AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental data
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larrouy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Viguerie, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larrouy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Viguerie, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Larrouy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Viguerie, N.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 88, No. 1, 125-132, July 2008
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Gene expression profiling of human skeletal muscle in response to stabilized weight loss1,2,3

Dominique Larrouy1, Pierre Barbe1, Carine Valle1, Sébastien Déjean1, Véronique Pelloux1, Claire Thalamas1, Jean-Philippe Bastard1, Anne Le Bouil1, Bertrand Diquet1, Karine Clément1, Dominique Langin1 and Nathalie Viguerie1

1 From INSERM, U858, Obesity Research Laboratory, Institut de Médecine Moléculaire de Rangueil, Toulouse, France (D Larrouy, PB, CV, CT, D Langin, and NV); Paul Sabatier University, Louis Bugnard Institute IFR31, Toulouse, France (D Larrouy, PB, CV, CT, D Langin, and NV); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France (D Larrouy, PB, CV, CT, D Langin, and NV); CHU de Toulouse, Biochemistry Laboratory, Biology Institute of Purpan, Toulouse, France (D Langin); Toulouse Clinical Centre of Investigation, Toulouse, France (CT); INSERM U680, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, and Assistance Publique/Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Biochimie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (J-PB); Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse UMR 5219, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, Cedex 9, France (SD); Université d'Angers, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, pôle de Biologie, UF de Pharmacologie-Toxicologie, rue Larrey, Angers Cedex 09, France (ALB and BD); INSERM U872, Les Cordeliers, Eq 7 Nutriomique, Paris, France (VP and KC); Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6 University, UMRS 872, Paris, France (VP and KC); Paris Descartes University, UMRS 872, Paris, France (VP and KC); Assistance Publique/Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Nutrition and Endocrinology Department, Paris, France (VP and KC)

2 Supported by grants from INSERM (CIC-Merck Clinical Research Program to D Langin and PB), the Programme National de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine (to D Langin), the Programme National de Recherche sur le Diabète (to D Langin), the Agence National de la Recherche program on Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes and Obesity (FAIR project) (to D Langin), and the project "Hepatic and adipose tissue and functions in the metabolic syndrome" (HEPADIP; see http://www.hepadip.org/), which is supported by the European Commission as an Integrated Project under the 6th Framework Programme (contract LSHM-CT-2005-018734).

3 Address reprint requests and correspondence to N Viguerie, INSERM, U858, Obesity Research Laboratory, Institut de Médecine Moléculaire de Rangueil, Toulouse, F-31432 France. E-mail: viguenat{at}toulouse.inserm.fr.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background:Diet-induced weight reduction promotes a decrease in resting energy expenditure that could partly explain the difficulty in maintaining reduced body mass. Whether this reduction remains after stabilized weight loss is still controversial, and the molecular mechanisms are unknown.

Objective:The objective was to investigate the effect of a stabilized 10% weight loss on body composition, metabolic profile, and skeletal muscle gene expression profiling.

Design:Obese women were assigned to a 4-wk very-low-calorie diet, a 3–6-wk low-calorie diet, and a 4-wk weight-maintenance program to achieve a 10% weight loss. Resting energy expenditure, body composition, plasma variables, and skeletal muscle transcriptome were compared before weight loss and during stabilized weight reduction.

Results:Energy restriction caused an 11% weight loss. Stabilization to the new weight was accompanied by an 11% decrease in the resting metabolic rate normalized to the body cellular mass. A large number of genes were regulated with a narrow range of regulation. The main regulated genes were slow/oxidative fiber markers, which were overexpressed, and the gene encoding the glucose metabolism inhibitor PDK4, which tended to be down-regulated. The knowledge-based approach gene set enrichment analysis showed that a set of genes related to long-term calorie restriction was up-regulated, whereas sets of genes related to insulin, interleukin 6, and ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis were down regulated.

Conclusions:Weight loss–induced decreases in resting metabolic rate persist after weight stabilization. Changes in skeletal muscle gene expression indicate a shift toward oxidative metabolism.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Energy restriction is a useful method for achieving weight loss, but long-term maintenance of the reduced body mass is difficult to achieve. Dieting may have significant effects on body composition and metabolic rate, which lead to weight fluctuation. The rate of weight loss decreases with time when the same hypocaloric diet is maintained. The body mass lost during dieting consists of both fat and lean tissue. This is accompanied by a rapid reduction in energy expenditure that, in turn, exacerbates the tendency to regain lost weight (1). The mechanisms controlling the decrease in resting energy expenditure observed during weight loss are not fully understood. The resting metabolic rate (RMR) is the largest portion of total daily energy expenditure and represents the energy spent for the maintenance of basic body functions and homeostasis. RMR is primarily related to the magnitude of lean body mass (LBM). Although skeletal muscle mass contributes only 20% of the RMR, skeletal muscle metabolism is a major determinant of variability in resting energy expenditure (2). Previous studies that aimed to examine the effects of altered body weight were undertaken during dynamic weight change and most of them showed that weight stability was not achieved. As such, examining the steady state after weight reduction is equally important, because, during the dynamic phase of weight reduction, many metabolic and hormonal perturbations may confound the adaptations occurring during weight loss itself.

Gene expression profiling combined with clinical investigations permit a novel approach to understanding physiologic and pathophysiological processes (3). The investigation of the skeletal muscle transcriptome may be the key for understanding metabolic diseases. Several groups, including ours, have successfully used DNA microarrays to examine human skeletal muscle mRNA expression in vivo after physiologic and hormonal challenges, which have led to the discovery of unexpected pathways (48). Little is known regarding the mechanisms that connect RMR to skeletal muscle gene expression in humans. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have examined global mRNA expression after stabilized weight loss.

The goal of the present study was to investigate the effect of stabilized 10% weight loss on body composition, the metabolic profile, and skeletal muscle gene expression in obese women. To gain insight into the molecular basis of the adaptive mechanisms to stabilized weight loss, we performed skeletal muscle gene expression profiling in obese women before and after stabilized weight loss.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects
Ten obese, white, premenopausal women aged 27–48 y with stable weight over the previous 3 mo were recruited at the Toulouse Clinical Investigation Center. The subjects were consuming their usual diet before the study, and none were engaged in physical activity training. The characteristics of the subjects are presented in Table 1. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Toulouse University Hospitals, and all subjects gave written informed consent.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Body composition and indirect calorimetry1

 
Study design
The program of weight loss included 3 phases. The first phase involved a 4-wk very-low-calorie liquid-formula diet (3.3 MJ/d, GAYELORD HAUSER, Distriborg France, Saint Genis Laval, France). The formula included 62 g protein, 104 g carbohydrate, and 13 g fat. The second phase involved a 3- to 6-wk low-calorie diet (4–5 MJ/d, 15% protein, 50% carbohydrate, and 35% lipid) until the subjects achieved a 10% reduction in initial body weight. The last phase was a 4-wk isocaloric diet (mean: 5.8 MJ/d; 15% protein, 50% carbohydrate, and 35% lipid), planned to stabilize the reduced body weight. The subjects were instructed to continue with their usual level of physical activity during the study.

The same investigations were performed before and after the weight-loss program as follows. After the subjects fasted overnight for 12 h and rested for 45 min, oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production were monitored over 30 min with an open-circuit ventilated-canopy system (Deltatrac II monitor; Datex Instrumentarium Corp, Helsinki, Finland). RMR was derived from oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production using indirect calorimetry. Blood samples were drawn for determinations of hormonal and metabolic variables, and a percutaneous biopsy sample of the vastus lateralis muscle was obtained as previously described (5). Body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry performed with a total body scanner (DPX, Software 3.6; Lunar Radiation Corp, Madison, WI) (9). The extracellular water compartment was determined by bromide dilution. Bromide concentration in serum ultrafiltrate was determined with HPLC, and the corrected bromide space was calculated according to Miller et al (10).

Plasma biochemical determinations
Blood glucose was assayed by using the glucose oxidase technique (Biotrol, Paris, France). Plasma nonesterified fatty acids were assayed with an enzymatic method (Unipath, Dardilly, France). Serum insulin was measured by using a Bi-insulin immunoradiometric assay kit (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, Marne-La-Coquette, France). Adiponectin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and leptin were measured with Quantikine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Other variables were determined by using standard clinical biochemistry methods.

Total RNA preparation and amplification
Skeletal muscle biopsy samples were obtained at the beginning and at the end of the protocol. Total RNA from frozen biopsy samples was prepared and amplified as previously described (5). Total and amplified RNA (aRNA) concentrations and quality checks using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer and RNA 6000 labChip Kit (Agilent Technologies, Massy, France) led to the exclusion of 2 samples. A flow chart of the sample processing and decision tree is presented in Figure 1Go.


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. Flow chart of sample processing and decision tree. A brief description of the different steps of the analyses is given in Methods.

 
Probe labeling and microarray hybridization
Fluorescent probes were synthesized from 1 µg of aRNA by using the CyScribe First Strand cDNA Labeling Kit (Amersham Biosciences, Orsay, France). Cy3 (before weight reduction) and Cy5 (after weight reduction) probes from the same subject were purified and hybridized as described by Viguerie et al (5). The arrays were scanned by using a GenePix 4000B scanner (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA).

Microarray analysis
The cDNA microarrays produced at Stanford University (Internet: http://genome-www5.stanford.edu) consisted of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–amplified cDNAs printed on glass slides with 41 473 cDNA spots representing 23 267 genes listed in the unigene database. The images were analyzed as previously described (5). The quality of the hybridization and of the lowess normalization was checked by using an M/A plot. In the end, we performed the statistical analysis using microarray data from 6 different subjects. These 6 subjects did not differ from the whole group regarding their decrease in RMR. The mean fold change in expression for a gene is the ratio of mean signal values from 6 experiments; 23 267 spots were exploitable in ≥5 of 6 slides. Data were analyzed by using the one-class significance analysis of microarray (SAM) procedure (11). To analyze the function of the differential genes, we used the PANTHER (Protein ANalysis THrough Evolutionary Relations) database (Internet: http://panther.appliedbiosystems.com). Biological processes over-represented among the list of differentially expressed genes were considered significant if P < 0.05, as determined by the binomial statistic (12).

To test for the enrichment of sets of genes in expression data sets, we used version 2.0.1 of the computational method Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) (13) and the 1687 curated gene sets from the c2 collection of the Molecular Signatures Database, MSigDB (http://www.broad.mit.edu/gsea/). GSEA comparison of skeletal muscle gene expression before and after stabilized weight loss was performed using the signal-to-noise ratio metric of 19 738 features to produce rank-ordered gene lists in the human data set.

Real-time quantitative PCR
Reverse transcription was performed with the use of 1 µg aRNA for each sample from the 8 patients, as previously described (5). Primers were designed by using the Primer express software (see Table S1 under "Supplemental data" in the online issue). We used the geometric mean of TATA-box binding protein and hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase 1 (Taqman Control Assays; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) mRNA concentrations to normalize gene expression.

Conventional statistical analysis
General statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS for WINDOWS 13.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Significant differences were determined by nonparametric paired Wilcoxon's test and were considered significant if P < 0.05.

Microarray data set
The data discussed in this publication were deposited in NCBIs Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; Internet: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE9917.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Effects of a nutritional challenge on anthropometric, metabolic, and plasma variables
Ten obese women (BMI, in kg/m2: 34 ± 2) were submitted to an energy-restricted diet until they lost 10% of their initial body weight. They were then fed an isocaloric diet for 4 wk. As targeted, the mean weight loss was 11.4 ± 2.9%, whereas the decrease in fat mass reached 20.1 ± 5.5% (Table 1Go). Stabilized weight reduction induced a slight but significant decrease in LBM. Because variations in LBM can be due to variations in extracellular water (14), this compartment was determined by using bromide dilution space assessment and was taken into account when calculating body cellular mass (BCM = LBM – extracellular water). The decrease in body weight was accompanied by a significant decrease in RMR, which remained significant even after normalization of RMR using BCM (RMR/BCM). Because the intercept of the regression line between RMR and BCM did not pass through zero, we calculated the equation of the regression line before weight reduction and used this equation to calculate the predicted RMR after weight reduction. After weight loss, the actual RMR was significantly lower than predicted RMR. The resting respiratory quotient was not affected by weight reduction.

As expected, weight reduction lowered plasma total cholesterol, leptin, and IL-6 in obese subjects (Table 2Go). Plasma glucose did not change, and insulin was not significantly decreased after the stabilized weight loss. Thyroid status was not affected by the loss of weight.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Plasma variables1

 
Changes in skeletal muscle mRNA expression
Gene expression profiling was carried out to gain insight into the molecular mechanisms of the adaptive process that take place in skeletal muscle after stabilized weight loss. Total RNA was considered correct for before and after samples from each of the 8 subjects out of the 10 enrolled in the program. Gene expression profiling analysis was performed using data from 6 subjects. A flow chart of the microarray-based gene expression analysis is shown in Figure 1Go.

SAM resulted in the selection of 2839 differentially expressed cDNA with a false discovery rate (FDR) of 5%. These cDNA represented 2161 genes listed in the UniGene database; 1623 cDNAs were down-regulated and 1216 were up-regulated (see Table S2 and S3 under "Supplemental data" in the online issue). We found no change in adipose-specific transcripts such as leptin, adiponectin, lipin, or perilipin, which indicated that the changes in transcript levels observed here were not due to changes in the putative adipose tissue content of skeletal muscle biopsy samples. Of these 2161 genes, 1902 were found in the PANTHER database. Fourteen biological processes were specifically overrepresented in this list (Figure 2Go). Between 25% and 50% of the genes belonging to these selected biological processes were differentially expressed after stabilized weight loss. The extent of variation in gene expression was low, as >98% of the significant genes had <60% of variation (equivalent to a 1.6-fold change). Selection of genes with more than a 1.5-fold increase or decrease in expression level resulted in the selection of 102 cDNA (34 down-regulated and 68 up-regulated), including 78 assigned in the UniGene database (Table 3Go and Table 4Go).


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2. Biological processes significantly overrepresented among the list of differentially expressed skeletal muscle mRNA during weight stabilization. The number of up- and down-regulated genes in each process, respectively, is shown in parentheses. The ratios represent the numbers of differentially expressed genes divided by the number of expected genes that is the number of genes randomly expected for this biological process based on the draw of 1902 genes from the 11957 unique transcripts detected on the arrays. The biological processes with a ratio > 1.5 are shown.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Up-regulated genes during weight loss in vastus lateralis muscle1

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4 Down-regulated genes during weight loss in vastus lateralis muscle1

 
Microarray data validation of genes selected among the most relevant biological processes was performed on 8 subjects with good-quality RNA using real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) (Table 5Go). We confirmed the changes observed for troponin I type 1 (TNNI1), troponin T type 1 (TNNT1), troponin C type 1 (TNNC1; P = 0.07), NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 {alpha} subcomplex (NDUFA13/GRIM-19), myosin light chain 3 (MYL3, P = 0.09), and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase isozyme 4 (PDK4, P = 0.07). The up-regulated genes encoded slow/oxidative skeletal muscle (TNNI1, TNNT1, TNNC1, and MYL3) or mitochondrial markers (NDUFA13). The mRNA level of PDK4, the inhibitor of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, tended to decrease during weight loss.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 5 Comparison of fold changes in mRNA concentrations in 8 selected genes determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

 
Because most of the genes had a mean fold change of <1.5, we applied the GSEA method. We searched the c2 collection of MSigDB, which includes metabolic and signaling pathways as well as gene expression signatures of genetic and chemical perturbations coming from experimental results in the literature. Because of the large number of down-regulated pathways according to the criteria recommended by Subramanian et al (FDR < 25%) (13), we increased the stringency of the analysis and selected 34 gene sets with an FDR ≤ 10% (see Table S4 and S5 under "Supplemental data" in the online issue). Of the top ranked sets, only 2 were specifically designed from skeletal muscle gene expression data, CALRES_MOUSE_UP and ROME_INSULIN_2F_UP. The first one contains genes that were overexpressed in the gastrocnemius muscle of aged mice subjected to long-term energy restriction (15) (see Table S6 under "Supplemental data" in the online issue). As expected, in the present study, CALRES_MOUSE_UP gene set was up-regulated after the stabilized weight loss. The genes from the ROME_INSULIN_2F_UP gene set were up-regulated in human vastus lateralis muscle during a 3-h hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (7) (see Table S7 under "Supplemental data" in the online issue). Here, this gene set was more expressed in the skeletal muscle before weight loss. Of the top ranked gene sets, 2 sets related to IL6, KRETZSCHMAR_IL6_DIFF and BROCKE_IL6, included genes down-regulated after stabilized weight loss. The UBIQUITIN_MEDIATED_PROTEOLYSIS gene set was also down-regulated after weight loss.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The adaptive mechanisms to weight reduction remain poorly understood in humans. Here, we combined a comprehensive study of the metabolic adaptations to a stabilized weight loss with a transcriptomic analysis of skeletal muscle to assess the molecular mechanisms occurring along with the reduction in body weight. The adaptations that took place at the skeletal muscle gene expression level suggested an improved aerobic capacity.

Long-term maintenance of weight loss appears to be a crucial obstacle for most people (16). Weight fluctuation has led to speculation that metabolic efficiency increases after weight reduction and then predisposes individuals to regain the weight they have lost (1). Although a proportional decrease in metabolic rate is expected with a loss of LBM, a greater than expected decrease in metabolic rate has been hypothesized to explain weight fluctuations (1, 17). The extent to which the change in RMR persists after weight stabilization remains controversial. Some studies have suggested that there is a persistent decrease in energy expenditure after weight loss (18, 19), whereas other showed no change (2022). To address this debate, we aimed at a focused assessment of body composition and thus of RMR adjusted for BCM. In agreement with previous investigations (1, 18, 19), the present study showed that an 11% body weight loss was accompanied by an 11% decrease in RMR adjusted for BCM. It has been proposed that changes in the circulating concentrations of metabolic hormones are involved in the adaptation to reduced calorie intake (23). A possible effect of the decrease in the circulating concentration of the thermogenic hormone leptin remains controversial in humans (24). Indeed, leptin administration reverses the decrease in total energy expenditure but does not modify RMR (25). Thyroid status was not modified by weight loss and cannot explain the decrease in RMR observed in the present study.

The precise determination of the change in RMR constituted a valid basis for deciphering the molecular adaptations occurring in skeletal muscle during steady weight loss accompanied with a decrease in RMR. After weight loss, {approx}9% of the skeletal muscle transcriptome was affected, but the magnitude of the changes was modest. A low level of regulation is often observed in vivo in human transcriptomic studies as has been reported in skeletal muscle (4, 5, 7, 26). We previously used microarrays to study in vivo changes in the gene expression of human skeletal muscle after intravenous epinephrine infusion (5). Of the {approx}40 000 transcripts studied, only 4% were regulated by the catecholamine. Although the hormone was infused for 6 h, the magnitude of the skeletal muscle gene response to epinephrine was small, as <1% of the catecholamine-responsive genes exhibited more than a 2-fold change in expression.

In the present study, 14 biological processes were significantly altered by weight loss. Of them, glucose homeostasis, the tricarboxylic acid pathway, and oxidative phosphorylation seem to be strongly related to the metabolic rate. Unfortunately, of the 5 regulated genes belonging to the glucose homeostasis biological process (glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor, suppressor of cytokine signaling 7, Fem-1 homolog a, glycoprotein hormones {alpha} polypeptide, protein tyrosine phosphatase, and non-receptor type1; data not shown), only protein tyrosine phosphatase seems to be related to glucose utilization. The implication of the 8 genes belonging to the tricarboxylic acid cycle in the metabolic rate is most obvious, but 4 were up-regulated and 4 were down-regulated. Similarly, of the 17 regulated genes belonging to the oxidative phosphorylation pathway, 11 were up-regulated and 6 were down-regulated. This kind of analysis did not allow us to determine which gene was clearly involved in the decrease in RMR.

GSEA analysis was designed to study discrete variations in gene expression (13). This strategy is a knowledge-based approach that uses gene sets defined on the basis of prior biological knowledge. The present GSEA analysis showed variations in sets of genes involved in response to long-term calorie restriction, IL-6, insulin, and ubiquitin mediated proteolysis. Down-regulation of gene sets involved in IL-6 and insulin response agrees with the observed decrease in plasma insulin and IL-6, stressing that GSEA is an appropriate method to analyze microarray data from clinical studies. Down-regulation of the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis gene set, as revealed by GSEA and SAM analysis, is related to the presence of 3 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in the list of most down regulated genes (Table 4Go) and could be responsible for a decrease in protein turnover explaining the observed decrease in RMR. Indeed, the protein turnover contributes to {approx}20% of the basal metabolic rate, and the synthesis and breakdown of muscle protein are principally responsible for the energy expenditure of resting muscle (27, 28).

PDK4 was the only gene implicated in glucose metabolism, which was down-regulated by weight loss. It encodes an enzyme that inactivates the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, which links glycolysis to the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle and ATP production (29). Reduced PDK4 expression was previously shown to be associated with an increased insulin sensitivity in previously obese patients (30). The decrease in PDK4 expression indicates a probable enhancement of glucose oxidation by increasing pyruvate dehydrogenase activity, although the resting respiratory quotient was not affected by weight loss.

In the present study, the majority of genes regulated during weight loss are involved in muscular contraction. The vastus lateralis skeletal muscle contains mixed slow and fast fibers. A shift in skeletal muscle fiber type occurs in various physiologic conditions, such as aging or physical training (31, 32). The increase in mRNA of all 3 subunits of the slow fiber specific troponin TNNI1, TNNT1, and TNNC1; the slow fiber specific myosin light chain MYL3; and the NADH dehydrogenase subcomplex NDUFA13 suggest an enhanced muscular aerobic capacity. Troponins and myosin are involved in muscular contraction. The function of NDUFA-13 in the respiratory chain complex I is not yet fully understood. The implication of the products of these genes in lowering RMR remains to be investigated.

Overexpression of FOXO1, a known regulator of metabolism from the FOXO family of transcription factors, has been shown to regulate type I fiber genes, including TNNC, TNNT, and myosin light chain among other transcripts (33). Skeletal muscle FOXO1 expression negatively regulates glucose metabolism via activation of PDK4 transcription (34). In the present study, PDK4 mRNA concentrations were down-regulated after weight loss. The lack of change in FOXO1 gene expression after weight loss (data not shown), combined with the absence of correlation between regulation of PDK4 and troponin genes, does not favor the implication of FOXO1.

To summarize, the present study confirmed that steady weight loss in humans is accompanied by a decrease in RMR adjusted to BCM. This decrease is concomitant with a significant modification of skeletal muscle transcriptome. The causal relation between the decrease in RMR and the changes in skeletal muscle gene expression remain to be clarified, but the present study provides new insight about the general transcriptomic adaptation occurring in muscle during and after stabilized weight loss.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are grateful to Jean José Maoret (IFR31, Toulouse), Marie-Adeline Marques (Inserm U858, Toulouse), Audrey Sicard (Inserm U858, Toulouse), Balbine Roussel (Inserm U858, Toulouse), and the staff of the Clinical Investigation Center (Toulouse University Hospitals and INSERM) for skillful technical assistance.

The authors' responsibilities were as follows—D Larrouy, PB, D Langin, and NV: study design; CT and PB: clinical investigation; CV, VP, J-PB, ALB, and BD: practical aspects of the study (plasma measurements, bromide space assessment, RNA extraction, microarray work, RT-qPCR confirmation); D Larrouy, SD, and NV: statistical and bioinformatics analyses; D Larrouy, KC, D Langin, and NV: first draft of the manuscript; and D Larrouy, D Langin, and NV: final manuscript. All authors read and gave input on the different versions of the manuscript. None of the authors had a conflict of interest.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Leibel RL, Rosenbaum M, Hirsch J. Changes in energy expenditure resulting from altered body weight. N Engl J Med 1995;332:621–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Zurlo F, Larson K, Bogardus C, Ravussin E. Skeletal muscle metabolism is a major determinant of resting energy expenditure. J Clin Invest 1990;86:1423–7.[Medline]
  3. Liu ET, Karuturi KR. Microarrays and clinical investigations. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1595–7.[Free Full Text]
  4. Meugnier E, Faraj M, Rome S, et al. Acute hyperglycemia induces a global downregulation of gene expression in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle of healthy subjects. Diabetes 2007;56:992–9.[Medline]
  5. Viguerie N, Clement K, Barbe P, et al. In vivo epinephrine-mediated regulation of gene expression in human skeletal muscle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:2000–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Timmons JA, Larsson O, Jansson E, et al. Human muscle gene expression responses to endurance training provide a novel perspective on Duchenne muscular dystrophy. FASEB J 2005;19:750–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Rome S, Clement K, Rabasa-Lhoret R, et al. Microarray profiling of human skeletal muscle reveals that insulin regulates approximately 800 genes during a hyperinsulinemic clamp. J Biol Chem 2003;278:18063–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Laaksonen R, Katajamaa M, Paiva H, et al. A systems biology strategy reveals biological pathways and plasma biomarker candidates for potentially toxic statin-induced changes in muscle. PLoS ONE 2006;1:e97.
  9. Jebb SA, Elia M. Techniques for the measurement of body composition: a practical guide. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1993;17:611–21.[Medline]
  10. Miller ME, Cosgriff JM, Forbes GB. Bromide space determination using anion-exchange chromatography for measurement of bromide. Am J Clin Nutr 1989;50:168–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:5116–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Mi H, Lazareva-Ulitsky B, Loo R, et al. The PANTHER database of protein families, subfamilies, functions and pathways. Nucleic Acid Res 2005;33:D284–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:15545–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Marken Lichtenbelt WD, Fogelholm M. Increased extracellular water compartment, relative to intracellular water compartment, after weight reduction. J Appl Physiol 1999;87:294–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lee CK, Klopp RG, Weindruch R, Prolla TA. Gene expression profile of aging and its retardation by caloric restriction. Science 1999;285:1390–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Glenny AM, O'Meara S, Melville A, Sheldon TA, Wilson C. The treatment and prevention of obesity: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1997;21:715–37.[Medline]
  17. Hirsch J, Hudgins LC, Leibel RL, Rosenbaum M. Diet composition and energy balance in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67(suppl):551S–5S.[Abstract]
  18. Weyer C, Pratley RE, Salbe AD, Bogardus C, Ravussin E, Tataranni PA. Energy expenditure, fat oxidation, and body weight regulation: a study of metabolic adaptation to long-term weight change. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:1087–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Rosenbaum M, Vandenborne K, Goldsmith R, et al. Effects of experimental weight perturbation on skeletal muscle work efficiency in human subjects. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2003;285:R183–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Wyatt HR, Grunwald GK, Seagle HM, et al. Resting energy expenditure in reduced-obese subjects in the National Weight Control Registry. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:1189–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Weinsier RL, Nagy TR, Hunter GR, Darnell BE, Hensrud DD, Weiss HL. Do adaptive changes in metabolic rate favor weight regain in weight-reduced individuals? An examination of the set-point theory. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:1088–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Amatruda JM, Statt MC, Welle SL. Total and resting energy expenditure in obese women reduced to ideal body weight. J Clin Invest 1993;92:1236–42.[Medline]
  23. Miyawaki T, Masuzaki H, Ogawa Y, et al. Clinical implications of leptin and its potential humoral regulators in long-term low-calorie diet therapy for obese humans. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002;56:593–600.[Medline]
  24. Hukshorn CJ, Saris WH. Leptin and energy expenditure. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2004;7:629–33.[Medline]
  25. Rosenbaum M, Goldsmith R, Bloomfield D, et al. Low-dose leptin reverses skeletal muscle, autonomic, and neuroendocrine adaptations to maintenance of reduced weight. J Clin Invest 2005;115:3579–86.[Medline]
  26. Clement K, Viguerie N, Diehn M, et al. In vivo regulation of human skeletal muscle gene expression by thyroid hormone. Genome Res 2002;12:281–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Hulbert AJ, Else PL. Mechanisms underlying the cost of living in animals. Annu Rev Physiol 2000;62:207–35.[Medline]
  28. Wolfe RR. The underappreciated role of muscle in health and disease. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:475–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Sugden MC, Holness MJ. Interactive regulation of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex and the carnitine palmitoyltransferase system. FASEB J 1994;8:54–61.[Abstract]
  30. Rosa G, Di Rocco P, Manco M, et al. Reduced PDK4 expression associates with increased insulin sensitivity in postobese patients. Obes Res 2003;11:176–82.[Medline]
  31. Mahoney DJ, Parise G, Melov S, Safdar A, Tarnopolsky MA. Analysis of global mRNA expression in human skeletal muscle during recovery from endurance exercise. FASEB J 2005;19:1498–500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Hoppeler H, Fluck M. Plasticity of skeletal muscle mitochondria: structure and function. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:95–104.[Medline]
  33. Kamei Y, Miura S, Suzuki M, et al. Skeletal muscle FOXO1 (FKHR) transgenic mice have less skeletal muscle mass, down-regulated Type I (slow twitch/red muscle) fiber genes, and impaired glycemic control. J Biol Chem 2004;279:41114–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Furuyama T, Kitayama K, Yamashita H, Mori N. Forkhead transcription factor FOXO1 (FKHR)-dependent induction of PDK4 gene expression in skeletal muscle during energy deprivation. Biochem J 2003;375:365–71.[Medline]
Received for publication October 15, 2007. Accepted for publication March 14, 2008.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental data
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larrouy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Viguerie, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larrouy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Viguerie, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Larrouy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Viguerie, N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS