|
|
||||||||
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR |
Medicine D, Beilinson Hospital
Rabin Medical Center
Petah-Tikva 49100
Israel
E-mail: nirbarak{at}post.tau.ac.il
Dear Sir:
A recent study by Faisy et al (1) provided an equation for predicting energy expenditure (EE) in mechanically ventilated patients. Like Ireton-Jones and Jones (2), Swinamer et al (3), and Frankenfield et al (4), Faisy et al speculated that the addition of factors such as minutes of ventilation and body temperature to the traditional indexes (ie, sex, age, weight, and height) used for EE prediction (5) would result in a better correlation.
To assess the validity of this equation, I screened the indirect calorimetry database of the University of Chicago Hospitals (6) and found 77 patients with complete records. Weight for the Harris-Benedict equation was adjusted by 50% (6), and a stress factor of 1.3 was used (7). The correlation (r) was assessed by using Pearson's coefficient, bias was the difference between measured and calculated EEs, and agreement was assessed by using Bland-Altman analysis (8).
The data validate the equation of Faisy et al as a tool for EE prediction in mechanically ventilated patients. However, the Harris-Benedict equation (multiplied by 1.3) gave a better correlation and agreement with the measured EE and the smallest mean bias (Table 1
). EE should be measured whenever possible. This analysis shows that, when the EE measurement is not available, the Harris-Benedict equation with a stress factor of 1.3 is the most accurate tool for EE prediction.
|
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. M. Fiorito, D. C. Mitchell, H. Smiciklas-Wright, and L. L. Birch Girls' Calcium Intake Is Associated with Bone Mineral Content During Middle Childhood J. Nutr., May 1, 2006; 136(5): 1281 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |