|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION |
1 From the Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, United Kingdom (HMM, FEM, and DMR); the Centre for Nutrition and Food Safety, School of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom (SAL-N); the Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom (WDF); and the Rheumatic Diseases Unit, Molecular Medicine Centre, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom (SHR)
2 Any views expressed are those of the authors. 3 Supported by the UK Food Standards Agency (N 05043) and the Arthritis Research Campaign for continuing infrastructure support (DMR). 4 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to HM Macdonald, Osteoporosis Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom. E-mail: h.macdonald{at}abdn.ac.uk.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: We investigated the relation between dietary vitamin K1 intake, APOE polymorphisms, and markers of bone health.
Design: We measured bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) in a cohort of Scottish women aged 49–54 y in 1990–1994 (baseline) and in 1997–2000 (visit 2). At visit 2, bone markers (urinary pyridinoline crosslinks and serum N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen) were measured, 3199 women completed a food-frequency questionnaire, and 2721 women were genotyped for APOE.
Results: Compared with quartile 3 (Q3) of energy-adjusted vitamin K1 intake (
: 116 µg/d), women in the lowest quartile (
: 59 µg/d) had lower BMD (analysis of variance; FN, Q1: 0.831 ± 0.122 g/cm2; Q3: 0.850 ± 0.126 g/cm2; P < 0.001; LS, Q1: 1.000 ± 0.170 g/cm2; Q3: 1.020 ± 0.172 g/cm2; P = 0.009), remaining significant at the FN after adjustment for age, weight, height, menopausal status or use of hormone replacement therapy, socioeconomic status, and physical activity (P = 0.04). Vitamin K1 intake was associated with reduced concentrations of pyridinoline crosslinks (Q1: 5.4 ± 2.0 nmol/mmol; Q4: 5.1 ± 1.9 nmol/mmol; P = 0.003). Carriers of the E2 allele had greater LS BMD at visit 2 and lost less BMD than did carriers of the E4 allele (E2: –0.50 ± 1.22%/y; E4: –0.71 ± 1.17%/y; P = 0.05). After adjustment for confounders, the P value for BMD loss (0.03 for LS and 0.04 for FN) did not reach the level of significance required for multiple testing (P = 0.012). No interaction was observed between dietary vitamin K and APOE on BMD.
Conclusions: Vitamin K1 intake was associated with markers of bone health, but no interaction was observed with APOE alleles on BMD or markers of bone turnover.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nutrient interactions were reported between alcohol intake and APOE genotype on LDL concentrations (19) and between polyunsaturated fatty acid intake and APOA1 genotype on HDL cholesterol (20). Yan et al (21) showed that higher concentrations of vitamin K1 were associated with E4 genotype in older persons in China and the United Kingdom. However, to the best of our knowledge, no one has specifically tested for an interaction between APOE genotype and dietary vitamin K in relation to bone health. The aim of this study was to determine whether APOE polymorphisms and dietary intake of vitamin K1 are associated with markers of bone health in Scottish early postmenopausal women and whether there is an interaction between the vitamin K1 intake and APOE genotype on early postmenopausal bone loss.
| SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The women were weighed on both occasions wearing light clothing and no shoes on a set of balance scales (Seca, Hamburg, Germany) calibrated to 0.05 kg. Height and sitting height were measured with a stadiometer (Holtain Ltd, Crymych, United Kingdom). Information was collected on general health (whether the subject had a disease), smoking (past, current, and never and how many cigarettes were smoked over how many years), menopausal status (regularity of menstrual periods or date of last menstrual period), and use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT; times started and stopped therapy) and other medication (what medication was currently being taken). Written informed consent was obtained for all the women, and the study was approved by Grampian Research Ethics Committee.
Genotyping
Genomic DNA was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the use of the Qiagen Taq polymerase system and primers APOE forward (AGA CGC GGG CAC GGC TGT) and APOE reverse (CTC GCG GAT GGC GCT GAG). The reaction mixture consisted of 2.5 µL 10x Q buffer, 2 µL deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates at 2.5 mmol/L each, 5 µL of Q solution, 0.5 µL of each forward and reverse primer (10 µmol/L), 0.125 µL Q Taq (5 uµl–1) and 2.5 µL genomic DNA 20 ng µL–1 made up to 25 µL with 11.875 µL sterile water. The samples were thermocycled on a DYAD DNA Engine (MJ Research Inc, Waltham, MA) as follows: denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 50 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 62 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s with a final extension cycle of 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR product (6 µL) was cleaned to remove any unused deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates and primers that would interfere in the sequencing reaction with the use of ExoSAP-IT (USB Corp, Cleveland, OH), which contains exonuclease 1 and shrimp alkaline phosphatase. The samples were labeled for sequencing by adding 2 µL of DYEnamicET terminator reagent premix (Amersham Biosciences, Amersham, United Kingdom) and 1 µL of the forward primer (2.5 mmol/L) to each aliquot of 7 µL of purified PCR product and then cycled for 31 cycles by the following steps: 95 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 15 s, and 65 °C for 1 min. The labeled PCR products were ethanol-precipitated. The sequencing reactions were analyzed on the Amersham Biosciences MegaBACE 1000 DNA Analysis System with the use of downstream base caller (Cimarron 3.12), and the base-called sequences were viewed with the use of the SEQ MAN II expert sequence analysis software (version 5.07; DNASTAR Inc, Madison, WI). The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were called individually from the sequence and analyzed according to the genotype of the SNPs situated in the codons at amino acid positions 112 and 158. Both SNPs had C/T base changes with TGC coding for cysteine and CGC coding for arginine. For E3 there is a cysteine in position 112 and arginine in position 158; E2 has a cysteine in both positions; and E4 has an arginine in both positions.
Markers of bone health
BMD of the left femoral neck (FN) and lumbar spine (LS; L2–L4) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. At baseline all women were measured on the same Norland scanner (Cooper Surgical Inc, Trumbull, CT). At follow-up, most of the women were scanned again with the use of a Norland XR26; however, 12% of women had measurements on the XR36 model. Because the XR36 machine gave slightly higher readings (1.258%), a correction factor was applied to bring these measurements in line with the XR26 measurements. A second, early morning fasting urine sample, collected 2 h after first void, was provided at the second visit only for analysis of free pyridinoline (fPYD) crosslinks and free deoxypyridinoline (fDPD) crosslinks by HPLC (23, 24). Creatinine was measured in urine by standard automated techniques (Roche, Lewes, United Kingdom), and results were expressed as fPYD/creatinine and fDPD/creatinine (in nmol/mmol). Serum N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen was measured with the use of an enzyme chemiluminescent immunoassay supplied by Roche Products Ltd (Penzberg, Germany) (25).
Diet and physical activity
Dietary assessment was made at the follow-up visit with the use of an FFQ that was validated with the use of 7-d weighed intakes [correlation coefficients (r) ranging from 0.31 for vitamin D, 0.40 for iron, 0.66 for phosphorus, 0.52 for calcium, 0.78 for potassium, 0.61 for protein, 0.81 for vitamin C, and 0.82 for fiber, with 45–90% correctly classified to within 1 quintile] (26) and serum concentrations of antioxidants (r = 0.14 for vitamin A and 0.42 for vitamin C, with 68–89% of subjects correctly classified within 1 tertile) (27). A subgroup of women (n = 898) also completed the same FFQ at baseline. For most women there was little change in nutrient intake, although mean (±SD) energy intake had decreased from 8.1 ± 1.2 MJ/d to 7.7 ± 1.1 MJ/d (28). Vitamin K1 concentrations were obtained by analyzing the FFQ with the use of a UK database, compiled by Bolton-Smith et al (29), which specifically detailed the vitamin K1 content of foods listed in our FFQ.
Physical activity levels (PALs) were obtained with the use of the same questions as used for the Scottish Heart Health Study (30). The PAL was calculated from the numbers of hours in a 24-h period doing heavy, moderate, or light activities and how many hours were spent sleeping or resting in bed. These questions were asked separately for working and nonworking days. PAL is normally defined as the ratio of energy expenditure divided by the basal metabolic rate, which is calculated from Schofield equations (31).
Statistical analysis
Analyses were performed with the use of SPSS version 14.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Dietary vitamin K1 intakes were adjusted for dietary energy intake by the residual method (32). Categorization of nutrient intake was carried out because this is a particularly appropriate method for analysis of FFQ data. For comparison of the 3 APOE alleles, the approach used by Corella et al (19) was adopted, which categorized the 6 possible genotypes for APOE into 3 groups as follows: carriers of E2 (E2/E2 and E2/E3), carriers of E4 (E4/E4 and E3/E4), and the E3/E3 genotype, omitting the E2/E4 genotype from the analysis (because this genotype could belong to either the E2 or the E4 carrier group). Because a number of independent tests were performed, this raises the possibility of false-positive associations. We took into account the correlation of the BMD sites (r = 0.66), and 6 tests resolve into 4.15 independent tests, so that a significance level of 0.012 would be equivalent to P = 0.05.
One-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA; with Scheffe post hoc test) and analysis of covariance (adjusting for confounding variables) were used to examine differences in characteristics and bone health indexes between different genotypes and quartiles of energy-adjusted dietary intake of vitamin K1. Chi-squared tests were used for categorical variables. Stepwise linear multiple regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors, including energy-adjusted dietary vitamin K1 as a continuous variable, of bone resorption markers and BMD. Dummy variables for menopausal status (premenopausal, perimenopausal, postmenopausal not using HRT, and postmenopausal with past use of HRT) were used to account for menopausal status or HRT use (with current HRT use as the reference). Interaction between genotype and vitamin K1 was tested by including the following variables in the general linear model: genotype (as carriers of the E2 allele compared with noncarriers of the E2 allele), energy-adjusted intake of vitamin K1, and an additional multiplicative term of genotype with energy-adjusted intake of vitamin K1. Estimated power was calculated with the use of the standardized β values obtained from the linear regression between the nutrient and BMD according to Luan et al (33).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subject characteristics
The women who were genotyped for ApoE (n = 2731) were not significantly different from women who were not genotyped (n = 1150) in terms of BMD measurements and dietary energy intake, but they were marginally younger (
± SD: 54.7 ± 2.2 y and 55.1 ± 2.3 y, respectively) and lighter (68.4 ± 12.7 kg and 69.9 ± 13.4 kg, respectively). No differences were observed in mean age, weight, height, and type of scanner used between carriers of the E2 allele, the E3/E3 genotype, and carriers of the E4 allele (Table 1
). The characteristics of subjects who had one copy each of the E2 and E4 alleles (n = 62) and who were excluded from further analysis were not significantly different from the other genotypes (data not shown).
|
Vitamin K
For the subset of women that completed the FFQ on both occasions (n = 898), no change was observed in mean (±SD) vitamin K1 intakes between baseline (100 ± 39µg/d) and visit 2 (103 ± 44 µg/d; P = 0.31). The vitamin K1 intake of the women who completed the FFQ at the second visit only was significantly greater at 109 ± 55 µg/d (P = 0.01). This may be explained by the former group being younger (mean age at baseline: 47.6 ± 1.5 y compared with 48.8 ± 2.51 y; P < 0.01) because the women were selected because they were premenopausal and also had no medical condition and were not taking any medication known to affect bone metabolism. When the groups were combined, mean daily vitamin K1 intake (at visit 2) was 107 ± 50 µg, ranging from 8 µg to 494 µg.
Vitamin K1 and markers of health
A significant association was observed between energy-adjusted intake of vitamin K1 and both BMD and markers of bone resportion (Table 2
). BMD was found to be lower in the lowest quartile of energy-adjusted intake of vitamin K1 (daily vitamin K1 intake: 64 ± 14 µg, energy-adjusted intake; 59 ± 17 µg, actual) than in the upper quartiles of vitamin K1 intake [daily vitamin K1 intake, quartile 3 (Q3): 124 ± 9 µg energy-adjusted, 116 ± 19 µg actual; Q4: 181 ± 55 µg energy-adjusted, 162 ± 57 µg actual] (ANOVA; second visit: P < 0.01 for FN BMD; P = 0.01 for LS BMD). Scheffe post hoc analysis showed significant differences between Q1 (0.83 ± 0.12 g/cm2) and Q3 (0.85 ± 0.13 g/cm2) (P = 0.01) and between Q2 (0.83 ± 0.12 g/cm2) and Q3 (P < 0.01) for FN and between Q2 (1.00 ± 0.16 g/cm2) and Q3 (1.02 ± 0.17 g/cm2) (P = 0.04) for LS. The same findings were observed if women who were scanned on the XR36 scanner were excluded or if women on warfarin treatment were excluded. The results were significant after adjustment for the following confounders: age, weight, height, smoking, socioeconomic status, menopausal status and use of HRT, and PAL at the hip but not at the spine (analysis of covariance; P = 0.04 for FN BMD; P = 0.38 for LS BMD) (Table 2
). With linear regression analysis, adjusting for confounders, energy-adjusted intake of vitamin K1 as a continuous variable was not found to be a predictor of either LS or FN BMD. Weight accounted for most of the variation of BMD (13.5%) followed by menopausal status (1.4%). For LS BMD, again, weight was the major predictor (11.3%) with menopausal status accounting for a further 3.7% variation. In total, the variables we tested accounted for 17–18% of the total variation of BMD.
|
Interaction between APOE and vitamin K1
No interaction was found between APOE genotype and dietary intake of vitamin K1 in regulating BMD or bone loss (BMD change: P = 0.76 for LS; P = 0.16 for FN). Postanalysis power was determined after excluding E2/E4 genotypes by comparing standardized β values between FN BMD change and energy-adjusted intake of vitamin K1 for carriers of the E2 allele and noncarriers of the E2 allele. For carriers of the E2 allele, the relation between FN BMD change and energy-adjusted intake of vitamin K1 was weakly positive (standardized β: 0.065), whereas for noncarriers of the E2 allele the relation was weakly negative (standardized β: –0.023). Power was calculated as 31.9% at the 5% significance level.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, our data suggest that vitamin K1 associations on bone health operate by a different mechanism from the trends seen with APOE. The association was between vitamin K1 and BMD (visit 2 and baseline) and bone markers and was not with a change in BMD. A 3-y vitamin K intervention study in healthy postmenopausal women saw a benefit at the FN only and no influence at the LS, which is consistent with our data (37). In a depletion-repletion study phylloquinone (vitamin K1) did not produce a marked effect on bone metabolism, although 450 µg (5–7 times adequate intake) resulted in a decrease in the bone resorption marker urine N-terminal telopeptide (38). We observed a significant difference in deoxypyridinoline markers between women with a low mean daily intake of vitamin K1 (59 µg) and women with a high mean intake (162 µg). For BMD, women with a low mean intake of vitamin K1 (59 µg/d) had a lower BMD than did women with a higher mean intake (116 µg/d), but BMD did not increase further for higher concentrations of vitamin K1 (mean intake: 162 µg/d). This, together with the observation that vitamin K1 as a continuous variable was not found to be a significant predictor of BMD, may suggest a threshold effect for this nutrient. A recent Danish study found no association between vitamin K1 intake and BMD or fracture risk in 1139 perimenopausal and postmenopausal women in whom mean intakes were estimated to be 60 µg/d (39). Although the scale of our findings was small, as is often the case for nutritional factors (2–3% BMD difference between Q1 and Q3 of vitamin K), it was 15% of the SD in BMD for this population. It is known that a 0.5-SD difference in BMD, if maintained into old age, could reflect a 30% reduction in fractures. Similarly, vitamin K intake accounted for 2–3% of the total variation in bone resorption markers, and there was a 5% difference in BMD between Q1 and Q4. We consider that the size of the effect, although modest, was biologically meaningful.
A study examining both British and Chinese populations found that the E4 allele was associated with higher plasma concentrations of vitamin K1 (and also lower concentrations of undercarboxylated osteocalcin in the Chinese population) compared with E2/3 or E3/3 genotypes (21). The mean daily intake of vitamin K1 in their UK population (103 µg) was similar to the mean intake in our study (107 µg), whereas vitamin K1 intake in their Chinese population was more than twice as much (247 µg/d). If, as has been hypothesized, the ApoE gene influences transport of vitamin K1, their study would indicate that E4 carriers had the advantage for bone health. This is the opposite of our own findings, whereby we found the E2 allele to be associated with reduced bone loss and again suggests that the influences of APOE and vitamin K on bone health are likely to be independent. The sample size in the study by Yan et al (21) was small (n = 132 in the United Kingdom; n = 177 in China) and included men and women, and it is possible that there may be sex differences in how APOE affects circulating vitamin K1.
We found no significant interaction between the ApoE genotype and vitamin K1 on BMD, although it is recognized that this analysis may be limited in terms of power. The observation that vitamin K1 and the APOE genotype affect different phenotypes (predominantly affecting different bone sites) and the trend observed with the APOE genotype was with bone loss, whereas for vitamin K1 it was with BMD and bone markers, suggest that the mechanisms behind the associations with markers of bone health are different for the APOE genotype and vitamin K1 intake. If nutrient interaction has masked the association of APOE with bone health, our data would not support that it is through vitamin K transport. Alternative hypotheses that could be explored include ApoE effects mediated through transport of fats or fat-soluble vitamins other than vitamin K such as vitamin A or vitamin D.
As with all observational studies that investigate diet, there will be some correlation between nutrients, and it is possible that vitamin K1 is simply a marker of green vegetable or overall nutritional intake. We previously reported an association with net endogenous acid production and BMD in premenopausal but not in early postmenopausal women (22). Prynne et al (40) found that fruit and vegetable intake was associated with the size-adjusted bone mineral content in postmenopausal women and concluded that it was not due to the acidity generated by the diet. We would concur that further research is required to determine which component in fruit and vegetables is responsible for better bone health.
A limitation of our study is that, because of its large size (essential for determining genetic effects on BMD), volunteers were seen throughout the day, and it was not possible to collect blood samples at a fixed time of day. The timing of sampling is crucial for measurements that are dependent on circadian rhythm, and, consequently, we have no measurements of circulating vitamin K or estimates of the ratio of carboxylated to undercarboxylated osteocalcin. A recent study of postmenopausal women in Ireland found that vitamin K1 was inversely related to undercarboxylated osteocalcin (41). That study found that the mean daily intake from food was 107 µg (with 44% coming from broccoli, cabbage, and lettuce), which is comparable to the mean intake of vitamin K1 of the women in our study.
A further limitation of our study is that we have only estimated vitamin K1. Evidence suggests that hydrogenation of vegetable oils produces a form of vitamin K that is not as well absorbed and is less active, which could influence the estimate of vitamin K obtained from spreadable fats (42). We do not have estimates of vitamin K2, although intakes of vitamin K2 are likely to be low in our population. In populations in which intakes of vitamin K2 are higher, through greater consumption of fermented foods (eg, in Japanese diets), these intakes still fall short of the amounts used in the vitamin K intervention studies that are published (up to several thousand-fold of what would be found in a normal diet) (13).
In conclusion, in this large cohort of well-characterized early postmenopausal women, dietary intake of vitamin K1 was associated with several markers of bone health. No interaction was observed between dietary vitamin K and APOE alleles on BMD or biochemical markers of bone turnover. Although advice about dietary guidelines is premature, these data add to the evidence that a healthy diet, which includes green vegetables, would appear to benefit bone.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The author's responsibilities were as follows—HMM: carried out the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript; FEM: was responsible for the genotyping and wrote the manuscript; SAL-N: was involved in the design of the baseline dietary study and critically reviewed the manuscript; WDF: provided the bone marker results and critically reviewed the manuscript; SHR: gave advice on genetic aspects of the study, interpreted the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript; DMR: was responsible for the study design of APOSS and critically reviewed the manuscript. None of the authors had a financial or commercial interest in any company or organization sponsoring the research for this study.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |