AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polednak, A. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Polednak, A. P
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Polednak, A. P
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 77, No. 6, 1527-1528, June 2003
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Letter to the Editor

Uncoupling protein genes and racial differences in obesity

Anthony P Polednak

Connecticut Department of Public Health, 410 Capitol Avenue, Hartford, CT 06134-0308, E-mail: anthony.polednak{at}po.state.ct.us

Dear Sir:

Kimm et al (1) reported a "tantalizing suggestion" of a "genetic modulator" of the higher susceptibility of African American women than of white women to obesity. The CC genotype of exon 5 of the uncoupling protein (UCP) gene UCP3 is actually less common among blacks than among whites (1), so that genetic susceptibility would depend on associations between the genotypes and fat mass in blacks but not in whites. "Corroboration from a larger study" (1) is needed because only 6 black patients had the CC genotype, and chance findings are possible even if statistically significant (as for resting energy expenditure). A nonsignificant trend was reported in mean fat mass across the UCP3 exon 3 genotypes for black women, but the mean for CT was not intermediate between the means for CC and TT. The association for white women also was not significant, but data on mean fat mass by genotype were not given.

Human genetic variation is much greater within a race than between races (ie, {approx}85% compared with 15% of variation in allele frequencies; 2, 3). However, the importance of the limited genetic variation between races for disease or risk factors is largely unknown, so that genetic explanations for racial-ethnic differences cannot be ruled out (3).

An autosomal genetic hypothesis for black-white differences in obesity would need to explain the absence (in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994) of black-white differences in the age-adjusted prevalence of overweight or obesity among men (4). An alternative hypothesis would involve sociocultural factors in women. In the 1985 National Health Interview Survey, black women were less likely than white women to perceive themselves as overweight when categorized by actual weight relative to ideal weight (5). In a survey in East Baltimore, the ideal body image size selected did not differ between black and white men, but black women selected a significantly larger ideal image than did white women (6). In the Baton Rouge Children’s Study, the black-white difference in total daily energy expenditure was explained by lower energy expended in physical activity in black girls (7). Neighborhood factors such as the availability of safe areas for exercise and the availability and cost of healthier foods may be important in explaining racial differences in obesity among women (8).

Whereas the search for "thrifty" genotypes, and for population differences in their frequencies, will undoubtedly continue, so should work on black-white differences in leisure-time physical activity among women and studies of variation in living circumstances that might explain racial differences in obesity prevalence and success in obesity treatment programs (8).

REFERENCES

  1. Kimm SYS, Glynn NW, Aston CE, et al. Racial differences in the relation between uncoupling protein genes and resting energy expenditure. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;75:714–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Dean M, Stephens C, Winckler C, et al. Polymorphic admixture typing in human ethnic populations. Am J Hum Genet 1994;55:788–808.[Medline]
  3. Lin SS, Kelsey JL. Use of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic research: concepts, methodological issues, and suggestions for research. Epidemiol Rev 2000;22:187–202.[Free Full Text]
  4. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL. Overweight and obesity in the United States: Prevalence and trends. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998;22:39–47.[Medline]
  5. Stevens J, Kumanyika SK, Keil JE. Attitudes toward body size and dieting: differences between elderly black and white women. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1322–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Becker DM, Yanek LR, Koffman DM, Bronner YC. Body image preferences among urban African Americans and whites from low income communities. Ethn Dis 1999;9:377–86.[Medline]
  7. DeLany JP, Bray JA, Harsha DW, Volaufova J. Energy expenditure in preadolescent African American and white boys and girls: the Baton Rouge Children’s Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;75:705–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kumanyika SK. Obesity treatment in minorities. In: Wadden TA, Stunkard AJ, eds. Handbook of obesity treatment. New York: Guilford Press, 2002:416–44.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polednak, A. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Polednak, A. P
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Polednak, A. P


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS