AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJCN
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kahn, H. S
Right arrow Articles by Valdez, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kahn, H. S
Right arrow Articles by Valdez, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kahn, H. S
Right arrow Articles by Valdez, R.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 78, No. 5, 928-934, November 2003
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Metabolic risks identified by the combination of enlarged waist and elevated triacylglycerol concentration1,2

Henry S Kahn and Rodolfo Valdez

1 From the Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta

2 Address reprint requests to HS Kahn, Mail Stop K-10, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717. E-mail: hkahn{at}csiro.au

See corresponding editorial on page 902


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Abdominal fat and circulating triacylglycerols increase with age, which indicates lipid overaccumulation. Enlarged waist (EW) with elevated triacylglycerols (ET) could identify adults at metabolic risk.

Objective: Using thresholds for EW and ET observed among the youngest adults, we estimated for all adults the prevalence of combined EW and ET (EWET) and described the metabolic risks associated with EWET.

Design: In a cross-sectional, weighted sample of 9183 adults, we used two-dimensional displays to provide thresholds for EW (men: >= 95 cm; women: >= 88 cm) and fasting ET (>= 1.45 mmol/L) and estimated the characteristics of EWET among adults of all ages.

Results: The population prevalence of EWET in 18-24-y-olds was 6%; it rose with age until age 55-74 y (prevalence: 43%) and then was lower among the elderly. Persons with EWET were more likely (P < 0.0001) to have adverse mean (± SEE) concentrations of risk variables in adjusted analyses (fasting insulin: 43 ± 3 pmol/L; HDL cholesterol: -0.27 ± 0.02 mmol/L; apolipoprotein B: 0.20 ± 0.01 g/L; fasting glucose: 0.71 ± 0.07 mmol/L; uric acid: 50 ± 2 µmol/L) and to have diabetes (relative risk: 3.2) than were persons without EWET. Compared with a similar-size subpopulation with high body mass index, persons with EWET were older and had more dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and hyperuricemia. Compared with "metabolic syndrome," EWET identified more persons who were younger and had greater LDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B concentrations. Compared with "prediabetes," EWET identified more persons with hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia, and hyperuricemia.

Conclusions: EWET identifies a syndrome of lipid overaccumulation associated with metabolic risk and accelerated mortality after middle age. Prospective studies should evaluate this simple indicator.

Key Words: Adult • anthropometry • body mass index • glucose intolerance • hyperinsulinemia • hyperlipidemia • hypertension • hyperuricemia • insulin resistance • metabolic syndrome X • metabolic diseases • obesity • risk assessment


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Many investigators assume that insulin resistance is the fundamental metabolic defect that underlies a cluster of conditions called syndrome X, the deadly quartet, metabolic syndrome, or dysmetabolic syndrome (1-6). However, insulin resistance might be an effect rather than a cause (7). Analternative syndromic concept might be defined more fundamentally by the limited capacity of the human body to buffer and dispose of lipid fuels (8, 9). During periods when lipid availability exceeds this capacity, adipocytes would expand—especially in the intraabdominal compartment—to store the excess fuel. In parallel, the blood concentrations of certain lipids would become chronically elevated. A state of lipid overaccumulation would lead to ectopic deposition of lipids in nonadipose tissues, where insulin resistance (10, 11) and other metabolic dysfunctions would arise.

For this population-based study, we postulated that a state of lipid overaccumulation could be recognized as a combination of abdominal enlargement and elevated concentration of circulating triacylglycerols (12). We established normative threshold values for an enlarged waist (EW) circumference and elevated triacylglycerols (ET) by assessing only the youngest adults, because abdominal size and triacylglycerol concentration increase with adult age and metabolic risk (13-16). Accordingly, establishing the thresholds with values from any subpopulation but the youngest adults would be inappropriate. We defined our category of lipid overaccumulation as the occurrence in one person of both EW and ET (EWET). Using the thresholds derived from the youngest adults, we examined the associations of EWET with hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, hyperuricemia, and hypertension among adults through age 90 y.

We report here the testing of cross-sectional relations in adulthood between our marker of lipid overaccumulation (EWET) and continuous metabolic risk variables. We also compare the estimated subpopulation identified by EWET with other estimated subpopulations identified by 3 alternative, dichotomous risk markers: 1) high body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2): a BMI above a threshold chosen to yield an estimated subpopulation similar in size to the subpopulation with EWET; 2) metabolic syndrome: >= 3 of 5 risk factors defined by the Third Report of the Adult Treatment Panel (MS-ATPIII) of the National Cholesterol Education Program (5, 17); and 3) prediabetes: impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or both, shown by a 2-h oral-glucose-tolerance test (18).


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our analytic population was drawn from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), a probability sample of the noninstitutionalized civilian US population studied in 1988-1994 (19). This complex, multistage survey oversampled non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans. Our final analytic population contained 4448 male and 4735 female participants who were aged 18-90 y, were not pregnant, and had fasted for 8-19 h before their laboratory examination and for whom data on basic anthropometry and serum triacylglycerol concentration were available. Participants were asked to complete a household interview and a standardized examination, including measurement of the standing waist circumference (in the horizontal plane at a point marked just above the right ilium on the midaxillary line, at minimal respiration; 20, 21).

Serum triacylglycerol concentrations were measured enzymatically after hydrolysis to glycerol (Hitachi 704 Analyzer; Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis); the CV was 3-5% over the study and across the clinical range. Additional details of all laboratory procedures are available elsewhere (22). Calculations of LDL-cholesterol concentrations were limited to participants with triacylglycerol concentration < 4.5 mmol/L (a requirement of the Friedewald equation; 23) who fasted >= 9 h. Analyses for serum apolipoprotein B were conducted only during phase 1 of NHANES III (1988-1991).

Laboratory values for insulin, glucose, and glycated hemoglobin were omitted for 63 participants who described themselves as current insulin users. For participants with valid fasting values of insulin and glucose, we estimated insulin resistance by using the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (24), defined as fasting insulin (pmol/L) x fasting glucose (mmol/L)/22.5. Participants 40-74 y old, with the exception of insulin users, underwent a 2-h oral-glucose-tolerance test with 75 g glucose. On the basis of self-reported histories of diabetes and the oral-glucose-tolerance test, we classified these participants as having diabetes (nongestational, unspecified type), isolated IFG (6.1 <= fasting glucose < 7.0 mmol/L), isolated IGT (7.8 <= 2-h glucose < 11.1 mmol/L), combined IFG and IGT, or normal glucose tolerance (25).

Statistical analysis
We used NHANES III sampling weights along with SAS/Graph (release 8.2; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC), and SUDAAN (release 8.0; Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle, NC) software to estimate the represented population sizes, the prevalences of EWET, and the distributions of associated risk variables. Our analyses thereby incorporated weights that accounted for unequal selection probabilities (clustered design, planned oversampling, and differential nonresponse) (26). On the basis of the weights assigned, we estimated that our analytic sample represented a total of 100 113 964 US adults aged 18-90 y, 50.5% of whom were women.

We prepared sex-specific, age-stratified, bubble plots of population distribution by the values for waist circumference (to nearest cm) and triacylglycerol concentration (to nearest mmol/L) (Figure 1Go). The area of each circle on these plots is proportional to the estimated number of US men or women represented by those intersections. We established normative thresholds for waist circumference and triacylglycerol concentration by visual inspection of the plots restricted to subjects aged 18-24 y (Figure 1, A and BGo). For both sexes we noted predominant, rounded clusters in the lower left region that appeared to end just below waist threshold values of 95 cm (37.4 inches) for men and 88 cm (34.6 inches) for women and just below a triacylglycerol threshold of 1.45 mmol/L (128 mg/dL) for both sexes. We applied these threshold boundaries to all of our sex-specific, two-dimensional, graphic displays, thus establishing consistent quadrants for the plots of estimated persons in each age range. Subpopulations of persons whose values were above both thresholds (ie, located in the upper right quadrant) were defined as having EWET.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1.. Estimated US population distribution according to waist circumference and concentration of fasting serum triacylglycerols, by sex and 2 age strata. Survey participants contributing to each plot: n = 685 (A), 715 (B), 545 (C), and 559 (D).

 
Mean values of risk variables in the adult population were estimated by linear regression with adjustment for sex, age, age squared, and race or ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican American, other). No exclusions or adjustments were made for self-reported use of oral medications.

For the comparison of EWET with each alternative dichotomous marker, we estimated the 2 subpopulations that were discordant for marker status (ie, EWET-positive with negative alternative marker; EWET-negative with positive alternative marker). In the 2 discordant subpopulations, we compared prevalences (unadjusted) of adverse risk levels and then compared the mean values of risk variables with adjustments for sex, age, and race or ethnicity.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Prevalence of EWET by age and its relation to continuous risk variables
At age 18-24 y, the mean (± SEE) estimated US prevalence of EWET was 6.2 ± 1.1%. This estimate rose through consecutive decades of age to 55-64 y (43.7 ± 2.4%) and 65-74 y (42.1 ± 2.3%), but the prevalence was lower (36.4 ± 1.9%) at age 75-90 y. In the age groups from 25 to 44 y, the prevalence in men was higher than that in women (Figure 2Go). For both sexes combined, at age 18-90 y, the estimated prevalence of EWET was 24.8 ± 0.9%. We also estimated prevalences of 19.6 ± 0.5% for EW with low triacylglycerol concentration, 12.3 ± 0.6% for low waist circumference with ET, and 43.3 ± 1.1% for low waist circumference with low triacylglycerol concentration.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2.. Mean (± SEE) prevalence of enlarged waist and elevated triacylglycerols (EWET) by age groups, estimated for the noninstitutionalized civilian US population, 1988-1994. The number of survey participants in each age group was 459-932 men ({square}) and 480-990 women ({blacksquare}).

 
Compared with adults without EWET, those with EWET had significantly higher mean values for conventional risk variables and lower mean concentrations of HDL cholesterol (Table 1Go). These adverse differences were most pronounced for insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (Figure 3Go), and uric acid irrespective of age or sex. The risk variables related to lipids, glucose, and blood pressure also had strong associations with EWET, although they were less consistent by age and sex (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. . Risk factors for adults with and without enlarged waist circumference and elevated triacylglycerols (EWET) from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-19941

 


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3.. Mean (± SEM) estimated homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) according to 4 classes of waist circumference and triacylglycerol concentration ({square}, enlarged waist and elevated triacylglycerol; , enlarged waist and low triacylglycerol; {blacksquare}, low waist circumference and elevated triacylglycerol; , low waist circumference and low triacylglycerol), by sex and 2 age strata. Insulin users were excluded. The numbers of survey participants contributing to each mean value was 126-812 men and 103-856 women. The numbers beneath columns indicate the estimated percentage of participants reporting the use of medication to lower blood sugar.

 
EWET compared with high body mass index
Within our estimated population of 100.1 million adults, a threshold BMI of >= 29.25 identified a subpopulation (high BMI) similar in size (24.9 million) to that identified by EWET (24.8 million). A majority within the estimated population was concordant for EWET and high BMI: 14.3 ± 0.7% met the criteria for both conditions, and 64.6 ± 0.9% were concordant by meeting neither criterion. The discordant subpopulations were of equal size (Table 2Go), but the subpopulation with EWET alone was older ( age: 54.7 y compared with 42.6 y; P < 0.0001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. . Risk factor comparisons for subpopulations of participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey who were discordant for enlarged waist in combination with elevated triacyglycerols (EWET) and high BMI (>= 29.25), for EWET and metabolic syndrome, and for EWETand prediabetes1

 
For all lipid variables, fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, uric acid, and systolic blood pressure, persons with EWET alone had higher unadjusted prevalences of adverse values than did persons with high BMI alone (Table 2Go). For all lipid variables (including LDL cholesterol; P = 0.017), fasting glucose (P = 0.011), and glycated hemoglobin (P = 0.022), the adjusted mean values were higher for persons with EWET alone. For fasting insulin and systolic blood pressure (P = 0.014), the adjusted mean values were higher for persons with high BMI alone.

EWET compared with the metabolic syndrome
There were 8730 adult NHANES III participants with sufficient data (fasting triacylglycerol, fasting glucose, blood pressure, sex-specific waist circumference, and sex-specific HDL cholesterol) to allow the identification of either EWET or MS-ATPIII (5), and this sample represented an adult population of 95.5 million. The prevalence of MS-ATPIII was 23.1 ± 1.0%. Most of this population was concordant for EWET and MS-ATPIII, including 16.0 ± 0.8% who met the criteria for both conditions and 67.5 ± 1.1% who met neither criterion. Of those who were discordant for EWET and MS-ATPIII, the subpopulation with EWET alone was larger (Table 2Go) and younger ( age: 48.4 y compared with 53.1 y; P = 0.0016) than was the group with MS-ATPIII alone.

EWET alone identified more persons with high-risk concentrations of LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B than did MS-ATPIII alone (Table 2Go), and the adjusted mean concentrations were higher for these 2 variables (for LDL cholesterol: P = 0.024). However, HDL cholesterol, fasting glucose, blood pressure (3 of the 5 risk variables that define MS-ATPIII), fasting insulin, insulin resistance, and glycated hemoglobin were more likely to be adverse in the group with MS-ATPIII alone. The adjusted mean value for the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol was similar (P = 0.10) in these 2 subpopulations.

EWET in relation to diabetes and prediabetes
Participants 40-74 y old who either reported having diabetes or underwent an oral-glucose-tolerance test (n = 3800) were estimated to total 42.4 million adults. Among those with EWET, an estimated 25.4 ± 1.7% had diabetes; among those without EWET, the estimated diabetes prevalence was 8.0 ± 0.8% (relative risk: 3.2; 95% CI: 2.5, 4.0). The relative risk for diabetes was lower for men (2.6; 95% CI: 1.9, 3.6) than for women (4.0; 95% CI: 3.0, 5.3). Among the persons with diabetes, 64.7 ± 2.7% were estimated to have EWET; of the nondiabetic adults in the same age range, an estimated 31.9 ± 1.2% had EWET.

After excluding the 6.1 million persons with diabetes, we estimated that 8.9 million had prediabetes, a dysglycemic state defined by IFG, IGT, or combined IFG and IGT (18). Of those with prediabetes, an estimated 4.0 million also had EWET (a concordant subpopulation). Of the 27.4 million with normal glucose tolerance (ie, without prediabetes), 19.8 million also did not have EWET (concordant). The discordant subpopulation with EWET alone was larger than that with prediabetes alone (Table 2Go), but these discordant subpopulations were of similar mean age (54.3 y compared with 55.7 y; P = 0.19).

The estimated subpopulation with EWET alone had higher unadjusted prevalences (Table 2Go) of adverse values related to hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance (P = 0.062), all lipid variables, and uric acid than did the subpopulation with prediabetes alone. Persons with prediabetes alone had higher prevalences of fasting hyperglycemia (a criterion of prediabetes) and systolic hypertension (P = 0.017). With the exception of fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and blood pressures, the adjusted mean values of risk variables were more adverse for the subpopulation with EWET alone.

Potential efficiency of screening for EWET
On the assumption that measuring waist circumferences is simpler and less expensive than obtaining a fasting blood specimen or blood pressure reading, we used these NHANES III data to illustrate how the community-based screening of adults could benefit logistically from screening for EWET. Of the noninstitutionalized US population aged 18-90 y, we estimated that 44.4 ± 0.8% (slightly higher for the men and lower for the women) would exceed the threshold for waist circumference (Table 3Go). Thus, 56% of adults initially screened in this manner might be immediately determined not to have EWET and would thereby not have any need for a blood test. Table 3Go further illustrates how the logistical simplicity of EWET is more advantageous for younger adults than for older adults. Among younger adults (aged 18-34 y), 75% would avoid a blood test, whereas, among older adults (aged 55-74 y), only 31% would do so. At age 75-90 y, the proportion avoiding a blood test would rise to 38% (37% for men and 39% for women).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. . Estimated yields of screening the US adult population (100.1 million in 1988-1994) for enlarged waist circumference and for elevated triacylglycerols

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We have proposed that EWET, a relatively simple, dichotomous risk marker, may identify adults who are at metabolic risk because of lipid overaccumulation. Our population-based, cross-sectional analysis showed a rising prevalence of EWET through middle age, which is consistent with an accumulative process. The leveling off of this syndrome after age 55 y and the declining prevalence after age 74 y (Figure 2Go) suggest that persons who have experienced several decades of excessive lipid burden may eventually also experience higher mortality rates.

We might ask: through what mechanisms might abdominal obesity and elevated circulating triacylglycerols become associated with more familiar risk factors such as conventional dyslipidemia, hyperinsulinemia, glucose intolerance, hyperuricemia, and hypertension? Lipid fuels are primarily the long-chain fatty acids that circulate through blood in their esterified form (relatively stable triacylglycerols inside lipoproteins) or in their nonesterified form (relatively unstable free fatty acids). The increased delivery of lipolytic products from enlarged intraabdominal fat depots to the liver could result in a higher concentration of circulating VLDL and LDL particles (27, 28), whereas enhanced clearance of selected triacylglycerol-rich lipoprotein particles could depress the concentration of HDL cholesterol (29). At the same time, excessive fluxes of lipid fuels would lead to the ectopic accumulation of intracellular or subfascial fatty acid metabolites in nonadipose tissues (eg, liver, skeletal muscle), which would cause them to become insulin-resistant (10, 11, 30). Compensatory hyperinsulinemia would result (31) and would contribute through renal or other mechanisms to hyperuricemia (32, 33) and hypertension (32, 34). The increased delivery of lipolytic products to the liver would also promote hepatic gluconeogenesis (35), whereas the long-term accumulation of fatty acid metabolites in the pancreas could impair insulin secretion (36). This combination of processes would lead to hyperglycemia and an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (37).

The use of abdominal size and circulating triacylglycerol concentration to estimate risk is not new. Investigators in Quebec have pointed out that a "hypertriglyceridemic waist" could serve to identify men with hyperinsulinemia, elevated apolipoprotein B, and small, dense LDL particles (38). Without reference to the age dependence of abdominal size and triacylglycerol concentration, they assigned cutoffs for waist circumference (>= 90 cm) and triacylglycerol concentration (>= 2.0 mmol/L) that were rounded for simplicity. In cross-sectional studies limited to several hundred men, they found that the hypertriglyceridemic waist was positively associated with angiographically assessed coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and hyperinsulinemia (38-40).

Our study has built on the reports from Quebec by using population-based survey data that include both sexes. In contrast with the approach taken in Canada, we assigned threshold values for waist circumference and triacylglycerol concentration that were based on the examination of two-dimensional plots obtained only from young adults. The thresholds we obtained in this manner are consistent with other research observations. An analysis of white adults participating in NHANES III found that obesity-associated risk factors were most efficiently predicted at waist thresholds of 96 cm for men and 86 cm for women (41). Our proposed value of 95 cm for men is similar, and it also falls between the mean baseline waist circumference for incident cases and noncases among middle-aged Finnish men followed prospectively for the onset of diabetes (42) or coronary heart disease (43). A longitudinal description of non-African American adolescents from Texas found that, by age 18 y, the waist circumference of males was 6 cm larger than that of females (44); this sex difference was similar to the 7-cm difference between our proposed thresholds of 95 cm for men and 88 cm for women. Our threshold triacylglycerol concentration estimate of 1.45 mmol/L falls midway between the mean baseline concentration in adults who later acquired type 2 diabetes and that of those who did not, as reported from Texas (45) and Finland (42).

Although waist circumference is not commonly measured in clinical practice, the excellent reproducibility (46) and simplicity of this measurement should facilitate its adoption. Obtaining a standardized waist measurement is no more complicated than properly obtaining the standardized weight and height needed for calculating a BMI, and a waist circumference conveys a concept of obesity that may be easier for patients to understand. In addition, a tape measure is less expensive and more portable than are a good-quality stadiometer and scale. Cross-sectional studies within North American populations of European ancestry showed that waist circumference, even without triacylglycerol measurement, is more closely associated with multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors than is BMI (14, 41).

In our era of apparently increasing obesity and diabetes (47), it becomes more important than ever for clinicians to identify efficiently those persons who will most likely benefit from preventive or therapeutic interventions. Public health programs also need efficient markers for monitoring the prevalence of metabolic risks in communities (surveillance) and for evaluating the effectiveness of community-based attempts to prevent chronic disease. Traditional approaches to these requirements have depended on the assessment of many biochemical, physiologic, and anthropometric variables. However, the various campaigns against high cholesterol, hypertension, diabetes, and overweight may be missing an opportunity to focus on a more primary pathophysiologic pathway—possibly a key component of the "common soil" (48) from which grow major portions of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

We have presented evidence that EWET could serve as a simple marker for a syndrome of lipid overaccumulation that would help to identify either persons in whom or communities in which "lipotoxicity" (9) might be doing the most harm. Used in community-based trials, EWET might also reveal which interventions could most effectively prevent or reverse this process of accumulation. However, our data are only cross-sectional. Missing from our evidence is any indication that EWET does, over time, predict the most important ultimate outcomes such as cardiovascular events, major disability, or premature mortality. Population-based, prospective studies already showed that triacylglycerol concentration provides significant prediction of cardiovascular risk (49, 50). However, the use of EWET instead of triacylglycerol concentration would have the advantage of substantially reducing the number of venipunctures and blood samples required from the population being assessed. Nevertheless, prospective studies will be necessary to prove the utility of EWET as a simple indicator of metabolic risks.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We acknowledge the extraordinary efforts of the field staff, laboratory personnel, and statisticians who collected and processed the information in NHANES III. Barbara Bowman, Allan Sniderman, KM Venkat Narayan, Bob Gerzoff, and Peter L Taylor also provided valuable insights and advice during the preparation of this paper.

HSK and RV contributed to the study design and data analysis; HSK drafted the manuscript. Neither author had any corporate affiliations or financial interests related to this research topic.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Reaven GM. Banting lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 1988;37:1595-607.
  2. Kaplan NM. The deadly quartet. Upper-body obesity, glucose intolerance, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypertension. Arch Intern Med1989; 149:1514-20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Liese AD, Mayer-Davis EJ, Haffner SM. Development of the multiple metabolic syndrome: an epidemiologic perspective. Epidemiol Rev1998; 20:157-72.[Free Full Text]
  4. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus, provisional report of a WHO consultation.Diabet Med 1998;15:539-53.[Medline]
  5. NCEP Expert Panel. Executive Summary of The Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486-97.[Free Full Text]
  6. Groop L, Orho-Melander M. The dysmetabolic syndrome. J Intern Med 2001;250:105-20.[Medline]
  7. Stern MP. The insulin resistance syndrome. In: Alberti KGMM, Zimmet P, DeFronzo RA, eds. International textbook of diabetes mellitus. 2nd ed. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley & Sons, 1997:255-83.
  8. Frayn KN. Adipose tissue and the insulin resistance syndrome. Proc Nutr Soc 2001;60:375-80.[Medline]
  9. Unger RH. Lipotoxic diseases. Annu Rev Med 2002;53:319-36.[Medline]
  10. Kelley DE, Goodpaster BH, Storlien L. Muscle triglyceride and insulin resistance. Annu Rev Nutr 2002;22:325-46.[Medline]
  11. Petersen KF, Befroy D, Dufour S, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in the elderly: Possible role in insulin resistance. Science 2003;300:1140-2.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kriketos AD, Furler SM, Gan SK, Poynten AM, Chisholm DJ, Campbell LV. Multiple indexes of lipid availability are independently related to whole body insulin action in healthy humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:793-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Stevens J, Knapp RG, Keil JE, Verdugo RR. Changes in body weight and girths in black and white adults studied over a 25 year interval. Int J Obes 1991;15:803-8.[Medline]
  14. Dobbelsteyn CJ, Joffres MR, MacLean DR, Flowerdew G. A comparative evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as indicators of cardiovascular risk factors.The Canadian Heart Health Surveys. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001;25:652-61.[Medline]
  15. Jungner I, Marcovina SM, Walldius G, Holme I, Kolar W, Steiner E. Apolipoprotein B and A-I values in 147576 Swedish males and females, standardized according to the World Health Organization-International Federation of Clinical Chemistry First International Reference Materials. Clin Chem 1998;44:1641-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. MacLean DR, Petrasovits A, Connelly PW, Joffres M, O'Connor B, Little JA. Plasma lipids and lipoprotein reference values, and the prevalence of dyslipoproteinemia in Canadian adults.Canadian Heart Health Surveys Research Group. Can J Cardiol 1999;15:434-44.[Medline]
  17. Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA 2002;287:356-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. American Diabetes Association. Pre-diabetes. 2002. Internet: http://www.diabetes.org/main/info/pre-diabetes.jsp#ABOUT (accessed 12 March 2003).
  19. National Center for Health Statistics. Plan and Operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. 1994. Internet: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_01/sr01_032.pdf (accessed 12 March 2003).
  20. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination III: Body Measurements (Anthropometry). 1988. Internet: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes3/cdrom/NCHS/MANUALS/ANTHRO.PDF (accessed 12 March 2003).
  21. Chumlea NC, Kuczmarski RJ. Using a bony landmark to measure waist circumference. J Am Diet Assoc 1995;95:12 (letter).[Medline]
  22. Gunter EW, Lewis BG, Koncikowski SM. Laboratory procedures used for the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES-III), 1988-1994. 1996. Internet: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes3/cdrom/NCHS/MANUALS/LABMAN.PDF (accessed 12 March 2003).
  23. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499-502.[Abstract]
  24. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985;28:412-9.[Medline]
  25. Unwin N, Shaw J, Zimmet P, Alberti KG. Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glycaemia: the current status on definition and intervention. Diabet Med 2002;19:708-23.[Medline]
  26. Mohadjer L, Montaquila J, Waksberg J, et al. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, weighting and estimation methodology. 1996. Internet: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes3/cdrom/NCHS/MANUALS/WGT_EXEC.PDF (accessed 12 March 2003).
  27. Lewis GF, Steiner G. Hypertriglyceridemia and its metabolic consequences as a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Rev 1996;12:37-56.[Medline]
  28. Sniderman AD, Scantlebury T, Cianflone K. Hypertriglyceridemic hyperapob: the unappreciated atherogenic dyslipoproteinemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:447-59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Lamarche B, Uffelman KD, Carpentier A, et al. Triglyceride enrichment of HDL enhances in vivo metabolic clearance of HDL apo A-I in healthy men. J Clin Invest 1999;103:1191-9.[Medline]
  30. Shulman GI. Cellular mechanisms of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest2000; 106:171-6.[Medline]
  31. Lakka HM, Salonen JT, Tuomilehto J, Kaplan GA, Lakka TA. Obesity and weight gain are associated with increased incidence of hyperinsulinemia in non-diabetic men. Horm Metab Res 2002;34:492-8.[Medline]
  32. Reaven GM. The kidney: an unwilling accomplice in syndrome X.Am J Kidney Dis 1997;30:928-31.[Medline]
  33. Clausen JO, Borch-Johnsen K, Ibsen H, Pedersen O. Analysis of the relationship between fasting serum uric acid and the insulin sensitivity index in a population-based sample of 380 young healthy Caucasians.Eur J Endocrinol 1998;138:63-9.[Abstract]
  34. Edelson GW, Sowers JR. Insulin resistance in hypertension: a focused review. Am J Med Sci 1993;306:345-7.[Medline]
  35. Gastaldelli A, Miyazaki Y, Pettiti M, et al. Metabolic effects of visceral fat accumulation in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2002; 87:5098-103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Unger RH, Zhou YT. Lipotoxicity of beta-cells in obesity and in other causes of fatty acid spillover. Diabetes 2001;50(suppl):S118-21.
  37. Bergman RN, Ader M. Free fatty acids and pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2000;11:351-6.[Medline]
  38. Lemieux I, Pascot A, Couillard C, et al. Hypertriglyceridemic waist: a marker of the atherogenic metabolic triad (hyperinsulinemia; hyperapolipoprotein B; small, dense LDL) in men? Circulation 2000;102:179-84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Lemieux I, Almeras N, Mauriege P, et al. Prevalence of ‘hypertriglyceridemic waist' in men who participated in the Quebec Health Survey: association with atherogenic and diabetogenic metabolic risk factors.Can J Cardiol 2002;18:725-32.[Medline]
  40. St-Pierre J, Lemieux I, Vohl MC, et al. Contribution of abdominal obesity and hypertriglyceridemia to impaired fasting glucose and coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:15-8.[Medline]
  41. Zhu S, Wang Z, Heshka S, Heo M, Faith MS, Heymsfield SB. Waist circumference and obesity-associated risk factors among whites in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: clinical action thresholds. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:743-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Laaksonen DE, Lakka HM, Niskanen LK, Kaplan GA, Salonen JT, Lakka TA. Metabolic syndrome and development of diabetes mellitus: application and validation of recently suggested definitions of the metabolic syndrome in a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol2002; 156:1070-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, et al. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men.JAMA 2002;288:2709-16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Dai S, Labarthe DR, Grunbaum JA, Harrist RB, Mueller WH. Longitudinal analysis of changes in indices of obesity from age 8 years to age 18 years. Project HeartBeat! Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:720-9.
  45. Haffner SM, Stern MP, Hazuda HP, Mitchell BD, Patterson JK. Cardiovascular risk factors in confirmed prediabetic individuals.Does the clock for coronary heart disease start ticking before the onset of clinical diabetes? JAMA 1990;263:2893-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Wang J, Thornton JC, Bari S, et al. Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sites. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:379-84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003;289:76-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Stern MP. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease.The "common soil" hypothesis. Diabetes 1995;44:369-74.[Abstract]
  49. Austin MA, Hokanson JE, Edwards KL. Hypertriglyceridemia as a cardiovascular risk factor. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:7B-12B.[Medline]
  50. Jeppesen J, Hein HO, Suadicani P, Gyntelberg F. Triglyceride concentration and ischemic heart disease: an eight-year follow-up in the Copenhagen Male Study. Circulation 1998;97:1029-36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication March 18, 2003. Accepted for publication May 30, 2003.


Related articles in AJCN:

Waist circumference: a simple, inexpensive, and reliable tool that should be included as part of physical examinations in the doctor's office
Jack Wang
AJCN 2003 78: 902-903. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Wiltgen, I.G. Benedetto, L.S. Mastella, and P.M. Spritzer
Lipid accumulation product index: a reliable marker of cardiovascular risk in polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1726 - 1731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
J.-P. Despres, P. Poirier, J. Bergeron, A. Tremblay, I. Lemieux, and N. Almeras
From individual risk factors and the metabolic syndrome to global cardiometabolic risk
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., March 1, 2008; 10(suppl_B): B24 - B33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
P. Blackburn, I. Lemieux, B. Lamarche, J. Bergeron, P. Perron, G. Tremblay, D. Gaudet, and J.-P. Despres
Type 2 Diabetes Without the Atherogenic Metabolic Triad Does Not Predict Angiographically Assessed Coronary Artery Disease in Women
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2008; 31(1): 170 - 172.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. J.G. Hanley, L. E. Wagenknecht, A. Festa, R. B. D'Agostino Jr., and S. M. Haffner
Alanine Aminotransferase and Directly Measured Insulin Sensitivity in a Multiethnic Cohort: The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2007; 30(7): 1819 - 1827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. Wang
Standardization of waist circumference reference data
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2006; 83(1): 3 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Esmaillzadeh, P. Mirmiran, and F. Azizi
Clustering of metabolic abnormalities in adolescents with the hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2006; 83(1): 36 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
H. S. Kahn
The Lipid Accumulation Product Is Better Than BMI for Identifying Diabetes: A population-based comparison
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2006; 29(1): 151 - 153.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
Z. T. Bloomgarden
2nd International Symposium on Triglycerides and HDL: Metabolic syndrome
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2005; 28(10): 2577 - 2584.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. Bigaard, I. Spanggaard, B. L. Thomsen, K. Overvad, and A. Tjonneland;
Self-Reported and Technician-Measured Waist Circumferences Differ in Middle-Aged Men and Women
J. Nutr., September 1, 2005; 135(9): 2263 - 2270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. B. Tanko, Y. Z. Bagger, G. Qin, P. Alexandersen, P. J. Larsen, and C. Christiansen
Enlarged Waist Combined With Elevated Triglycerides Is a Strong Predictor of Accelerated Atherogenesis and Related Cardiovascular Mortality in Postmenopausal Women
Circulation, April 19, 2005; 111(15): 1883 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Esmaillzadeh, P. Mirmiran, and F. Azizi
Whole-grain intake and the prevalence of hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype in Tehranian adults
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 55 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
H. Zhao, S. Yakar, O. Gavrilova, H. Sun, Y. Zhang, H. Kim, J. Setser, W. Jou, and D. LeRoith
Phloridzin Improves Hyperglycemia But Not Hepatic Insulin Resistance in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes, November 1, 2004; 53(11): 2901 - 2909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
F. Vinicor and B. Bowman
The Metabolic Syndrome: The Emperor Needs Some Consistent Clothes: Response to Davidson and Alexander
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2004; 27(5): 1243 - 1243.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJCN
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kahn, H. S
Right arrow Articles by Valdez, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kahn, H. S
Right arrow Articles by Valdez, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kahn, H. S
Right arrow Articles by Valdez, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS