AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJCN
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keinan-Boker, L.
Right arrow Articles by Peeters, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keinan-Boker, L.
Right arrow Articles by Peeters, P. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Keinan-Boker, L.
Right arrow Articles by Peeters, P. H.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 79, No. 2, 282-288, February 2004
© 2004 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Dietary phytoestrogens and breast cancer risk1,2,3

Lital Keinan-Boker, Yvonne T van Der Schouw, Diederick E Grobbee and Petra HM Peeters

1 From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands

2 Supported by grant no. 21000027 from Zorg Onderzoek Nederland, grant no. 2000/30 from the World Cancer Research Fund, and the Europe Against Cancer Program of the European Commission (SANCO).

3 Address reprint requests to PHM Peeters, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, D01.335, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands. E-mail: p.h.m.peeters{at}jc.azu.nl.

See corresponding editorial on page 183.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: A high intake of phytoestrogens, particularly isoflavones, has been suggested to decrease breast cancer risk. Results from human studies are inconclusive.

Objective: We investigated the association between phytoestrogen intake and breast cancer risk in a large prospective study in a Dutch population with a habitually low phytoestrogen intake.

Design: The study population consisted of 15 555 women aged 49–70 y who constituted a Dutch cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutriton (EPIC; 1993–1997). Data concerning habitual dietary intake in the preceding year were obtained by using a validated food-frequency questionnaire. The content of isoflavones and lignans in relevant food items was estimated through a literature search, the use of food-composition tables, and contact with experts. Newly diagnosed breast cancer cases up to 1 January 2001 were identified through linkage with the Comprehensive Cancer Center Middle Netherlands. Hazard ratios for the disease were estimated by Cox proportional hazard analysis for quartiles of isoflavone and lignan intake. Associations were adjusted for known breast cancer risk factors and daily energy intake.

Results: A total of 280 women were newly diagnosed with breast cancer during follow-up. The median daily intakes of isoflavones and lignans were 0.4 (interquartile range: 0.3–0.5) and 0.7 (0.5–0.8) mg/d, respectively. Relative to the respective lowest intake quartiles, the hazard ratios for the highest intake quartiles for isoflavones and lignans were 1.0 (95% CI: 0.7, 1.5) and 0.7 (0.5, 1.1), respectively. Tests for trend were nonsignificant.

Conclusion: In Western populations, a high intake of isoflavones or mammalian lignans is not significantly related to breast cancer risk.

Key Words: Breast cancer • phytoestrogens • isoflavones • lignans • Prospect–European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) • Netherlands


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Phytoestrogens, natural estrogen-like substances in plant food, are subdivided into 3 main classes: isoflavones, lignans, and coumestans. Two of the major plant isoflavones, genistein and daidzein, may also be metabolized from other isoflavonoid precursors, eg, biochanin A and formononetin, respectively. Enterolactone and enterodiol, the main mammalian lignans, are formed from the plant lignans matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol, respectively, as well as others, by gut microflora. The main compound in the coumestan subgroup is coumesterol (14).

Isoflavones resemble estrogen structurally, are able to bind to the estrogen receptor (ER), and have ER-mediated estrogenic properties (transcriptional activity) (1, 2). They also act as antiestrogens by competing with the more potent endogenous estrogen for the ERs (5). Additionally, phytoestrogens have antioxidative, antiproliferative, and antiangiogenic activities, which are hormonally independant (18). The plant lignans show hardly any binding affinity to ERs (6). However, in animal and in vitro studies, lignans were reported to have antioxidative activity (9) and to reduce tumor progression and metastasis (10, 11).

Soy foods are rich in isoflavones, and Asian populations habitually consume large amounts of soy foods. Ecologic observations suggest that the intake of soy foods plays a role in the prevention of breast cancer (1214). Few prospective studies have been conducted in this field (15). Several studies, but not all, showed protective effects of soy in Asian populations (1618). No such associations were suggested for Western subjects (19, 20). In Western populations, soy consumption is infrequent, but isoflavones are consumed in small amounts from other sources. Lignans are more widespread and occur more frequently in Western diets than do isoflavones.

A method of estimating daily phytoestrogen intake on the basis of daily intakes of certain food items for which values of isoflavone and lignan content are available has been developed (2126) and used in Western populations (2729). To prospectively study the effect of phytoestrogens on breast cancer risk in a Western population, we conducted a cohort study on habitual intake of isoflavones and lignans in 15 555 Dutch women.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects
The study population consisted of a Dutch cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC); this Dutch portion of the EPIC was conducted in Utrecht, Netherlands, and is referred to here as "Prospect-EPIC" (30). The cohort includes 17 357 women aged 50–69 y who reside in Utrecht or its vicinity and were recruited between 1993 and 1997 through a regional program for breast cancer screening (34.5% response) (30). At recruitment, each participant filled out a general questionnaire and a food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ). In addition, pulse rate, blood pressure, and anthropometric measurements (height, weight, and waist and hip circumference) were taken, and a blood sample (30 mL) was donated by participants and stored at -196 °C under liquid nitrogen (30).

For the present study, eligible participants were all Prospect-EPIC participants with complete questionnaires who signed an informed consent form (n = 17 235). Exclusion criteria included a daily intake of <500 or >6000 kcal/d (n = 95), prevalent cancer at any site at the time of enrollment (n = 1136), and residency in areas not fully covered by the Comprehensive Cancer Center Middle Netherlands (n = 449). Consequently, there were 15 555 eligible subjects.

The cohort data were linked to the databases of the municipal registries to ascertain the vital status of all participants and to obtain information about subjects who moved from the region or emigrated abroad ({approx}100% completeness). Linkage of the cohort to the Comprehensive Cancer Center Middle Netherlands (complete since 1989) provided us with information regarding incident cancer cases, which were coded according to the 9th revision of the International Classification of Diseases. Additional causes of death were obtained through general practitioners and were coded according to the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases.

The endpoint for the study was the diagnosis of primary breast cancer. For cases of breast cancer, follow-up ended at the date of diagnosis or at the date of death due to breast cancer, whichever occurred first. For women diagnosed with other primary cancers, follow-up was censored at the date of diagnosis. For women who left the region or country, the censoring date was the date of emigration. For those who died, follow-up was censored at the date of death. For all others, the censoring date was 1 January 2001. The Institutional Review Board of the University Medical Center Utrecht approved the study.

Prospect-EPIC general questionnaire, FFQ, and anthropometric measurements
The general questionnaire included questions regarding demographic factors, lifestyle habits, obstetric and gynecologic history, and past and current morbidity. Menopause was defined as the complete cessation of menstrual bleeding during the 12 mo preceding enrollment due to natural, chemical, or surgical causes (according to self-report). Marital status and education level were determined categorically. Parity was categorically defined as "yes" or "no." Use of oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy was categorically defined as "ever" or "never." Smoking was described by a categorical variable (past, current, or never smoker) and by the continuous variable of total pack-years smoked (number of cigarettes smoked per day multiplied by the number of smoking years and divided by 20). The Voorrips score is a summary measure that combines household, occupational, and recreational physical activity (31). Body mass index was computed as weight (in kg) divided by the square of height (in m) (30).

The self-administered FFQ included questions on the subjects' habitual intake of 178 food items during the preceding year (32, 33). The questionnaire contained color photographs of 2–4 different-sized portions of 21 food items, which helped in assessing serving sizes. The frequency of consumption of each food item could be indicated on a daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly scale or as "never." The FFQ also included open-ended questions, in which the names of the brands used (eg, for margarine) could be filled out.

Scoring of phytoestrogen intake
The method used and the guidelines applied for assigning an individual phytoestrogen intake score for each participant were described in detail previously (25, 26). Briefly, published laboratory analysis data on the phytoestrogen contents of relevant food items were located by conducting a search of the medical (MEDLINE; National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD) and agricultural (AGRICOLA; National Agricultural Library, Beltsville, MD) scientific literature and by contacting experts in the field of phytoestrogens and several Dutch food manufacturers. Search terms included isoflavones, coumestans, plant lignans, and mammalian lignans. Note that mammalian lignans are not naturally present in plant foods, and their food content values are based on in vitro production of enterolactone and enterodiol from certain food items, according to published databases. Literature data for the contents of the isoflavones daidzein, genistein, formononetin, and biochanin A; the coumestan coumestrol; the plant lignans matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol; and the mammalian lignans enterolactone and enterodiol were grouped in 7 categories according to their exact values. This was done to avoid implying a degree of accuracy for which the current available data are too limited and too preliminary (25, 26). Subsequently, the phytoestrogen score of each food item was multiplied by the quantity consumed per day per participant. The resulting phytoestrogen score was then summed up across food items to obtain daily intake scores of daidzein, genistein, formononetin, biochanin A, coumsterol, matairesinol, secoisolariciresinol, enterolactone, and enterodiol for each participant. We then summarized the individual intake scores of daidzein, genistein, formononetin, and biochanin A into a total isoflavone score; the individual intake scores of matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol into a total plant lignan score; and the individual intake scores of enterolactone and enterodiol into a total mammalian lignan score.

Statistical analysis
Our analyses refer to the subgroup of mammalian lignans (enterolactone and enterodiol) rather than to the plant lignans (matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol). The mammalian lignans—end products of various plant precursors metabolized by the gut microflora—are the bioactive forms, which might be more relevant in analytic studies on cancer associations. Additionally, besides matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol, enterolactone and enterodiol are produced from other plant lignans (3, 4), for most of which no food-composition data are available. Thus, the use of mammalian lignan scores might account for the lack of data on some of their plant precursors. Isoflavones are found both in plants and in body fluids, so no distinction was made between their plant and bioactive forms. Coumesterol was not used in our analyses because of its very low intake in this study population.

Quartiles of total isoflavone (daidzein, genistein, biochanin A, and formononetin) and total mammalian lignan (enterolactone and enterodiol) intake were computed according to the distribution of the total cohort. General characteristics of the study population are presented by quartiles of total phytoestrogen intake (ie, summed intakes of daidzein, genistein, biochanin A, formononetin, enterolactone, and enterodiol). Daily intake is expressed in medians because the distribution curves appeared to be skewed.

Hazard ratios for breast cancer were estimated by Cox proportional hazard analysis and are presented, together with 95% CIs, for quartiles of isoflavone and lignan intake, with the lowest quartile as the reference. We first present the results of a model adjusted only for age at enrollment. Subsequently, we present the results of models adjusted for established risk factors for breast cancer (age at enrollment, age at first full-term delivery, height, weight, parity, physical activity score, use of oral contraceptives, use of hormone replacement therapy, menopausal status, marital status, and academic education). Finally, we further adjust the fully adjusted models for daily energy intake (as a continuous variable). Trends were assessed by testing the significance of the models' linearity (Wald test) by using phytoestrogen intake as a categorical variable (quartiles) in polynomial contrast. We repeated the analyses by excluding all cases that were diagnosed <1 y after enrollment.

Previous studies suggested that the effects of phytoestrogens on breast cancer risk differ according to menopausal status. Therefore, we also conducted a subanalysis of all participants who were postmenopausal at enrollment (and thus also postmenopausal at breast cancer diagnosis). In addition to the adjustment variables used for the total population, the models for postmenopausal participants were also adjusted for age at menopause. The SPSS statistical package for WINDOWS, version 9.0, was used for all statistical analyses (34), and all tests were two-sided.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Among the 15 555 eligible participants in the study, 280 (1.8%) were diagnosed with their first case of incident breast cancer during follow-up. A total of 549 (3.5%) subjects were diagnosed with other types of cancer, and 581 (3.7%) subjects left the region. One hundred forty-two (0.9%) participants died, and 14 003 (90.0%) subjects were alive and free from cancer at the end of follow-up (1 January 2001). The women were followed up for a total of 80 215 person-years. The median follow-up for the total cohort was 5.2 y. Most of the cohort participants (n = 11 655, 74.9%) were postmenopausal at enrollment.

The participants who had the highest (4th quartile) intake scores for phytoestrogens were significantly younger at enrollment and significantly older at delivery of their first child than were the participants who had lower intake scores. The subjects with the highest intake scores also smoked significantly less, were significantly taller, and had significantly lower BMI values and significantly higher physical activity scores. They also had significantly higher daily intakes of energy, fiber, fruit, vegetables, and soy products (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. General characteristics of the study population by quartiles of total phytoestrogen intake1

 
The median daily total intake of phytoestrogens was {approx}1 mg/d. The daily intake of mammalian lignans (0.67 mg/d) was {approx}80% higher than that of isoflavones (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Phytoestrogen intakes in the total study population1

 
Risk estimates for breast cancer by quartiles of isoflavone intake indicated no associations. For mammalian lignans, the estimates indicated a possible protective trend: with the lowest quartile as the reference, the hazard ratio for the highest quartile was 0.7 (95% CI: 0.5, 1.1) (P for trend = 0.06). However, none of the results were significant (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Hazard rates (HRs) for breast cancer risk by quartiles of isoflavone and lignan intake1

 
When only breast cancer cases that were diagnosed >=12 mo after enrollment were included in the analyses (n = 203), the results were very similar (data not shown). The same was true when only postmenopausal participants (at enrollment and at diagnosis) were included (for mammalian lignans in the fully adjusted model, P for trend = 0.06; data not shown). An interaction term for menopausal status in the model that included all women was not significant.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The results of the present study, which focused on Western women whose habitual diet is low in phytoestrogens, showed no protective effects of isoflavones or lignans against breast cancer. The main advantages of this study are its prospective nature, the large sample size, the completeness of the risk factor data and of the follow-up, and the detailed dietary assessment. The FFQs, which included questions on habitual dietary intake during the year preceding enrollment, were filled out by the participants long before the diagnosis of breast cancer and thus could not have been influenced by awareness of the disease. The fact that participants were recruited through an existing population-based breast cancer–screening program ensured the disease-free state of the cases at enrollment; they were all mammographically free of the disease. The completeness of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Middle Netherlands ensured a complete follow-up. The incidence of invasive breast tumors in our study population was {approx}300/100 000 women [{approx}86% of total breast tumors (0.86 x 280 x 100 000/80 215)], and the incidence of invasive breast cancer that was expected on the basis of Dutch cancer rates published in 1997 (weighted by the relevant age categories) was similar (ie, 285/100 000 women) (35). Additionally, the updated data from the municipal registries provided detailed follow-up information about vital status and lowered the proportion of subjects who were lost to follow-up.

The semiquantitative FFQ was not specifically designed to estimate phytoestrogen intake and did not include questions about specific food items that contain high amounts of phytoestrogens (eg, soy foods for isoflavones and flaxseed or linseed for lignans). However, these foods are infrequently consumed in the Netherlands. On the other hand, the FFQ was specifically designed to estimate the habitual intake of foods from food groups that contribute significantly to phytoestrogen intake in Western societies, such as grains, fruit, nuts and seeds, and alcoholic beverages. For these food groups, the correlation between the consumption estimated from the FFQ and that estimated from twelve 24-h dietary recalls during a period of 1 y was high (Spearman correlation coefficients >= 0.7) (26, 32, 33).

Published epidemiologic studies regarding dietary intake of soy foods—a proxy for isoflavone intake—and breast cancer risk were largely concerned with Asian populations having a high traditional intake of soy (1618). Only a few studies referred to dietary intake in a Western population (27, 28, 36). Although the first studies showed clear protective effects of a high soy intake, later studies were less clear. The results of the few prospective studies were mostly negative (17, 18, 28). The results of the present study showed no protective effects of isoflavones and are therefore in accordance with previously published data for Western women.

The results of several studies suggest that isoflavone consumption should be high at certain ages (eg, prepuberty) to yield protective effects (3739). This may explain why we observed no beneficial effects of isoflavone intake in our study: overall consumption was very low, and we obtained data regarding recent consumption only, but not consumption at a young age.

Another hypothesis was recently introduced in an attempt to explain the inconsistent results for isoflavones. Equol is exclusively the product of intestinal bacterial metabolism of dietary daidzein. Only 50–70% of the healthy population produce equol in response to a dietary challenge by daidzein. Because equol has greater antioxidant activity than do all other isoflavones, it was suggested that only subjects who are equol producers benefit from consuming isoflavones (40). We have no data concerning the equol production ability of the study participants; therefore, we cannot examine this hypothesis.

Although less studied, lignans are more common in Western diets (25, 26, 41, 42); thus, the role of lignans might be more relevant than that of isoflavones. Only 3 previous studies assessed the relation between lignan intake and breast cancer risk in Western populations (2729). Two of them (27, 28) focused on plant lignan intake, and their results did not indicate a protective effect of high intakes. The third study (29) indicated that high intakes of mammalian lignans are associated with a low risk of breast cancer, mostly in premenopausal women and in carriers of a certain genotype of the CYP17 gene (29).

The methodology in the prospective study by Horn-Ross et al (28) was similar to ours. However, Horn-Ross et al used estimates of plant lignan (matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol) intake, whereas we used estimates of mammalian lignan (enterolactone and enterodiol, the bioactive forms) intake. The mammalian lignan content of foods is determined by in vitro fermentation with human fecal microbiota (thus simulating colon fermentation) and subsequent measurement of the quantity of enterolactone and enterodiol produced (43). It should be kept in mind, though, that in vitro values of mammalian lignans are only an indicator of in vivo values because the in vitro values do not incorporate individual metabolic capacity. Additionally, the published values for the mammalian lignan content of foods may have been overestimated if the high background of bacterial mammalian lignans was not accounted for.

When we used estimates of plant lignan intake instead of mammalian lignan intake in our analyses (data not shown), we observed a slightly higher risk of breast cancer with high intakes, although the results were not significant. The discrepancy noted between our results for plant lignans and those for mammalian lignans, as well as similar discrepancies found in previous studies (28, 29), warrants clarification. One explanation is the incompleteness of food-composition tables with regard to both plant and mammalian lignans. For example, coffee and tea and, to a lesser extent, alcoholic beverages are frequently consumed by Dutch women. These drinks contain plant lignans but lack values for mammalian lignans. This causes differences in classification. In fact, of 15 555 participants, only one-third were classified into identical intake quartiles for plant and mammalian lignans. Therefore, the different risk estimates for plant and mammalian lignans may simply be caused by a lack of accurate food-composition data.

Alternatively, the discrepancy could partly reflect real differences between lignan precursors and bioactive compounds. Besides being produced from matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol, the bioactive compounds enterolactone and enterodiol are produced from other plant precursors, such as hydroxymatairesinol, secoisolariciresinol diglucoside, lariciresinol, pinoresinol, syringaresinol, and others, which to date are not included in any of the food-composition tables (3, 4). The effects noted for mammalian lignans may actually be produced by some other plant lignans, not necessarily matairesinol and secoisolariciresinol, for which composition data (and thus intake data) are unavailable.

Our findings for mammalian lignans were not significant but seem to show a protective trend. This is supported by the results of the case-control study of McCann et al (29), in which they reported that, relative to postmenopausal women in the lowest tertile of mammalian lignan intake, those in the highest tertile had a breast cancer hazard ratio of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.28, 1.27).

Apart from attempts to estimate dietary intakes of lignans, several studies focused on measurements of enterolactone in body fluids. We were unable to show protective effects of high urinary excretion of enterolactone in a comparable Dutch cohort for which we had no dietary data (20). Urinary excretion of enterolactone reflects not only the individual dietary intake but also the results of the metabolic process involving the bacterial colonic flora, which might be influenced by a recent use of antibiotics or gastrointestinal diseases. Urinary excretion reflects short-term intake (24–72 h) (41), whereas our FFQ reflected the habitual diet during the preceding year. We believe that when studying associations with cancer, habitual exposure to phytoestrogens may be more relevant.

Two other studies assessed serum or plasma enterolactone concentrations in relation to breast cancer risk (44, 45). Both of them showed slightly protective, nonsignificant results for high concentrations in older women, which is in accordance with the results of the present study.

Lignan intake in our study population was rather low (median: 0.7 mg/d). Similar intakes were reported in American women (29). True consumption is probably higher given the incompleteness of available food-composition tables. Consumption of vegetables, fruit, grain products, and nuts accounted for most of the lignan intake (26). Similar sources have been reported for Finnish (44) and American (24, 25) women. Because these food groups are frequently consumed in Western diets, it is reasonable to assume that the intake of lignans is stable over the course of a lifetime and occurs at younger ages also, which is important if lignan intake is relevant only at younger ages, as has been suggested for isoflavones. In conclusion, the results of this prospective study in a large cohort of Dutch women do not show protective effects of high dietary intakes of isoflavones or lignans against breast cancer risk.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
LK-B, YTvdS, and PHMP provided the conceptual basis for the study and performed the data and statistical analyses. DEG supervised the study design and the statistical analysis. LK-B wrote the final manuscript, which was critically reviewed by all the other coauthors. No conflicts of financial or personal interest in any company or organization are reported.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Murkies AL, Wilcox G, Davis SR. Clinical review 92: phytoestrogens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:297–303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Adlercreutz H, Mazur W. Overview of naturally occurring endocrine-active substances in the human diet. In: Dunaif GE, Olin SS, Scimeca JA, Thomas JA, eds. Human diet and endocrine modulation: estrogenic and androgenic effects. Washington, DC: ILSI Press/ILSI North America, 1998:135–45.
  3. Wang LQ. Mammalian phytoestrogens: enterodiol and enterolactone. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2002;777:289–309.[Medline]
  4. Heinonen S, Nurmi T, Liukkonen K, et al. In vitro metabolism of plant lignans: new precursors of mammalian lignans enterolactone and enterodiol. J Agric Food Chem 2001;49:3178–86.[Medline]
  5. Kuiper GG, Lemmen JG, Carlsson B, et al. Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor ß. Endocrinology 1998;139:4252–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Saarinen NM, Warri A, Makela SI, et al. Hydroxymatairesinol, a novel enterolactone precursor with antitumor properties from coniferous tree (Picea abies). Nutr Cancer 2000;36:207–16.[Medline]
  7. Setchell KDR. Phytoestrogens: the biochemistry, physiology, and implications for human health of soy isoflavones. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;68(suppl):1333S–46S.
  8. Fotsis T, Pepper MS, Montesano R, et al. Phytoestrogens and inhibition of angiogenesis. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;12:649–66.[Medline]
  9. Kitts DD, Yuan YV, Wijewickreme AN, Thompson LU. Antioxidant activity of the flaxseed lignan secoisolariciresinol diglycoside and its mammalian lignan metabolites enterodiol and enterolactone. Mol Cell Biochem 1999;202:91–100.[Medline]
  10. Sung MK, Lautens M, Thompson LU. Mammalian lignans inhibit the growth of estrogen-independent human colon tumor cells. Anticancer Res 1998;18:1405–8.[Medline]
  11. Serraino M, Thompson LU. The effect of flaxseed supplementation on the initiation and promotional stages of mammary tumorigenesis. Nutr Cancer 1992;17:153–9.[Medline]
  12. Messina MJ, Persky V, Setchell KDS, Barnes R. Soy intake and cancer risk: a review of the in vitro and in vivo data. Nutr Cancer 1994;21:113–31.[Medline]
  13. Adlercreutz H, Mousavi Y, Clark J, et al. Dietary phytoestrogens and cancer: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1992;41:331–7.[Medline]
  14. Adlercreutz H, Mousavi Y, Höckerstedt K. Diet and breast cancer. Acta Oncol 1992;31:175–81.[Medline]
  15. Peeters PHM, Keinan-Boker L, van der Schouw YT, Grobbee DE. Phytoestrogens and breast cancer risk. Review of the epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;77:171–83.
  16. Wakai K, Egami I, Kato K, et al. Dietary intake and sources of isoflavones among Japanese. Nutr Cancer 1999;33:139–45.[Medline]
  17. Hirayama T. Life-style and mortality: a large scale census-based cohort study in Japan. In: Wahrendorf J, ed. Contributions to epidemiology and biostatics. Vol. 6. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1990:18–27.
  18. Key TJ, Sharp GB, Appelby PN, et al. Soya foods and breast cancer risk: a prospective study in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. Br J Cancer 1999;81:1248–56.[Medline]
  19. Greenstein J, Kushi L, Zheng W, et al. Risk of breast cancer associated with intake of specific foods and food groups. Am J Epidemiol 1996;145(suppl):S36(abstr).
  20. den Tonkelaar I, Keinan-Boker L, Van 't Veer P, et al. Urinary phytoestrogens and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:223–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Pillow PC, Duphorne CM, Chang S, et al. Development of a database for assessing dietary phytoestrogen intake. Nutr Cancer 1999;33:3–19.[Medline]
  22. Horn-Ross PL, Barnes S, Lee M, et al. Assessing phytoestrogen exposure in epidemiological studies: development of a database (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2000;11:289–98.[Medline]
  23. Kirk P, Patterson RE, Lampe J. Development of a soy food frequency questionnaire to estimate isoflavone consumption in US adults. J Am Diet Assoc 1999;99:558–63.[Medline]
  24. Horn-Ross PL, Lee M, John EM, Koo J. Sources of phytoestrogen exposure among non-Asian women in California, USA. Cancer Causes Control 2000;11:299–302.[Medline]
  25. De Kleijn MJJ, van der Schouw YT, Wilson PWF, et al. Intake of dietary phytoestrogens is low in postmenopausal women in the United States: the Framingham Study. J Nutr 2001;131:1826–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Keinan Boker L, van der Schouw YT, de Kleijn MJJ, Jacques PF, Grobbee DE, Peeters PHM. Intake of dietary phytoestrogens in Dutch women. J Nutr 2002;132:1319–28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Horn-Ross PL, John EM, Lee M, et al. Phytoestrogen consumption and breast cancer risk in a multiethnic population. Am J Epidemiol 2001;154:434–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Horn-Ross PL, Hoggatt KJ, West DW, et al. Recent diet and breast cancer risk: the California teachers Study (USA). Cancer Causes Control 2002;13:407–15.[Medline]
  29. McCann SE, Moysich KB, Freudenheim JL, Ambrosone CB, Shields PG. The risk of breast cancer associated with dietary lignans differs by CYP17 genotype in women. J Nutr 2002;132:3036–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Keinan Boker L, van Noord PAH, van der Schouw YT, et al. Prospect-EPIC Utrecht: study design and characteristics of the cohort population. Eur J Epidemiol 2001;17:1047–53.[Medline]
  31. Voorrips LE, Ranelli AE, Dongelmans PC, Deurenberg P, van Staveren WA. A physical activity questionnaire for the elderly. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991;23:974–9.[Medline]
  32. Ocké MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Goddijn HE, et al. The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. I. Description of the questionnaire, and relative validity and reproducibility for food groups. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26(suppl):S37–46.
  33. Ocké MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Pols MA, Smit HA, van Staveren WA, Kromhout D. The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. II. Relative validity and reproducibility for nutrients. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26(suppl):S49–58.
  34. SPSS Inc. Statistical package version 9.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc, 1998.
  35. Visser O, Coebergh JWW, Schouten LJ, van Dijk JA, eds. Incidence of cancer in The Netherlands 1997. Utrecht, Netherlands: Drukkerij van Nieuwenhuijsen BV, 2001.
  36. Witte JS, Ursin G, Siemiatycki J, Thompson WD, Paganini-Hill A, Heile RW. Diet and premenopausal bilateral breast cancer: a case-control study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1997;42:901–6.
  37. Wu AH, Ziegler RG, Horn-Ross PL, et al. Tofu and risk of breast cancer in Asian-Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996;5:901–6.[Abstract]
  38. Shu XO, Jin F, Dai Q, et al. Soyfood intake during adolescence and subsequent risk of breast cancer among Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:483–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Lamartiniere CA. Timing of exposure and mammary cancer risk. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2002;7:67–76.[Medline]
  40. Setchell DR, Brown NM, Lydeking-Olsen E. The clinical importance of the metabolite equol—a clue to the effectiveness of soy and its isoflavones. J Nutr 2002;132:3577–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Lampe JW, Gustafson DR, Hutchins AM, et al. Urinary isoflavonoid and lignan excretion on a Western diet: relation to soy, vegetable and fruit intake. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:699–707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Hutchins AM, Lampe JW, Martini MC, Campbell DR, Slavin JL. Vegetables, fruits and legumes: effect on urinary isoflavonoid phytoestrogen and lignan excretion. J Am Diet Assoc 1995;95:769–74.[Medline]
  43. Thompson LU, Robb P, Serraino M, Cheung F. Mammalian lignan production from various foods. Nutr Cancer 1991;16:43–52.[Medline]
  44. Pietinen P, Stumpf K, Männistö S, Kataja V, Uusitupa M, Adlercreutz H. Serum enterolactone and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:339–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Hulten K, Winkvist A, Lenner P, Johansson R, Adlercreutz H. An incident case-referent study on plasma enterolactone and breast cancer risk. Eur J Nutr 2002;41:168–76.[Medline]
Received for publication November 1, 2002. Accepted for publication August 6, 2003.


Related articles in AJCN:

Phytoestrogens and breast cancer
Regina G Ziegler
AJCN 2004 79: 183-184. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. Jaceldo-Siegl, G. E Fraser, J. Chan, A. Franke, and J. Sabate
Validation of soy protein estimates from a food-frequency questionnaire with repeated 24-h recalls and isoflavonoid excretion in overnight urine in a Western population with a wide range of soy intakes
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1422 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. Galluzzo, P. Ascenzi, P. Bulzomi, and M. Marino
The Nutritional Flavanone Naringenin Triggers Antiestrogenic Effects by Regulating Estrogen Receptor {alpha}-Palmitoylation
Endocrinology, May 1, 2008; 149(5): 2567 - 2575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. Hedelin, M. Lof, M. Olsson, H. Adlercreutz, S. Sandin, and E. Weiderpass
Dietary Phytoestrogens Are Not Associated with Risk of Overall Breast Cancer But Diets Rich in Coumestrol Are Inversely Associated with Risk of Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Negative Breast Tumors in Swedish Women
J. Nutr., May 1, 2008; 138(5): 938 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Iwasaki, M. Inoue, T. Otani, S. Sasazuki, N. Kurahashi, T. Miura, S. Yamamoto, and S. Tsugane
Plasma Isoflavone Level and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer Among Japanese Women: A Nested Case-Control Study From the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study Group
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 26(10): 1677 - 1683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
C. Duffy, K. Perez, and A. Partridge
Implications of Phytoestrogen Intake for Breast Cancer
CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2007; 57(5): 260 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. S. Touillaud, A. C. M. Thiebaut, A. Fournier, M. Niravong, M.-C. Boutron-Ruault, and F. Clavel-Chapelon
Dietary Lignan Intake and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk by Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 21, 2007; 99(6): 475 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
B. N. Fink, S. E. Steck, M. S. Wolff, J. A. Britton, G. C. Kabat, J. C. Schroeder, S. L. Teitelbaum, A. I. Neugut, and M. D. Gammon
Dietary Flavonoid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk among Women on Long Island
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2007; 165(5): 514 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Verheus, C. H. van Gils, L. Keinan-Boker, P. B. Grace, S. A. Bingham, and P. H.M. Peeters
Plasma Phytoestrogens and Subsequent Breast Cancer Risk
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2007; 25(6): 648 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. E. McCann, J. Wactawski-Wende, K. Kufel, J. Olson, B. Ovando, S. N. Kadlubar, W. Davis, L. Carter, P. Muti, P. G. Shields, et al.
Changes in 2-Hydroxyestrone and 16{alpha}-Hydroxyestrone Metabolism with Flaxseed Consumption: Modification by COMT and CYP1B1 Genotype
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2007; 16(2): 256 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. S. Touillaud, A. C.M. Thiebaut, M. Niravong, M.-C. Boutron-Ruault, and F. Clavel-Chapelon
No Association between Dietary Phytoestrogens and Risk of Premenopausal Breast Cancer in a French Cohort Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2006; 15(12): 2574 - 2576.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. Piller, E. Verla-Tebit, S. Wang-Gohrke, J. Linseisen, and J. Chang-Claude
CYP17 Genotype Modifies the Association between Lignan Supply and Premenopausal Breast Cancer Risk in Humans
J. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 136(6): 1596 - 1603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. M. Sacks, A. Lichtenstein, L. Van Horn, W. Harris, P. Kris-Etherton, M. Winston, and for the American Heart Association Nutrition Commi
Soy Protein, Isoflavones, and Cardiovascular Health: An American Heart Association Science Advisory for Professionals From the Nutrition Committee
Circulation, February 21, 2006; 113(7): 1034 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. M Velie, C. Schairer, A. Flood, J.-P. He, R. Khattree, and A. Schatzkin
Empirically derived dietary patterns and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in a large prospective cohort study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2005; 82(6): 1308 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
P. Totta, F. Acconcia, F. Virgili, A. Cassidy, P. D. Weinberg, G. Rimbach, and M. Marino
Daidzein-Sulfate Metabolites Affect Transcriptional and Antiproliferative Activities of Estrogen Receptor-{beta} in Cultured Human Cancer Cells
J. Nutr., November 1, 2005; 135(11): 2687 - 2693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Stuedal, I. T. Gram, Y. Bremnes, H. Adlercreutz, M. B. Veierod, and G. Ursin
Plasma Levels of Enterolactone and Percentage Mammographic Density among Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2154 - 2159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. H Wu, F. Z Stanczyk, C. Martinez, C.-C. Tseng, S. Hendrich, P. Murphy, S. Chaikittisilpa, D. O Stram, and M. C Pike
A controlled 2-mo dietary fat reduction and soy food supplementation study in postmenopausal women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2005; 81(5): 1133 - 1141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. Bosetti, L. Spertini, M. Parpinel, P. Gnagnarella, P. Lagiou, E. Negri, S. Franceschi, M. Montella, J. Peterson, J. Dwyer, et al.
Flavonoids and Breast Cancer Risk in Italy
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2005; 14(4): 805 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
D. Bhakta, I. dos Santos Silva, C. Higgins, L. Sevak, T. Kassam-Khamis, P. Mangtani, H. Adlercreutz, and A. McMichael
A Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire Is a Valid Indicator of the Usual Intake of Phytoestrogens by South Asian Women in the UK Relative to Multiple 24-h Dietary Recalls and Multiple Plasma Samples
J. Nutr., January 1, 2005; 135(1): 116 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. L. Neuhouser
Soy and Mammographic Breast Density: Plausible Hypothesis but Limited Evidence in Humans
J. Nutr., November 1, 2004; 134(11): 2911 - 2912.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. Messina
Western soy intake is too low to produce health effects
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2004; 80(2): 528 - 529.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. Keinan-Boker, Y. T van der Schouw, D. E Grobbee, and P. H. Peeters
Reply to M Messina
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2004; 80(2): 529 - 530.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJCN
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keinan-Boker, L.
Right arrow Articles by Peeters, P. H.
Right arrow