AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston & Online Sept 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, C. L F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walker, C. L F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Walker, C. L F.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 85, No. 3, 887-894, March 2007
© 2007 American Society for Nutrition

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Zinc during and in convalescence from diarrhea has no demonstrable effect on subsequent morbidity and anthropometric status among infants <6 mo of age 1,2,3,4

Christa L Fischer Walker, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Nita Bhandari, Telahun Teka, Farhana Shahid, Sunita Taneja, Robert E Black the Zinc Study Group

1 From the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, Baltimore, MD (CLFW and REB); The Aga Khan University, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Karachi, Pakistan (ZAB and FS); Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India (NB and ST); and Addis Ababa University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (TT)

2 This study was made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.

3 Supported by the Johns Hopkins Family Health and Child Survival and Global Research Activity Cooperative Agreement with the US Agency for International Development. The zinc and placebo supplements were provided by the World Health Organization.

4 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to CL Fischer Walker, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Room E8031, Baltimore, MD 21218. E-mail: cfischer{at}jhsph.edu.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Preventing illness and improving growth in the first 6 mo of life is critical to reducing infant mortality. Zinc given for 14 d at the start of diarrhea has been shown to decrease the incidence and prevalence of diarrhea and pneumonia and improve growth in the 2–3 mo after, but no trial has been done in infants <6 mo of age.

Objective: This study sought to assess the effect of 14 d of zinc supplementation on subsequent morbidity and growth among infants 1–5 mo of age living in Pakistan, India, and Ethiopia.

Design: Infants with acute diarrhea were randomly assigned to receive zinc (10 mg/d; n = 538) or placebo (n = 536) for 2 wk. Weekly follow-up visits were conducted for 8 wk after the diarrhea episode. Incidence and prevalence of diarrhea and prevalence of respiratory infections including pneumonia were compared between the groups. Changes in weight, length, and corresponding z scores during the 8 wk of follow-up were also compared.

Results: One thousand seventy-four infants were enrolled at the start of follow-up. The groups did not differ significantly in the proportion of infants with at least one episode of diarrhea or respiratory infections. Infants who received zinc had more days of diarrhea (rate ratio = 1.20) than did the infants who received placebo. The groups had similar prevalences of pneumonia and overall respiratory infections. No significant differences in the mean changes in weight-for-age, length-for-age, and weight-for-length z scores were observed between the groups overall or in stratified analyses.

Conclusion: Young infants do not appear to benefit from 2 wk of zinc, unlike what has been observed among older children.

Key Words: Zinc • infants • growth • diarrhea management • pneumonia • diarrhea


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Diarrhea is the second leading cause of death among children <5 y of age, accounting for 18% of all child deaths (1). Although in recent decades the use of Oral Rehydration Solution has led to a decrease in the case fatality rate, diarrhea incidence rates have remained unchanged in the developing world (2). Malnutrition is an underlying risk factor for 61% of all childhood deaths associated with diarrhea (1). In addition to causing mortality, diarrhea is an important determinant of growth faltering in the developing world (3)

Zinc has been shown to be an effective treatment for diarrhea in young children, shortening the duration and severity of the diarrhea episode, and is now recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF as part of diarrhea therapy for all children aged <5 y (4, 5). When given for 10–14 d during and after a diarrhea episode, zinc has benefits for the subsequent 2–3 mo in decreasing the prevalence of diarrhea [odds ratio (OR): 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.83] and the incidence of pneumonia (OR: 074; 95% CI: 0.40, 1.37) (6–10). Zinc for diarrhea treatment has also been shown to help children maintain their weight during a diarrhea episode and to improve growth in the weeks after an episode (11–13). The prevention of diarrhea and pneumonia is critical, especially in areas where limited access and financial constraints prevent prompt treatment, as is the case in much of the developing world (14, 15).

We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the effect of zinc on diarrhea among infants 1–5 mo of age in Pakistan, India, and Ethiopia, where there are high rates of infant mortality, diarrhea, and stunting (16–19). We previously reported that there was no effect of zinc on the duration and severity of the treated diarrhea episode among these young infants (20). Herein we report the effect of zinc on morbidity and growth during 8 wk of follow-up after the index diarrhea episode. The current study is the first to assess the effects of zinc on subsequent morbidity and growth exclusively in infants <6 mo of age.


   SUBJECTS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We enrolled infants for this randomized, placebo-controlled diarrhea treatment trial and continued follow-up for 8 wk after the initial diarrhea episode to monitor subsequent morbidity and growth. Infants were enrolled from October 2003 through February 2005 from low income districts of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Karachi, Pakistan, and New Delhi, India. Complete screening and enrollment details have been described (20). Briefly, we enrolled 1110 infants 1–5 mo of age with <72 h of diarrhea who had no signs of other serious illnesses. Infants were excluded if they presented with a serious underlying illness, such as severe pneumonia or severe malnutrition, or if the infant required an overnight hospital stay. Sample size calculations for all outcome measures including morbidity and anthropometric follow-up were calculated with 80% power assuming a 2-sided {alpha} of 0.05. We enrolled 1110 infants to detect a difference of 0.16 in the length-for-age z (LAZ) score and a 25% decline in diarrhea incidence rate between zinc and placebo groups, assuming a 10% loss to follow-up.

The study was thoroughly explained to the parents or guardians of the eligible infants. The parents were told the purpose, potential benefits, potential risks, and time commitment for participation in the study. If the parent agreed, he or she was asked to sign a written parental permission document outlining the study details. All study methods, including consent procedures and documentation, were approved by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board, the Addis Ababa Faculty of Medicine Ethics Board, the Aga Khan University Faculty of Science Ethical Review Committee, and the Society for Applied Studies Ethical Review Committee.

Infants who met all inclusion and no exclusion criteria and whose parent signed the permission document were enrolled in the study. Enrolled infants were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg zinc sulfate or placebo in the form of a dispersible tablet once per day for 14 d. Each blister pack was prenumbered according to a block randomization scheme conducted at the WHO in Geneva. Numbered packs were then sent to each study site. The randomization code was kept in Geneva until all analyses were complete. Zinc and placebo tablets looked and tasted the same to ensure blinding. All investigators, study personnel, and parents of enrolled infants were blinded from the randomization scheme until data analyses were complete.

A trained doctor or nurse conducted the baseline interview and clinic visit to assess the history of the diarrhea, breastfeeding status before and since the start of the diarrhea episode, and sociodemographic characteristics. Weight was measured by placing the lightly clothed infant on an infant scale and recording to the nearest 100 g The measurement was recorded after the needle was steady (in India and Ethiopia) or when the digital read display remained unchanged (in Pakistan) for several seconds. The scales were calibrated daily to ensure accuracy. Recumbent length was measured by using an infant length board and recording to the nearest 0.1 cm. All doctors, nurses, and data collectors were trained to measure both length and weight using standard methodology.

The infant was followed up at home or in the clinic every 3 d by a trained data collector until the infant passed <3 loose or watery stools/24 h and had maintained this non-diarrhea state for ≥48 h. On the last diarrhea episode follow-up visit the infant's length and weight were recorded as described above.

Weekly follow-up began 1 wk after the first diarrhea free day and continued for 8 wk. Daily information on morbidity was recorded. In the case where the parent or infant was unavailable or the visit fell on a holiday, the follow-up visit was conducted the following 1–2 d. Every effort was made to retain the infants in the study and find missing enrollees. Only if the infant was not found after daily visits for 7 d was the child dropped from the study. Until the end of the 14-d supplementation period, the data collector asked the mother about compliance with the tablets and verified each verbal report by counting the missing tablets from the blister pack. The data collector asked the mother about any diarrhea or respiratory symptoms during the previous 7 d and assessed the infant for current cough or difficulty breathing. If the infant had cough or difficulty breathing, the data collector counted the infant's respiratory rate, looked for chest indrawing, and took his or her axillary temperature. The data collector also asked the parent or guardian if the infant had had any other illnesses in the past week or had been to any health care facility for any reason. On the 4th and the 8th weeks of follow-up, the infant's length and weight were measured as described above. Infants were visited by the same data collector to ensure there was precision in the length and weight measures. Infants with observed or reported illnesses at the time of follow-up were referred to the study clinic or hospital for appropriate treatment.

Statistical methods
The sex of the infant, age, mean number of children in the household, mother's education, exclusive breastfeeding status, and presentation with cough or difficulty breathing in addition to diarrhea on enrollment were assessed by group for all infants. Differences in means were assessed with a Student's t test analysis and differences in proportion by Pearson's chi-square analysis.

An episode of diarrhea was defined as ≥1 d of diarrhea as reported by the caregiver. The episode was not considered over until there were >48 h with no reported diarrhea (21). The proportion of infants with ≥1 episode of diarrhea, the proportion of infants with ≥2 episodes of diarrhea, and the proportion of infants with ≥1 episode of dysentery during the 8 wk of follow-up were calculated.

The diarrhea incidence rate was calculated by dividing the total number of episodes of diarrhea per child by the total number of days of follow-up and multiplying by 30.42 for a monthly rate. Rate ratios (RRs) were then calculated.

Any infant was reported as having a respiratory infection during the past week if the mother reported any one or more of the following signs or symptoms: cough, fast breathing, difficulty breathing, chest indrawing, wheezing, nasal flaring, grunting, congestion, runny nose, or stuffed nose. Pneumonia was defined per the WHO definition (22), ie, as cough and difficult or fast breathing on the day of follow-up visit with a respiratory rate of ≥60 breaths/min for infants <2 mo of age or ≥50 breaths/min for infants aged ≥2 mo. Reported cases of pneumonia were considered respiratory infections and only classified as pneumonia if confirmed by an elevated respiratory rate on the day of follow-up. The proportion of infants with ≥1 reported respiratory infection and pneumonia episode were compared by group. The presence of any respiratory infection or pneumonia episode was recorded weekly. Prevalence of respiratory infection was calculated by finding the total number of weeks with respiratory symptoms, dividing by the number of weeks of follow-up, and multiplying by 4.3. Prevalence of pneumonia infection was calculated by finding the total follow-up days where the child met previously described pneumonia criteria, dividing by the number of days of follow-up, and multiplying by 30.42. RRs were calculated.

Mothers were asked to report care-seeking at any health care facility, including a hospital, for each day during the 8 wk of follow-up. Hospitalization was defined as any overnight stay at a health care facility. The proportion of infants taken to a health facility and the proportion hospitalized during the 8 wk of follow-up were calculated for each group.

The proportions of infants with diarrhea, respiratory infection, or pneumonia were assessed by using a multivariate logistic regression, and a difference in rates was assessed with a robust Poisson regression. Before each full regression analyses for all outcome variables, interaction between supplementation group and nutritional status at the start of follow-up [weight-for-length z (WLZ) score] was assessed. Differences between the zinc and placebo groups for all proportions were determined by a multiple logistic regression analysis after adjustment for diarrhea episodes lasting >7 d, exclusive breastfeeding on enrollment, and the WLZ score at the start of follow-up.

The mean weight (g) and length (cm) at start of follow-up, week 4 of follow-up, and week 8 of follow-up were calculated and plotted by group. t Tests were used to calculate any differences between the zinc and placebo groups for both weight and length at all time points. z Scores were calculated by using the WHO reference population of breastfed infants (23). Whereas we previously used the National Center for Health Statistics/WHO reference population for the z score calculations, for this analysis, z scores were calculated by using the latest WHO recommendation (WHO Child Growth Standards/ANTHRO 2005), which calculates z scores on the basis of exact age and weight or length and compares to the WHO breastfed reference population (24). The mean weight-for-age (WAZ), LAZ, and WLZ scores were calculated at the start of follow-up and after 8 wk of follow-up and compared by group and site.

Baseline z scores were compared by the Student's t test analysis. The mean change in z scores (WAZ, LAZ, and WLZ) from the start of follow-up until the end of follow-up (week 8) was compared by group by using analysis of variance (ANOVA), with control for the baseline z score. The data were then stratified by baseline WAZ (<–2 WAZ compared with ≥–2 WAZ), LAZ (<–2 LAZ compared with ≥ –2 LAZ), breastfeeding status on enrollment (exclusive or not exclusive), and by sex. ANOVA regressions were used to assess differences between zinc and placebo groups for the overall mean change and for each stratified analysis while controlling for sex, WAZ, LAZ, exclusive breastfeeding, and the total days of diarrhea during the follow-up period. Possible interactions between site and treatment group were assessed for each outcome measure. Interaction terms were incorporated into the previously described, and no statistically significant differences were observed (P > 0.20) (results not presented). All analyses were performed by using STATA version 9.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A total of 1074 infants began the weekly enrollment. Infants in the zinc group were more likely to be girls and to have been exclusively breastfed before the diarrhea episode than were infants who received placebo; all other characteristics were not statistically different between the 2 groups (Table 1Go). Of those enrolled, 998 infants completed the 8 wk of follow-up; 32 infants were not fully followed-up because they withdrew from the study. For 46 infants, the initial diarrhea episode lasted longer than 9 d; therefore, the follow-up weeks during that time were excluded. Infants in the zinc group contributed 4200 infant-weeks of observation and infants who received placebo contributed 4169 infant-weeks of observation for the morbidity analyses (Figure 1Go). One infant in the zinc group and 6 infants in the placebo group were missing final growth data and were therefore excluded from the growth analysis. Thus, 522 infants in the zinc group and 513 infants in the placebo group contributed complete data for the final growth analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Baseline characteristics by site and supplementation group1

 

Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1.. Flow diagram of the study. a) Reasons for loss to follow-up during the initial diarrhea episode: no longer wanted to participate (n = 9), moved from the study area (n = 6), or death (n = 1). b) Reasons for loss to follow-up during the initial diarrhea episode: no longer wanted to participate (n = 8), moved from study area (n = 10), hospitalized during diarrhea follow-up (n = 1), or death (n = 1). c) Reasons for loss to follow-up during weekly follow-up: no longer wanted to participate (n = 1) or moved from the study area (n = 14). d) Morbidity analyses included all infant weeks of observation. For the zinc group, 496 infants with complete follow-up contributed 8 full weeks of observation (3968 wk) and 28 infants with incomplete follow-up (withdrew early or index diarrhea episode lasted >9 d) contributed partial follow-up (232 total weeks of observation). e) Reasons for loss to follow-up during weekly follow-up: no longer wanted to participate (n = 4), moved from the study area (n = 12), or death (n = 1). f) Morbidity analyses included all infant weeks of observation. For the placebo group, 502 infants with complete follow-up contributed 8 full weeks of observation (4016 wk) and 18 infants with incomplete follow-up (withdrew early or index diarrhea episode lasted >9 d) contributed partial follow-up (153 total weeks of observation).

 
Both the proportion of infants with ≥one episode of diarrhea and the proportion of infants with ≥2 episodes of diarrhea were not statistically different between the groups (Table 2Go). No significant difference between the diarrhea incidence rates of infants in the zinc and placebo groups after control for covariates (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: –0.18, 0.15). Infants in the zinc group had more days of diarrhea during the follow-up period (RR = 1.22; 95% CI: –0.01, 0.36) after control for covariates.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Incidence and prevalence of diarrhea by supplementation group

 
The proportion of infants with ≥1 respiratory infections or pneumonia episodes was not significantly different between the groups (Table 3Go). The prevalence of respiratory infections (RR = 1.00; 95% CI: –0.09, 0.27) and the prevalence of pneumonia (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: –0.33, 0.49) were also not statistically different. No significant difference in the proportions of infants who were brought to a health care facility or hospitalized overnight at any point during follow-up was observed between the zinc- and placebo-supplemented infants (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3. Prevalence of respiratory illnesses and proportion of infants brought to a health facility by supplementation group

 
Weight and length were not significantly different between the zinc and placebo groups at the start of follow-up, week 4, and week 8 (Table 4Go). Mean weight and length increased linearly from the start of follow-up to week 4 and week 8. WAZ, LAZ, and WLZ scores at baseline were not significantly different between the zinc and placebo groups (Table 5Go). The average change in z scores per month were calculated for WAZ, LAZ, and WLZ scores. No significant differences in the monthly z score changes were observed between the zinc and placebo groups for WAZ, LAZ, or WLZ as assessed by ANOVA after control for covariates (Table 5Go). Also, no significant differences in the average change in WAZ, LAZ, or WLZ scores were observed when stratified by WAZ at the start of follow-up, LAZ at the start of follow-up, exclusive breastfeeding at enrollment, or sex (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 4. Mean weight and length at start, week 4, and week 8 of follow-up1

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 5. Baseline anthropometric status at the start of the weekly follow-up and mean change 8 wk after the supplementation period by supplementation group1

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Zinc has been proven to be an effective treatment for diarrhea in children aged 6–59 mo and has been shown to decrease the incidence and prevalence of infectious diseases for 2–3 mo after 2 wk of daily zinc (4, 10, 25). However, there is uncertainty about the effect of this approach in young infants. We randomly assigned infants 1–5 mo of age with acute diarrhea to receive either zinc or placebo for 14 d and continued observations for 8 wk after the diarrhea episode. To our knowledge, the current study is the first to look at both the immediate and longer term effects of zinc on morbidity and growth among infants enrolled before 6 mo of age. We previously reported that there was no effect of zinc supplementation for the treatment of diarrhea in this population of infants (20). Here we present the longer-term effects of zinc supplementation on infant morbidity and growth.

In our study, 14 d of zinc for the treatment of diarrhea in young infants did not decrease the incidence or prevalence of diarrhea episodes in the 8 wk after treatment. These results differ from the previously reported pooled analysis of short-course supplementation trials conducted in older children, which reported a 34% decrease in the prevalence of diarrhea among zinc-supplemented children when compared with those receiving placebo (10). It is difficult to explain why we observed a 20% increase in the prevalence of diarrhea in the zinc-supplemented infants; there is little biological plausibility for this. Our study observed no significant difference in the incidence of respiratory infections or pneumonia between the groups. Although a statistically significant positive effect of zinc on the incidence of pneumonia has only been observed in longer-duration supplementation trials, a positive trend has been observed among zinc-supplemented children in short-course trials as well (10).

Additionally, no significant observed effect of zinc on growth was observed during the 2 mo after the diarrhea episode in these young infants. Of the 4 trials giving zinc for longer periods of time in this age group, 2 found limited effects on growth (26–29). One found a positive effect of zinc among infants with low serum zinc at the start of supplementation (29), and the other found a positive effect on weight during segments of the follow-up time but not overall (28). Zinc supplementation can be an important intervention to improve growth where dietary zinc intake among children is low and where high rates of stunting are present (30). In Ethiopia, Umeta et al (31) randomly assigned 100 stunted and 100 nonstunted infants 6–12 mo of age to receive zinc or placebo daily for 6 mo. Zinc supplementation increased the length of infants in both groups, but this was more pronounced among infants who were stunted at baseline. Although 27.8% of our enrolled infants were stunted at baseline, this is likely to reflect small size at birth in this young age group, rather than growth faltering as seen in later infancy. Throughout the follow-up period the infants in our study did not grow at an adequate rate to achieve optimal growth, which resulted in decreasing z scores. We observed greater growth faltering in length than in weight; stunting rates (<–2 LAZ) increased from 27.8% to 31.7% in 8 wk.

It is possible that the infants enrolled in the current study did not respond to the zinc with the benefits observed in other studies conducted in older children because they had not yet become zinc deficient. Nearly all these young infants were receiving breastmilk, which contains highly bioavailable zinc (32). Osendarp et al (29) supplemented Bangladeshi infants daily from 4–24 wk of age with 5 mg Zn or placebo and did not observe an effect on the incidence or prevalence of diarrhea or on the overall incidence of acute lower respiratory infections. However, when only zinc-deficient infants were assessed, there was a 70% decrease in the incidence of acute lower respiratory infections among infants who were supplemented with zinc compared with those who received placebo. A limitation of the current study was that we did not assess zinc status via serum zinc concentrations or the quantification of dietary zinc intake via breastmilk and complementary foods. For these reasons, we could not assess the variation in effect, if any, by baseline zinc status.

The exact mechanism by which zinc is an effective therapy for diarrhea and also prevents subsequent morbidity is not clearly known. One plausible mechanism is via the important role zinc plays in maintaining proper immune function and specifically enhancing cellular immunity (33). During the first year of life, the cellular immune system is still developing, thus the young infant may not respond to zinc in the same way as an older infant. Further investigation of the exact mechanisms by which zinc helps maintain immune function and prevents infectious diseases is needed to clarify why the positive effect of zinc is observed in older infants, but not in all infants under 6 mo of age.

Because we previously reported no effect of zinc on the duration and severity of the diarrhea episode (20), it is not surprising that here we report no positive effect on morbidity or growth during the 8 wk of follow-up in the current study population. The only other study of zinc for diarrhea treatment in this age group also observed no effect of zinc on diarrhea duration, but had no follow-up assessment after recovery from illness (34). Additional research among specific subgroups of infants who appear to benefit from zinc supplementation, such as low-birth-weight and small-for-gestational-age infants, may help clarify current uncertainties and guide targeted zinc interventions.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Olivier Fontaine for technical support and the World Health Organization for providing the zinc and placebo dispersible tablets for this trial. The authors also thank Dilip Mahalanabis for technical support and Kiran Bhatia for data management skill, both of whom are from the Society for Applied Studies, India.

CLFW, REB, ZAB, and NB conceptualized the study. CLFW, ZAB, NB, TT, FS, and ST enrolled patients, implemented the study protocol, and provided ongoing monitoring. CLFW analyzed the data. CLFW wrote the manuscript. CLFW, REB, ZAB, and NB were responsible for editing the final manuscript. The expanded Zinc Study Group was also part of data collection, data management, and technical support for the duration of the study. The Zinc Study Group includes Shahid Rasool (Aga Khan University), S Qamaruddin Nizami (Aga Khan University), Temsunaro Rongsen (Society for Applied Studies), Vandna Suri (Society for Applied Studies), Sileshi Lulseged (Addis Ababa University), and Yeshewatsehaye Tesfaye (Addis Ababa University). The authors have no personal or financial conflicts of interests.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Bryce J, Boschi-Pinto C, Shibuya K, Black RE. WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet 2005;365:1147–52.[Medline]
  2. Kosek M, Bern C, Guerrant RL. The global burden of diarrhoeal disease, as estimated from studies published between 1992 and 2000. Bull World Health Organ 2003;81:197–204.[Medline]
  3. Black RE, Brown KH, Becker S. Malnutrition is a determining factor in diarrheal duration, but not incidence, among young children in a longitudinal study in rural Bangladesh. Am J Clin Nutr 1984;39:87–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Zinc Investigators' Collaborative Group. Therapeutic effects of oral zinc in acute and persistent diarrhea in children in developing countries: pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:1516–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. WHO/UNICEF. WHO-UNICEF Joint statement on the clinical management of acute diarrhea. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Assembly, 2004.
  6. Bhandari N, Bahl R, Taneja S, et al. Substantial reduction in severe diarrheal morbidity by daily zinc supplementation in young north Indian children. Pediatrics 2002;109:e86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Brooks WA, Santosham M, Naheed A, et al. Weekly zinc supplements prevent pneumonia and reduce mortality in children less than two years in a Dhaka urban low-income population: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2005;366:999–1004.[Medline]
  8. Gupta DN, Mondal SK, Ghosh S, Rajendran K, Sur D, Manna B. Impact of zinc supplementation on diarrhoeal morbidity in rural children of West Bengal, India. Acta Paediatr 2003;92:531–6.[Medline]
  9. Sur D, Gupta DN, Mondal SK, et al. Impact of zinc supplementation on diarrheal morbidity and growth pattern of low birth weight infants in Kolkata, India: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, community-based study. Pediatrics 2003;112:1327–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Zinc Investigators' Collaborative Group. Prevention of diarrhea and pneumonia by zinc supplementation in children in developing countries: pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Pediatr 1999;135:689–97.[Medline]
  11. Bhutta ZA, Nizami SQ, Isani Z. Zinc supplementation in malnourished children with persistent diarrhea in Pakistan. Pediatrics 1999;103:e42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Roy SK, Tomkins AM, Haider R, et al. Impact of zinc supplementation on subsequent growth and morbidity in Bangladeshi children with acute diarrhoea. Eur J Clin Nutr 1999;53:529–34.[Medline]
  13. Roy SK, Tomkins AM, Mahalanabis D, et al. Impact of zinc supplementation on persistent diarrhoea in malnourished Bangladeshi children. Acta Paediatr 1998;87:1235–9.[Medline]
  14. Zaidi AK, Awasthi S, deSilva HJ. Burden of infectious diseases in South Asia. BMJ 2004;328:811–5.[Free Full Text]
  15. Mbonye AK. Prevalence of childhood illnesses and care-seeking practices in rural Uganda. Scientific World J 2003;3:721–30.
  16. Black RE, Morris SS, Bryce J. Where and why are 10 million children dying every year? Lancet 2003;361:2226–34.[Medline]
  17. Ethiopia demographic and health survey. Columbia, MD: ORC Macro International, 2000.
  18. Pakistan demographic and health survey. Columbia, MD: ORC Macro International, 1990–1991.
  19. India demographic and health survey. Columbia, MD: ORC Macro International, 1998–1999.
  20. Fischer Walker CL, Bhutta Z, Bhandari N, et al. Zinc supplementation for the treatment of diarrhea in infants in India, Pakistan, and Ethiopia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006;43:357–63.[Medline]
  21. Baqui AH, Black RE, Yunus M, Hoque AR, Chowdhury HR, Sack RB. Methodological issues in diarrhoeal diseases epidemiology: definition of diarrhoeal episodes. Int J Epidemiol 1991;20:1057–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. WHO. Technical updates of the guidelines on Integrated Management of Childhood Infectious Illnesses (IMCI). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2005.
  23. WHO Multicenter Growth Reference Study Group. WHO child growth standards: length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height, and body mass index-for-age: methods and development. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2006.
  24. WHO. WHO child growth standards. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2005.
  25. Baqui AH, Black RE, El Arifeen S, et al. Effect of zinc supplementation started during diarrhoea on morbidity and mortality in Bangladeshi children: community randomised trial. BMJ 2002;325:1059–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Castillo-Duran C, Perales CG, Hertrampf ED, Marin VB, Rivera FA, Icaza G. Effect of zinc supplementation on development and growth of Chilean infants. J Pediatr 2001;138:229–35.[Medline]
  27. Dijkhuizen MA, Wieringa FT, West CE, Martuti S, Muhilal. Effects of iron and zinc supplementation in Indonesian infants on micronutrient status and growth. J Nutr 2001;131:2860–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lira PI, Ashworth A, Morris SS. Effect of zinc supplementation on the morbidity, immune function, and growth of low-birth-weight, full-term infants in northeast Brazil. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;68(suppl):418S–24S.[Abstract]
  29. Osendarp SJ, Santosham M, Black RE, Wahed MA, van Raaij JM, Fuchs GJ. Effect of zinc supplementation between 1 and 6 mo of life on growth and morbidity of Bangladeshi infants in urban slums. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:1401–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Brown KH, Rivera JA, Bhutta Z, et al. Assessment of the risk of zinc deficiency in populations. Food Nutr Bull 2004;25:S130–62.
  31. Umeta M, West CE, Haidar J, Deurenberg P, Hautvast JG. Zinc supplementation and stunted infants in Ethiopia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:2021–6.[Medline]
  32. Yoon PW, Black RE, Moulton LH, Becker S. Effect of not breastfeeding on the risk of diarrheal and respiratory mortality in children under 2 years of age in Metro Cebu, The Philippines. Am J Epidemiol 1996;143:1142–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sazawal S, Jalla S, Mazumder S, Sinha A, Black RE, Bhan MK. Effect of zinc supplementation on cell-mediated immunity and lymphocyte subsets in preschool children. Indian Pediatr 1997;34:589–97.[Medline]
  34. Brooks WA, Santosham M, Roy SK, et al. Efficacy of zinc in young infants with acute watery diarrhea. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:605–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication August 13, 2006. Accepted for publication October 20, 2006.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, C. L F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walker, C. L F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Walker, C. L F.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS