|
|
||||||||
Beyond Cholesterol: Prevention and Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease with n–3 Fatty Acids |
1 From the Office of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, the Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
2 Presented at the symposium "Beyond Cholesterol: Prevention and Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease with n–3 Fatty Acids," held in New York, NY, June 9, 2007. 3 Address reprint requests and correspondence to TA Jacobson, Emory University Faculty Office Building, 49 Jesse Hill Jr Drive SE, Atlanta, GA 30303. E-mail: tjaco02{at}emory.edu.
ABSTRACT
n–3 Fatty acids (FAs) when used in doses of 3–4 g/d eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid have profound effects on triacylglycerol (TG) concentrations. The mechanism for their TG reduction relates to their favorable effects on reducing hepatic production and secretion of VLDL and VLDL apolipoprotein B particles, along with favorable effects on plasma lipolytic activity through lipoprotein lipase–mediated clearance, as well as stimulation of β-oxidation of other FAs in the liver. Their hypotriglyceridemic properties are related to both the dose of n–3 FAs used and the baseline TG concentrations of the population. In patients with TG concentrations >500 mg/dL, 4 g n–3 FAs have been shown to reduce TGs by 45%, VLDL by 42%, and non-HDL by 10.2%. A recent pooled meta-analysis with multiple doses of n–3 FAs ranging from 0.8 to 5.4 g revealed changes in TGs of –27 mg/dL (95% CI: –33, –20), in HDL of +1.6 mg/dL (95% CI: + 0.8, +2.3), and in LDL cholesterol of +6 mg/dL (95% CI: + 3, +8). The clinical uses of n–3 FAs include treatment of severe and moderate hypertriglyceridemia, use in statin-treated patients with elevated TG concentrations or non–HDL cholesterol (mixed hyperlipidemia), and use in the secondary and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Existing large-scale clinical trials such as the GISSI-Prevenzione Study and JELIS with low doses of n–3 FAs (1–2 g) show clinical benefit in reducing coronary heart disease without substantial changes in concentrations of TGs or other lipids. Future clinical trials need to determine whether the TG-lowering doses of n–3 FAs (3-4 g/d) result in additional risk reduction.
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
One of the earliest observations made by Bang and Dyerberg in the 1970s (1-3) was that Greenland Inuits had lower rates of heart disease than Danes despite a diet high in fats and cholesterol. It was also noted that Inuits consumed high amounts of long chain n–3 fatty acids (i.e.- 5–10 g) and had lower intakes of n–6 fatty acids.
Major differences in lipids characterized by low concentrations of triacylglycerols (TGs) and higher concentrations of HDL cholesterol were noted in the Inuits compared with the Danes (4). It was hypothesized that the high concentrations of n–3 fatty acids (FAs) found in fish might have potent hypolipidemic effects, particularly that of lowering TG and VLDL cholesterol concentrations. In the early 1980s it was confirmed that the active compounds in fish responsible for the potent hypotriglyceridemic effects were the long-chain polyunsaturated n–3 FAs, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, C20:5n–3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, C22:6n–3) (5).
n–3 FAs AND TG CONCENTRATIONS: DOSE RESPONSE
Early controlled feeding studies used supraphysiologic doses of n–3 FAs (20–25 g) to lower TG concentrations. In healthy volunteers TG reductions of 33% were seen (6) versus 65% reductions in patients with severe combined dyslipidemia (7). The dose often used in these early studies was 100 mL of salmon oil plus 2 salmon steaks per day. Further studies followed to determine a more reasonable and practical n–3 FA dose for clinical usage. These studies suggested that the determinants of TG reduction were based on both the total n–3 FA dosage as well as on the baseline TG concentration.
Several meta-analyses have been conducted to determine the degree of TG reductions seen with n–3 FAs. In a meta-analysis of 72 placebo-controlled trials, Harris (8) determined that average triacylglycerol reductions with fixed doses of 3–4 g EPA and DHA were between 25% and 35%, with greater reductions seen in those with high TG concentrations of >500 mg/dL (Figure 1
). It was also shown that at higher TG concentrations there were small increases in LDL of 5–10% and increases in HDL cholesterol of 1–3%.
|
8 mg/dL. For each mean increase in baseline TGs of 100 mg/dL, there was a decrease in TGs of an additional 16 mg/dL. Fish oil dose and baseline TG concentrations interacted with each other, so that those with both high baseline TGs (ie, >294 mg/dL) had greater TG reduction (–19 mg/dL compared with –8 mg/dL) per additional 1 g fish oil.
Several studies suggested that clinically significant TG reductions do not occur until the n–3 FA dose exceeds 2 g/d, generally in the range of 3–4 g/d. The practical implication of this finding is that to obtain clinically significant TG reductions consumption of 12–15 tablets of standard n–3 FA dietary supplements (i.e., 300–400 mg EPA or DHA per tablet) would be required. Because of the high pill burden, a prescription with superconcentrated n–3 FAs containing 900 mg/dL EPA and DHA was designed to lower TG concentrations and also to ensure the quality, purity, consistency, and safety (mercury free) of n–3 FA therapy. The prescription n–3 FA (Lovaza; Reliant Pharmaceuticals, Liberty Corner, NJ) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2004 for the treatment of very high TG concentrations (>500 mg/dL) at a dose of 4 g/d. As with nonprescription n–3 FA therapy, doses at
3 g are required to lower TGs in patients with TG concentrations between 200 and 499 mg/dL (Figure 2
) (11). A caveat of these dose-response studies with n–3 FAs is that it is unlikely that a diet rich in daily fish intake is likely to significantly reduce TG concentrations. However, there are clearly other cardiovascular benefits of fish consumption that occur at lower intakes, on the average of 250–500 mg/d EPA and DHA (12).
|
Chylomicrons and postprandial lipid changes
Several studies suggested that n–3 FAs reduce postprandial excursion of TG concentrations after a fatty meal (13-15). This effect seems to occur only after a few weeks of pre-feeding with n–3 FAs. One study showed a reduction by 31% in TG excursion with given test meals (16). Of major interest is the fact that a dose as low as 1 g/d has been shown to reduce postprandial hyperlipemia (17, 18). It still remains to be determined whether reducing postprandial lipemia reduces coronary heart disease (CHD) risk.
LDL cholesterol
Unlike n–6 FAs that can reduce LDL cholesterol, n–3 FAs can increase LDL concentrations particularly in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia. A pooled analysis of 2 studies with 4 g prescription n–3 FAs in severe hypertriglyceridemia (TG concentration >500 mg/dL) showed not only a 45% reduction in TGs from a baseline of 816 mg/dL, but a 45% increase in LDL cholesterol from a baseline of 89 mg/dL (Figure 3
) (19, 20). This modest rise in LDL cholesterol has also been seen in studies in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia receiving gemfibrozil and fenofibrate (21). The rise in LDL probably reflects more of an increase in LDL particle size rather than an increase in LDL particle number. This theory is supported by significant reductions in non–HDL cholesterol by 13.8% and modest reductions in apolipoprotein (apo) B (Figure 3
). Most of the available data suggest that n–3 FAs increase LDL particle size by decreasing small dense LDL (pattern B) and increasing the concentrations of the larger LDL cholesterol (pattern A) (22, 23). The major driver in shifting from the smaller, more dense LDL to the larger LDL particle is the TG concentration achieved as opposed to the percentage of TG reduction. Concentrations of TGs <150 mg/dL are associated with the greatest degree of conversion from LDL subclass pattern B to A.
|
|
In patients with very high TG concentrations of >500 mg/dL, a pooled analysis with 4 g/d suggested increases in HDL of 13% (Figure 4
) (27). Few data exist for raising low concentrations of HDL <40 mg/dL. Most of the HDL increases are of the HDL2-cholesterol subfraction (22). A kinetic study with use of 4 g n–3 FAs in viscerally obese men with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia revealed both slowed production and slowed clearance of apo A-I, resulting in little net change in HDL cholesterol (28).
MECHANISTIC STUDIES OF n–3 FAs ON LIPOPROTEIN METABOLISM
Several theories have been proposed to explain the mechanism of action of n–3 FAs in reducing TG concentrations in humans. Many of the explanations have been derived from rodent experiments. Three potential mechanisms of TG lowering are summarized in Table 1
and Figure 5
. Of the postulated mechanisms, the strongest evidence is for reduced hepatic lipogenesis or, more specifically, reduced hepatic production and secretion of VLDL TGs.
|
|
|
Stimulation of FA oxidation
n–3 FAs also appear to increase the β-oxidation of other FAs in the liver (29). The processes of TG biosynthesis compete with the processes of in vivo FA oxidation for the use of FAs as substrates. This increased rate of FA oxidation occurs primarily in the mitochondria but may also occur in peroxisomes. n–3 FAs also affect the nuclear transcription factor, peroxisome proliferation–activated receptor (PPAR)-
, responsible for fatty acid oxidation in the peroxisomes, microsomes, and mitochondria (30, 31). Activation of PPAR-
has also been associated with reductions in apo CIII and induction of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity. Although PPAR-
activation would seem to be an important mechanism of action for TG reduction, n–3 FAs are only weak PPAR agonists (34). In addition, in PPAR-
knockout mice, n–3 FAs still show significant TG reduction (35). However, metabolites of n–3 FA such as eicosanoids or oxidized FAs derived from EPA have several orders of magnitude higher affinity for the PPAR-
receptor than the parent molecule (34).
LPL-mediated clearance
n–3 FAs may also increase plasma lipolytic activity (ie, LPL) and thus TG clearance rates. The lipolytic activity of non–heparin-stimulated plasma is enhanced by n–3 FAs (36, 37). However, most studies with postheparin plasma show no effect of n–3 FAs (38). One exception is the study of Khan et al (39), which showed increased LPL concentrations and increased LPL gene expression in adipose tissue. Although kinetic studies fail to show an increase in VLDL clearance with n–3 FAs (32), VLDL particles rich in n–3 are more susceptible to in vitro lipase-mediated conversion to LDL than controls (29, 40, 41).
CLINICAL TRIALS AND n–3 FAs: MAJOR CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES
Although many trials have contributed to our current knowledge base about n–3 FAs, several recent trials (42) stand out as significant in influencing current evidence-based treatment guidelines. Of note, the 2 most important cardiovascular outcome trials [Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI)-Prevenzione Study and the Japan EPA Lipid Intervention Study (JELIS)] used n–3 FAs doses in the range of 0.8–1.8 g. These doses would not be considered sufficient to lower TG concentrations or to improve other lipid parameters.
GISSI-Prevenzione Study
In the GISSI-Prevenzione Study (43, 44) 1 g EPA/DHA from fish oil was used in patients who had had a myocardial infarction (MI) in the prior 3 mo. In brief, 11 234 Italian patients with recent MI (<3 mo) were randomly assigned to 0.85 g/d EPA and DHA for 3.5 y and had a significant reduction of 21% in total mortality and a 45% reduction in sudden death by study end (Table 2
, Figure 7
). Analysis of secondary endpoints revealed a 21% reduction in relative risk of total mortality as early as 3 mo after treatment initiation, an effect attributable largely to the reduction in sudden death (44). The primary combined endpoint of death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke was significantly reduced by 15% (95% CI: 2–26%) with n–3 FA treatment. There was an insignificant change in the relative risk of nonfatal MI (0.86; 95% CI: 0.70–1.18) and nonfatal stroke (1.22: 95% CI: 0.75–1.97). During the trial, the changes in lipids were fairly minimal as expected, owing to the low dose of n–3 FAs used. Thus the mechanism of benefit appears to be independent of lipid changes (Figure 8
). Because of the rapid time course in the reduction of CHD and total mortality, it was hypothesized that at these n–3 FA doses the primary mechanism of benefit was from their antiarrhythmic effects, resulting in a large reduction in sudden death. However, this was a post hoc finding and needs to be confirmed prospectively. Although the GISSI-Prevenzione Study was a landmark trial owing to its sheer number of post-MI patients (n = 11 234), it did have a few methodologic weaknesses, including the use of a usual care control group instead of a placebo control group and an open-label design.
|
|
|
5% (P < 0.001), the results appeared to be independent of lipid mechanisms. In JELIS, the trends in the reduction of the incidence of unstable angina and nonfatal coronary events suggest that important plaque-stabilizing properties may also be involved with n–3 FA therapy. The benefits of therapy appeared to be related most to the underlying risk of the population. When the primary prevention population in JELIS was compared with the secondary prevention population, the number needed to treat to prevent one event over 4.6 y was 333 versus 50 in secondary prevention patients (46). Thus, although there was benefit in primary prevention patients, many more patients would need to be treated to prevent one event. Thus, the benefits of n–3 FA therapy in a low-risk population consuming high amounts of n–3 may be quite small. In interpreting JELIS, it is important to realize that the benefit seen was in addition to the benefit from statin therapy in a population already consuming high amounts of n–3 FAs. The absence of a reduction in CHD death and total mortality in JELIS is supported by the theory that there may be a threshold of benefit in a population already consuming large amounts of n–3 FAs (12).
|
|
Hypertriglyceridemia—TG concentration >500 mg/dL
The major indication in the United States for prescription n–3 FAs is their use in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia of >500 mg/dL. These patients are at increased risk of pancreatitis and CHD. As noted earlier, the dosage usually required to obtain significant TG reduction is generally >2 g/d, and for most patients the full dose of 4 g/d is required. Although other TG-lowering therapies such as niacin or fibrates can also be used in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, n–3 FAs have particular advantages in that they have very few known drug interactions and need no additional laboratory monitoring. They are generally free of cytochrome P450 interactions and thus are unlikely to affect other medications metabolized by the cytochrome P450 system including statins. Occasionally, abnormalities in liver function tests occur, but these generally are reversible and transient. The degree of TG reduction depends on both the baseline TG concentration and the dose of EPA/DHA used. Although prolongation of bleeding time was reported in prior n–3 FA studies, no evidence of clinically important bleeding has been reported in pooled data or in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass or coronary angioplasty (47). Most n–3 FA studies were done in patients using other antiplatelet or anticlotting agents, including aspirin. Few data, however, are available in the poststent era for patients taking both aspirin and clopidogrel.
The efficacy of n–3 FAs in lowering TGs in patients with TG concentrations >500 mg is a 45% reduction in TG, a non-HDL reduction of 13.8%, an HDL elevation of 9.1%, and an elevation in LDL of 45% (Figure 3
). The LDL elevation accompanying n–3 FA therapy reflects a conversion of large TGs to the larger pattern A LDL particles. In some cases pattern B or more dense LDL particles may be reduced particularly with larger TG reductions. Of note, the rise in LDL and the shift toward large-density pattern A particles depends on the TG concentration achieved. Achievement of lower TG concentrations is often associated with even greater improvements in LDL particle size. n–3 FAs may also be used safely with other TG-lowering therapies including fibrates, niacin, and statins.
Hypertriglyceridemia—TG concentration >200–499 mg/dL
Although currently prescription n–3 FAs are not Food and Drug Administration–approved for patients with TG concentrations between 200 and 499 mg/dL, their use in this population represents an alternative treatment modality to existing drugs that lower TG concentrations including fibrates, niacin, and statins. Their efficacy in lowering TGs is
25–30% in patients with TG concentrations between 200 and 499 mg/dL. When they are used at 4 g in this population, there are generally insignificant changes in LDL, HDL, and non–HDL cholesterol. According to the National Cholesterol Education Program III guidelines, Non–HDL cholesterol represents the secondary target of treatment in patients with TG concentrations of > 200 mg/dL (48).
Combination therapy with other lipid-lowering drugs
Clinically, one of the most important uses of prescription n–3 FAs will be in combination with other lipid-lowering drugs. Frequently, many patients with elevated TG concentrations of >500 mg/dL will require combinations of lipid-lowering drugs including fibrates, niacin, statins, and n–3 FAs. n–3 FAs are particularly attractive in combination therapy because of their lack of side effects and lack of drug interactions.
Mixed hyperlipidemia (elevated LDL and TG concentrations)—combination n–3 FAs and statins
Because statins have the best evidence base for CHD risk reduction in patients with LDL elevations, they are currently the most prescribed lipid-lowering medication. However, many statin-treated patients, even at National Cholesterol Education Program LDL goal, may still have uncontrolled TG concentrations, elevated non–HDL cholesterol concentrations, or low concentrations of HDL. These other lipid abnormalities still contribute to residual CHD risk and are important additional targets of therapy. Recent data suggest that patients receiving statins whose TG concentrations remain between 200 and 499 mg/dL will have further TG and non-HDL concentration reductions with prescription n–3 FAs (Figure 4
). A recent trial combining 4 g prescription n–3 FAs with 40 mg simvastatin showed placebo-corrected median reductions in TGs by 23.2%, non–HDL cholesterol by 6.8%, and apo B by 2.3%. In this study called the Combination of Prescription n–3 with Simvastatin Study (COMBOS) (26), there were also small placebo-corrected increases in HDL by 4.6% and LDL by 3.5%. Overall, the combination was well tolerated, with significant improvements in TG and non–HDL cholesterol concentrations over use of simvastatin alone.
CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF n–3 FA THERAPY: BEYOND TG REDUCTIONS
CHD prevention: secondary prevention
One of the major recommendations for the use of n–3 FA is in secondary prevention. These recommendations go beyond the effects of n–3 FAs on concentrations of TGs or other lipids. Several national recommendations exist for the usage of n–3 FAs in secondary prevention. The American Heart Association (AHA) first recommended n–3 FAs in cardiovascular prevention in their Nutrition Advisory Committee's Recommendation on Fish Oils and n–3 Fatty Acids in Cardiovascular Disease (Table 4
). Their recommendation was that patients with documented CHD consume about 1 g of EPA and DHA/d, preferably from oily fish or through EPA and DHA supplementation from fish oils (49). This recommendation was reaffirmed in the 2006 AHA/ACC Guidelines for Secondary Prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular diseases (50). The 2006 AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention recommended that patients increase consumption of n–3 FAs in the form of fish or in capsule form (1g/d) for CHD risk reduction. These recommendations are based on the outcomes of the GISSI-Prevenzione Study.
|
-linolenic acid (flaxseed, canola, or soybean oils or flaxseed and walnuts). Of note,
-linolenic acid has little effect on TG concentrations even at high doses. For patients who do not eat fish, 1 g/d EPA/DHA from fish oil can be considered or plant-based n–3 FA sources (flaxseed, walnuts, soybean oil, and canola oil). Patients who try to get 1 g/d EPA/DHA from fish oil supplements will often require 3–4 capsules because most dietary fish oil supplements only contain 300 mg EPA/DHA. As discussed previously, this low dose of 1 g/d does not have significant effects on TG or other lipid concentrations. However, the JELIS trial supports the idea that low doses of n–3 FAs (<2 g/d) may reduce CHD risk in primary prevention patients even when combined with statin therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
n–3 FAs, when used in doses of 3–4 g/d EPA and DHA, have profound effects on TG concentrations. The mechanism for their TG reduction relates to their favorable effects on reducing hepatic production and secretion of VLDL and VLDL apo B particles, along with favorable effects on plasma lipolytic activity through LPL-mediated clearance, as well as stimulation of β-oxidation of other FAs in the liver. Their hypotriglyceridemic properties are related to both the dose of n–3 FAs used and the baseline TG concentrations of the population. The clinical uses of n–3 FA include the treatment of severe and moderate hypertriglyceridemia, use in statin-treated patients with elevated TGs or non–HDL cholesterol (mixed hyperlipidemia), and use in the secondary and primary prevention of CVD. Existing large-scale clinical trials such as the GISSI-Prevenzione Study and JELIS with low doses of n–3 FAs (1–2 g) show clinical benefit in reducing CHD without substantial changes in TGs or other lipids. Future clinical trials need to determine whether the TG-lowering doses of n–3 FAs (3-4 g/d) result in additional risk reduction.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank Richard Deckelbaum, MD, and Sharon Akabas PhD of the Institute of Human Nutrition at Columbia University (New York, NY) for organizing the symposium.
The author takes full responsibility for manuscript preparation. The author has served as a consultant to Reliant Pharmaceuticals and other manufacturers of lipid-lowering therapies and reports no other personal or financial conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
-3 fatty acids on the blood lipid composition in healthy human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 1981;34:1752–7.
-3 fatty acids on serum markers of cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review. Atherosclerosis 2006;189:19–30.[Medline]
-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular risk factors and intermediate markers of cardiovascular disease. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 93 (Prepared by Tufts-New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0022). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2004. [AHRQ Publication No. 04-E010-2.]
-3 fatty acids. J Lipid Res 1988;29:1451–60.[Abstract]
-3 fatty acids: an emerging therapy for combined hyperlipidemia. Future Lipidol 2006;1:579–91.
-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid concentrate administered for one year decreased triglycerides in simvastatin treated patients with coronary heart disease and persisting hypertriglyceridemia. Heart 2001;85:544–8.
-3 fatty acids 4 g/d to simvastatin 40 mg/d in hypertriglyceridemic patients: an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther 2007;29:1354–67.[Medline]
-3 fatty acids lower serum triglycerides? Curr Opin Lipidol 2006;17:387–93.[Medline]
-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;53:638–42.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. K. Duda, K. M. O'Shea, and W. C. Stanley {omega}-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation for the treatment of heart failure: mechanisms and clinical potential Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2009; 84(1): 33 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. C. Hanwell, C. D. Kay, J. W. Lampe, B. J. Holub, and A. M. Duncan Acute Fish Oil and Soy Isoflavone Supplementation Increase Postprandial Serum (n-3) Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Isoflavones but Do Not Affect Triacylglycerols or Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Overweight and Obese Hypertriglyceridemic Men J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1128 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Egert, F. Kannenberg, V. Somoza, H. F. Erbersdobler, and U. Wahrburg Dietary {alpha}-Linolenic Acid, EPA, and DHA Have Differential Effects on LDL Fatty Acid Composition but Similar Effects on Serum Lipid Profiles in Normolipidemic Humans J. Nutr., May 1, 2009; 139(5): 861 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hill, T. K. Gill, S. Appleton, L. G. Cleland, A. W. Taylor, and R. J. Adams The use of fish oil in the community: results of a population-based study Rheumatology, April 1, 2009; 48(4): 441 - 442. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J Deckelbaum, A. Leaf, D. Mozaffarian, T. A Jacobson, W. S Harris, and S. R Akabas Conclusions and recommendations from the symposium, Beyond Cholesterol: Prevention and Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease with n-3 Fatty Acids Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2008; 87(6): 2010S - 2012S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |