|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS |
1 From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
2 Supported by grant no. 21000027 from Zorg Onderzoek Nederland, grant no. 2000/30 from the World Cancer Research Fund, and the Europe Against Cancer Program of the European Commission (SANCO).
3 Address reprint requests to PHM Peeters, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, D01.335, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands. E-mail: p.h.m.peeters{at}jc.azu.nl.
See corresponding editorial on page 183.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: We investigated the association between phytoestrogen intake and breast cancer risk in a large prospective study in a Dutch population with a habitually low phytoestrogen intake.
Design: The study population consisted of 15 555 women aged 4970 y who constituted a Dutch cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutriton (EPIC; 19931997). Data concerning habitual dietary intake in the preceding year were obtained by using a validated food-frequency questionnaire. The content of isoflavones and lignans in relevant food items was estimated through a literature search, the use of food-composition tables, and contact with experts. Newly diagnosed breast cancer cases up to 1 January 2001 were identified through linkage with the Comprehensive Cancer Center Middle Netherlands. Hazard ratios for the disease were estimated by Cox proportional hazard analysis for quartiles of isoflavone and lignan intake. Associations were adjusted for known breast cancer risk factors and daily energy intake.
Results: A total of 280 women were newly diagnosed with breast cancer during follow-up. The median daily intakes of isoflavones and lignans were 0.4 (interquartile range: 0.30.5) and 0.7 (0.50.8) mg/d, respectively. Relative to the respective lowest intake quartiles, the hazard ratios for the highest intake quartiles for isoflavones and lignans were 1.0 (95% CI: 0.7, 1.5) and 0.7 (0.5, 1.1), respectively. Tests for trend were nonsignificant.
Conclusion: In Western populations, a high intake of isoflavones or mammalian lignans is not significantly related to breast cancer risk.
Key Words: Breast cancer phytoestrogens isoflavones lignans ProspectEuropean Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Netherlands
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isoflavones resemble estrogen structurally, are able to bind to the estrogen receptor (ER), and have ER-mediated estrogenic properties (transcriptional activity) (1, 2). They also act as antiestrogens by competing with the more potent endogenous estrogen for the ERs (5). Additionally, phytoestrogens have antioxidative, antiproliferative, and antiangiogenic activities, which are hormonally independant (18). The plant lignans show hardly any binding affinity to ERs (6). However, in animal and in vitro studies, lignans were reported to have antioxidative activity (9) and to reduce tumor progression and metastasis (10, 11).
Soy foods are rich in isoflavones, and Asian populations habitually consume large amounts of soy foods. Ecologic observations suggest that the intake of soy foods plays a role in the prevention of breast cancer (1214). Few prospective studies have been conducted in this field (15). Several studies, but not all, showed protective effects of soy in Asian populations (1618). No such associations were suggested for Western subjects (19, 20). In Western populations, soy consumption is infrequent, but isoflavones are consumed in small amounts from other sources. Lignans are more widespread and occur more frequently in Western diets than do isoflavones.
A method of estimating daily phytoestrogen intake on the basis of daily intakes of certain food items for which values of isoflavone and lignan content are available has been developed (2126) and used in Western populations (2729). To prospectively study the effect of phytoestrogens on breast cancer risk in a Western population, we conducted a cohort study on habitual intake of isoflavones and lignans in 15 555 Dutch women.
| SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For the present study, eligible participants were all Prospect-EPIC participants with complete questionnaires who signed an informed consent form (n = 17 235). Exclusion criteria included a daily intake of <500 or >6000 kcal/d (n = 95), prevalent cancer at any site at the time of enrollment (n = 1136), and residency in areas not fully covered by the Comprehensive Cancer Center Middle Netherlands (n = 449). Consequently, there were 15 555 eligible subjects.
The cohort data were linked to the databases of the municipal registries to ascertain the vital status of all participants and to obtain information about subjects who moved from the region or emigrated abroad (
100% completeness). Linkage of the cohort to the Comprehensive Cancer Center Middle Netherlands (complete since 1989) provided us with information regarding incident cancer cases, which were coded according to the 9th revision of the International Classification of Diseases. Additional causes of death were obtained through general practitioners and were coded according to the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases.
The endpoint for the study was the diagnosis of primary breast cancer. For cases of breast cancer, follow-up ended at the date of diagnosis or at the date of death due to breast cancer, whichever occurred first. For women diagnosed with other primary cancers, follow-up was censored at the date of diagnosis. For women who left the region or country, the censoring date was the date of emigration. For those who died, follow-up was censored at the date of death. For all others, the censoring date was 1 January 2001. The Institutional Review Board of the University Medical Center Utrecht approved the study.
Prospect-EPIC general questionnaire, FFQ, and anthropometric measurements
The general questionnaire included questions regarding demographic factors, lifestyle habits, obstetric and gynecologic history, and past and current morbidity. Menopause was defined as the complete cessation of menstrual bleeding during the 12 mo preceding enrollment due to natural, chemical, or surgical causes (according to self-report). Marital status and education level were determined categorically. Parity was categorically defined as "yes" or "no." Use of oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy was categorically defined as "ever" or "never." Smoking was described by a categorical variable (past, current, or never smoker) and by the continuous variable of total pack-years smoked (number of cigarettes smoked per day multiplied by the number of smoking years and divided by 20). The Voorrips score is a summary measure that combines household, occupational, and recreational physical activity (31). Body mass index was computed as weight (in kg) divided by the square of height (in m) (30).
The self-administered FFQ included questions on the subjects' habitual intake of 178 food items during the preceding year (32, 33). The questionnaire contained color photographs of 24 different-sized portions of 21 food items, which helped in assessing serving sizes. The frequency of consumption of each food item could be indicated on a daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly scale or as "never." The FFQ also included open-ended questions, in which the names of the brands used (eg, for margarine) could be filled out.
Scoring of phytoestrogen intake
The method used and the guidelines applied for assigning an individual phytoestrogen intake score for each participant were described in detail previously (25, 26). Briefly, published laboratory analysis data on the phytoestrogen contents of relevant food items were located by conducting a search of the medical (MEDLINE; National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD) and agricultural (AGRICOLA; National Agricultural Library, Beltsville, MD) scientific literature and by contacting experts in the field of phytoestrogens and several Dutch food manufacturers. Search terms included isoflavones, coumestans, plant lignans, and mammalian lignans. Note that mammalian lignans are not naturally present in plant foods, and their food content values are based on in vitro production of enterolactone and enterodiol from certain food items, according to published databases. Literature data for the contents of the isoflavones daidzein, genistein, formononetin, and biochanin A; the coumestan coumestrol; the plant lignans matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol; and the mammalian lignans enterolactone and enterodiol were grouped in 7 categories according to their exact values. This was done to avoid implying a degree of accuracy for which the current available data are too limited and too preliminary (25, 26). Subsequently, the phytoestrogen score of each food item was multiplied by the quantity consumed per day per participant. The resulting phytoestrogen score was then summed up across food items to obtain daily intake scores of daidzein, genistein, formononetin, biochanin A, coumsterol, matairesinol, secoisolariciresinol, enterolactone, and enterodiol for each participant. We then summarized the individual intake scores of daidzein, genistein, formononetin, and biochanin A into a total isoflavone score; the individual intake scores of matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol into a total plant lignan score; and the individual intake scores of enterolactone and enterodiol into a total mammalian lignan score.
Statistical analysis
Our analyses refer to the subgroup of mammalian lignans (enterolactone and enterodiol) rather than to the plant lignans (matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol). The mammalian lignansend products of various plant precursors metabolized by the gut microfloraare the bioactive forms, which might be more relevant in analytic studies on cancer associations. Additionally, besides matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol, enterolactone and enterodiol are produced from other plant lignans (3, 4), for most of which no food-composition data are available. Thus, the use of mammalian lignan scores might account for the lack of data on some of their plant precursors. Isoflavones are found both in plants and in body fluids, so no distinction was made between their plant and bioactive forms. Coumesterol was not used in our analyses because of its very low intake in this study population.
Quartiles of total isoflavone (daidzein, genistein, biochanin A, and formononetin) and total mammalian lignan (enterolactone and enterodiol) intake were computed according to the distribution of the total cohort. General characteristics of the study population are presented by quartiles of total phytoestrogen intake (ie, summed intakes of daidzein, genistein, biochanin A, formononetin, enterolactone, and enterodiol). Daily intake is expressed in medians because the distribution curves appeared to be skewed.
Hazard ratios for breast cancer were estimated by Cox proportional hazard analysis and are presented, together with 95% CIs, for quartiles of isoflavone and lignan intake, with the lowest quartile as the reference. We first present the results of a model adjusted only for age at enrollment. Subsequently, we present the results of models adjusted for established risk factors for breast cancer (age at enrollment, age at first full-term delivery, height, weight, parity, physical activity score, use of oral contraceptives, use of hormone replacement therapy, menopausal status, marital status, and academic education). Finally, we further adjust the fully adjusted models for daily energy intake (as a continuous variable). Trends were assessed by testing the significance of the models' linearity (Wald test) by using phytoestrogen intake as a categorical variable (quartiles) in polynomial contrast. We repeated the analyses by excluding all cases that were diagnosed <1 y after enrollment.
Previous studies suggested that the effects of phytoestrogens on breast cancer risk differ according to menopausal status. Therefore, we also conducted a subanalysis of all participants who were postmenopausal at enrollment (and thus also postmenopausal at breast cancer diagnosis). In addition to the adjustment variables used for the total population, the models for postmenopausal participants were also adjusted for age at menopause. The SPSS statistical package for WINDOWS, version 9.0, was used for all statistical analyses (34), and all tests were two-sided.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The participants who had the highest (4th quartile) intake scores for phytoestrogens were significantly younger at enrollment and significantly older at delivery of their first child than were the participants who had lower intake scores. The subjects with the highest intake scores also smoked significantly less, were significantly taller, and had significantly lower BMI values and significantly higher physical activity scores. They also had significantly higher daily intakes of energy, fiber, fruit, vegetables, and soy products (Table 1
).
|
1 mg/d. The daily intake of mammalian lignans (0.67 mg/d) was
80% higher than that of isoflavones (Table 2
|
|
12 mo after enrollment were included in the analyses (n = 203), the results were very similar (data not shown). The same was true when only postmenopausal participants (at enrollment and at diagnosis) were included (for mammalian lignans in the fully adjusted model, P for trend = 0.06; data not shown). An interaction term for menopausal status in the model that included all women was not significant. | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
300/100 000 women [
86% of total breast tumors (0.86 x 280 x 100 000/80 215)], and the incidence of invasive breast cancer that was expected on the basis of Dutch cancer rates published in 1997 (weighted by the relevant age categories) was similar (ie, 285/100 000 women) (35). Additionally, the updated data from the municipal registries provided detailed follow-up information about vital status and lowered the proportion of subjects who were lost to follow-up.
The semiquantitative FFQ was not specifically designed to estimate phytoestrogen intake and did not include questions about specific food items that contain high amounts of phytoestrogens (eg, soy foods for isoflavones and flaxseed or linseed for lignans). However, these foods are infrequently consumed in the Netherlands. On the other hand, the FFQ was specifically designed to estimate the habitual intake of foods from food groups that contribute significantly to phytoestrogen intake in Western societies, such as grains, fruit, nuts and seeds, and alcoholic beverages. For these food groups, the correlation between the consumption estimated from the FFQ and that estimated from twelve 24-h dietary recalls during a period of 1 y was high (Spearman correlation coefficients
0.7) (26, 32, 33).
Published epidemiologic studies regarding dietary intake of soy foodsa proxy for isoflavone intakeand breast cancer risk were largely concerned with Asian populations having a high traditional intake of soy (1618). Only a few studies referred to dietary intake in a Western population (27, 28, 36). Although the first studies showed clear protective effects of a high soy intake, later studies were less clear. The results of the few prospective studies were mostly negative (17, 18, 28). The results of the present study showed no protective effects of isoflavones and are therefore in accordance with previously published data for Western women.
The results of several studies suggest that isoflavone consumption should be high at certain ages (eg, prepuberty) to yield protective effects (3739). This may explain why we observed no beneficial effects of isoflavone intake in our study: overall consumption was very low, and we obtained data regarding recent consumption only, but not consumption at a young age.
Another hypothesis was recently introduced in an attempt to explain the inconsistent results for isoflavones. Equol is exclusively the product of intestinal bacterial metabolism of dietary daidzein. Only 5070% of the healthy population produce equol in response to a dietary challenge by daidzein. Because equol has greater antioxidant activity than do all other isoflavones, it was suggested that only subjects who are equol producers benefit from consuming isoflavones (40). We have no data concerning the equol production ability of the study participants; therefore, we cannot examine this hypothesis.
Although less studied, lignans are more common in Western diets (25, 26, 41, 42); thus, the role of lignans might be more relevant than that of isoflavones. Only 3 previous studies assessed the relation between lignan intake and breast cancer risk in Western populations (2729). Two of them (27, 28) focused on plant lignan intake, and their results did not indicate a protective effect of high intakes. The third study (29) indicated that high intakes of mammalian lignans are associated with a low risk of breast cancer, mostly in premenopausal women and in carriers of a certain genotype of the CYP17 gene (29).
The methodology in the prospective study by Horn-Ross et al (28) was similar to ours. However, Horn-Ross et al used estimates of plant lignan (matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol) intake, whereas we used estimates of mammalian lignan (enterolactone and enterodiol, the bioactive forms) intake. The mammalian lignan content of foods is determined by in vitro fermentation with human fecal microbiota (thus simulating colon fermentation) and subsequent measurement of the quantity of enterolactone and enterodiol produced (43). It should be kept in mind, though, that in vitro values of mammalian lignans are only an indicator of in vivo values because the in vitro values do not incorporate individual metabolic capacity. Additionally, the published values for the mammalian lignan content of foods may have been overestimated if the high background of bacterial mammalian lignans was not accounted for.
When we used estimates of plant lignan intake instead of mammalian lignan intake in our analyses (data not shown), we observed a slightly higher risk of breast cancer with high intakes, although the results were not significant. The discrepancy noted between our results for plant lignans and those for mammalian lignans, as well as similar discrepancies found in previous studies (28, 29), warrants clarification. One explanation is the incompleteness of food-composition tables with regard to both plant and mammalian lignans. For example, coffee and tea and, to a lesser extent, alcoholic beverages are frequently consumed by Dutch women. These drinks contain plant lignans but lack values for mammalian lignans. This causes differences in classification. In fact, of 15 555 participants, only one-third were classified into identical intake quartiles for plant and mammalian lignans. Therefore, the different risk estimates for plant and mammalian lignans may simply be caused by a lack of accurate food-composition data.
Alternatively, the discrepancy could partly reflect real differences between lignan precursors and bioactive compounds. Besides being produced from matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol, the bioactive compounds enterolactone and enterodiol are produced from other plant precursors, such as hydroxymatairesinol, secoisolariciresinol diglucoside, lariciresinol, pinoresinol, syringaresinol, and others, which to date are not included in any of the food-composition tables (3, 4). The effects noted for mammalian lignans may actually be produced by some other plant lignans, not necessarily matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol, for which composition data (and thus intake data) are unavailable.
Our findings for mammalian lignans were not significant but seem to show a protective trend. This is supported by the results of the case-control study of McCann et al (29), in which they reported that, relative to postmenopausal women in the lowest tertile of mammalian lignan intake, those in the highest tertile had a breast cancer hazard ratio of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.28, 1.27).
Apart from attempts to estimate dietary intakes of lignans, several studies focused on measurements of enterolactone in body fluids. We were unable to show protective effects of high urinary excretion of enterolactone in a comparable Dutch cohort for which we had no dietary data (20). Urinary excretion of enterolactone reflects not only the individual dietary intake but also the results of the metabolic process involving the bacterial colonic flora, which might be influenced by a recent use of antibiotics or gastrointestinal diseases. Urinary excretion reflects short-term intake (2472 h) (41), whereas our FFQ reflected the habitual diet during the preceding year. We believe that when studying associations with cancer, habitual exposure to phytoestrogens may be more relevant.
Two other studies assessed serum or plasma enterolactone concentrations in relation to breast cancer risk (44, 45). Both of them showed slightly protective, nonsignificant results for high concentrations in older women, which is in accordance with the results of the present study.
Lignan intake in our study population was rather low (median: 0.7 mg/d). Similar intakes were reported in American women (29). True consumption is probably higher given the incompleteness of available food-composition tables. Consumption of vegetables, fruit, grain products, and nuts accounted for most of the lignan intake (26). Similar sources have been reported for Finnish (44) and American (24, 25) women. Because these food groups are frequently consumed in Western diets, it is reasonable to assume that the intake of lignans is stable over the course of a lifetime and occurs at younger ages also, which is important if lignan intake is relevant only at younger ages, as has been suggested for isoflavones. In conclusion, the results of this prospective study in a large cohort of Dutch women do not show protective effects of high dietary intakes of isoflavones or lignans against breast cancer risk.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in AJCN:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Yang, X.-O. Shu, H. Li, W.-H. Chow, H. Cai, X. Zhang, Y.-T. Gao, and W. Zheng Prospective cohort study of soy food intake and colorectal cancer risk in women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2009; 89(2): 577 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Jaceldo-Siegl, G. E Fraser, J. Chan, A. Franke, and J. Sabate Validation of soy protein estimates from a food-frequency questionnaire with repeated 24-h recalls and isoflavonoid excretion in overnight urine in a Western population with a wide range of soy intakes Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1422 - 1427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Galluzzo, P. Ascenzi, P. Bulzomi, and M. Marino The Nutritional Flavanone Naringenin Triggers Antiestrogenic Effects by Regulating Estrogen Receptor {alpha}-Palmitoylation Endocrinology, May 1, 2008; 149(5): 2567 - 2575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hedelin, M. Lof, M. Olsson, H. Adlercreutz, S. Sandin, and E. Weiderpass Dietary Phytoestrogens Are Not Associated with Risk of Overall Breast Cancer But Diets Rich in Coumestrol Are Inversely Associated with Risk of Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Negative Breast Tumors in Swedish Women J. Nutr., May 1, 2008; 138(5): 938 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Iwasaki, M. Inoue, T. Otani, S. Sasazuki, N. Kurahashi, T. Miura, S. Yamamoto, and S. Tsugane Plasma Isoflavone Level and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer Among Japanese Women: A Nested Case-Control Study From the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study Group J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 26(10): 1677 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Duffy, K. Perez, and A. Partridge Implications of Phytoestrogen Intake for Breast Cancer CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2007; 57(5): 260 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Touillaud, A. C. M. Thiebaut, A. Fournier, M. Niravong, M.-C. Boutron-Ruault, and F. Clavel-Chapelon Dietary Lignan Intake and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk by Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status J Natl Cancer Inst, March 21, 2007; 99(6): 475 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. N. Fink, S. E. Steck, M. S. Wolff, J. A. Britton, G. C. Kabat, J. C. Schroeder, S. L. Teitelbaum, A. I. Neugut, and M. D. Gammon Dietary Flavonoid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk among Women on Long Island Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2007; 165(5): 514 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Verheus, C. H. van Gils, L. Keinan-Boker, P. B. Grace, S. A. Bingham, and P. H.M. Peeters Plasma Phytoestrogens and Subsequent Breast Cancer Risk J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2007; 25(6): 648 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. McCann, J. Wactawski-Wende, K. Kufel, J. Olson, B. Ovando, S. N. Kadlubar, W. Davis, L. Carter, P. Muti, P. G. Shields, et al. Changes in 2-Hydroxyestrone and 16{alpha}-Hydroxyestrone Metabolism with Flaxseed Consumption: Modification by COMT and CYP1B1 Genotype Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2007; 16(2): 256 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Touillaud, A. C.M. Thiebaut, M. Niravong, M.-C. Boutron-Ruault, and F. Clavel-Chapelon No Association between Dietary Phytoestrogens and Risk of Premenopausal Breast Cancer in a French Cohort Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2006; 15(12): 2574 - 2576. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Piller, E. Verla-Tebit, S. Wang-Gohrke, J. Linseisen, and J. Chang-Claude CYP17 Genotype Modifies the Association between Lignan Supply and Premenopausal Breast Cancer Risk in Humans J. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 136(6): 1596 - 1603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Sacks, A. Lichtenstein, L. Van Horn, W. Harris, P. Kris-Etherton, M. Winston, and for the American Heart Association Nutrition Commi Soy Protein, Isoflavones, and Cardiovascular Health: An American Heart Association Science Advisory for Professionals From the Nutrition Committee Circulation, February 21, 2006; 113(7): 1034 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M Velie, C. Schairer, A. Flood, J.-P. He, R. Khattree, and A. Schatzkin Empirically derived dietary patterns and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in a large prospective cohort study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2005; 82(6): 1308 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Totta, F. Acconcia, F. Virgili, A. Cassidy, P. D. Weinberg, G. Rimbach, and M. Marino Daidzein-Sulfate Metabolites Affect Transcriptional and Antiproliferative Activities of Estrogen Receptor-{beta} in Cultured Human Cancer Cells J. Nutr., November 1, 2005; 135(11): 2687 - 2693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Stuedal, I. T. Gram, Y. Bremnes, H. Adlercreutz, M. B. Veierod, and G. Ursin Plasma Levels of Enterolactone and Percentage Mammographic Density among Postmenopausal Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2154 - 2159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H Wu, F. Z Stanczyk, C. Martinez, C.-C. Tseng, S. Hendrich, P. Murphy, S. Chaikittisilpa, D. O Stram, and M. C Pike A controlled 2-mo dietary fat reduction and soy food supplementation study in postmenopausal women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2005; 81(5): 1133 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bosetti, L. Spertini, M. Parpinel, P. Gnagnarella, P. Lagiou, E. Negri, S. Franceschi, M. Montella, J. Peterson, J. Dwyer, et al. Flavonoids and Breast Cancer Risk in Italy Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2005; 14(4): 805 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bhakta, I. dos Santos Silva, C. Higgins, L. Sevak, T. Kassam-Khamis, P. Mangtani, H. Adlercreutz, and A. McMichael A Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire Is a Valid Indicator of the Usual Intake of Phytoestrogens by South Asian Women in the UK Relative to Multiple 24-h Dietary Recalls and Multiple Plasma Samples J. Nutr., January 1, 2005; 135(1): 116 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Neuhouser Soy and Mammographic Breast Density: Plausible Hypothesis but Limited Evidence in Humans J. Nutr., November 1, 2004; 134(11): 2911 - 2912. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Messina Western soy intake is too low to produce health effects Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2004; 80(2): 528 - 529. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Keinan-Boker, Y. T van der Schouw, D. E Grobbee, and P. H. Peeters Reply to M Messina Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2004; 80(2): 529 - 530. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |