| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION |
1 From the Center for Human Nutrition, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (YW), and the School of Community and Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA (QZ)
2 Supported by the Johns Hopkins University, the University of Chicago, and Old Dominion University. YW was supported by research grants from the NIDDK/NIH (R01 DK63383) and the USDA (2044-05322).
3 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to Y Wang, Center for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD. E-mail: ywang{at}jhsph.edu.
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Objective: The objective was to examine secular trends in the relations between overweight (body mass index 
95th percentile) and SES.
Design: We examined secular trends in the relation between overweight and SES using nationally representative data collected in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) between 1971 and 2002 for 30 417 US children aged 2–18 y. Poverty income ratio tertiles at each survey were used to indicate low, middle, and high SES.
Results: Considerable race, sex, and age differences were observed in the association between overweight and SES. A reverse association only existed in white girls; African American children with a high SES were at increased risk. Socioeconomic disparities in overweight have changed over time, with an overall trend of weakening. Compared with the medium-SES group, the adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs were 0.79 (0.47, 1.33), 1.08 (0.73, 1.61), 1.24 (0.73, 2.09), and 1.04 (0.82, 1.33) in NHANES I, II, and III and in the 1999–2002 NHANES for the low-SES group and 0.66 (0.43, 1.00), 0.60 (0.35, 1.03), 0.42 (0.23, 0.76), and 0.99 (0.68, 1.43) for the high-SES group, respectively. Between 1988–1994 and 1999–2002, the ratio in the prevalence of overweight between adolescent boys with a low or high SES decreased from 2.5 to 1.1 and from 3.1 to 1.6 in girls. Consistently across almost all SES groups, the prevalence of overweight was much higher in blacks than in whites.
Conclusions: Complex patterns in the association between SES and overweight exist. Efforts solely targeting reductions in income disparities probably cannot effectively reduce racial disparities in obesity.
Key Words: Obesity • overweight • body mass index • children • socioeconomic status
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
It is widely accepted that low-SES groups in the United States are at greater risk than are their higher-SES counterparts. However, this perception was recently challenged (12, 13). Our recent study, which was based on nationally representative data collected in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) from American adults since the 1970s, indicated an overall trend of a weakening association between SES and obesity, with the patterns differing across ethnic groups (13), but little is known about the trend in children and adolescents. Using the 1996 data collected in the Add Health Study, a national representative study in American adolescents (grades 7 through 12), Gordon-Larsen et al (12) reported considerable ethnic disparity in the prevalence of overweight by SES, but only in girls was there a clear inverse association between SES and obesity. Some researchers have speculated that differences in SES factors (eg, education and income) are the primary causes of the ethnic disparity in the prevalence of obesity in American young people (9, 11). On the other hand, other studies suggest that differences in other factors, such as culture, body image, dietary habits, and sexual maturity, may have contributed to the disparity (12-18).
Overall, these studies suggest a complex relation between SES and obesity, which might change over time. In adults the causality between SES and obesity may operate in either direction (1-4). In contrast, the effect of body weight status on SES is likely to be trivial in children because children’s SES is determined by their parents’ characteristics, such as parental education and income. Thus, research findings based on national surveys for children can provide better hints regarding the effect of SES factors on a person’s body weight status. A good understanding of the relation between SES and obesity and the trends of that relation will provide useful insights for developing effective obesity-prevention and -management programs and policies.
In the present study, which is based on nationally representative data collected in the NHANES between 1971 and 2002, our main objectives were to 1) examine the secular changes in the relation between obesity and SES in American children and adolescents, and 2) to test the differences in the trends across different population groups. Our findings help provide a basis for predicting future socioeconomic disparity in obesity in addition to other public health implications.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
In each survey, standardized protocols were used for all interviews and examinations. Data on weight and height were collected for each individual through direct physical examination in a mobile examination center. In NHANES I and II, race-ethnic group was classified as white, black, and "other" based on observation. In NHANES III and in 1999–2002, the subjects were classified as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican American, and other ethnic groups based on self-reported race and ethnicity.
Measures
Definitions of overweight
Body mass index [BMI = weight (kg)/height2 (m)] was calculated for each individual on the basis of measured weight and height. In the present study, the children’s and adolescents’ body weight status was classified on the basis of the age- and sex-specific BMI percentiles provided in the 2000 growth charts of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (23): overweight was defined as a BMI 95th percentile, and at risk of overweight was defined as a BMI 85th percentile (ie, it included overweight).
Socioeconomic status
The commonly used SES variables include education, income, and occupational status. Each of these measures has its own strengths and limitations for studying the relation between SES and health outcomes (6, 13). In the present study we chose to use poverty income ratio as the indicator of children’s SES. The poverty income ratio is the ratio of household income and the poverty line published by Census Bureau for a certain family size in that calendar year. Specifically, we used the poverty income ratio tertiles at each survey to indicate low-, middle-, and high-SES groups. Compared with using parental education, this allowed us to have an even distribution of the 3 SES groups.
Sociodemographic characteristics
Subjects were separated into 2 age groups according to the World Health Organization’s recommendation (24): children (2–9 y old) and adolescents (10–18 y old). On the basis of self-reported race and ethnicity, the participants were categorized as white, black, Mexican American, and other groups. Note that in NHANES I and II, the sample sizes for Mexican Americans were small and did not allow for stable estimates of the association between SES and overweight in children and adolescents, respectively.
Statistical analysis
First, we examined the differences in the prevalence of overweight and at risk of overweight between the low-, medium-, and high-SES groups by age, sex, and ethnic group as well as over time. Chi-square tests were conducted to test the differences between groups. Next, we conducted logistic regression analysis to examine the association between body weight status and SES. We used 2 dummy variables to code low and high SES and used the medium-SES group as the reference, which facilitated the tests of a nonlinear relation between SES and overweight. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated. In general, the results for being at risk of overweight were similar to those for being overweight; thus, they are not presented. Then, using multiple linear regression analysis, we examined the relation between BMI and SES. Finally, to further test the changes in the association between obesity and SES over time, we pooled all the NHANES data and conducted logistic and linear regression analysis including the interaction terms between survey periods and SES in the models. In addition, using ANOVA and the pooled data, we tested the interaction terms (2-, 3-, and 5-factor interaction terms) between income and the other key covariates (ie, age, sex, ethnicity, and waves of survey), and they were significant, which further justified the stratified analysis. All regression analyses were conducted separately for boys and for girls, and we controlled for age. Race-ethnicity was also adjusted for when the analysis was conducted for combined ethnic groups. Statistical tests were conducted at the P = 0.05 significance level. Except for the pooled data analysis, all analyses took into account the complex survey design and unequal probabilities of sample selection in NHANES. All analyses were conducted by using the "svy" commands in STATA (version 7; Stata Press, College Station, TX).
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
, 
50% of the participants in each wave of the NHANES were girls; the proportion of white children decreased from 80.8% in NHANES I (1971–1975) to 60.8% in 1999–2002, whereas the proportion of minority children increased. Approximately 20% of the participants were below the poverty line. The prevalence of at risk of overweight or overweight (BMI 85th percentile) has almost doubled from the 1970s to 2002, increasing from 15.5% to 29.2%. During this period, the prevalence of overweight (BMI 95th percentile) has tripled, increasing from 5.0% to 14.9%. Consistent with the rising prevalence of overweight, the mean BMI of American children and adolescents has also increased steadily during this period, from 18.1 to 19.5. Interestingly, the largest increase occurred in adolescent boys, whose BMI increased by 2.1 points (from 19.7 to 21.8), followed by adolescent girls (from 20.2 to 22.2).
|
. Overall, the prevalence in all groups has increased since the 1970s. However, the trends in SES-related disparity patterns varied across age, sex, and ethnic groups. In boys aged 2–9 y, a significant reverse association between family income and overweight appeared in 1999–2002 (Figure 1). In girls aged 2–9 y, none of the associations were significant. A strong reverse association was observed in adolescent boys aged 10–18 y in NHANES III (1988–1994), but it became statistically nonsignificant by 1999–2002. In adolescent girls, the reverse association between family income and overweight remained significant between 1976 and 1980 and between 1999 and 2002, but the ratio in the prevalence of overweight in the low-SES group compared with the high-SES group decreased from 3.1 in NHANES III (1988–1994) to 1.6 in 1999–2002.
|
. Considerable differences in the association between SES and overweight across ethnic groups were observed. In white adolescent boys and girls, there was a significant reverse association in NHANES III (1988–1994). In contrast, black girls with a high SES had a higher prevalence than did their low- and medium-SES counterparts in 1988–1994 and 1999–2002. For Mexican Americans, the study sample was only large enough with NHANES III (1988–1994) to allow us to examine the trends. There were no consistent patterns.
|
). Overall, the results suggest considerable ethnic, sex, and time differences in the relation between SES and obesity and an overall weak association in American adolescents because only 5 of the ORs were statistically significant at P = 0.05. Furthermore, it seems that the association was weakened over time because the ORs changed toward 1, and none was statistically significant by 1999–2002, except for black girls, for whom a strong positive association emerged in 1999–2002. Blacks with a high SES were twice as likely to be overweight than were their counterparts with a medium SES (OR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.68, 3.23).
|
. Only 4 of the ß coefficients presented in Table 3 were statistically significant. In general, except for black girls and Mexican American adolescents, all the ß coefficients became smaller and all the significant associations became insignificant from NHANES III (1988–1994) to 1999–2002. In adolescent boys, although the ß coefficients indicate a reverse association between BMI and SES in NHANES III (1988–1994) and 1999–2002, none of them were statistically significant. In NHANES II (1976–1980), high-SES black adolescent boys, on average, had a higher BMI (P < 0.05). In adolescent girls, the BMI in white girls with a high SES was 1.96 points lower (P < 0.001) than that in the medium-SES groups in NHANES III (1988–1994), but the difference decreased to 0.34 and became insignificant in 1999–2002. In black girls, the BMI in the high SES group was 2.22 points higher than that of the medium-SES group in 1999–2002 (P < 0.05).
|
). The partial R2 decreased between 1988 and 1994 and between 1999 and 2002 in all groups (especially in white girls), except black girls and Mexican boys and girls. White girls showed the largest change. The partial R2 increased between NHANES II (1976–1980) and III (1988–1994) and then decreased between 1988 and 1994 and between 1999 and 2002. However, to our knowledge, statistical tests cannot be conducted to tests significance of the changes in R2. In 1999–2002, only a very small proportion (1–2% in girls and <1% in boys) of the variation in BMI could be explained by SES.
|
Overall, our findings were consistent with those presented above. When the analysis was conducted for the whole pooled sample, none of the interaction terms were statistically significant (P > 0.05), except for "low-income*NHANES 1999–2002" when BMI was used as the outcome variable. However, when a stratified analysis was performed for each race-sex group, some of interaction terms became significant. For example, in white boys, the interaction term "low-SES*NHANES III (1988–94)" was significant in linear (ß = 1.3, SE = 0.6, P = 0.021) and logistic (OR: 3.8; 95% CI: 1.4, 10.5; P = 0.010) regression models; in white girls, "low-SES*NHANES 1999–2002" and "high-SES*NHANES III (1988–94)" were significant in the linear models (ß = 1.1, SE = 0.5, P = 0.047; ß = –1.8, SE = 0.5, P = 0.001, respectively); and "low-SES*NHANES III (1988–94)" was significant in the logistic model (OR: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.0–0.7; P = 0.018). These results indicate significant changes in the association in NHANES III (1988–1994) and 1999–2002 among white boys and girls.
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
First, on the basis of the most recent nationally representative survey data, not all low-SES groups were at increased risk of overweight. Considerable racial, sex, and age differences existed. Previously, it was a widely accepted perception that high-SES groups in the United States and other industrialized countries are less likely to become overweight than are their low-SES counterparts (1-7). In general, our findings indicate that a reverse association only existed in white children, not in black children and adolescents. In whites, such a reverse association existed only in girls (not in boys). In blacks, a strong positive association existed in girls. The observed association was stronger in older white adolescents than in white children. In black children and adolescents, no significant systematic socioeconomic disparity was observed. Black adolescent girls with a high SES were more likely to be overweight than were their medium-SES counterparts in NHANES III and 1999–2002 (P < 0.05). In Mexican American children and adolescents, no consistent association between SES and overweight was observed.
Second, an unparallel increase in the prevalence of overweight in American adolescents over time was observed in the low- and high-SES groups. This resulted in an increase in socioeconomic disparity during 1976–1994 (NHANES II and III) and then a decrease between 1988–1994 and 1999–2002. As indicated in Figures 1
and 2, an increase in the prevalence of overweight in the low-income group occurred between NHANES II (1976–1980) and III (1988–94), whereas the "jump" in prevalence in the high-income group occurred mostly between NHANES III (1988–1994) and NHANES 1999–2002. It is important to understand the fundamental causes for the increase of obesity in the United States and other societies, which involve many complex factors and issues. It is beyond the scope of this report to provide a thorough discussion. In general, it has been argued that increased television viewing time and energy intake accompanied by decreased physical activity over time have contributed to the growing childhood obesity epidemic in the United States (7, 25, 26). We speculated that the following factors might help explain the patterns we observed. During the period of NHANES II (1976–1980) and III (1988–1994), television viewing might have been the primary type of inactivity in poor adolescents. However, during NHANES III (1988–1994) and 1999–2002, computers and computer games became more widely accessible and affordable, especially in high-SES groups, and the energy intake and expenditure patterns of all adolescents, regardless of SES, particularly for white adolescent boys, become more similar. Thus, the economic disparities of overweight tended to become smaller.
Third, economic disparities in obesity have changed over the past 3 decades. The overall trend is a weakening association between SES and overweight, particularly between the late 1980s and 1999–2002, and in adolescent boys and girls. For example, the ratio in prevalence of at risk of overweight between adolescent boys with a low and high SES decreased from 2.5 to 1.1 between NHANES III (1988–94) and 1999–2002; in adolescent girls, it decreased from 3.1 to 1.6. Changes in the associations also varied considerably across race, sex, and age groups. In general, in whites, the change was greater in adolescents than in children. For example, between NHANES III (1988–1994) and 1999–2002, the low- versus high-SES prevalence ratio changed from 6.4 to 1.7 in white adolescent girls compared with from 0.7 to 0.6 in 2–9-y-olds.
It is worth noting that, although the association between SES and overweight has been weakened over time, the gap between ethnic groups became wider, especially in adolescent girls. For example, the prevalence was 7.1%, 6.4%, and 3.8% in low-, medium- and high-SES white adolescent girls compared with 8.2%, 14.8%, and 1.9% in black adolescent girls in NHANES I (1971–1975); however, in 1999–2002, the values were 17.9%, 10.6%, and 10.6% compared with 24.5%, 18.7%, and 38.0%, respectively. In a recent study based on data collected from 21 911 preschool children who participated in the Hawaii WIC (Women, Infants, and Children) Nutrition Program in 1997–1998, Baruffi et al (27) reported that even in a relatively "homogeneous" low-SES sample of young US children, remarkable ethnic differences remained, and the differences emerged at very young ages. Our findings of inconsistent associations between SES and overweight across ethnic and sex groups are consistent with previous findings, such as those by Gordon-Larsen et al (12), which were based on a 1996 national school-based survey conducted in adolescents. Our study included younger children, used more recent national representative data, and examined the secular trends in the association. Our study suggests considerable changes in the association between 1988–1994 and 1999–2002. Ethnic disparities in obesity are likely due to environmental, contextual, biological, and sociocultural factors in addition to parental education and family income. Further longitudinal studies are needed to fully understand the underlying causes.
Our findings of a weakening association between SES and overweight particularly in white adolescent girls and boys and a widening gap between ethnic groups have many policy implications. Efforts solely targeting a reduction of income disparities probably cannot effectively help reduce the racial disparities in obesity (12, 28). More balanced intervention programs targeting all SES groups are needed. However, we need to develop different strategies to address the obesity problem in different race-ethnicity groups. For example, although white children with a low SES might be at higher risk and need more attention than their high-SES counterparts, the high-SES black groups should be targeted as well to help promote healthy lifestyles. To reduce the ethnic disparity, more efforts and resources are needed in minority groups. It is important to develop broad national policies and programs to fight the obesity epidemic. Meanwhile, it is crucial to tailor prevention and management efforts to each particular ethnic group to ensure efficiency and effectiveness.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
YW drafted the manuscript; provided administrative, technical, and material support; and had full access to all of the data and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. YW and QZ were responsible for the study concept and design, statistical analysis, analysis and interpretation of the data, and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. None of the authors declared a conflict interest.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. T. Soliman, R. L. Bassett Jr, E. B. Wilson, S. Boyd-Rogers, K. M. Schmeler, M. R. Milam, D. M. Gershenson, and K. H. Lu Limited Public Knowledge of Obesity and Endometrial Cancer Risk: What Women Know Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2008; 112(4): 835 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Gundersen, B. J. Lohman, S. Garasky, S. Stewart, and J. Eisenmann Food Security, Maternal Stressors, and Overweight Among Low-Income US Children: Results From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2002) Pediatrics, September 1, 2008; 122(3): e529 - e540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Schuetzmann, H. Richter-Appelt, M. Schulte-Markwort, and B. G. Schimmelmann Associations Among the Perceived Parent-Child Relationship, Eating Behavior, and Body Weight in Preadolescents: Results from a Community-based Sample J. Pediatr. Psychol., August 1, 2008; 33(7): 772 - 782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. K. Kumanyika, E. Obarzanek, N. Stettler, R. Bell, A. E. Field, S. P. Fortmann, B. A. Franklin, M. W. Gillman, C. E. Lewis, W. C. Poston II, et al. Population-Based Prevention of Obesity: The Need for Comprehensive Promotion of Healthful Eating, Physical Activity, and Energy Balance: A Scientific Statement From American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Interdisciplinary Committee for Prevention (Formerly the Expert Panel on Population and Prevention Science) Circulation, July 22, 2008; 118(4): 428 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. E. Wilson and B. Kinkead Gene-Environment Interactions, Not Neonatal Growth Hormone Deficiency, Time Puberty in Female Rhesus Monkeys Biol Reprod, April 1, 2008; 78(4): 736 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Q. Zhang and Y. Wang Using concentration index to study changes in socio-economic inequality of overweight among US adolescents between 1971 and 2002 Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2007; 36(4): 916 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Wang and M. A. Beydoun The Obesity Epidemic in the United States--Gender, Age, Socioeconomic, Racial/Ethnic, and Geographic Characteristics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis Epidemiol. Rev., May 17, 2007; (2007) mxm007v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Bishop Poverty threshold as an indicator of the association between childhood overweight and socioeconomic status over time Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1437 - 1437. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Wang and Q. Zhang Reply to M Bishop Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1437 - 1438. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
