-based diet, the mean synthesis rate of 22:6n-3 from 22:5n-3 was 
18 mg/d compared with 5 mg/d when they were consuming the fish-based diet. However, there was a higher rate of synthesis of 22:5n-3 from 20:5n-3 during consumption of the fish-based diet (beef-based diet: 7.8 mg/d; fish-based diet: 14.7 mg/d). The higher synthesis rate of 22:5n-3 was primarily due to a greater availability of substrate (20:5n-3) entering the plasma pool from the diet, which indicates that the homeostasis of plasma n-3 fatty acids is determined by the steady state concentrations of their precursors and the kinetic parameters. Confirming our previous observation, we found that a high flow of 18:3n-3 exiting the biosynthetic pathway restricted the rate of long-chain PUFA biosynthesis across all 3 diets (15). A high rate of oxidation of 18:3n-3 in humans and a substantial transfer to the skin in rodents was reported by other investigators, which may account for the loss of isotope from the system (18–20). Also consistent with this observation are several reports indicating that 18:3n-3 does not support neural concentrations of 22:6n-3 as well as a preformed source of 22:6n-3 (21–24). The t1/2 values of n-3 fatty acids in the plasma also indicated that 18:3n-3 was more rapidly removed from the plasma than were the other n-3 fatty acids, which is consistent with its rapid catabolism.
The individual in vivo rate constants calculated from data obtained during the self-selected and the beef-based dietary periods were not significantly different (Table 4). This finding indicates that these diets probably produce similar effects on n-3 fatty acid metabolism and suggests that the fatty acid composition of the beef-based and self-selected diets were similar. This was also noted for many parameters while subjects were maintained on the fish-based diet, with the exception of 2 rate constants. There was a 70% reduction in the value of the rate constant coefficient that regulated transfer of the isotope from the 22:5n-3 compartment to 22:6n-3 when the fish-based diet was compared with the beef-based diet. The fish-based diet had the effect of reducing the amount of mass of 22:5n-3 utilized for synthesis of 22:6n-3 by 68%.
The percentage of isotope that was transferred through the n-3 fatty acid compartments along the pathway was calculated for each intermediate, and these values were used to determine the efficiency of the biosynthetic processes (Table 5). Although a somewhat lower percentage of 18:3n-3 was used for the biosynthesis of 20:5n-3 during the fish-based diet than during the beef-based diet, the major effect of this diet was that the percentage of 22:5n-3 utilized for synthesis of 22:6n-3 (-46%) was much lower during the fish-based diet than during the beef-based diet.
While the subjects were subsisting on the fish-based diet, a significant reduction was observed in the turnover rate of 22:6n-3, as deduced from its t1/2 value in the plasma compared with that during the beef-based diet (Table 5). Although the fish-based diet appeared to have a similar effect on the t1/2 values of 22:5n-3, this difference was not significant in this group of subjects. In contrast, the turnover rate of 20:5n-3 was similar across all 3 diets. This contrast is interesting because the fish-based diet elevated the steady state concentrations of both 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3, and the dilution of these tracers in their respective pools was similar. The concomitant increase in the concentrations of these fatty acids while the subjects remained on the fish-based diet might be expected to inhibit the rate of synthesis from their precursors. However, this only occurred for the synthesis rate of 22:6n-3 from 22:5n-3. This suggests that plasma 22:6n-3 concentrations may exhibit feedback inhibition, whereas plasma 20:5n-3 concentrations do not.
In the current study, it was shown that the plasma concentrations of n-3 fatty acids were responsive to dietary changes in 10 healthy subjects. The plasma concentrations of both 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 were significantly greater during the fish-based diet than during the beef-based diet. The effects of the fish-based diet on the kinetics of n-3 fatty acid metabolism appear to be centered on processes that inhibit the synthesis of 22:6n-3 from 22:5n-3. A feedback control mechanism responsive to the plasma concentration of 22:6n-3 may effect processes that regulate its own synthesis, thereby maintaining 22:6n-3 homeostasis during dietary changes.
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
-linolenic acid metabolism in adult humans. J Lipid Res 2001;42:1257–65.-linolenic acid in the guinea pig. Pediatr Res 2000;47:414–7.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. C. DeMar Jr., C. DiMartino, A. W. Baca, W. Lefkowitz, and N. Salem Jr. Effect of dietary docosahexaenoic acid on biosynthesis of docosahexaenoic acid from alpha-linolenic acid in young rats J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1963 - 1980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. H. Lin and N. Salem Jr. Whole body distribution of deuterated linoleic and {alpha}-linolenic acids and their metabolites in the rat J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 2709 - 2724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Pawlosky, J. R. Hibbeln, and N. Salem Jr. Compartmental analyses of plasma n-3 essential fatty acids among male and female smokers and nonsmokers J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 935 - 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. L. Goyens, M. E Spilker, P. L Zock, M. B Katan, and R. P Mensink Conversion of {alpha}-linolenic acid in humans is influenced by the absolute amounts of {alpha}-linolenic acid and linoleic acid in the diet and not by their ratio Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2006; 84(1): 44 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M Arterburn, E. B. Hall, and H. Oken Distribution, interconversion, and dose response of n-3 fatty acids in humans Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2006; 83(6): S1467 - 1476S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R Hibbeln, L. R. Nieminen, T. L Blasbalg, J. A Riggs, and W. E. Lands Healthy intakes of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids: estimations considering worldwide diversity Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2006; 83(6): S1483 - 1493S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Basu, S. Devaraj, and I. Jialal Dietary Factors That Promote or Retard Inflammation Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2006; 26(5): 995 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. H. Lin and N. Salem Jr. In vivo conversion of 18- and 20-C essential fatty acids in rats using the multiple simultaneous stable isotope method J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 1962 - 1973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. L. L. Goyens, M. E. Spilker, P. L. Zock, M. B. Katan, and R. P. Mensink Compartmental modeling to quantify {alpha}-linolenic acid conversion after longer term intake of multiple tracer boluses J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1474 - 1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Hussein, E. Ah-Sing, P. Wilkinson, C. Leach, B. A. Griffin, and D. J. Millward Long-chain conversion of [13C]linoleic acid and {alpha}-linolenic acid in response to marked changes in their dietary intake in men J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2005; 46(2): 269 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Denomme, K. D. Stark, and B. J. Holub Directly Quantitated Dietary (n-3) Fatty Acid Intakes of Pregnant Canadian Women Are Lower than Current Dietary Recommendations J. Nutr., February 1, 2005; 135(2): 206 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Whelan and M. F. McEntee Dietary (n-6) PUFA and Intestinal Tumorigenesis J. Nutr., December 1, 2004; 134(12): 3421S - 3426S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Zhao, T. D. Etherton, K. R. Martin, S. G. West, P. J. Gillies, and P. M. Kris-Etherton Dietary {alpha}-Linolenic Acid Reduces Inflammatory and Lipid Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Hypercholesterolemic Men and Women J. Nutr., November 1, 2004; 134(11): 2991 - 2997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. F Leitzmann, M. J Stampfer, D. S Michaud, K. Augustsson, G. C Colditz, W. C Willett, and E. L Giovannucci Dietary intake of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids and the risk of prostate cancer Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2004; 80(1): 204 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
