AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orton, S.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Ebers, G. C
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Orton, S.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Ebers, G. C
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Orton, S.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Ebers, G. C
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 88, No. 2, 441-447, August 2008
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Evidence for genetic regulation of vitamin D status in twins with multiple sclerosis1,2,3

Sarah-Michelle Orton, Andrew P Morris, Blanca M Herrera, Sreeram V Ramagopalan, Matthew R Lincoln, Michael J Chao, Reinhold Vieth, A Dessa Sadovnick and George C Ebers

1 From the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics and Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford; Oxford, United Kingdom (S-MO, APM, BMH, SVR, MRL, MJC, and GCE); Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology Department, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (RV); and the 3Department of Medical Genetics and Faculty of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (ADS)

2 Supported by the MS Society of Canada Scientific Research Foundation (the CCPGSMS), a pilot grant from the MS Society of Canada (the vitamin D twin study), and a Clarendon fund studentship (to SMO).

3 Address reprint requests to GC Ebers, University Department of Clinical Neurology, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom. E-mail: george.ebers{at}clneuro.ox.ac.uk.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) risk is determined by both genes and environment. One of the most striking features of MS is its geographic distribution, particularly the pattern of high MS frequency in areas with low sunlight exposure, the main inducer of vitamin D synthesis. Recent epidemiologic, experimental, and clinical evidence support an effect for low environmental supplies of vitamin D in mediating an increased susceptibility to MS.

Objectives: We 1) examined the association of serum 25-hydroxy-vitaminD [25(OH)D] concentrations and MS status and 2) assessed the genetic contribution to serum 25(OH)D concentrations and tested for its association with genetic variants in 2 candidate genes [vitamin D receptor and 1-{alpha}-hydroxylase (CYP27B1)].

Design: We used a twin study approach, comprising adult pairs identified from the longitudinal population-based Canadian Collaborative Project on Genetic Susceptibility to MS. Monozygotic (MZ; n = 40) and dizygotic (DZ; n = 59) pairs, both concordant and discordant for MS, were studied. End-of-winter serum 25(OH)D concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay, and genotypes were assessed by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay.

Results: Serum concentrations of 25(OH)D were highly correlated in MS-concordant pairs (r = 0.83, P < 0.001), but they were not significantly associated with having the disease (P = 0.4) when analyzed by logistic regression. Intraclass correlation for 25(OH)D concentration was significantly greater in MZ pairs (MZ, r: 0.71 > DZ r: 0.32, P = 0.006). Significant associations of 2 CYP27B1 SNP variants and 25(OH)D concentrations were observed.

Conclusion: The findings indicate important genetic influences on regulation of seasonal circulating 25(OH)D concentrations in MS twins.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The cause of multiple sclerosis (MS) is unknown, but it is widely accepted as a complex trait that develops in genetically susceptible persons exposed to as yet undefined environmental risk factors (1). The strongest, consistently replicated, genetic susceptibility factor is the major histocompatibility complex human leukocyte antigen–dicloro-1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-benzimidazole 1 (HLA-DRB1) locus (1). The environmental component in MS susceptibility has attracted relatively little study in the past few decades. Genetic epidemiologic evidence strongly indicates that environment or gene-environment interactions in MS risk act at a broad population level (2-5). The most striking feature of MS epidemiology has long been the geographical distribution of prevalence (6), and its determinants are thought to be central to the environmental components in MS risk. The gradient of increasing MS risk with increasing latitude in both hemispheres is coincident with annual sunlight exposure and frequency of vitamin D deficiency (7). Several decades ago it was proposed that vitamin D adequacy mediates this ultraviolet radiation (UVR)–latitude effect (8). Inadequate concentrations of vitamin D has since reemerged as a prime candidate in MS susceptibility and pathogenesis (9), although strong evidence directly supporting this hypothesis has been difficult to establish (10).

Clinical observations include low serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] in MS patients (11, 12), seasonal fluctuation in the timing of MS births (13, 14), and fluctuation in MS disease activity correlating with 25(OH)D seasonality (15, 16). Vitamin supplementation (17) and high concentrations of serum 25(OH)D in adulthood (18) were modestly associated with reduced risk of MS in 2 US cohort studies. In addition, sunlight exposure through outdoor activity has shown an inverse correlation with MS risk (19-22). Associations of various vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene variants and MS were also reported (23-25). In animal models for MS, prenatal hypovitaminosis D in rats has shown impaired nervous system development (26), and 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D inhibits development and progression of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (27).

25(OH)D is the main circulating metabolite of vitamin D and is the best measure of vitamin D adequacy (28). Circulating 25(OH)D concentrations are predominantly influenced by ultraviolet B exposure from sunlight (9), although evidence suggests that genetic factors are also important (29, 30). Presumably, any genetic effect and elucidating genes involved would be most evident when ultraviolet exposure is inadequate or seasonally limited. This is the case in Canada, where the ultraviolet intensity is inadequate for cutaneous vitamin D synthesis from approximately October to March (31, 32).

Maintaining optimal concentrations of serum 25(OH)D is important to immune health and disease risk (9, 10). However, the relative contribution of genetic factors to maintaining 25(OH)D adequacy is unclear, and published studies elucidating genes involved are scarce. More systematic studies could shed light on underlying gene, gene-environment interactions, or both involved in MS. The aims of this study were to examine the vitamin D–MS relation and to investigate the genetic contribution to circulating 25(OH)D.


   SUBJECTS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Concentrations of serum 25(OH)D were assayed in twin pairs concordant and discordant for MS. First, we examined the relation of disease concordance to 25(OH)D concentrations. We next assessed the association of circulating 25(OH)D and MS affection status. Monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) pairs were compared to examine the genetic influence on 25(OH)D concentrations. Finally, we tested for the association of candidate gene polymorphisms with both 25(OH)D and disease status. 25(OH)D was the only vitamin D metabolite measured in this study; for clarity, all references to vitamin D measurements within this study implicate this particular metabolite.

Study group
Twin pairs were identified from the database of the longitudinal, population-based Canadian Collaborative Project on the Genetic Susceptibility to MS (CCPGSMS). The CCPGSMS ascertainment, database, and consenting process were described previously in detail (33). Procedures for recontact of the CCPGSMS subjects were followed in accordance with the study's institutional review board guidelines. Two hundred twenty persons participated by providing a blood sample and completing a short questionnaire (details below). Inclusion in the study required that both members of the twin pair agreed to participate. The twin cohort within the CCPGSMS has been followed for >20 y and has been described in detail (34). Zygosity was determined by self-reporting, and accuracy was subsequently verified in {approx}10% of cases by microsatellite marker genotyping.

Sampling
Given the large seasonal dependence of serum 25(OH)D concentrations, all blood was drawn at the end of winter (March or April 2005) to minimize bias from environmental influence. Serum was extracted from the samples and stored at –80 °C. The study sample comprised 40 MZ and 59 DZ pairs, 18 of which were concordant for MS. The mean age of the sample was 53 y (range: 34–78 y), with an overall female-to-male sex ratio of {approx}2.2:1. These characteristics are consistent with those of the entire CCPGSMS twin cohort previously reported (34).

To limit potential confounders, a short interview-based questionnaire about factors known to significantly affect 25(OH)D (9, 35) was administered by the health care professional doing the venipuncture. The participants were asked whether they were taking vitamin D supplements, had used a tanning bed, or had taken a sunshine vacation within the previous 6 wk. Exclusion criteria included taking supplements > 800 IU/d, use of a tanning bed, or vacation below the 38°N latitude within 6 wk before blood collection. If a participant met any of those criteria, their co-twin was also excluded.

Serum 25(OH)D assays
Radioimmunoassay was used to measure serum 25(OH)D. Serum samples frozen at –80 °C were measured with commercial immunoradiometric assay kits (DiaSorin Inc, Stillwater, MN) that detect 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 equally. Radioimmunoassay kit instructions were followed as outlined previously (36), and the antibody tracer was quantified with the use of a gamma counter (RIASTAR; Canberra Packard, Mississauga, Canada). The intraassay and interassay CVs are typically <16%; a within-run CV was <10%. Results consistently report within the central ± 1 SD of the method group mean in the international External Quality Assurance Survey (EQAS, Northwest Thames, United Kingdom).

Samples collected from all 220 twins were assayed for 25(OH)D concentration, but only 99 pairs met criteria for inclusion in the statistical analyses. Twenty-two persons were excluded because either the co-twin was unavailable (n = 8) or their answers to the interview questionnaire met exclusion criteria (n = 14). The mean concentration of serum 25(OH)D in the subjects excluded, based on questionnaire responses, was 167.1 ± 5.4 nmol/L.

Genotyping
DNA was extracted from blood as outlined in previous CCPGSMS studies (37). HLA-DRB1 types determined by microsatellite marker genotyping were available from past studies (34). The genotypes were used for stratification in analyses by the presence or absence of HLA-DRB1*15, given the known increased risk the alleles carry (37). In addition, 35 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 2 candidate genes [VDR and 1-{alpha}-hydroxylase (CYP27B1)] were assayed on the Sequenom MassARRAY platform (Sequenom, San Diego, CA). Genotyping was limited to 150 twins for whom DNA was available. To ensure full gene coverage, the SNP panels for VDR and CYP27B1 were selected with the use of Haploview (38) and were designed to capture a minimum of 95% of all genetic variants listed in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Entrez SNP and Hapmap (Build 16) databases. Three variants failed the assay, and any SNP with total genotype counts < 10 in the heterozygous and rare homozygous groups combined (n = 9) was excluded from further analysis. The genotypes were analyzed for significant effects on prediction of MS susceptibility, 25(OH)D concentrations, or both.

Statistical analysis
25(OH)D concentrations are reported as mean ± SEM. For regression analysis, values were log-transformed to generate an approximate Gaussian distribution. Log 25(OH)D concentrations were tested for prediction of MS status with the use of logistic regression in STATA (39). Conversely, MS affection status was tested for the association with 25(OH)D concentration with linear regression in STATA (39). Age and sex were incorporated as covariates, because they are thought to be factors in both MS risk and vitamin D metabolism. For all models, adjustment for the correlation between twin pairs was made with the use of Huber-White robust variance estimation (40).

In the region flanking a causal variant, it is not uncommon to see several SNPs associated with disease. This may be a result of linkage disequilibrium of all SNPs tested with a single causal variant, or it may be indicative of multiple causal variants. To distinguish between these possibilities, we carried out multilocus modeling with the use of a forward selection approach. We first assessed each SNP individually for association with log serum 25(OH)D concentrations, after adjustment for age, sex, and MS status. We next tested whether the genetic variants were predictors of MS affection status, after adjustment for age, sex, and log 25(OH)D concentrations. Multilocus models of association fully take account of the underlying linkage disequilibrium between SNPs, as well as the correlation in the effects of the SNPs; thus, it may be more powerful to detect the association than single-locus tests. All SNPs with single-locus effects of P < 0.05 were considered as potential predictors in an overall linear or logistic regression model to test each SNP for independent effects of significant association. At each stage, the most significantly associated SNP, after adjustment for the effects of all others in the model, is included. To allow for multiple testing (24 SNPs), we report results for a Bonferroni-corrected P value of 0.002.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Characteristics of twin data set
Analyses included 198 twin persons (130 women, 68 men) with a mean (±SD) age of 53.1 ± 9 y. This comprised 40 MZ and 59 DZ pairs, of which 16 pairs were concordant for MS (11 MZ, 5 DZ). The overall mean (±SEM) 25(OH)D concentration was 78.2 ± 2.4 nmol/L, and no significant differences were observed in the mean concentrations of men compared with women or MZ twins compared with DZ twins (Table 1Go). Among all pairs discordant for MS, the mean 25(OH)D concentration was similar in affected and unaffected subjects (Table 1Go). Several subjects (20.2%) had concentrations in the insufficiency range, defined as ≤45 nmol/L (31), 6 of which were ≤25 nmol/L. Rates of hypovitaminosis were not significantly influenced by disease status, MS concordance, sex, or age (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1 Characteristics of the twin data set with respect to 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations

 
25(OH)D concentrations and disease risk
Descriptively, it can be seen that 25(OH)D concentrations are more similar in MS-concordant pairs, but this may be affected by zygosity (Table 1Go; Figure 1Go). The intrapair difference is simply the absolute value of the difference between 25(OH)D concentration in twin 1 and twin 2. MS-concordant pairs were highly correlated for 25(OH)D concentrations (concordant pairs: r = 0.83, P < 0.001; discordant pairs: r = 0.37, P = 0.01; Table 1Go). The most dissimilar group was the DZ-discordant pairs (intrapair difference: 33.2 nmol/L; correlation: r = 0.28, P = 0.380), whereas MZ-concordant pairs were the most similar (intrapair difference: 20.4 nmol/L; r = 0.86, P = 0.001). The intrapair difference of same-sex compared with opposite-sex pairs was similar (26.6 and 28.3 nmol/L, respectively).


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1. Intraclass correlation of serum 25-hyrdroxy-vitaminD [25(OH)D] concentration (in nmol/L) in monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs. The Pearson correlation coefficients were r = 0.71 (P < 0.001) and r = 0.32 (P = 0.014) for MZ and DZ twins, respectively. The difference between the 2 correlation values was significant (P < 0.006). The dashed lines represent the theoretical axis for full correlation (r = 1) of 25(OH)D concentrations within each twin pair.

 
To test for any significant trends of lower or higher 25(OH)D concentrations in affected subjects, we used logistic regression, after adjustment for age and sex. 25(OH)D concentration was not a significant predictor of MS status in our sample (P = 0.43; Table 2Go). Stratification for the presence or absence of the HLA-DRB1*15 risk alleles did not influence these results (Table 2Go). Conversely, we examined whether MS status predicted 25(OH)D concentrations, and, again, no significant trends were observed (data not shown). Overall, although disease-concordant pairs were significantly correlated for 25(OH)D concentrations, this did not appear to be a result of low or high adult concentrations affecting the likelihood of MS affection status or vice versa.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2 Test for association of log 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations and multiple sclerosis (MS) affection status, with adjustment for age and sex (n = 198) as determined by logistic regression analysis and with stratification by the presence or absence of ≥1 DRB1*15 risk allele

 
Genetic contribution to 25(OH)D concentration
The mean intrapair difference for 25(OH)D concentration was lower in MZ twin pairs than in DZ twin pairs (Table 1Go). We assessed the significance of this intrapair variation with the use of correlation statistics and regression models. Comparison of MZ and DZ correlation coefficients for 25(OH)D concentrations showed higher similarity in MZ twins (r = 0.71, P < 0.001) than in DZ twins (r = 0.32, P = 0.014; Figure 1Go). The difference between these MZ-DZ correlation values was significant (P < 0.006). Both discordant and concordant pairs were included in the zygosity correlation. The heritability estimate for circulating 25(OH)D was calculated [2 x (rMZ – rDZ)], providing an estimate of 0.77. Finally, the assessment of the HLA-DRB1*15 genotype in the twins showed association (as expected) with MS (odds ratio: 1.63, P = 0.01) but not with concentrations of 25(OH)D (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3 Single-locus regression analyses for association of vitamin D receptor(VDR) and 1-{alpha}-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) gene variants with log 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations and multiple sclerosis (MS) affection status1

 
Genetic polymorphisms
Thirty SNPs of the VDR gene and 6 SNPs of the CYP27B1 gene were genotyped in the 150 subjects for whom DNA was available. Multilocus modeling with the use of a forward selection approach was used. We first assessed each SNP individually for association with log serum 25(OH)D concentrations, after adjustment for age, sex, and MS status (Table 3Go). These covariates were not significant predictors of 25(OH)D concentration (P > 0.05); thus, they were dropped from the model. Next, we similarly tested whether the genetic variants were predictors of MS affection status, after adjustment for age, sex, and log 25(OH)D concentrations (Table 3Go). All SNPs with single-locus association of P < 0.05 were considered as potential predictors in the multilocus model. These included 2 CYP27B1 variants and 3 VDR variants (Table 3Go). Results are not presented for the remaining 24 SNPs that showed no trend for association (uncorrected P > 0.05).

A Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was used (P < 0.002) for the multilocus model. VDR SNPs (rs2254210, rs98784) tested for the association with MS status did not reach significance (P = 0.025, P = 0.137, respectively; data not shown). The 2 CYP27B1 SNPs (rs4646536, rs703842) both remained significant predictors of 25(OH)D concentrations (P < 0.001 for both; Table 3Go). Association of the FokI (rs10735810) SNP and 25(OH)D fell slightly below significance (P = 0.005; Table 4Go). The mean concentration in subjects with the FokI genotype (GG) coding for the shorter length VDR was 64.6 ± 5.6 nmol/L compared with 83.2 ± 3.9 nmol/L in subjects with the AA and AG genotype (Table 4Go). Mean concentrations were lower in subjects homozygous for the less frequent C allele in the CYP27B1 SNPs (Table 4Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 4 Multilocus regression modeling to test for independent single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects on association with log 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration1

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
The evidence is compelling that MS is a disease strongly influenced by ≥1 environmental factors in genetically susceptible persons (1). Evidence from the CCPGSMS studies of adoptees (2), step-siblings (5), and half-siblings (3) indicates that the environmental component of MS risk is ubiquitous and acts at a broad population level, rather than within the shared family environment. A protective role for UVR exposure, mediated by vitamin D, remains the most attractive explanation for the latitude gradient of MS prevalence (6, 41). The active vitamin D metabolite, 1,25(OH)2D, is a potent immunomodulator that is important to immune function and development (42). It may be the imbalance or impairment of its immunologic functions that implicates vitamin D insufficiency in the pathogenesis of MS and other autoimmune diseases (42, 43). Chronic low concentrations, seasonal fluctuation, or acute effects are all plausible, but it remains likely that an underlying genetic predisposition to MS is required.

Recently, the evidence in support of the MS–vitamin D theory has mounted. This evidence includes genetic (23-25) and experimental (26, 27) studies, observational case-control and cohort studies (17, 19-22, 44), and clinical evidence (18, 45, 46). There are currently no clinical trials of vitamin D in MS prevention, but 2 treatment trials showed promising findings on reduction of exacerbation rates (47, 48). If MS susceptibility is associated with 25(OH)D concentrations, preventative measures could be implemented easily and cost-effectively (49), especially given the known additional health benefits of vitamin D (9).

Despite numerous reports investigating the vitamin D–MS relation, most evidence is indirect, with relatively few studies measuring patients’ vitamin D concentrations. This may be in part due to the challenge of studying environmental susceptibility factors in adult-onset diseases, especially those for which risk is believed to be acquired early in life, as is suggested for MS (13, 50). The timing of a possible 25(OH)D influence on MS susceptibility is unclear (ie, gestation, childhood, cumulative effects). Given that concentrations are to a certain extent heritable (30, 51), combined with behavioral consistencies, we reasoned that adult 25(OH)D concentrations potentially reflect prediagnosis concentrations, especially if certain persons are prone to insufficiency. Wintertime sampling was used to minimize current environmental effects because UVR wavelength is not effective for cutaneous vitamin D synthesis during the Canadian winter. Furthermore, a short questionnaire was used to reduce bias resulting from use of tanning beds, supplements, and sunshine vacations.

Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were analyzed in CCPGSMS twin subjects to examine the vitamin D–MS relation. We found a higher correlation of 25(OH)D concentrations in pairs in which both twins were affected. Presumably, this observation could be a result of 25(OH)D status influencing disease risk and, thus, the likelihood of concordance or conversely the disease affecting 25(OH)D concentrations. However, analysis of 25(OH)D and MS status (and vice versa) showed no significant associations. HLA-DRB1*15 stratification did not alter this result. Nevertheless, it should be noted that they were adult twin pairs; conclusive determination of 25(OH)D relation to MS risk may require sampling many years before disease onset or even sampling of mothers during gestation.

Several recent case-control studies in Finland (45, 52), Ireland (53), and Australia (46) also reported no difference in adult concentrations of 25(OH)D between MS-affected and MS-unaffected persons. Other studies have observed lower circulating 25(OH)D in MS patients (11, 12). In addition, the mean 25(OH)D concentration observed in our study was higher than previous findings (54, 55), albeit consistent with others (53, 56, 57). These conflicting findings may be a result of regional differences, interassay variation, or study design, including disease stage. Indeed, the Australian study found the trend for likelihood of 25(OH)D insufficiency only among MS patients with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score > 3 (46).

Because the correlation of 25(OH)D concentrations in concordant twin pairs was not a result of MS status, we examined the effects of zygosity on 25(OH)D concentrations. MZ and DZ twin comparisons can provide insight into the genetic influence on a particular trait (58). The limitation of equal environmental sharing in adult twins is acknowledged, and interpretation relies on the assumptions that differences will be similar for MZ and DZ twins and that environmental effect is minimized in the current study. The correlation for 25(OH)D concentrations in MZ twins was more than double that in DZ twins, and the magnitude of the difference was significant. This suggests that gene or gene-environment factors influence the trait.

Evidence for genetic contribution to 25(OH)D concentrations was shown previously in an osteoarthritis twin cohort of mainly women (30), and a genome-wide linkage scan in asthma families reported a heritability index of 0.80 (51). Heritability estimates indicate the amount of phenotypic variance ascribed to genetic factors in a given population (58). They should not be mistaken as a genetic percentage and are both time- and population-dependent. The higher heritability index in the asthma and MS cohorts may be a reflection of 25(OH)D influence on disease susceptibility, such that the genetic effects are easier detected in these cohorts. Given these findings, we conducted a preliminary assessment of vitamin D–related gene region effects on 25(OH)D. Association with MS status was also assessed because this was previously reported (23, 24, 59). After Bonferroni correction, positive associations with 25(OH)D concentrations were observed for 2 CYP27B1 SNPs. Effects of the VDR FokI variant fell slightly below significance, although the trend is interesting, given its genotype-based differences in functionality (60). The resultant VDR isoforms differ structurally, and decreased activity was observed in the longer isoform (60). Although CYP27B1 and VDR actions are downstream of circulating 25(OH)D, causal variants could possibly alter their role in metabolic feedback loops or effect the speed at which 25(OH)D is metabolized. Speculation on the overall importance of these genes is limited by the sample size, and the findings merit follow-up.

Perhaps because of dominating environmental influences, there has been little investigation into the genes involved in regulation of serum 25(OH)D concentrations. Research about vitamin D genes is predominantly focused on SNP-disease associations, and most does not relate this to 25(OH)D or other metabolite concentrations. It is unclear the number, type, and interactions of genes that may be involved, although one quantitative trait locus scan has identified several regions of interest (51). The importance of genes in maintaining vitamin D adequacy is likely to be most significant in regions where UVR exposure is limited or is seasonally limited. It may be that some persons are genetically more susceptible to low 25(OH)D concentrations. There is widespread consensus that current recommended daily intake guidelines for vitamin D are not sufficient for optimal immune health (9, 49). A better understanding of the genetic contribution to 25(OH)D concentrations may have important implications in the debate for changing such guidelines.

Despite numerous studies that consider an association between vitamin D and MS risk, surprisingly few have directly measured serum concentrations of vitamin D [25(OH)D] in MS patients. Although we did not find an association of adult 25(OH)D concentrations and MS status in the current study, that does not rule out the possibility that such a relation exists. It may be that assessing childhood or even maternal concentrations is required to support or refute the vitamin D–MS theory, and the challenges of this are obvious. The present results support a significant genetic influence in determining serum 25(OH)D concentration, and further investigation to decipher the genes involved in its regulation is merited. If a particular genetic background alters 25(OH)D influence on immune function, these genetic factors could in turn affect susceptibility to MS.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank all the participants of the Canadian Collaborative Project on the Genetic Susceptibility to MS involved in the current study. We especially thank Holly Armstrong and Katie ME Morrison for their help with sample and database management, Francisco Yun for his contribution in running the assay experiments, and Professor Marriot for his help in initial stages of statistical analysis.

The authors’ responsibilities were as follows—S-MO: was the principle writer in manuscript preparation, production of figures and tables, literature searches, and data analysis; APM: statistical analyses; BMH, SVR, MRL, and MJC: participated in editing the report, literature searches, initial study set-up, help with genotyping and genetic analyses; RV: managed the serum 25(OH)D laboratory work and discussions; GCE and ADS: planned and executed the study with their students and colleagues. None of the authors had a personal or financial conflict of interest.

The Canadian Collaborative Study Group includes V Devonshire, SA Hashimoto, J Hooge, JJ-F Oger, P Rieckmann, P Smyth, and T Traboulsee (Vancouver); L Metz (Calgary); S Warren (Edmonton); W Hader and K Knox (Saskatoon); M Freedman (Ottawa); D Brunet (Kingston); J Paulseth (Hamilton); G Rice and M Kremenchutzky (London); P O'Connor, T Gray, and M Hohol (Toronto); P Duquette and Y Lapierre (Montreal); TJ Murray, V Bhan, and C Maxner (Halifax); W Pryse-Phillips and M Stefanelli (St Johns).


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Peltonen L. Old suspects found guilty–the first genome profile of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2007;357:927–9.[Free Full Text]
  2. Ebers GC, Sadovnick AD, Risch NJ. A genetic basis for familial aggregation in multiple sclerosis. Canadian Collaborative Study Group. Nature 1995;377:150–1.[Medline]
  3. Ebers GC, Sadovnick AD, Dyment DA, Yee IM, Willer CJ, Risch N. Parent-of-origin effect in multiple sclerosis: observations in half-siblings. Lancet 2004;363:1773–4.[Medline]
  4. Orton SM, Herrera BM, Yee IM, et al. Sex ratio of multiple sclerosis in Canada: a longitudinal study. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:932–6.[Medline]
  5. Dyment DA, Yee IM, Ebers GC, Sadovnick AD. Multiple sclerosis in stepsiblings: recurrence risk and ascertainment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:258–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kurtzke JF. Geography in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 1977;215:1–26.[Medline]
  7. Hayes CE, Cantorna MT, DeLuca HF. Vitamin D and multiple sclerosis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1997;216:21–7.[Abstract]
  8. Goldberg P. Multiple sclerosis: vitamin D and calcium as environmental determinants of prevalence (A viewpoint) part 1: sunlight, dietary factors and epidemiology. Int J Environ Stud 1974;6:19–27.[Medline]
  9. Holick MF. Sunlight and vitamin D for bone health and prevention of autoimmune diseases, cancers, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80(suppl):1678S–88S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Smolders J, Damoiseaux J, Menheere P, Hupperts R. Vitamin D as an immune modulator in multiple sclerosis, a review. J Neuroimmunol 2008;194:7–17.[Medline]
  11. Nieves J, Cosman F, Herbert J, Shen V, Lindsay R. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and reduced bone mass in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1994;44:1687–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ozgocmen S, Bulut S, Ilhan N, Gulkesen A, Ardicoglu O, Ozkan Y. Vitamin D deficiency and reduced bone mineral density in multiple sclerosis: effect of ambulatory status and functional capacity. J Bone Miner Metab 2005;23:309–13.[Medline]
  13. Willer CJ, Dyment DA, Sadovnick AD, Rothwell PM, Murray TJ, Ebers GC. Timing of birth and risk of multiple sclerosis: population based study. BMJ 2005;330:120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Sotgiu S, Pugliatti M, Sotgiu MA, et al. Seasonal fluctuation of multiple sclerosis births in Sardinia. J Neurol 2006;253:38–44.[Medline]
  15. Embry AF, Snowdon LR, Vieth R. Vitamin D and seasonal fluctuations of gadolinium-enhancing magnetic resonance imaging lesions in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2000;48:271–2.[Medline]
  16. Auer DP, Schumann EM, Kumpfel T, Gossl C, Trenkwalder C. Seasonal fluctuations of gadolinium-enhancing magnetic resonance imaging lesions in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2000;47:276–7.[Medline]
  17. Munger KL, Zhang SM, O'Reilly E, et al. Vitamin D intake and incidence of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2004;62:60–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Munger KL, Levin LI, Hollis BW, Howard NS, Ascherio A. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of multiple sclerosis. JAMA 2006;296:2832–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kampman MT, Wilsgaard T, Mellgren SI. Outdoor activities and diet in childhood and adolescence relate to MS risk above the Arctic Circle. J Neurol 2007;254:471–7.[Medline]
  20. van der Mei IA, Ponsonby AL, Dwyer T, et al. Past exposure to sun, skin phenotype, and risk of multiple sclerosis: case-control study. BMJ 2003;327:316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. van der Mei IA, Blizzard L, Ponsonby AL, Dwyer T. Validity and reliability of adult recall of past sun exposure in a case-control study of multiple sclerosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1538–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Freedman DM, Dosemeci M, Alavanja MC. Mortality from multiple sclerosis and exposure to residential and occupational solar radiation: a case-control study based on death certificates. Occup Environ Med 2000;57:418–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Fukazawa T, Yabe I, Kikuchi S, et al. Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism with multiple sclerosis in Japanese. J Neurol Sci 1999;166:47–52.[Medline]
  24. Tajouri L, Ovcaric M, Curtain R, et al. Variation in the vitamin D receptor gene is associated with multiple sclerosis in an Australian population. J Neurogenet 2005;19:25–38.[Medline]
  25. Partridge JM, Weatherby SJ, Woolmore JA, et al. Susceptibility and outcome in MS: associations with polymorphisms in pigmentation-related genes. Neurology 2004;62:2323–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Eyles D, Almeras L, Benech P, et al. Developmental vitamin D deficiency alters the expression of genes encoding mitochondrial, cytoskeletal and synaptic proteins in the adult rat brain. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2007;103:538–45.[Medline]
  27. Cantorna MT, Hayes CE, DeLuca HF. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 reversibly blocks the progression of relapsing encephalomyelitis, a model of multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:7861–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Hollis BW. Assessment of vitamin D nutritional and hormonal status: what to measure and how to do it. Calcif Tissue Int 1996;58:4–5.[Medline]
  29. Pfeffer C. Vererbung und rachitis: eine medizin-geschichtliche studie. PhD dissertation. Düsseldorf Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany, 1938.
  30. Hunter D, De Lange M, Snieder H, et al. Genetic contribution to bone metabolism, calcium excretion, and vitamin D and parathyroid hormone regulation. J Bone Miner Res 2001;16:371–8.[Medline]
  31. Vieth R, Cole DE, Hawker GA, Trang HM, Rubin LA. Wintertime vitamin D insufficiency is common in young Canadian women, and their vitamin D intake does not prevent it. Eur J Clin Nutr 2001;55:1091–7.[Medline]
  32. Matsuoka LY, Wortsman J, Haddad JG, Hollis BW. In vivo threshold for cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D3. J Lab Clin Med 1989;114:301–5.[Medline]
  33. Sadovnick AD, Risch NJ, Ebers GC. Canadian collaborative project on genetic susceptibility to MS, phase 2: rationale and method. Canadian Collaborative Study Group. Can J Neurol Sci 1998;25:216–21.[Medline]
  34. Willer CJ, Dyment DA, Risch NJ, Sadovnick AD, Ebers GC. Twin concordance and sibling recurrence rates in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:12877–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Tangpricha V, Turner A, Spina C, Decastro S, Chen TC, Holick MF. Tanning is associated with optimal vitamin D status (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration) and higher bone mineral density. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:1645–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Hollis BW, Kamerud JQ, Selvaag SR, Lorenz JD, Napoli JL. Determination of vitamin D status by radioimmunoassay with an 125I-labeled tracer. Clin Chem 1993;39:529–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Dyment DA, Herrera BM, Cader MZ, et al. Complex interactions among MHC haplotypes in multiple sclerosis: susceptibility and resistance. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14:2019–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 2005;21:263–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Corporation S. Statistical software: release 7.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation, 2001;
  40. Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics 2000;56:645–6.[Medline]
  41. Acheson ED, Bachrach CA, Wright FM. Some comments on the relationship of the distribution of multiple sclerosis to latitude, solar radiation, and other variables. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1960;35(suppl 147):132–47
  42. Cantorna MT, Mahon BD. Mounting evidence for vitamin D as an environmental factor affecting autoimmune disease prevalence. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2004;229:1136–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Hypponen E, Laara E, Reunanen A, Jarvelin MR, Virtanen SM. Intake of vitamin D and risk of type 1 diabetes: a birth-cohort study. Lancet 2001;358:1500–3.[Medline]
  44. Goldacre MJ, Seagroatt V, Yeates D, Acheson ED. Skin cancer in people with multiple sclerosis: a record linkage study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58:142–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Soilu-Hanninen M, Laaksonen M, Laitinen I, Eralinna JP, Lilius EM, Mononen I. A longitudinal study of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and intact parathyroid hormone levels indicate the importance of vitamin D and calcium homeostasis regulation in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:152–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. van der Mei IA, Ponsonby AL, Dwyer T, et al. Vitamin D levels in people with multiple sclerosis and community controls in Tasmania, Australia. J Neurol 2007;254:581–90.[Medline]
  47. Goldberg P, Fleming MC, Picard EH. Multiple sclerosis: decreased relapse rate through dietary supplementation with calcium, magnesium and vitamin D. Med Hypotheses 1986;21:193–200.[Medline]
  48. Wingerchuk DM, Lesaux J, Rice GP, Kremenchutzky M, Ebers GC. A pilot study of oral calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1294–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Dietrich T, Dawson-Hughes B. Estimation of optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for multiple health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:18–28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Detels R, Visscher BR, Haile RW, Malmgren RM, Dudley JP, Coulson AH. Multiple sclerosis and age at migration. Am J Epidemiol 1978;108:386–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Wjst M, Altmuller J, Braig C, Bahnweg M, Andre E. A genome-wide linkage scan for 25-OH-D(3) and 1,25-(OH)2-D3 serum levels in asthma families. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2007;103:799–802.[Medline]
  52. Soilu-Hanninen M, Airas L, Mononen I, Heikkila A, Viljanen M, Hanninen A. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D levels in serum at the onset of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2005;11:266–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Barnes MS, Bonham MP, Robson PJ, et al. Assessment of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 concentrations in male and female multiple sclerosis patients and control volunteers. Mult Scler 2007;13:670–2.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Vieth R, Chan PC, MacFarlane GD. Efficacy and safety of vitamin D3 intake exceeding the lowest observed adverse effect level. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:288–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Rucker D, Allan JA, Fick GH, Hanley DA. Vitamin D insufficiency in a population of healthy western Canadians. CMAJ 2002;166:1517–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Lips P, Duong T, Oleksik A, et al. A global study of vitamin D status and parathyroid function in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: baseline data from the multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:1212–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Tangpricha V, Pearce EN, Chen TC, Holick MF. Vitamin D insufficiency among free-living healthy young adults. Am J Med 2002;112:659–62.[Medline]
  58. Martin N, Boomsma D, Machin G. A twin-pronged attack on complex traits. Nat Genet 1997;17:387–92.[Medline]
  59. Niino M, Fukazawa T, Yabe I, Kikuchi S, Sasaki H, Tashiro K. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism in multiple sclerosis and the association with HLA class II alleles. J Neurol Sci 2000;177:65–71.[Medline]
  60. Uitterlinden AG, Fang Y, Van Meurs JB, Pols HA, Van Leeuwen JP. Genetics and biology of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms. Gene 2004;338:143–56.[Medline]
Received for publication March 4, 2008. Accepted for publication May 9, 2008.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orton, S.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Ebers, G. C
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Orton, S.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Ebers, G. C
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Orton, S.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Ebers, G. C

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS