AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Surles, R. L
Right arrow Articles by Tanumihardjo, S. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Surles, R. L
Right arrow Articles by Tanumihardjo, S. A
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Surles, R. L
Right arrow Articles by Tanumihardjo, S. A
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 86, No. 4, 1045-1053, October 2007
© 2007 American Society for Nutrition

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

One-time graded doses of vitamin A to weanling piglets enhance hepatic retinol but do not always prevent vitamin A deficiency1,2,3,4

Rebecca L Surles, Jordan P Mills, Ashley R Valentine and Sherry A Tanumihardjo

1 From the Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI

2 Presented in part at the Experimental Biology 2006 meeting, San Diego, CA, and at the 2007 Micronutrient Forum, Istanbul, Turkey.

3 Supported by NIH NIDDK 61973, USDA NRI 2003-35200-13754, and a University of Wisconsin–Madison College of Agriculture and Life Sciences scholarship (to JPM); this study was part of the doctoral dissertation of RLS.

4 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to SA Tanumihardjo, Department of Nutritional Sciences, 1415 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: sherry{at}nutrisci.wisc.edu.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Vitamin A supplements are administered to infants in developing countries at immunization contacts; doses of 50000 IU vitamin A are recommended. Doses of 100000 IU are given to children aged 0.5–1 y. The efficacy of these doses has not been adequately determined.

Objective: We aimed to quantify liver vitamin A after the administration of vitamin A doses to piglets. Piglets are a good model for infants because of their similar size, gastrointestinal anatomy, and vitamin A requirements.

Design: Castrated male piglets born to sows fed a vitamin A–depleted diet throughout 1 (parity A) or 3 (parity B) pregnancy and lactation cycles were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 4 oral vitamin A doses (ie, 0, 25000, 50000, or 100000 IU) at weaning (days 9–14). A vitamin A–depleted diet was fed until the piglets were killed on day 10. Serum retinol was measured on days 1, 2, 4, 7, and 10. The modified relative dose response was measured before supplementation and at the time of killing, and liver vitamin A concentration was measured.

Results: In both parities, 25000 IU did not result in a mean liver retinol reserve > 0.07 µmol/g liver (the deficiency cutoff). The 50000-IU dose increased mean reserves above 0.07 µmol/g only in parity A. Liver vitamin A reserves with the 100000-IU treatment were only 5% above those with the 50000-IU treatment. The modified relative dose-response test reflected differences in liver vitamin A stores in parity B, and the 0-IU group differed significantly from the 100000-IU group (P = 0.011).

Conclusion: This piglet model suggests that, for supplementation to infants <6 mo old, a 50000-IU dose is likely to be more efficacious in mitigating deficiency than is a 25000-IU dose.

Key Words: Vitamin A status • infant nutrition • supplementation


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Children with vitamin A deficiency have a greater risk of irreversible blindness and dying of infectious diseases than do children who are vitamin A replete. Globally, >250 million children under the age of 5 y have vitamin A deficiency (1), and supplementation programs are commonly used to address this issue (2). Studies found little or no improvement in infant vitamin A status after supplementation with either low-dose ß-carotene (3) or 25000 IU vitamin A in the form of retinyl palmitate (4, 5). At about the same time, the recommendation was made to increase the dose to 50000 IU (2, 6). The World Health Organization currently recommends that infants receive 50000 IU vitamin A at immunization contacts at age 6, 10, and 14 wk, that children 6–11 mo old receive 100000 IU vitamin A, and that those 12–59 mo old receive 200000 IU vitamin A every 4–6 mo (1).

Multicentered (4) and randomized (4, 5) trials of infant supplementation programs have been inconsistent, and the value of infant supplementation itself has been debated because of the greater occurrence of bulging fontanelle in vitamin A–dosed infants than in those not receiving vitamin A (7). In Zimbabwe, a large combined maternal and infant vitamin A supplementation trial showed similar infant mortality rates up to age 12 mo in the treated and placebo group infants born to HIV-negative mothers (8). In Nepal, infants ≤5 mo old who were given 50000 or 100000 IU vitamin A, depending on their age, had 4-mo mortality rates that did not differ significantly from those of infants receiving a placebo (9). In Ghana, India, and Peru, infants receiving three 25000-IU doses within 14 wk at immunization contacts had mortality rates at 9 mo of age that did not differ significantly from those of infants receiving a placebo (10). In contrast, a study in India showed a 22% reduction in mortality up to age 3 mo in infants treated with two 24000-IU capsules within 48 h of birth (11), and Indonesian infants had a 63% reduction in mortality up to age 12 mo if they had received a 50000-IU capsule at birth (12).

The efficacy of these supplements in changing the vitamin A status and improving the liver vitamin A reserves of young infants has not been ascertained, because of a lack of appropriate methods. The gold standard for determining vitamin A status is a liver sample. Retinol concentrations < 0.07 µmol retinol equivalents (RE)/g liver are considered deficient. Because liver biopsy is not a feasible method for determining the vitamin A status of humans—except in special circumstances (13)—indirect measures such as the serum retinol concentration and the modified relative dose-response (MRDR) test (14) are used. The serum retinol concentration is maintained under homeostatic control and does not indicate vitamin A deficiency until liver reserves are below the deficiency cutoff. The MRDR test is an indicator that offers more information on vitamin A status than do serum retinol concentrations alone (15), but, as currently applied in the field, the MRDR test cannot provide a quantitative estimate of changes in liver vitamin A reserves in response to an intervention.

The objective of the present study was to determine the efficacy of graded vitamin A doses in quantitatively improving liver vitamin A reserves in a piglet model. The swine model has been applied to evaluate vitamin A supplementation programs in lactating women (16–18) and to validate and refine vitamin A status assessment methods (19, 20). Swine are a good model because of the similarity of their anatomy and physiology to those of humans. Weanling piglets are similar in size to infants who are <6 mo old, which allows the use of vitamin A doses identical to those used in vitamin A supplementation programs aimed specifically at infants.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sows and milk collection
Approval for the use of the animals was obtained from the University of Wisconsin (UW)–Madison Animal Care and Use Committee. Sows (n = 15; crossbreeds of Large White and Landrace) were housed at the Swine Research and Teaching Center (Arlington, WI) during vitamin A depletion. The sows had a mean ( ± SD) of 2.4 ± 0.5 parities when assigned to this study. The sows were crossbred with Duroc boars, and, when pregnancy was confirmed, the sows' diet was changed from a standardized fortified diet (16) to a diet that did not contain added preformed vitamin A. They were maintained on this diet for 3 consecutive gestation and lactation cycles. The diet for the first 2 cycles (296 d) was corn- and barley-based, and that for the third cycle (126 d) was wheat-based. This strategy resulted in a gradual vitamin A depletion in the sows. Because litter size is variable, more sows than necessary were put on the vitamin A–depleted diets to ensure enough male piglets for these studies.

The experimental timeline is depicted in Figure 1Go. Milk was collected on postpartum days 1, 3, and 6 for measurement of vitamin A concentrations during transition. To collect milk, piglets were isolated from the sows for 1 h. Sows were injected intramuscularly with 40 IU oxytocin, and one teat was milked by hand ({approx}30 mL) (20). The milk was gently mixed to ensure homogeneity, and 500-µL aliquots were put into analysis tubes, which were stored on dry ice until they were transferred to a –80°C freezer.


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1.. Experimental timeline. After the birth of the piglets, sow milk was collected on days 1, 3, and 6 (O). Piglets were weaned on {approx}day 11 and assigned to a vitamin A–depleted diet. On day 18, baseline modified relative dose-response (MRDR) tests were done and piglets were treated with 0, 25000, 50000, or 100000 IU vitamin A as retinyl acetate. Serum retinol concentrations were determined at baseline and on days 1, 2, 4, 7, and 10 (X). Repeat MRDR tests were done on day 28, and then the piglets were killed.

 
Piglets, dosing, and blood and liver collection
Castrated male piglets were selected from 6 sows in the first parity (parity A) and from 7 sows in the third parity (parity B) (n = 28 and 36 piglets for parity A and B, respectively). Because of differences in parturition, 4 of the 15 sows on the depletion diet were the same for parities A and B. The piglets were brought to the UW-Madison Livestock Laboratory when they were 9–14 d old (11.4 ± 1.1 d); they were weaned to a diet with no added vitamin A (Table 1Go) for 1 wk, and then the MRDR test was conducted (19). The MRDR test involves giving a standard 5.3-µmol dose of 3,4-didehydroretinyl acetate and taking a single blood sample 4–7 h after the dose. The ratio of 3,4-didehydroretinol to retinol (MRDR value) is determined by HPLC. An MRDR value > 0.060 is considered abnormal for both infants and piglets.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Ingredient composition of piglet diet

 
Piglets were assigned to 4 treatment groups within each parity (n = 7 and 9/treatment group for parities A and B, respectively), dosed orally with 0, 25000, 50000, or 100000 IU vitamin A (0, 26.2, 52.4, or 105 µmol retinyl acetate), and observed for adverse events periodically during the subsequent 24 h. Piglets were fed the depletion diet for the next 10 d. Blood samples (5 mL) were collected on days 1, 2, 4, 7, and 10. On day 10, the MRDR test was repeated; then the piglets were killed, and their livers were collected. Serum and livers were stored on dry ice until they were transferred to a –80°C freezer until they were analyzed.

Milk, serum, and liver HPLC analysis
Milk (500 µmol) was analyzed for retinol by using a slight modification of a previously described method (16, 20). After saponification and extraction, the residue was reconstituted with 200 µL 50:50 (by vol) methanol:dichloroethane; 25 µL was injected onto a Resolve C18, 5-µm, 3.9 x 150–mm reversed-phase column (Waters, Milford, MA) equipped with a guard column. The HPLC system consisted of a binary pump, an autosampler, and a photodiode array detector (model nos. 1525, 717, and 996, respectively; Waters). Serum (200 µL) and liver (1 g) were analyzed for retinol and retinyl esters, respectively, according to published procedures (18, 20).

Statistical analysis
A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with fixed effects was applied by using SAS PROC MIXED software (version 8.2, SAS Institute, Cary, NC) to determine the main effects of parity and of the time since birth on sow milk retinol concentration and the effects of vitamin A treatment, parity, and the time since dosing on piglet serum retinol and 3,4-didehydroretinol concentrations. PROC MIXED allows unequal variances among groups. To account for potential differences by parity group, sow was a random effect in the model. The influence of parity was evaluated by using 3-factor and 2-factor ANOVAs when appropriate. The least-squares means (LSMs) were calculated, and the overall significance at specific time points was determined by LSM differences when the interaction terms were significant. When the treatment x day interactions were significant, a Bonferroni-corrected test of effect slices (SAS OnlineDoc 9.1.3) was used to determine which days were significant. When the parity x treatment interaction term was significant, 1-factor ANOVA was used to evaluate differences in response to treatment, and Tukey's test was applied for multiple comparisons. Retention of the vitamin A supplemental doses and the 3,4-didehydroretinol dose was calculated. The vitamin A liver reserves of the treatment groups were corrected for the placebo group and divided by the vitamin A dose amount. The 3,4-didehydroretinol retention was estimated by calculating the total amount in the liver and dividing by the standard amount of 3,4-didehydroretinyl acetate given to all piglets (5.3 µmol). A 2-factor ANOVA was used to determine the differences in the percentage retention of the doses administered by parity and by treatment. Values are presented as means ± SDs. Main treatment effects and interaction terms that included time were considered significant at P < 0.05; interactions that did not include time and 3-factor interactions at P < 0.1 were considered significant.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sow milk vitamin A concentrations
Milk vitamin A concentrations did not differ significantly between the 2 lactation cycles (P = 0.55). A repeated-measures ANOVA showed that the sow milk vitamin A concentration decreased significantly (P < 0.0001) with time, as the milk transitioned from colostrum on day 1 (4.4 ± 1.7 µmol retinol/L) to more mature milk on day 3 (2.3 ± 0.85 µmol/L) and day 6 (1.2 ± 0.40 µmol/L). The day 6 concentration in milk was similar to that in mature milk found in previous studies (16, 20). A parity x days since birth interaction was not significant (P = 0.71).

Piglet body and liver weight
At weaning (experimental day 11), piglet body weights did not differ by treatment or parity, nor was there a significant treatment x parity interaction (P > 0.62) (Table 2Go). At the time of the killing of the piglets (experimental day 28), piglet body weight was significantly (P < 0.0001) different by parity but not by treatment (P = 0.51), and the treatment x parity interaction was not significant (P = 0.57). Piglet body weight differed significantly by sow in both parity A (P = 0.02) and parity B (P = 0.0003). On day 28, the difference in piglet body weight by sow was marginal in parity A (P = 0.088) and significant in parity B (P < 0.003). On day 28, mean body weight for the piglets from parities A and B was 7.1 ± 1.4 and 5.8 ± 1.4 kg, respectively (P = 0.0006). On the day the piglets were killed, piglet liver weights were significantly (P < 0.0001) greater in animals from parity A (265.7 ± 51.7 g) than in those from parity B (191.1 ± 57.4 g), but they did not differ significantly by treatment in either parity (P > 0.74). One piglet from parity B (0-IU treatment group) died before the experiment was over, but no adverse events, such as vomiting or diarrhea, were observed after vitamin A treatment.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Characteristics of piglets from 2 parities of sows fed a vitamin A–depleted diet at the time of treatment allocation1

 
Liver vitamin A reserves
The RE/g liver concentration in each treatment group was determined at the time of killing (Figure 2Go). Significant main effects of parity (P = 0.038) and treatment (P < 0.0001) existed, but the parity x treatment interaction was not significant (P = 0.56). In the piglets from parity A, the 50000- and 100000-IU doses increased mean liver vitamin A concentrations above 0.07 µmol RE/g liver (the current deficiency cutoff). The 25000- IU dose did not increase mean liver reserves above 0.07 µmol RE/g liver. The piglets from parity B (Figure 2Go) had notably lower hepatic vitamin A concentrations than did those from parity A after treatment, even though the liver size of the parity B piglets was smaller. In parity B, only the 100000-IU vitamin A treatment was able to increase the mean liver reserves above 0.07 µmol RE/g liver.


Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 2.. Hepatic retinol concentrations (µmol/g liver) in piglets dosed with either 0, 25000, 50000, or 100000 IU vitamin A. Significant main effects of parity (P = 0.038) and treatment (P < 0.0001) existed, but the parity x treatment interaction was not significant (P = 0.56). Of the piglets from parity A, liver vitamin A concentrations in those receiving the 50000- and 100000-IU treatments increased above 0.07 µmol/g liver, the current deficiency cutoff. Of the piglets from parity B, only the 100000-IU treatment group had mean reserves that increased above 0.07 µmol retinol equivalents/g.

 
Total liver reserves (RE/liver) were also determined for piglets from both parities (Figure 3Go). Significant main effects of parity and treatment existed (P < 0.0001 for both), but the parity x treatment interaction was not significant (P = 0.12). The piglets from parity A retained more of the treatment dose than did the more vitamin A–depleted piglets from parity B. Total liver reserves increased only 5% more between the 50000- and 100000-IU dose groups.


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 3.. Total hepatic retinol of piglets dosed with 0, 25000, 50000, or 100000 IU vitamin A. Significant main effects of parity and treatment existed (P < 0.0001 for both), but the parity x treatment interaction was not significant (P = 0.12).

 
Modified relative dose-response test and serum 3,4-didehydroretinol concentrations
Significant main effects of parity (P < 0.0001) and treatment (P = 0.0066) existed, and the parity x treatment interaction was significant (P = 0.061). In the piglets from parity A, the baseline (P = 0.85) and final (P = 0.39) MRDR tests were not affected overall by treatment (Table 3Go). In piglets from parity B, whose mothers had greater vitamin A depletion, baseline MRDR test values did not differ significantly (P = 0.33), but the post-vitamin A treatment values did differ significantly (P = 0.013) among the treatments. With the use of LSM differences with a Tukey adjustment, the control group (0-IU dose) had a response marginally higher than that of the 50000-IU dose group (P = 0.072) and significantly higher than that of the 100000-IU dose group (P = 0.011). The increases in MRDR values were consistent with reduced liver vitamin A reserves in the groups from parity B.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3. Baseline and final modified relative dose-response (MRDR) values in piglets from 2 parities of sows fed a vitamin A–depleted diet including 0-, 25 000-, 50 000-, or 100 000-IU (0, 26.2, 52.4, or 105 µmol) supplements of retinyl acetate1

 
The repeated blood drawing allowed the 3,4-didehydroretinol concentration to be followed from the first MRDR test (at 4 h) to 7 d after dosing (Table 4Go). A review solely of the change in 3,4-didehydroretinol concentration with time can show its use as a vitamin A tracer, independent of the influence of serum retinol. A 3-factor ANOVA showed no significant difference by parity (P = 0.73), but significant differences were seen in the 3,4-didehydroretinol concentration by treatment group and by time after dosing (P < 0.0001 for both). The parity x day (P < 0.0001), the parity x treatment (P = 0.078), and parity x treatment x day (P = 0.098) interactions were significant, but the treatment x day interaction was not significant (P = 0.16). After treatment, the 3,4-didehydroretinol concentration was consistently higher in the control group from both parities than in the groups treated with vitamin A, and it decreased in all of the treatment groups with time.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 4. 3, 4-Didehydroretinol concentrations in the serum of piglets followed for 7 d after an oral dose of 3, 4-didehydroretinyl acetate (5.3 µmol)1

 
Serum retinol concentrations
A 3-factor ANOVA found significant differences by parity (P = 0.012), treatment (P = 0.0023), and day (P < 0.0001). The parity x treatment interaction was not significant (P = 0.76), but the parity x day (P < 0.0001), treatment x day (P < 0.0001), and parity x treatment x day (P = 0.073) interactions were significant. Because of these significant interactions, the data were analyzed separately. Serum retinol concentrations for piglets from parity A (Figure 4Go) were marginally affected by treatment (P = 0.064), and there was a significant difference by time (P < 0.0001) and a significant treatment x day interaction (P = 0.005). With the use of a Bonferroni-corrected test of effect slices by day, the only treatment x day effect that was significant was that for day 1 (P = 0.044). This effect represents a slight increase in the serum retinol concentration during the time that the vitamin A doses were equilibrating with body vitamin A. No other treatment x day effects were noted.


Figure 4
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 4.. Serum retinol concentrations in piglets dosed with 0 ({diamond}), 25000 ({square}), 50000 ({triangleup}), or 100000 ({circ}) IU vitamin A in the form of retinyl acetate. A 3-factor ANOVA showed a significant difference for parity (P = 0.012), treatment (P = 0.0023), and day (P < 0.0001). The parity x day (P < 0.0001), treatment x day (P < 0.0001), and parity x treatment x day (P = 0.073) interactions were significant. In piglets from parity A, the main effect of treatment on serum retinol concentrations was marginal (P = 0.064), but the effect of time after dosing (P < 0.0001) and the treatment x day interaction (P = 0.005) were significant. *Significant treatment x day effect (day 1), P = 0.044 (Bonferroni-corrected test of effect slices by day). No significant differences between treatments existed. In piglets from parity B, the main effects of treatment and time on serum retinol concentrations were significant (P = 0.033 and < 0.0001, respectively). The treatment x day interaction also was significant (P = 0.0002). *Significant treatment x day effect, P < 0.0006 (day 1) and P = 0.022 (day 7). The only difference between treatments using LSM differences occurred on d 1 when the mean serum retinol concentration was significantly higher in the 50000-IU group than in the 0-IU group (P < 0.05).

 
The main effects of treatment and time on serum retinol concentrations for piglets from parity B (Figure 4Go) were significant (P = 0.033 and < 0.0001, respectively). A significant (P = 0.0002) treatment x day interaction also existed. With the use of a Bonferroni-corrected test of effect slices by day, the only treatment x day effect that was significant was that for day 1 (P < 0.0006). This effect represents an increase after vitamin A dosing (also seen in parity A) and on day 7 (P = 0.022). The only significant difference between treatments with the use of LSM differences occurred on day 1 when the mean serum retinol concentration in the 50000-IU dose group was higher than that in the 0-IU dose group (P < 0.05). The serum retinol concentrations in the different treatment groups did not differ significantly at day 10 (Figure 4Go). Thus, both treatment response and time after treatment are important in interpreting changes in serum retinol concentration.

Retention of administered doses
The percentage retention of both the graded vitamin A doses and the 3,4-didehydroretinyl acetate doses was analyzed by parity and group (Table 5Go). Significantly (P = 0.0002) more of the vitamin A dose was stored in the livers of the piglets from parity A than in the livers of piglets from parity B, as evidenced by the lower percentage retention in the parity B piglets. There also was a significant (P = 0.002) effect of treatment group, but no significant parity x treatment interaction occurred (P = 0.76).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 5. Retention of administered doses of retinyl acetate and 3,4-didehydroretinyl acetate expressed as alcohol equivalents in liver1

 
Storage of the standard 3,4-didehydroretinol dose for the MRDR test consistently was significantly (P < 0.0001) greater in the piglets from parity A than in those from parity B, and a significant (P < 0.0001) difference by treatment group existed, but the parity x treatment interaction was not significant (P = 0.14). The percentage range of the 3,4-didehydroretinol dose stored was 23 ± 14%–51 ± 15% for piglets from parity A and 16 ± 7.1%–29 ± 11% for piglets from parity B. The lowest amount of 3,4-didehydroretinol dose stored for both parities was that for the control groups. This finding concurs with the observation that more 3,4-didehydroretinol was circulating in the serum of the control groups that generated higher MRDR values (Table 3Go).


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
In areas where vitamin A deficiency is prevalent, high doses of vitamin A are currently given to postpartum mothers in hopes of increasing the vitamin A status of the mothers and their nursing infants (1). Subsequent to maternal supplementation, infants are given multiple vitamin A doses throughout the first 2 y of life. These practices continue, even without adequate evidence of their efficacy, which results from the difficulty of assessing total-body vitamin A reserves in infants. This study used piglets, which are born with low hepatic vitamin A reserves (18, 21–23) and which weigh approximately the same as 3–5-mo-old infants at the 50th percentile of weight-for-age (24), to determine quantitative improvements in liver vitamin A reserves after a single dose of vitamin A. These results suggest that few infants would be vitamin A adequate after receiving a single large dose, especially if the mother is vitamin A depleted. In addition, the 100000-IU vitamin A dose may be too large to be effectively handled in the gastrointestinal system of young infants, as suggested by the fact that total liver vitamin A reserves increased only 5% more with the 100000-IU dose than with the 50000-IU dose. These findings explain the conflicting results from human trials (8–12) and provide a reason for the fact that some investigators have found smaller doses to be more effective in reducing infant morbidity and mortality (25, 26).

In utero, vitamin A pathways are tightly regulated to ensure normal fetal development. Studies have found a reduction in maternal nightblindness (27) and improvements in infant serum retinol concentrations (28, 29) after vitamin A supplementation during pregnancy. Because of the risk of teratogenicity during pregnancy, low-dose supplementation has been used (30–32). Groups given daily vitamin A supplementation during pregnancy tended to have a lower incidence of depleted vitamin A liver stores, as assessed by the MRDR test (31, 32). Analysis of fetal livers from nonhuman primates found an amplification of early vitamin A hepatic reserves when mothers were fed excessive amounts of vitamin A in laboratory diets (33), which indicates continuous transfer to the fetus. The piglets from parity A of vitamin A–adequate sows were able to store more of the supplemented vitamin A than were piglets from parity B of vitamin A–depleted sows. This difference suggests that the vitamin A dose was utilized by vitamin A–deprived tissues in the piglets from parity B through chylomicron delivery (34), and, thus, less vitamin A was available for long-term storage in the liver. Because of this finding, more emphasis on increasing vitamin A stores during pregnancy may be warranted. In addition, a greater proportion of the 3,4-didehydroretinol dose was found in the livers of the treatment groups than in those of the control groups from both parities. Along with chylomicron delivery, this could indicate a "priming" of the vitamin A regulatory pathways by the vitamin A supplements (35) that were received 10 d before, which meant that the vitamin A–treated piglets were able to retain more of the subsequent 3,4-didehydroretinol dose.

In some communities, prenatal care is sparse or nonexistent, and many programs have tried high-dose postpartum supplementation (36) and direct supplementation to infants (8–11). Liver vitamin A reserves of piglets from sows dosed with single high-vitamin A doses that were equivalent to 200000 or 400000 IU (according to differences from women in body weight) were elevated over a placebo dose (18) but did not differ from each other. Because the percentage retention of the vitamin A doses decreased in both parities in the present study and because liver reserves increased only 5% between the 50000- and 100000-IU dose groups, it can be concluded that more is not necessarily better in the defining of dose sizes. Combined programs for mothers and infants may ensure adequate liver vitamin A reserves, but a single intervention strategy could result in a failure of many infants to attain an adequate vitamin A status.

In piglets from parity A, no treatment effect for serum retinol concentration was observed; however, there was a significant treatment x day interaction on the day after the doses were administered. In contrast were the piglets from parity B, in whom a treatment effect was observed but not evident on the final day of the experiment. The drop in serum retinol concentration 10 d after treatment may be due to the body's attempt to conserve hepatic retinol by decreasing the utilization rate of retinol and thereby setting a new lower homeostatic setpoint in the serum (37). A similar finding was seen in an earlier study in piglets that were fed a vitamin A–depleted diet after being weaned (18). Serum retinol concentrations decreased after 2 wk regardless of vitamin A status. A lack of dietary vitamin A will trigger a response to slow the utilization rate to retain vitamin A. Previous studies in piglets (18), rats (37), and gerbils (38) have shown this phenomenon, which sometimes results in a slight increase in serum retinol concentrations before the lower setpoint is obtained, as was seen for the 7- and 10-d data of the piglets from parity B.

MRDR values were affected by treatment but did not differ among parity A piglets because of the lack of power due to the small group size, although a trend was noted. The more vitamin A–depleted parity B piglets showed increasing MRDR values as liver vitamin A reserves decreased. Furthermore, the MRDR values and liver reserves in these piglets showed that infants may still be deficient after supplementation. Even in the piglets given the higher doses, stores were barely over the deficiency cutoff of 0.07 µmol/g liver. This finding concurs with recent data in Tanzanian infants: 43% and 47% of those infants were considered vitamin A–deficient according to the MRDR test after the high- and low-dose supplements, respectively (39). The fact that the test was conducted 3 h after dosing and not at 4 h after dosing—the time recommended for infants—strengthens the conclusion that some infants are still vitamin A deficient after supplementation. A 3-h MRDR test would be more sensitive to very low liver reserves of vitamin A at the individual level than would a later test (19). Measurements only of serum retinol concentrations or of differences in childhood morbidity and mortality (4, 12, 25) would mean that the ability of vitamin A supplementation to increase liver vitamin A reserves cannot be assessed. The MRDR values obtained in the vitamin A–deficient piglets from parity B in the present study are similar to those obtained in infants who were recipients of repeated 25000-IU supplements (4), which confirms that not all infants are vitamin A replete after supplementation. The liver vitamin A concentration data in the present study showed that 71% of the piglets were still vitamin A deficient after a 25000-IU dose, and 24% remained deficient after a 50000- or 100000-IU dose. This evaluation of the efficacy of vitamin A doses currently used in infants may explain negative effect trials. Because of these low liver reserves, a single illness could easily deplete the liver vitamin A stores by decreasing intake and absorption and increasing losses in the urine (40).

Side effects of supplementation are rare in infants, and many studies show improvement in morbidity or mortality with dosing (11, 12). The most common acute side effect in infants given vitamin A doses is bulging of the anterior fontanelle (7). However, one study found the incidence of bulging fontanelle to be similar to that in a placebo group (41). Comparison of long-term effects in infants reported to have had a vitamin A–induced bulging fontanelle and effects in infants with normal fontanelles after supplementation found no adverse effects on growth and development (42). However, maternal and infant supplementation programs in HIV-endemic areas need further evaluation. Among HIV-exposed infants who were not infected with HIV during pregnancy and delivery, both postpartum maternal and neonatal vitamin A supplementation were associated with a doubling of the mortality rate by age 2 y (43).

Because the liver vitamin A reserves of most piglets in this study did not reach adequacy, the current recommendation to repeat vitamin A administration at the immunization contacts at 6, 10, and 14 wk seems appropriate (6), but it still may not prevent deficiency (4, 39). Promoting the use of provitamin A–containing foods and providing them to women could be effective in improving the vitamin A status of the women and, perhaps, of their nursing infants. Provitamin A–containing foods were as effective as retinyl palmitate in treating nightblindness in pregnant women (27). A recent study in Mongolian gerbils showed that dark-orange maize can contribute as much vitamin A to the liver as ß-carotene supplements contribute during vitamin A depletion (44). As developing countries search for sustainable strategies to improve community vitamin A status, biofortification of staple crops (44, 45) and promotion of the consumption of vegetables (46) are viable options that can be safely introduced alongside vitamin A supplementation programs.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are grateful for the continued support of Thomas Crenshaw (Professor of Animal Science) in the orchestration of these swine studies and of Peter Crump (Univeristy of Wisconsin–Madison College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Statistical Consulting Service) for statistical analysis consultation. We also thank Jamie Reichert, swine facility manager, for valuable assistance during sow and piglet procedures.

The authors' responsibilities were as follows—RLS: conducting the study and serum and liver analyses, providing input on statistical analysis, and preparing the manuscript; JPM and ARV: assisted in many aspects of sow and piglet care and provided input on the manuscript; and SAT: study design, overseeing the operation of the study, providing input on data analysis, and preparing and revising the manuscript. None of the authors had a personal or financial conflict of interest.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. World Health Organization. Immunizations, vaccines, and biologicals. Vitamin A supplementation (updated May 2003). Internet: http://www.who.int/vaccines/en/vitamina.shtml (accessed 9 September 2006).
  2. Ross DA. Recommendations for vitamin A supplementation. J Nutr 2002;131(suppl):2902S–6S.
  3. Wieringa FT, Dijkhuizen MA, West CE, Thurnham DI, Muhilal, Van der Meer Jos WN. Redistribution of vitamin A after iron supplementation in Indonesian infants. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:651–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bahl R, Bhandari N, Wahed MA, Kumar GT, Bhan MK; WHO/CHD Immunization-Linked Vitamin A Group. Vitamin A supplementation of women postpartum and of their infants at immunization alters breast milk retinol and infant vitamin A status. J Nutr 2002;132:3243–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rahman MM, Mahalanabis D, Wahed MA, Islam MA, Habte D. Administration of 25,000 IU vitamin A doses at routine immunisation in young infants. Eur J Clin Nutr 1995;49:439–45.[Medline]
  6. Sommer A, Davidson FR. Assessment and control of vitamin A deficiency: the Annecy accords. J Nutr 2002;132(suppl):2845S–50S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Baqui AH, de Francisco A, Arifeen SE, Siddique AK, Sack RB. Bulging fontanelle after supplementation with 25,000 IU of vitamin A in infancy using immunization contacts. Acta Paediatr 1995;84:863–6.[Medline]
  8. Malaba LC, Iliff PJ, Nathoo KJ, et al. Effect of postpartum maternal or neonatal vitamin A supplementation on infant mortality among infants born to HIV-negative mothers in Zimbabwe. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:454–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. West KP Jr, Katz J, Shrestha SR, et al. Mortality of infants <6 mo of age supplemented with vitamin A: a randomized, double-masked trial in Nepal. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62:143–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. WHO/CHD Immunization-Linked Vitamin A Supplementation Study Group. Randomized trial to assess benefits and safety of vitamin A supplementation linked to immunisation in early infancy. Lancet 1998;352:1257–63.[Medline]
  11. Rahmathullah L, Tielsch JM, Thulasiraj RD, et al. Impact of supplementing newborn infants with vitamin A on early infant mortality: community based randomised trial in southern India. BMJ 2003;327:254–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Humphrey JH, Agoestina T, Wu L, et al. Impact on neonatal vitamin A supplementation on infant morbidity and mortality. J Pediatr 1996;128:489–96.[Medline]
  13. Haskell M, Handelman G, Peerson J, et al. Assessment of vitamin A status by the deuterated-retinol-dilution technique and comparison with hepatic vitamin A concentration in Bangladeshi surgical patients. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;66:67–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Tanumihardjo SA. Assessing vitamin A status: past, present and future. J Nutr 2004;134(suppl):290S–3S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Vitamin A Tracer Task Force. Appropriate uses of vitamin A tracer (stable isotope) methodology. Washington, DC: ILSI Human Nutrition Institute, 2004.
  16. Penniston KL, Valentine AR, Tanumihardjo SA. A theoretical increase in infants' hepatic vitamin A is realized using a supplemented lactating sow model. J Nutr 2003;133:1139–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Penniston KL, Tanumihardjo SA. Elevated serum concentrations of ß-glucuronide metabolites and 4-oxoretinol in lactating sows after treatment with vitamin A: a model for evaluating supplementation in lactating women. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:851–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Valentine AR, Tanumihardjo SA. One-time vitamin A supplementation of lactating sows enhances hepatic retinol in their offspring independent of dose size. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:427–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Valentine AR, Tanumihardjo SA. Adjustments to the modified relative dose response (MRDR) test for assessment of vitamin A status minimize the blood volume used in piglets. J Nutr 2004;134:1186–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Surles RL, Li J, Tanumihardjo SA. The modified-relative-dose-response values in serum and milk are positively correlated over time in lactating sows with adequate vitamin A status. J Nutr 2006;136:939–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Darroch CS. Vitamin A in swine nutrition. In: Lewis AJ, Southern LL, eds. Swine nutrition. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001:263–80.
  22. Book SA, Bustad LK. The fetal and neonatal pig in biomedical research. J Anim Sci 1974;38:997–1002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Mount LE. The climatic physiology of the pig. London, United Kingdom: Edward Arnold Ltd, 1968.
  24. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (last updated 2000). Internet: www.cdc.gov/growthcharts (accessed 22 September 2006).
  25. Benn CS, Martins C, Rodrigues A, Jensen H, Lisse IM, Aaby P. Randomised study of effect of different doses of vitamin A on childhood morbidity and mortality. BMJ 2005;331:1428–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Semba RD, Munasir Z, Akib A, et al. Integration of vitamin A supplementation with the Expanded Programme on Immunization: lack of impact on morbidity or infant growth. Acta Paediatr 2001;90:1107–11.[Medline]
  27. Haskell MJ, Pandey P, Graham JM, Peerson JM, Shrestha RK, Brown KH. Recovery from impaired dark adaptation in nightblind pregnant Nepali women who receive small daily doses of vitamin A as amaranth leaves, carrots, goat liver, vitamin A–fortified rice, or retinyl palmitate. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:461–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Katz J, West KP Jr, Khatry SK, et al. Maternal low-dose vitamin A or ß-carotene supplementation has no effect on fetal loss and early infant mortality: a randomized cluster trial in Nepal. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71:1570–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Schmidt MK, Muslimatun S, West CE, Schultink W, Hautvast JGAJ. Vitamin A and iron supplementation of Indonesian pregnant women benefits vitamin A status of their infants. Br J Nutr 2001;86:607–15.[Medline]
  30. Suharno D, West CE, Muhilal, Karyadi D, Hautvast JGAJ. Supplementation with vitamin A and iron for nutritional anaemia in pregnant women in West Java, Indonesia. Lancet 1993;342:1325–8.[Medline]
  31. Van den Broek NR, White SA, Flowers C, et al. Randomised trial of vitamin A supplementation in pregnant women in rural Malawi found to be anaemic on screening by HemoCue. BJOG 2006;113:569–76.[Medline]
  32. Tanumihardjo SA. Vitamin A and iron status are improved by vitamin A and iron supplementation in pregnant Indonesian women. J Nutr 2002;132:1909–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Mills JP, Terasawa E, Tanumihardjo SA. Excessive preformed vitamin A intake by mothers amplifies early fetal liver retinyl ester storage in captive Old World monkeys. Comp Med (in press).
  34. Paik J, Vogel S, Quadro L, et al. Vitamin A: overlapping delivery pathways to tissues from the circulation. J Nutr 2004;134(suppl):276S–80S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Humphrey JH, West KP Jr, Muhilal, See LC, Natadisastra G, Sommer A. A priming dose of oral vitamin A given to preschool children may extend protection conferred by subsequent large dose of vitamin A. J Nutr 1993;123:1363–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Tchum SK, Tanumihardjo SA, Newton S, et al. Evaluation of vitamin A supplementation regimens in Ghanaian postpartum mothers using the modified-relative-dose-response test. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:1344–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Green MH, Green JB, Lewis KC. Variation in retinol utilization rate with vitamin A status in the rat. J Nutr 1987;117:694–703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Davis CR, Jing H, Howe JA, Rocheford T, Tanumihardjo SA. Comparing the vitamin A bioefficacy of ß-cryptoxanthin to ß-carotene from supplements and maize in Mongolian gerbils. FASEB J 2007;21:A351 (abstr).
  39. Idindili B, Masanja H, Urassa H, et al. Randomized controlled safety and efficacy trial of 2 vitamin A supplementation schedules in Tanzanian infants. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:1312–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Stephensen CB. Vitamin A, infection, and immune function. Annu Rev Nutr 2001;21:167–92.[Medline]
  41. Iliff PJ, Humphrey JH, Mahomva AI, et al. Tolerance of large doses of vitamin A given to mothers and their babies shortly after delivery. Nutr Res 1999;19:1437–46.
  42. Humphrey JH, Agoestina T, Juliana A, et al. Neonatal vitamin A supplementation: effect on development and growth at 3 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;68:109–17.[Abstract]
  43. Humphrey JH, Iliff PJ, Marinda ET, et al. Effects of a single large dose of vitamin A, given during the postpartum period to HIV-positive women and their infants, on child HIV infection, HIV-free survival, and mortality J Infect Dis 2006;193:756–9.
  44. Howe JA, Tanumihardjo SA. Carotenoid-biofortified maize maintains adequate vitamin A status in Mongolian gerbils. J Nutr 2006;136:2562–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Howe JA, Tanumihardjo SA. Evaluation of analytical methods for carotenoid extraction from biofortified maize (Zea mays sp. ). J Ag Food Chem 2006;54:7992–7.
  46. van Jaarsveld PJ, Faber M, Tanumihardjo SA, Nestel P, Lombard CJ, Benade AJ. ß-Carotene-rich orange-fleshed sweet potato improves the vitamin A status of primary school children assessed with the modified-relative-dose-response test. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:1080–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication November 29, 2006. Accepted for publication June 7, 2007.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. L. Escaron, M. H. Green, and S. A. Tanumihardjo
Plasma turnover of 3,4-didehydroretinol (vitamin A2) increases in vitamin A-deficient rats fed low versus high dietary fat
J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2009; 50(4): 694 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
T. Sun, R. L. Surles, and S. A. Tanumihardjo
Vitamin A Concentrations in Piglet Extrahepatic Tissues Respond Differently Ten Days after Vitamin A Treatment
J. Nutr., June 1, 2008; 138(6): 1101 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Surles, R. L
Right arrow Articles by Tanumihardjo, S. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Surles, R. L
Right arrow Articles by Tanumihardjo, S. A
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Surles, R. L
Right arrow Articles by Tanumihardjo, S. A

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS