AJCN EB Program 2010 Early Registration
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Erratum for Forshee et al., Am J Clin Nutr 87 (6) 1662-1671.
Am J Clin Nutr 89: 441-442, 2009. First published December 3, 2008; doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.27217
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.27217
Vol. 89, No. 1, 441-442, January 2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/1/441    most recent
ajcn.2008.27217v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
© 2009 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

Erratum

Forshee RA, Anderson PA, Storey ML. Sugar-sweetened beverages and body mass index in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:1662–71.

Two of the studies (1, 2) included in our recently published meta-analysis of the relation between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and body mass index (BMI) in children and adolescents estimated their models using 1 oz as the unit of analysis for beverage consumption. We should have scaled the coefficients and standard errors for these 2 studies by a factor of 12 to make them comparable with the other studies. Both of these studies estimated a small negative association between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and BMI that was not statistically significant. The revised overall estimate is a 0.03 (95% CI: –0.01, 0.07) BMI unit change per serving compared with the original estimate of 0.02 (95% CI: –0.01, 0.04). This correction does not affect any of the substantive conclusions of the article. An updated version of the data set can be found under "Supplemental data" in the current online issue. Corrected versions of Figures 1 and 2 appear above.


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. Forest plot of studies of sugar-sweetened beverage (SB) consumption and BMI (in kg/m2) in children and adolescents. I–V, fixed-effects estimate (inverse variance method); D+L, random-effects estimate (Der Simonian and Laird method). The points for each study indicate the reported estimate for the predicted change ({Delta}) in BMI per serving {Delta}SB consumption. The size of the gray boxes indicates the weight the study received in the calculation of the overall association and CI. The weight given each study is based on the precision of the estimate. The horizontal lines indicate the 95% CI for each study. The 2 diamonds represent the overall estimate of the predicted {Delta}BMI per serving {Delta}SB consumption, based on the pooled results from all studies. The upper open diamond represents the fixed-effects estimation that assumes that the "true" treatment effects in all of the studies are the same. The lower open diamond represents the random-effects estimation that assumes that the true treatment effect may vary across studies. The study by Mrdjenovic and Levitsky (21) was omitted from this forest plot because it had a much larger CI than any other study. The omission of that study does not affect either the fixed-effects or random-effects estimates. ES, effect size.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2. Funnel plot of studies of sugar-sweetened beverage (SB) consumption and BMI (in kg/m2) in children and adolescents. Studies are plotted with the estimated coefficient along the horizontal axis and the SE of the coefficient along the vertical access. In the absence of publication bias, the plot should be symmetric around the average coefficient with greater dispersion among the less-precise studies at the bottom of the plot. This plot does not suggest publication bias.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Blum, JW, Jacobsen, DJ & Donnelly, JE. Beverage consumption patterns in elementary school aged children across a two-year period. J Am Coll Nutr 2005;24:93–8..[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Newby, PK, Peterson, KE, Berkey, CS, Leppert, J, Willett, WC & Colditz, GA. Beverage consumption is not associated with changes in weight and body mass index among low-income preschool children in North Dakota. J Am Diet Assoc 2004;104:1086–94..[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/1/441    most recent
ajcn.2008.27217v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS