AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silva, A. M
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silva, A. M
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Silva, A. M
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 88, No. 2, 315-323, August 2008
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Evaluation of between-methods agreement of extracellular water measurements in adults and children1,2,3

Analiza M Silva, Steven B Heymsfield, Dympna Gallagher, Jeanine Albu, Xavier F Pi-Sunyer, Richard N Pierson, Jr, Jack Wang, Stanley Heshka, Luis B Sardinha and ZiMian Wang

1 From the New York Obesity Research Center, St Luke's–Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University Institute of Human Nutrition, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (SBH, DG, JA, XFP-S, RNP, JW, SH, and ZW), and the Exercise and Health Laboratory, Faculty of Human Movement–Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal (AMS and LBS)

2 Supported by National Institutes of Health grants NIDDK-42618 and P30 DK 26687 and by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology.

3 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to Z Wang, Obesity Research Center, 1090 Amsterdam Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10025. E-mail: zw28{at}columbia.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Extracellular water (ECW), a relevant molecular level component for clinical assessment, is commonly obtained by 2 methods that rely on assumptions that may not be possible to test at the time the measurements are made.

Objective: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the degree of agreement between ECW assessment by the sodium bromide dilution (ECWNaBr) and total body potassium (TBK; whole-body 40K counting) to total body water (TBW; isotope dilution) methods (ECWTBK-TBW) in an ethnically mixed group of children and adults.

Design: ECW was measured with the ECWNaBr and ECWTBK-TBW methods in 526 white and African American males and females (86 nonobese children, 193 nonobese adults, and 247 obese adults). Fat mass was assessed with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the variables related to between-ECW method differences.

Results: Significant but generally small group mean (±SD) differences in ECW were found in the obese adults (1.28 ± 2.54 kg) and children (–0.71 ± 1.78 kg). The magnitude of the differences was related to mean ECW in obese adults, children, and nonobese adults, and the relations between these variables were modified by sex for nonobese adults. ECW differences were also dependent on age, weight, sex, and race or on interactions between these variables.

Conclusions: Overall, although good between-method agreement was found across the 3 groups, the degree of agreement varied according to subject characteristics, particularly at the extremes of ECW and body weight. We advance a possible mechanism that may link subject characteristics with the degree of agreement between ECW measurement methods and their underlying assumptions.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Extracellular water (ECW), the major compartment of extracellular fluid (ECF), is the aqueous component that surrounds cells and reflects clinical status in patients with acute or chronic diseases. ECW varies widely with age (1, 2), and among race groups, with the largest age-related differences observed in African Americans (3). Monitoring the ECW compartment, in combination with other nutritional measures, may be of interest in both healthy subjects and, particularly, in patients with clinical conditions (4-6). Moreover, and recently, reference values for ECW were proposed for healthy adults across the adult life span (7).

ECW is distributed in plasma; interstitial, lymph, and connective tissues; and transcellular water compartments (8, 9). One approach to distinguishing ECW from intracellular water (ICW) is based on compartment-specific cation/anion patterns, potassium is primarily found in the ICW compartment, whereas chloride is found primarily in the ECW compartment (2). Several methods exist to measure the distribution of ion-related markers, but the dilution of sodium bromide in the bromide space is typically the most used technique (10). A second noninvasive approach is to estimate total body water (TBW) by isotope dilution combined with total body potassium (TBK) measurement by whole-body 40K counting (ie, ECW = TBW – ICW). Because of the absence of radiation hazard and the ease of administration, ECW estimations obtained from the sodium bromide dilution technique (ECWNaBr) and the TBK-TBW method are appropriate for use in children and adults.

Although multiple methods exist to assess ECW, subjects vary widely in age, body mass, ethnicity, sex, and health status, and the degree of influence of these variables on the fundamental assumptions of the ECW estimation method has not been well studied. For instance, sodium bromide may not distribute uniformly in the various subcompartments of ECW, and ECWTBK-TBW may not present a stable TBK concentration between the ICW and ECW compartments. Consequently, estimated ECW volumes may differ depending on how subject characteristics interact with the specific ECW technique and its respective assumptions (11).

The primary aim of the current study was to investigate, in an ethnically mixed subject group of nonobese children and adults and obese adults, the degree of agreement and differences in ECW measurements obtained from the sodium bromide dilution and TBK-TBW methods to identify subject characteristics and ranges of variables where the methods were in good agreement and to examine the association of variables such as age, ethnicity, and sex with between-method differences with a view to whether these associations may reveal which variables critically affect agreement.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Protocol and subjects
Subjects were a convenience sample of 526 subjects participating in other unrelated investigations (12, 13). Two race groups, whites and African Americans, were identified by self-report. Classification into racial groups required similar parent and grandparent race. Subjects with a history of high blood pressure and/or use of medication for the treatment of high blood pressure were excluded. Body-composition studies were carried out over a single day. Three subgroups of subjects were identified: 86 nonobese children, 193 nonobese adults, and 247 obese adults. In the nonobese adult category, subjects with a body mass index (in kg/m2) <18.5 or >30 were excluded. For the child subgroup, the cutoff values developed by Cole et al (14) were used to exclude those identified as obese. A health screening was carried out in these subjects to ensure that they were in good health. The obese adult group consisted of individuals with a body mass index >30 and with no major diseases other than obesity.

There were 4 main evaluations: TBK was measured by whole-body 40K counting, TBW was measured by deuterium or tritium dilution, ECW was estimated by sodium bromide dilution, and fat mass (FM) was estimated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). All of the measurements were made for each subject on the same day, after an overnight fast, at the Body Composition Unit of St Luke's–Roosevelt Hospital in New York City. All of the original investigations were approved by the Institutional Review Board of St Luke's–Roosevelt Hospital.

Body-composition measurements
Anthropometric measurements
Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (Weight Tronix, New York, NY) and height to the nearest 0.5 cm with a stadiometer (Holtain, Crosswell, United Kingdom).

Fat mass
FM was measured by using a series of pencil-beam dual-photon systems and related software manufactured by GE Lunar Corporation (Madison, WI), specifically Lunar Prodigy (GE Medical) and Lunar DPX version 3.6, which incorporated pediatric software version 3.8G, which was used to analyze all of the DXA scans on children. Body-composition data collected with different DXA systems were translated to common values with cross-calibration equations using the procedure reported by Russell-Aulet et al (15). The cross-calibrations involved scanning samples of healthy subjects using old and new DXA systems in random order within the same day. Appropriate calibration equations were then developed for each of the relevant components.

Total body water
Deuterium (2H2O) or tritium (3H2O) dilution volumes were measured with CVs of 1.5% and 2.0%, respectively. The dilution volumes were then used to calculate TBW, as described by Schoeller (10): TBW (L) = 3H2O dilution space x 0.96. However, this correction was not applied for the deuterium dilution space, as reported elsewhere (16-18). TBW was then converted to water mass by using a water density of 0.9937 kg/L, assuming an average body temperature of 36 °°C.

Total body potassium
Total-body 40K mass was estimated from the measured 1.46 MeV {gamma}-ray decay of naturally occurring 40K in subject's body. The subject's 40K was determined by counting for 9 min in a 4{pi} whole-body counter (19). TBK mass was then calculated as TBK = 40K/0.000118 (19). The raw count is corrected for body mass as described elsewhere (20). The TBK counter was calibrated daily by counting a standard of known activity (each standard bottle contains 5000 decays/min of 40K) and adjusting all subsequent patient readings on that day by the deviation from that standard and for background counts. The reproducibility and accuracy of this system have between-measurement CVs of 1.5% and 2.3%, respectively (21)

Extracellular water measured with the TBK-TBW method
Potassium is present in ECW and ICW at relatively stable concentrations of 4 and 152 mmol/kg H2O, respectively (22). The ECW can be derived from TBK and TBW (23, 24) as follows:

Formula 1(1)

Formula 2(2)
where TBK and TBW are in mmol and kg, respectively. Resolving these 2 simultaneous equations, ECW mass can be calculated from measured TBK and TBW as follows:

Formula 3(3)

Extracellular water measured with the sodium bromide dilution method
The subject was asked to drink 5 g of a 4 mol/L solution of sodium bromide. The sodium bromide concentration in plasma was measured by HPLC before and 3 h after tracer administration. The volume of ECW was calculated as follows:

Formula 4(4)
where 0.90 is a correction factor for intracellular bromide (Br), found mainly in red blood cells, and 0.95 is the Donnan equilibrium factor (10). ECW was also converted to kg by multiplying the ECW values in liters by 0.9937 kg/L, assuming an average body temperature of 36 °C. The CV for sodium bromide dilution is 2.9% (11).

Propagated measurement error
Measurement precision is high for TBK and TBW, the 2 components of the TBK-TBW method. We accounted for the propagated error of these 2 measurements using the dilution technique for TBW (CV: 1.5% to 2.0%) and whole-body counting for TBK (CV: 1.5%). Therefore, considering equation 3 coefficients, the respective CV for each measurement, and TBK and TBW expressed in the same units, the propagated measurement error for ECWTBK-TBW can be estimated for the whole subjects in this study by assuming an average body composition (mean TBW and TBK of 34.7 kg and 2768.1 mmol, respectively) and the stated measurement precisions. Accordingly,

Formula 5(5)

Formula 6(6)

Formula 7(7)

Formula 8(8)

Statistical methods
All group results are expressed as means ± SDs. The analyses were carried out using the statistical program SPSS version 14.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). P < 0.05 was considered significant for individual tests. Independent-sample t tests were used to compare whites with African Americans and males with females within each group, whereas paired-sample t tests were performed to compare both methods. The main focus was to identify the potential variables associated with between-method differences in ECW measurements between and within each subgroup. For each group of children, obese, and nonobese adults, multiple regression analysis was applied to investigate the association of ECW differences with potential influencing factors, including sex, race, age, amount of ECW (the mean of the ECW methods), weight, FM, and 2-factor interactions (weight by race, FM by race, age by race, weight by sex, FM by sex, and age by sex). Variables or interactions making no significant contribution were eliminated from the final model. During model development, homogeneity of variance and normality of residuals were tested. In all cases, the models were in compliance with the assumptions of multiple linear regression.

Adjusted (for significant covariates) ECW differences were plotted separately against potential explanatory variables within each group. To obtain these adjusted differences we first obtained residuals from the regression of the simple differences on all significant covariates except the explanatory variable that would be on the x-axis in the plot. Adjusted values were then calculated by adding the mean value of the group to the residuals after completing the regression analysis. Using this procedure we were able to look at the effect of each significant predictor variable adjusted for covariates.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Subject characteristics
The characteristics of the subjects are summarized in Table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Subject characteristics1

 
ECW methods comparison
Comparisons of mean ECW amounts and differences are shown in Table 2Go and Table 3Go. Significantly higher values of ECWTBK-TBW than of ECWNaBr were found for the nonobese African American females, whereas no significant differences were found for nonobese African American males or white males or females. The pooled pediatric group showed significantly higher ECWNaBr than ECWTBK-TBW values. In the obese adult group, higher mean ECWTBK-TBW than ECWNaBr values were found in females, but not in males, likely because of the small sample size of obese males.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Total body potassium (TBK), total body water (TBW), and extracellular water (ECW) calculations for nonobese and obese adults1

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Total body potassium (TBK), total body water (TBW), and extracellular water (ECW) calculations for children1

 
Associations of subjects' characteristics with ECW agreement in nonobese adults
Age
Age per se did not show a significant association with the difference between the 2 ECW methods but an age-by-race interaction was found to be significantly associated. Regression models showed that ECW differences were larger by 0.033 kg for each year of age in African American (P = 0.004), but there was no significant relation in whites (β = –0.006, P = 0.500). This finding indicated that ECWTBK-TBW values increase more rapidly than do ECWNaBr values with age in African Americans. Also, race was related to the differences between ECW methods as a main effect, with whites presenting a positive coefficient (β = 4.948, P = 0.022).

ECW amount
The amount of ECW obtained from the mean of both ECW methods was significantly associated with the difference between methods in estimating ECW, which indicated that ECWTBK-TBW values increase more rapidly than ECWNaBr values. The interaction with sex showed that ECW differences increased less rapidly with each kilogram of ECW in males (β = 0.479, P < 0.001) than in females (β = 0.387, P < 0.001).

Weight
Weight alone was not significantly related to ECW differences, but a weight-by-race interaction was found. Regression analysis showed that, after control for other variables, ECW differences were larger by –0.081 units for each kilogram of body weight in whites (P = 0.001), whereas the weight coefficient for African Americans was not significant (β = –0.028, P = 0.250). Thus ECWTBK-TBW values increased less rapidly than ECWNaBr values in whites than in African Americans.

The differences between ECW methods in healthy white males and females and in African American males and females at the observed sample means of age, weight and ECW, are illustrated in Figure 1Go. The association of ECW between-methods differences with the amount of ECW in nonobese males and females, after adjustment for the effects of race and interactions, is shown in Figure 2Go.


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. Mean (±SE) differences between methods for determining extracellular water (ECW) in the sample of nonobese adult white males (n = 45), white females (n = 70), African American males (n = 18), and African American females (n = 60) adjusted to the observed sample mean values of age, weight, and mean ECW using the following model: ECWTBK-TBW minus ECWNaBr = –6.509 + [white: 4.948 (P = 0.022); African American: 0] + 0.479 x mean ECW + mean ECW x [male: –0.092 (P = 0.001); female, 0] + weight x [white: –0.081 (P = 0.001); African American: –0.028 (P = 0.256)] + age x [white: –0.006 (P = 0.501); African American: 0.033 (P = 0.004)].

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2. Relation between adjusted differences between methods for determining extracellular water (ECW) and the mean ECW for nonobese adults: males (r = 0.290, P = 0.021) and females (r = 0.263, P = 0.002), after adjustment for the effects of race, race by age, and race by weight.

 
Associations of subjects' characteristics with ECW agreement in obese females
Our sample included 6 obese males (3 whites, 3 African Americans). Initial analyses included the males, which found no main effects or interactions with sex and other variables on between-method differences. However, because the power to detect such effects would be low given the small number of males, we present the results and interpretation of the associations of subject characteristics using only obese females.

ECW amount
The amount of ECW obtained from the mean of both ECW methods was significantly associated with the difference between methods in estimating ECW. Regression analysis showed that ECW differences between methods were larger by 0.500 units for each kilogram of ECW (P < 0.001). These results are illustrated in the left panel of Figure 3Go. After control for weight, TBK-TBW values increased more rapidly than NaBr values with increasing ECW.


Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3. Relation between adjusted differences between methods for determining extracellular water (ECW) and mean ECW for obese females, after adjustment for the effects of mean ECW and for the effects of body weight.

 
Weight, age, fat mass, race, and sex
Weight affected the degree of agreement between methods. Regression parameters showed that the ECW differences were larger by 0.082 units for each kilogram of body weight (P < 0.001). ECWNaBr increased more rapidly with increasing weight than did ECWTBK-TBW, and the results are illustrated in the right panel of Figure 3Go, after control for the effect of mean ECW. Age, FM, race, sex, and their interactions were not related to the differences between the 2 methods.

Associations of the subjects' characteristics with ECW agreement in children
ECW amount
The amount of ECW obtained from the mean of both ECW methods affected the degree of agreement between methods. Regression showed that ECW differences between methods were larger by 0.323 units for each kilogram of ECW (P = 0.005). The results, after adjustment for the effects of body weight, are shown in the left panel of Figure 4Go.


Figure 4
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4. Relation between adjusted differences between methods for determining extracellular water (ECW) and mean ECW for children, after adjustment for the effects of mean ECW and for the effects of body weight.

 
Weight, age, fat mass, race, and sex
An association was found between body weight and the differences between ECW methods in the pediatric sample. Regression parameters showed that the differences between ECW methods were larger by –0.097 units for each kilogram of body weight (P = 0.011). After control for the effect of mean ECW, this relation is illustrated in the right panel of Figure 4Go. Age, FM, race, and sex or their interactions were not related to the differences between the 2 methods.

The agreement between methods using the Bland-Altman method (ie, plotting the differences between ECWTBK-TBW and ECWNaBr values against the mean of ECW obtained from both methods) is illustrated in Figure 5Go.


Figure 5
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5. Agreement between methods using Bland-Altman analysis. The solid line represents the mean differences between the methods. The dashed lines represent the 95% limits of agreement (±1.96 SD). The trend line represents the association between the differences in the methods and the mean of both methods. A: Nonobese adults (r = 0.078, P = 0.278); B: Children (r = 0.135, P = 0.214); C: Obese females (r = 0.250, P < 0.001).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This was the first large comprehensive study to address a comparison between ECW methods using a diverse sample of subjects, ranging widely in age, weight, race, and sex. The ECW estimates determined by using TBK-TBW were significantly lower than those determined by using sodium bromide in children, whereas these differences were higher for adult obese subjects and nonobese females. Nevertheless, the methods were highly correlated within each group, ranging from 0.6 (obese adults) to 0.8 (nonobese adults) to 0.9 (children).

Part of the difficulty in establishing between-method comparability based on previous studies is applied ECF definitions. Although ECF is often considered the sum of 2 fluid compartments, plasma and interstitial fluid, Cheek (8) and Edelman et al (9) suggested that ECF also includes joint transcellular fluids and connective tissue, lymph, central nervous system, eye, gastrointestinal tract, pericardium, and pleural fluids. Bromide, chloride, thiocyanate, thiosulfate, sulfate, sucrose, and mannitol are used as ECW markers, but behave differently with respect to the underlying assumptions of ECW measurement (10). Previous reviews have indicated that the disaccharides fail to penetrate dense connective tissue and transcellular water and thiosulfate, and sulfate fails to penetrate transcellular water (25). Bromide and isotopic chloride dilution provides the closest approximation of the extracellular space (9), and, with the advent of improved analytic techniques, bromide has become the most commonly used tracer. Neither bromide nor any other tracer used to date provides an exact measure of ECW because the physiologic properties of the various compartments of ECW differ from one another. Chemical analysis and radiochlorine dilution studies indicate a bromide intracellular penetration that accounts for 10% of the fully equilibrated bromide dilution space, of which about half is attributable to erythrocytes (9). Assumptions about distribution appear to break down even more in disease, where the bromide space may appear enlarged relative to the expectation for ECW, possibly because of bromide penetrating the ICW (26). The advantage of ECWNaBr over ECWTBK-TBW estimation is that whole-body 40K counting is not required. Whole-body counters are not widely available, and they are costly to maintain and operate.

One concern about the TBK-TBW method is that ECW volume may vary depending on actual intracellular or extracellular potassium concentrations in obese patients and children. Another concern is the reliability of this technique (SD of {approx}0.77 kg), which is almost twice that of the sodium bromide dilution method [{sigma}2ECW = {sigma}2NaBr; {sigma}2ECW = (0.029 x 16.3)2; SD {approx}0.46 kg] as the errors of TBW and TBK measurements propagate through the ECW calculations. Analysis of the differences between ECW methods in each group showed associations across subjects that varied with sex, race, age, mean ECW amount, and body weight.

Effect of amount of ECW
The amount of ECW, represented by the mean of both methods, was the most powerful predictive variable in explaining the variability of the observed ECW differences in nonobese children and adults and in the obese group. The pattern of association was similar across the 3 groups: ECWTBK-TBW values increased more rapidly than the ECWNaBr values with increasing amounts of ECW. A plausible mechanism to account for this is that the assumptions related to ECWNaBr may cause underestimates of ECW in subjects with larger amounts of ECW. For example, it is recognized that obese persons tend to have a higher fat-free mass (FFM) hydration due to an enlargement of the ECW compartment relative to the ICW compartment. It has been suggested (27) that an enlarged adipose tissue compartment that contains {approx}14% of TBW would be a possible explanation. Therefore, a 10% correction for the penetration of bromide into the ICW may overestimate the actual percentage of bromide that is penetrating into ICW (particularly erythrocytes), because ECW subcompartments other than plasma are enlarged in obese subjects. This means that the ECW amount in an obese subject, as a result of the contribution of all the subcompartments, will be corrected with a plasma-related assumption of 10%, independently of the actual percentage of contribution of each subcompartment in the total amount of ECW.

Effect of body weight
Body weight in nonobese white adults, obese females, and children were negatively associated with the between-methods difference. The results indicate that ECWNaBr values tend to increase more rapidly than ECWTBK-TBW values in heavier nonobese whites, obese females, and children. For nonobese white adults, a potential explanation may be a related underestimation of (TBKICW) relative to the assumed value. In heavier subjects, who are likely to have higher FFM values, the ECW compartment is underestimated with the TBK-TBW approach. If this is correct, a similar effect may also occur in heavier obese subjects. The assumptions for correcting the distribution of the bromide tracer may also be one of the reasons for disagreement. For example, the 5% Gibbs-Donnan's effect may underestimate the true percentage value in heavier subjects because of denser connective tissue, which is known to contain 8–14% more chloride per liter than plasma (28). For children, the finding that heavier subjects had a higher rate of increase in ECW when the sodium bromide method was used, as opposed to the TBK-TBW method, was likely related to the underestimation of the actual rate (TBKICW), because it is recognized that FM and FFM tend to increase after puberty (2), and, therefore, body weight increases.

Effects of age
In nonobese adults, the relation of age with between-methods differences was mediated by race. Older nonobese African Americans tend to have a higher rate of increase in ECW when the TBK-TBW method is used than when the sodium bromide method is used. This interaction may be due to the rapid decline in TBK reported in older African Americans (12, 29) than in other race groups. Therefore, the assumed (TBKICW) value may be overestimating the real value (TBKICW) in older African Americans, which thus increases the estimates of ECWTBK-TBW compared with the ECWNaBr estimation.

Study limitations
There are several limitations of the current study. Our convenience sample did not have adequate numbers of obese males and enough racial diversity (Hispanics and Asians) to investigate all the possible effects surrounding ECW methodologic differences, although our findings do reveal some potential influencing factors. Additionally, our investigation was cross-sectional and, ideally, age-related inferences should be based on longitudinal data. Another concern is the accuracy of DXA measurements for FM estimation in the obese sample because the attenuation coefficients for soft tissue depend on the subject's anteroposterior thickness of the body, if >25 cm (30, 31).

Conclusions
In the present study we applied multiple regression modeling methods to evaluate ECW variation obtained from 2 different methodologic approaches. Overall, ECWTBK-TBW yielded larger mean ECW values for obese subjects, whereas smaller amounts were found in nonobese children compared with ECWNaBr. We propose age-related tissue-organ body-composition differences as one potential explanation for these observations. We also observed significant age-related differences among race groups, with the largest age-related differences in the rate of ECW increase observed in nonobese African American subjects using TBK-TBW, whereas weight-related differences were observed in nonobese adults with the highest rate of ECW increase obtained from ECWNaBr in the heaviest whites. Our findings suggest that these 2 methods should not be considered interchangeable. Finally, the underlying assumptions of the methods used in this study to estimate ECW across the life span and disease state are worthy of future investigation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors' responsibilities were as follows—AMS: responsible for data pooling, screening, analysis, and manuscript writing; SH: responsible for data analysis and manuscript writing and provided advice and consultation; DG, JA, XFP-S, RNP, JW, ZW, and SBW: responsible for data collection; and SBW, LBS, and ZW: responsible for manuscript writing and provided administrative support, supervision, and advice. None of the authors had a conflict of interest in any company or organization sponsoring this study.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Fomom SJ, Haschke F, Ziegler EE, Nelson SE. Body composition of reference children from birth to age 10 years. Am J Clin Nutr 1982;35:1169–75.[Free Full Text]
  2. Forbes GB. Human body composition: growth, aging, nutrition, and activity. New York, NY: Springer, 1987.
  3. Silva AM, Wang J, Pierson RN Jr et al. Extracellular water: greater expansion with age in African Americans. J Appl Physiol 2005;99:261–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kotler DP, Wang J, Pierson RN. Body composition studies in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr 1985;42:1255–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Moore FD, Olesen KH, Parker HV, Ball MR, Boyden CM. The body cell mass and its supporting environment. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1963.
  6. Shizgal HM, Forse RA, Spanier AH, MacLean LD. Protein malnutrition following intestinal bypass for morbid obesity. Surgery 1979;86:60–9.[Medline]
  7. Silva AM, Wang J, Pierson RN Jr, et al. Extracellular water across the lifespan: reference values for adults. Physiol Meas 2007;28:489–502.[Medline]
  8. Cheek DB. Extracellular volume: its structure and measurement and the influence of age and disease. J Pediatr 1961;58:103–25.[Medline]
  9. Edelman IS, Leibman J. Anatomy of body water and electrolytes. Am J Med 1959;27:256–77.[Medline]
  10. Schoeller DA. Hydrometry. In: Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang Z, Going S, eds. Human body composition. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 2005:35–49.
  11. Kim J, Wang Z, Gallagher D, Kotler DP, Ma K, Heymsfield SB. Extracellular water: sodium bromide dilution estimates compared with other markers in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1999;23:61–6.[Abstract]
  12. He Q, Heo M, Heshka S, et al. Total body potassium differs by sex and race across the adult age span. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;78:72–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kim J, Shen W, Gallagher D, et al. Total-body skeletal muscle mass: estimation by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:1014–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 2000;320:1240–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Russell-Aulet M, Wang J, Thornton J, Pierson RN Jr. Comparison of dual-photon absorptiometry systems for total-body bone and soft tissue measurements: dual-energy X-rays versus gadolinium 153. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:411–5.[Medline]
  16. Horlick M, Arpadi SM, Bethel J, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis models for prediction of total body water and fat-free mass in healthy and HIV-infected children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:991–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lukaski HC, Johnson PE. A simple, inexpensive method of determining total body water using a tracer dose of D2O and infrared absorption of biological fluids. Am J Clin Nutr 1985;41:363–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ma K, Kotler DP, Wang J, Thornton JC, Ma R, Pierson RN Jr. Reliability of in vivo neutron activation analysis for measuring body composition: comparisons with tracer dilution and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Lab Clin Med 1996;127:420–7.[Medline]
  19. Pierson RN Jr, Wang J, Colt EW, Neumann P. Body composition measurements in normal man: the potassium, sodium, sulfate and tritium spaces in 58 adults. J Chronic Dis 1982;35:419–28.[Medline]
  20. Pierson RN Jr, Wang J, Thornton JC, Van Itallie TB, Colt EW. Body potassium by four-pi 40K counting: an anthropometric correction. Am J Physiol 1984;246:F234–9.[Medline]
  21. Schneider B, Wang J, Thornton JC, et al. Accuracy, reproducibility and normal total body potassium (TBK) ranges measured using the renovated whole body 40K counter of St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital. Int J Body Composition Res 2004;2:51–60.
  22. Maffy R. The body fluids: volume, composition, and physical chemistry. In: Brenner BM, Rector FC, eds. The kidney. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1976.
  23. Haschke F, Fomon SJ, Ziegler EE. Body composition of a nine-year-old reference boy. Pediatr Res 1981;15:847–9.[Medline]
  24. Wang Z, Deurenberg P, Wang W, Pietrobelli A, Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB. Hydration of fat-free body mass: new physiological modeling approach. Am J Physiol 1999;276:E995–1003.[Medline]
  25. Bell EF. Body water in infancy. In: Roche AF, ed. Body composition assessment in youth and adults: Sixth Ross Conferences on Medical Research. Columbus, OH: Ross Laboratories 1985:30–3.
  26. Schober O, Lehr L, Hundeshagen H. Bromide space, total body water, and sick cell syndrome. Eur J Nucl Med 1982;7:14–5.[Medline]
  27. Wang J, Pierson RN Jr. Disparate hydration of adipose and lean tissue require a new model for body water distribution in man. J Nutr 1976;106:1687–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Scatchard G, Scheinberg IH, Armstrong SH Jr. Physical chemistry of protein solutions, IV: The combination of human serum albumin with chloride ion. J Am Chem Soc 1950;72:532–40.
  29. Gallagher D, Visser M, De Meersman RE, et al. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: effects of age, gender, and ethnicity. J Appl Physiol 1997;83:229–39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Laskey MA, Lyttle KD, Flaxman ME, Barber RW. The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer whole-body scanning mode. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992;46:39–45.[Medline]
  31. Lohman TG, Chen Z. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. In: Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang Z, Going SB, eds. Human body composition. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2005:63–77.
Received for publication November 15, 2007. Accepted for publication April 16, 2008.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silva, A. M
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silva, A. M
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Silva, A. M
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS