AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ravaglia, G.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ravaglia, G.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ravaglia, G.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, C.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 84, No. 6, 1473-1480, December 2006
© 2006 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Apolipoprotein E e4 allele affects risk of hyperhomocysteinemia in the elderly1,2,3

Giovanni Ravaglia, Paola Forti, Fabiola Maioli, Martina Chiappelli, Fausta Montesi, Marisa Bianchin, Federico Licastro and Christopher Patterson

1 From the Department of Internal Medicine, Cardioangiology, and Hepatology, University Hospital S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy (GR, PF, FMa, and FMo); the Department of Experimental Pathology, University of Bologna, Italy (MC and FL); the District Health Unit of Lugo, Local Health Unit of Ravenna, Ravenna, Italy (MB); and the Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (CP)

2 Supported by a Basic Oriented Research grant from the University of Bologna.

3 Address reprint requests to G Ravaglia, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardioangiology, and Hepatology, University Hospital S Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy. E-mail: ravaglia{at}med.unibo.it.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Apolipoprotein E (APOE) plays a central role in VLDL metabolism. Both APOE e4 allele (APOE4) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are associated with greater risk of dementia and vascular disease, but APOE4 carriers have lower blood concentrations of CRP than do noncarriers, possibly through a mechanism favoring the clearance of the CRP VLDL–bound fraction. Homocysteine, another risk factor for vascular disease and dementia, also binds to VLDL in blood. However, the association between APOE4 and hyperhomocysteinemia has never been thoroughly investigated.

Objective: We investigated in an elderly population whether 1) APOE4 is associated with hyperhomocysteinemia [plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) > 15 µmol/L], 2) hyperhomocysteinemia affects the association between APOE4 and high CRP (serum CRP > 3 mg/L), and 3) B vitamin status affects these associations.

Design: APOE4 genotypes were assessed and tHcy, CRP, and serum concentrations of folate and vitamin B-12 were measured in 671 cognitively healthy subjects (52% women; mean age: 73 y) from an Italian population–based prospective cohort study.

Results: APOE4 carriers without high CRP [multivariate-adjusted odds ratio (OR): 0.22; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.59] had a lower risk of hyperhomocysteinemia than did noncarriers. The risk of high CRP was lower in APOE4 carriers without hyperhomocysteinemia (multivariate-adjusted OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.85) than in noncarriers. The associations were not affected by B vitamin status.

Conclusion: Independently from B vitamin status, APOE4 carriers have a lower risk of hyperhomocysteinemia and of high CRP than do noncarriers, but the presence of one condition attenuates the association of APOE4 with the other condition.

Key Words: Homocysteine • C-reactive protein • apolipoprotein E • elderly • lipid metabolism


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Apoliproprotein E (APOE) plays a central role in lipid metabolism as a component of VLDL and chylomicrons (1). The APOE gene, located at chromosome 19, is polymorphic with 3 common alleles—e2, e3, and e4 (2). The APOE e4 allele (APOE4) is a main risk factor for Alzheimer dementia and is also associated with vascular dementia and ischemic heart disease (2, 3). With respect to noncarriers, APOE4 carriers have lower blood concentrations of the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) (47), which is also a predictor of both vascular events (8) and dementia (9, 10). The ability of circulating CRP to bind to APOE (11) and VLDL (12) may explain the association with APOE4 (5), because carriers of this allele have the lowest APOE concentrations and, in them, VLDL is removed from the blood with particular efficiency (2).

Elevated blood concentrations of the sulfur amino acid homocysteine are another emerging risk factor for dementia (13, 14) and a predictor of vascular risk (15). Moderate hyperhomocysteinemia is common in elderly people and is usually caused by poor B vitamin status and reduced renal function (16, 17). An important fraction of plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) circulates bound to lipoproteins, particularly to VLDL (1820), but the possible association of APOE4 with homocysteinemia has, to our knowledge, never been thoroughly investigated. In this study, we used data from an elderly Italian cohort 1) to verify the hypothesis that APOE4 is associated with lower plasma concentrations of tHcy, 2) to investigate whether hyperhomocysteinemia affects the known association between circulating CRP and APOE4, and 3) to assess the effects of vitamin B status on these associations.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Study population
The Conselice Study of Brain Ageing (CSBA) is a population-based prospective survey described in detail elsewhere (21, 22), with the principal aim of exploring the epidemiology of and risk factors for dementia in the elderly. Briefly, in 1999–2000, 1016 (75%) of the 1353 persons aged ≥65 y residing in the Italian municipality of Conselice (the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy) participated in the prevalence study. Participants were screened with the Italian version of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE; 23), and participants scoring <24 underwent further examination with the Mental Deterioration Battery (24). Dementia was diagnosed without further neuropsychological evaluation for participants with MMSE scores <10. Standardized information on the general functional and mental status of these subjects was also obtained from a collateral informant (a relative or other person with reliable knowledge of the subject, such as the subject's physician). Dementia was defined with the use of clinical criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (25). The same protocol was used to collect data on cognitive status at follow-up examination (in 2003–2004) for 676 persons who were free of dementia at baseline. For the other 124 persons who were free of dementia at baseline and who survived but declined to participate at follow-up or died before reexamination, information from multiple sources (the subjects themselves, relatives, general practitioners, and death certificates) was used to define the presence or absence of dementia.

Subjects were considered eligible for the present study only if they had a baseline MMSE score ≥ 24 and had not developed dementia by the time of follow-up, because all the main outcome measures are risk factors for this condition and the resulting confounding might obscure the association. Complete data were available for 671 of the 865 eligible persons (574 who undertook the follow-up examination and 97 who did not participate at follow-up but had adequate information for cognitive diagnosis). A flow chart that details the sample derivation is shown in Figure 1Go.


Figure 1
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. Flow chart detailing the derivation of the study sample.

 
Written informed consent for the collection and use of this information was obtained from the subjects or their relatives. The study protocol was approved by the Isnstitutional Review Board of the Department of Internal Medicine, Cardioangiology, and Hepatology of the University of Bologna.

Laboratory investigations
At baseline, fasting venous blood samples were taken; they were immediately sent to the biochemical laboratory for processing. Serum folate and vitamin B-12 were measured with the use of immediate immunoelectrochemiluminescence analysis (Elecsys Folate Immunoassay and Elecsys B12 Immunoassay for Elecsys 2010 System; Roche Diagnostics Italia SpA, Monza, Italy). Serum total cholesterol and triacylglycerols were measured with the use of an enzymatic assay (Roche Diagnostics) on a Hitachi 917 System autoanalyzer (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). Serum creatinine was measured by using the Jaffé method adapted for autoanalyzers. Serum CRP was measured with the use of the N–high-sensitivity CRP assay on a BN II analyzer (Dade Behring, Milan, Italy). Plasma tHcy was measured with the automated IMx assay (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) on plasma samples stored at –70 °C for ≤12 mo. Intraassay and interassay CVs for homocysteine, serum B vitamins, and serum CRP were reported in detail elsewhere (14, 26).

Apolipoprotein E genotypes
A commercial kit (QiAmp blood kit; Kaga, Crawley, United Kingdom) was used for genomic DNA extraction. Standardized polymerase chain reaction protocols were used for genotyping of APOE (27) and the 677 (C->T) polymorphism of the gene was used for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) (28), a key enzyme in homocysteine metabolism. The variant T/T genotype is associated with the highest homocysteine concentrations under conditions of impaired folate status (29). Subjects were categorized as carriers or noncarriers of APOE4 and 677 MTHFR T/T genotypes.

Covariates
Covariates were selected on the basis of preliminary analyses (14, 28) and previous reports of homocysteine determinants (16, 17, 29) and were defined with the use of data collected at baseline. Educational status was categorized as 3 y compared with ≥4 y of formal education, because only a few participants had completed 5 y of formal education. Smoking habit was categorized as never smokers, ex-smokers, and current smokers. Physical activity was categorized as sedentary or active lifestyle, defined as performing at least moderate physical activity for a minimum of 4 h/wk. Diagnoses of cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, angina, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure) and stroke were based on medical history provided by the patients and confirmed by their physicians. When available, previous medical records were also reviewed. Body mass index (in kg/m2) was calculated.

Statistical analysis
Continuous variables are presented as means ± SDs, and categorical variables (except plasma tHcy, serum folate, serum vitamin B-12, and serum CRP because of their highly skewed distribution) are presented as number and percentage. Natural log–transformed values provided the best-fitting model for analyses in which plasma tHcy, serum folate, and serum vitamin B-12 were treated as continuous variables, and values were reported as geometric means and 95% CIs. Hyperhomocysteinemia was defined as plasma tHcy >15 µmol/L (14), which corresponds to the standard definition for hyperhomocysteinemia by international consensus (29). Because combined B vitamin deficits are more influential as a cause of hyperhomocysteinemia than are single deficits (16), we created a B vitamin index of 4 categories, based on the median value of each serum vitamin: combined B vitamin depletion (serum folate ≤5.3 ng/mL and serum vitamin B-12 ≤341 pg/mL), selective folate depletion (serum folate ≤5.3 ng/mL and serum vitamin B-12 >341 pg/mL), selective vitamin B-12 depletion (serum folate >5.3 ng/mL and serum vitamin B-12 ≤341 pg/mL), and B vitamin repletion (serum folate >5.3 ng/mL and serum vitamin B-12 >341 pg/mL). These thresholds fall near the upper limits of the range at which plasma tHcy is reported to begin increasing steeply [serum folate: 3–4.4 ng/mL (7–10 nmol/L); vitamin B-12: 271–339 pg/mL (200–250 pmol/L)] (29). As expected (16), the highest mean plasma concentration of tHcy (approximately corresponding to the cutoff for hyperhomocysteinemia) was found for combined B vitamin depletion (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Mean plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) by categories of B vitamin status1

 
Serum CRP distribution was so skewed that none of the commonly used mathematical transformations, including logarithms, allowed a satisfactory normalization. Therefore, CRP was dichotomized at the median value (3 mg/L), which corresponds to a significant increase in cardiovascular disease risk (30), and analyzed only as a categorical variable.

We used t tests and chi-square tests for comparisons between groups. Factorial analysis [2 x 3 analysis of variance (ANOVA)] was used to assess the effect of APOE4, high CRP, and B vitamin status (categorical) on plasma tHcy. Because our primary concern was the concurrent effect of these variables on homocysteinemia, the most relevant statistics were the interaction terms APOE4x B vitamin status and APOE4x high CRP. In the event of a statistically significant interaction term, Tukey's test for all pairwise comparisons was used to compare the subgroups obtained, by stratifying the sample for both the variables included in the interaction term. The ANOVA model was also tested after adjustment for possible confounders. A first group of confounders (model 1) included all the study covariates giving a statistically significant contribution to the model (ie, age, sex, education, serum concentration of creatinine, physical activity, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and baseline MMSE). A second group of confounders (model 2) included all the variables of model 1 along with other variables that were biologically important variables without statistically significant effect on the model (ie, smoking habit, serum concentrations of total cholesterol and triacylglycerols, body mass index, and MTHFR genotype).

The effect of APOE4 on CRP as a continuous variable could not be analyzed by using a factorial ANOVA design because of the failure to normalize its skewed distribution. However, the OR and 95% CI for the association of APOE4 (dependent variable) with high CRP and hyperhomocysteinemia (independent variables) were estimated by using a logistic regression model that also included the interaction term high CRP x hyperhomocysteinemia. The interaction term was again the most relevant statistic of this analysis because our primary aim was to investigate whether and how each of the variables affected the association of APOE4 with the other. In the event of the interaction term's being significant, ORs were estimated from the model according to the procedure described by Hosmer and Lemeshow (31). For this analysis, homocysteine was treated as a categorical variable to make it easier for the reader to understand the meaning of the ORs. Results were also tested by running additional logistic models adjusted for B vitamin status (categorical) and all of the other covariates used for multivariable adjustment of the ANOVA models. In preliminary analyses, the logistic model was also checked for interactions between B vitamin status (both as a categorical variable and as continuous log-transformed serum folate and vitamin B-12) and all the variables of interest. However, these interactions were not included in the final analysis because they were not significant (P > 0.200 for all) (31). Statistical analyses were performed with the use of SYSTAT software (version 10; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.050.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Plasma total homocysteine and APOE genotype
As expected, e3/e3 was the most frequent APOE genotype (n = 488; 72.7%), and e3/e4 (n = 89; 13.3%), e3/e2 (n = 77; 11.5%), e4/e2 (n = 9; 1.3%), e2/e2 (n = 3; 0.4%), and e4/e4 (n = 5; 0.7%) ranked next in descending order. The characteristics of study population by APOE4 status are detailed in Table 2Go. Mean plasma tHcy and prevalence of hyperhomocysteinemia were lower in APOE4 carriers than in noncarriers. No association with APOE4 status was found for the other study variables. The lack of difference in plasma tHcy across the 677 MTHFR genotypes, either in the population as a whole or with respect only to those subjects with selective folate depletion (P > 0.100 for all), is in agreement with other results (28, 32), which suggests that the effect of the 677 MTHFR variant loses importance in older age.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Characteristics of the study population1

 
The multivariable ANOVA model confirmed the significant effect of APOE4 (F = 6.073, P = 0.014) and B vitamin status (F = 18.455, P < 0.001) on plasma tHcy and also showed that these variables are related to homocysteinemia independently of each other, because their interaction was not significant (F = 1.470, P = 0.221). In the same model, CRP was not significantly associated with homocysteinemia (F = 0.402, P = 0.526), but the interaction term APOE4x high CRP was significant (F = 8.014, P = 0.005), which suggests the need to investigate specific differences across plasma homocysteine concentrations stratified by APOE4 and CRP. As shown in Table 3Go, the association between APOE4 and lower plasma tHcy was confirmed only in subjects without concurrent high CRP.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Mean plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) by APOE4 carrier status and serum C-reactive protein (CRP)1

 
Multivariate adjustment did not affect the statistical significance of APOE4x high CRP (model 1: F = 8.014, P = 0.005; model 2: F = 8.821, P = 0.003) or the results for the corresponding pairwise comparisons (APOE4 carriers compared with noncarriers among subjects without high CRP: P = 0.003 for both models 1 and 2). APOE4 noncarriers with low CRP had the highest homocysteine concentration but did not differ significantly from subjects with high CRP. Results did not change when log-transformed serum folate and vitamin B-12 were used instead of the categorical variable B vitamin status.

Information was also available about baseline alcohol and caffeine intakes, serum thyrotropin and plasma pyridoxal-5'-phosphate, diabetes, hypertension, and the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and statins. Adjustment for these additional variables did not alter the results (data not shown).

Association of APOE4 with high serum C-reactive protein and effect of hyperhomocysteinemia
The unadjusted logistic model that examined the simultaneous association of high CRP and hyperhomocysteinemia with APOE4 confirmed that the condition of being an APOE4 carrier was associated with a lower risk of both high CRP (OR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.91) and hyperhomocysteinemia (OR = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.65) than was the condition of being a noncarrier. However, the high CRP x hyperhomocysteinemia interaction term was also significant (P = 0.034) and remained so after multivariate adjustment (P < 0.05 for both models 1 and 2), which indicatied the need to estimate separate ORs for each variable stratified by the other. As shown in Table 4Go, the probability of high CRP was lower for APOE4 carriers than for noncarriers only if the carriers were without hyperhomocysteinemia. Conversely, in agreement with the results from the ANOVA model, the probability of hyperhomocysteinemia was lower for APOE4 carriers than for noncarriers but only if the carriers were without high CRP. Among subjects with both high CRP and hyperhomocysteinemia, the prevalence of high CRP tended to be higher in APOE4 carriers than in noncarriers, but the association was not significant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4 Relation of APOE4 carrier status with high C-reactive protein (CRP; >3 mg/L) and hyperhomocysteinemia (plasma total homocysteine >15 µmol/L)1

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The current study showed that, in an elderly population, hyperhomocysteinemia was less prevalent among APOE4 carriers than among noncarriers but only if the carriers were without high CRP. Moreover, the study confirmed and extended previous sporadic reports (47) of an association between APOE4 and lower prevalence of high CRP, which showed that the association was limited to subjects without hyperhomocysteinemia. All associations were found to be independent of B vitamin status.

A possible explanation for our findings is that, as has been hypothesized for VLDL-bound CRP (5), APOE4 affects the clearance of the lipoprotein-bound homocysteine fraction. Approximately 80% of homocysteine circulates in blood bound to proteins, with albumin as the main carrier (29). However, {approx}27% of all protein-bound homocysteine circulates bound to lipoproteins, and VLDL has the highest binding capacity, possibly because of its apolipoprotein B content (1820). APOE4 carriers have the highest apolipoprotein B concentrations and are particularly efficient in clearing VLDL from blood (1, 2). Therefore, under conditions leading to hyperhomocysteinemia, APOE4 carriers may have greater binding of homocysteine to lipoproteins, a faster clearance of the lipoprotein-bound homocysteine fraction, or both. Further support to the hypothesis is the fact that the association of APOE4 with a lower risk of hyperhomocysteinemia weakens under conditions of high CRP, whereas the association of APOE4 with a lower risk of high CRP weakens under conditions of hyperhomocysteinemia. These facts combine to suggest that CRP and homocysteine may compete for the same mechanism (perhaps a lipoprotein carrier) that favors their blood clearance in APOE4 carriers. Alternatively, APOE4 may be in linkage disequilibrium with other unknown genes that are able to affect both homocysteine and CRP metabolism.

The results that 1) the highest homocysteine concentration was actually found in APOE4 noncarriers with low CRP and 2) APOE4 carriers with high CRP had average homocysteine concentrations not significantly different from those in both APOE4 carriers and noncarriers with low high CRP may seem inconsistent with the hypothesis that high CRP attenuates the homocysteine-lowering effect of APOE4. However, by looking at the percentage of subjects with hyperhomocysteinemia in each group, it can be observed that the figures for subjects with high CRP and for APOE4 noncarriers with low CRP are almost 3 times the figures for APOE4 carriers with low CRP. Therefore, it may be speculated that, above a certain threshold of homocysteinemia, the hypothesized APOE4-related mechanism for removal of the homocysteine-lipid bound fraction is saturated, and other, more efficient, catabolic pathways are activated. That possibility may explain why the subjects with high CRP had lower homocysteinemia than expected: that is, the concurrent presence of high CRP so attenuates the efficiency of lipid-bound homocysteine removal that, independently of APOE, additional catabolic pathways are triggered. At the same time, that possibility may justify the unexpectedly high homocysteinemia found in APOE4 noncarriers with low CRP: that is, they lack the APOE4-related advantage for removal of the homocysteine lipid-bound quote, but their low CRP does not interfere with the normal VLDL or VLDL-like mechanism, so the threshold for activation of the additional mechanisms is not reached. Of course, because of the scant numbers in the APOE4 carrier subgroups, it cannot be excluded that the post hoc all-pairwise comparison test failed to identify existent significant differences.

No association between homocysteinemia and APOE4 was reported in previous investigations of Polish (33) or adult Taiwanese (34) subjects. Those investigations, however, were not specifically focused on the association of interest, and they had small population sizes. Differences in APOE4 frequencies related to differences in the ethnic origin of the samples (1) and to the selection criteria used for the present investigation—that is, APOE4 and other genotypes associated with risk of cognitive impairment are likely to be underrepresented in this study sample because of the exclusion of subject with prevalent and incident dementia—and to the better B vitamin status of the Polish population may have contributed to the different results obtained in those studies.

The main strengths of the current investigation are its population size, the large number of covariates available in the CSBA database, and the specific selection of persons free of dementia both at baseline and after a 4-y follow-up, which avoids the confounding effect of known associations between cognitive status and the variables of interest. The study, however, has several limitations. First, results for the analysis examining the interactions of hyperhomocysteinemia and CRP in their association with APOE4 are based on relatively small numbers of subjects. Second, because of its skewed distribution, CRP could be analyzed only as a categorical variable. Third, serum folate and vitamin B-12 are not the best indicators of metabolic vitamin deficiency, and other unmeasured vitamins may influence homocysteine metabolism (35). Fourth, only a single measurement of laboratory values was available. Fifth, although APOE4, homocysteine, and CRP are all associated with a greater risk of atherosclerotic events, we did not systematically excluded persons with vascular disease. The CSBA design did not include an assessment of cardiovascular conditions beyond clinical diagnosis, and it relied on data provided by participants and their physicians. Moreover, incident atherothrombotic events were not actively sought among those persons who refused to participate or who died before follow-up. However, the presence of vascular conditions at baseline was considered among the covariates, and inclusion of incident vascular events in the models as an additional covariate did not substantially change the results (data not shown). Sixth, although we did not genotype the cohort for known CRP genetic polymorphisms, evidence suggests that these polymorphisms have no effect on the association between APOE4 and serum CRP (6). Seventh, it may be speculated that the somewhat paradoxical association between a genetic risk factor for dementia and the lower concentrations of putative dementia risk factors that we found in this sample is the reason that the APOE4 carriers included in the study did not develop dementia during follow-up. In particular, it would have been interesting to verify whether the association was also present in the CSBA subjects who were cognitively normal at baseline but who received a diagnosis of dementia at follow-up and were excluded from the present investigation. However, the smallness of the latter group (only 12 subjects with full laboratory data) did not allow any reliable statistical analysis, and further studies on larger samples and with longer follow-up time are needed to investigate the hypothesis that blood concentrations of homocysteine and CRP may affect the risk of Alzheimer dementia associated with APOE4. A larger study sample is also needed to look for a confirmation of the nonsignificant trend we observed, under condition of hyperhomocysteinemia, for APOE4 carriers to have a higher prevalence of high CRP than noncarriers, because these subjects may be at greater risk of dementia.

In conclusion, this study suggests that, in comparison with noncarriers, APOE4 carriers have, independently from B vitamin status, a lower risk of hyperhomocysteinemia and of high CRP. However, the presence of one condition attenuates the association of APOE4 with the other, and it cannot be excluded that, for substantial increases in CRP and homocysteine, their hypothesized competition at a common APOE4-related mechanism may be bypassed by the intervention of other, more efficient elimination pathways. Given the growing interest of researchers in homocysteine and CRP as risk factors for vascular events and dementia (2, 3, 810), our results suggest the need to take the APOE genotype into account in future studies that involve blood measurement of these markers.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Edoardo Dalmonte (head physician of the Division of Geriatric Medicine at the Ravenna Hospital) and the general practitioners of Conselice for their invaluable help in organizing the study. We also thank the population of Conselice for their enthusiasm and participation in the study.

GR, PF, and FMa were responsible for the conception and design of the study; GR was responsible for obtaining the funds for the study; GR is responsible for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis; PF, MC, and FMa were responsible for data collection; PF and FMo were responsible for data analysis, with the assistance of MC, FMa, and CP; GR, PF, and FMa were responsible for drafting the manuscript; and FL, MB, and CP contributed to the revision of the manuscript. None of the authors had a financial or personal conflict of interest.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Mahley RW, Rall SC Jr. Apolipoprotein E: far more than a lipid transport protein. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2000;1:507–37.[Medline]
  2. Eichner JE, Dunn ST, Perveen GP, Thompson DM, Stewart KE, Stroehla BC. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and cardiovascular disease: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:487–95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Poirer J. Apolipoprotein E, cholesterol transport and synthesis in sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 2005;26:355–61.[Medline]
  4. Manttari M, Manninen V, Palosuo T, Ehnholm C. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and C-reactive protein in dyslipidemic middle-aged men. Atherosclerosis 2001;156:237–8 (letter).[Medline]
  5. Austin MA, Zhang C, Humphries SE, et al. Heritability of C-reactive protein and association with apolipoprotein E genotypes in Japanese Americans. Ann Intern Med 2004;68:179–88.
  6. Judson R, Brain C, Dain B, Windemuth A, Ruano G, Reed C. New and confirmatory evidence of an association between APOE genotype and baseline C-reactive protein in dyslipidemic individuals. Atherosclerosis 2004;177:345–51.[Medline]
  7. Marz W, Scharnagl H, Hoffmann MM, Boehm BO, Winkelmann BR. The apolipoprotein E polymorphism is associated with circulating C-reactive protein (the Ludwigshafen risk and cardiovascular health study). Eur Heart J 2004;25:2109–19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Libby P, Ridker PM. Inflammation and atherosclerosis: role of C-reactive protein in risk assessment. Am J Med 2004;116(suppl):9S–16S.
  9. Schmidt R, Schmidt H, Curb JD, Masaki K, White LR, Launer LJ. Early inflammation and dementia: a 25-year follow-up of the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Ann Neurol 2002;52:168–74.[Medline]
  10. Engelhart MJ, Geerling MI, Meijer J, et al. Inflammatory proteins in plasma and the risk of dementia. The Rotterdam Study. Arch Neurol 2004;61:668–72.
  11. Schwalbe RA, Coe JE, Nelsestuen GL. Association of rat C-reactive protein and other pentraxins with rat lipoproteins containing apolipoproteins E and A1. Biochemistry 1995;34:10432–9.[Medline]
  12. Rowe IF, Soutar AK, Trayner IM, Thompson GR, Pepys MB. Circulating human C-reactive protein binds very low density lipoproteins. Clin Exp Immunol 1984;58:237–44.[Medline]
  13. Seshadri S, Beiser A, Selhub J, et al. Plasma homocysteine as a risk factor for dementia and Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med 2002;346:476–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ravaglia G, Forti P, Maioli F, et al. Homocysteine and folate as risk factors for dementia and Alzheimer Disease. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:636–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. The Homocysteine Studies Collaboration. Homocysteine and risk of ischemic heart disease and stroke. A meta-analysis. JAMA 2002;288:2015–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Selhub J, Jacques PF, Wilson PWF, Rush D, Rosenberg IH. Vitamin status and intake as primary determinants of homocysteinemia in an elderly population. JAMA 1993;270:2693–8.[Abstract]
  17. Herrmann W, Quast S, Ullrich M, Schultze H, Bodis M, Geisel J. Hyperhomocysteinemia in high-aged subjects: relation of B-vitamins, folic acid, renal function and the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutation. Atherosclerosis 1999;144:91–100.[Medline]
  18. McCully KS, Olszewski AJ, Vezeridis MP. Homocysteine and lipid metabolism in atherogenesis: effect of the homocysteine thiolactonyl derivatives, thioretinaco and thioretinamide. Atherosclerosis 1990;83:197–206.[Medline]
  19. Olszewski AJ, McCully KS. Homocysteine content of lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis 1991;88:61–8.[Medline]
  20. Ventura P, Panini R, Rosa MC, Gaetti E, Salvioli G. Relevance of different apolipoprotein content in binding of homocysteine to plasma lipoproteins. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2003;4:218–26.
  21. Ravaglia G, Forti P, Maioli F, et al. Education, occupation, and prevalence of dementia: findings from the Conselice Study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2002;14:90–100.[Medline]
  22. Ravaglia G, Forti P, Maioli F, et al. Conselice study: a population based survey of brain aging in a municipality of the Emilia Romagna region: (A.U.S.L. Ravenna). Design and methods. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2001;7:313–24.
  23. Valente C, Maione P, Lippi A, et al. (Validation of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) as a screening instrument for dementia in an Italian population.) G Gerontol 1992;40:161–5 (in Italian).
  24. Carlesimo GA, Caltagirone C, Gainotti G. The Mental Deterioration Battery: normative data, diagnostic reliability and qualitative analyses of cognitive impairment. The Group for the Standardization of the Mental Deterioration Battery. Eur Neurol 1996;36:378–84.[Medline]
  25. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
  26. Ravaglia G, Forti P, Maioli F, et al. Plasma homocysteine and inflammation in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease and dementia. Exp Gerontol 2004;39:443–50.[Medline]
  27. Licastro F, Pedrini S, Ferri C, et al. Gene polymorphism affecting {alpha}1-antichymotrypsin and interleukin-1 plasma levels increases Alzheimer's disease risk. Ann Neurol 2000;48:388–91.[Medline]
  28. Ravaglia G, Forti P, Maioli F, et al. Common polymorphisms in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR): relationships with plasma homocysteine concentrations and cognitive status in elderly Northern Italian subjects. Arch Gerontol Geriatr Suppl 2004;9:339–48.
  29. Refsum H, Smith AD, Ueland PM, et al. Facts and recommendations about total homocysteine determinations: an expert opinion. Clin Chem 2004;50:3–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Ridker PM, Wilson PWF, Grundy SM. Should C-reactive protein be added to metabolic syndrome and to assessment of global cardiovascular risk? Circulation 2004;109:2818–25.
  31. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: Wiley, 1989.
  32. Ma J, Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism, plasma folate, homocysteine, and risk of myocardial infarction in US physicians. Circulation 1996;94:2410–6.
  33. Religa D, Styczynska M, Peplonska B, et al. Homocysteine, apolipoproteine E and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2003;16:64–70.[Medline]
  34. Lin SK, Kao JT, Tsai SM, et al. Association of apolipoprotein E genotypes with serum lipid profiles in a healthy population of Taiwan. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2004;34:443–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Jacques PK, Kalmbach R, Bagley PJ, et al. The relation between riboflavin and plasma total homocysteine in the Framingham Offspring cohort is influenced by folate status and the C677 transition in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene. J Nutr 2002;132:283–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication April 28, 2006. Accepted for publication August 3, 2006.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ravaglia, G.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ravaglia, G.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ravaglia, G.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS