|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION |
1 From the Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
2 Presented at the symposium "The Emerging Interplay among Muscle Mitochondrial Function, Nutrition, and Disease" held at Experimental Biology 2008, San Diego, CA, 5 April 2008. 3 Supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERCC; LLS and AB), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (AB), and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (AB). AB holds a Canada Research Chair in Metabolism and Health. GPH was supported by an NSERCC graduate scholarship. 4 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to LL Spriet, Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1. E-mail: lspriet{at}uoguelph.ca.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
coactivator 1
(PGC1
), PGC1β, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
), and mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) were not reduced with obesity. In contrast, it appears that obesity is associated with altered regulation of cofactors (PGC1
and PGC1β) and their downstream transcription factors (PPAR
, PPAR
/β, and TFAM), because relations among these variables were present in muscle from lean individuals but not from obese individuals. These findings imply that obese individuals would benefit from interventions that increase the skeletal muscle mitochondrial content and the potential for oxidizing FAs. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This brief review focuses on recent literature from our laboratory that has expanded the understanding of the regulation of FA metabolism in skeletal muscle. Particular emphasis is placed on the transport of FA across the mitochondrial membranes for ultimate oxidation and the effects of obesity on mitochondrial function in human skeletal muscle.
| FA TRANSPORT ACROSS THE MUSCLE AND MITOCHONDRIAL MEMBRANES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In skeletal muscle, the long-chain FA transport proteins are located in several subcellular domains (7), and recently FAT/CD36 was found on rat and human muscle mitochondria (8–10). At this location, FAT/CD36, along with carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPTI), contributes to regulating mitochondrial FA transport and oxidation in skeletal muscle at rest, since blocking mitochondrial FAT/CD36 has been shown to almost completely inhibit FA oxidation (8–10). During exercise, mitochondrial FA oxidation is up-regulated and accompanied by an increase in mitochondrial FAT/CD36 content (8, 10). The exercise-induced increase in FA oxidation is also completely inhibited when FAT/CD36 is pharmacologically blocked (8, 10). In other work, an increase in mitochondrial FAT/CD36 has been associated with exercise-induced weight loss and an improvement in whole-body FA oxidation (11). Thus, it appears that changes in mitochondrial FAT/CD36 are associated with changes in mitochondrial FA oxidation. These studies do not negate the well-known role of CPTI activity in mitochondrial FA oxidation. However, it appears that FAT/CD36 works in conjunction with CPTI, because together these 2 proteins predict rates of mitochondrial FA oxidation (9), and FAT/CD36 and CPTI are colocalized in mitochondria (8, 11).
FABPpm is another well-recognized plasma membrane FA transport protein that has also been found on mitochondria (12, 13). However, the role of FABPpm with respect to mitochondrial FA oxidation remains unknown. The current thinking is that the main function of FABPpm is to transport reducing equivalents into the mitochondria, because the protein is identical to mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase, a key enzyme in the malate-aspartate shuttle system (12, 13).
| OBESITY AND MITOCHONDRIAL FUNCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has also been suggested that reductions in FA oxidation in obese individuals contribute to IMTG accumulation (21–24). On the basis of reductions in whole-muscle CPTI activity in skeletal muscle from obese individuals, it has been proposed that FA transport into the mitochondria is diminished. This may account for the observed reduction in whole-muscle FA oxidation (22). It is possible that this reflects a decrease in mitochondrial content, although other proteins may also be involved.
Are mitochondria from skeletal muscle from obese individuals dysfunctional?
The net accumulation of lipids in obese skeletal muscle may result from a combination of increased whole-muscle FA uptake and/or decreased whole-muscle oxidation. Although the concept of impaired FA oxidation as a mechanism to increase intramuscular lipid species has gained attention in recent years, the exact mechanisms remain unknown. However, 3 plausible explanations exist: 1) mitochondrial content is decreased, 2) there is a dysfunction in FA oxidation within mitochondria, or 3) both of these conditions occur. Previous work in skeletal muscle indicated a reduction in mitochondrial content with obesity along with a concomitant decrease in FA oxidation (21), suggesting that mitochondria from obese individuals contain an inherent dysfunction to oxidize FA. In some studies the ratios of electron transport chain capacity to mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and size have been used to infer mitochondrial dysfunction for FA oxidation (21, 23). It has also been suggested that the relative proportion of FAs that are completely oxidized is decreased with obesity (25). Because β oxidation is regulated by substrate and product concentrations, an imbalance among β oxidation, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and electron transport chain activities would increase the amount of acyl-CoAs located within the cell. This may have deleterious effects and could induce oxidative damage in mitochondria and induce apoptosis, although this remains speculative. In addition, more FAT/CD36 is located on the plasma membrane without total expression being altered in the obese state. It is therefore possible that less would be available for mitochondria, potentially compromising oxidation and explaining the previously observed "mitochondrial dysfunction" in the obese state.
It should be mentioned that not all studies have reported decreased mitochondrial function with obesity. A recent study that measured the ability of mitochondria to oxidize FA directly in skeletal muscle from obese patients with type 2 diabetes reported the controversial finding of increased FA oxidation (26). However, this finding may not be directly applicable to the obese nondiabetic population and the underlying mechanism remains unknown.
Skeletal muscle mitochondria are not dysfunctional in obesity
Recent work in our laboratory focused on examination of whether obesity-related decreases in skeletal muscle lipid oxidation were attributable to a reduction in mitochondrial content or an intrinsic defect in mitochondria, and whether there were reductions in the content of mitochondrial FA transport proteins. We hypothesized that nondiabetic obesity would be associated with decreases in skeletal muscle mitochondrial content, as well as decreases in the ability of mitochondria to oxidize FA. In addition, we speculated that impairments in mitochondrial oxidation would be associated with reductions in the content of mitochondrial FAT/CD36 and FABPpm.
In age-matched lean [body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2): 23.3 ± 0.7] and obese (BMI: 37.6 ± 2.2) individuals, citrate synthase (CS) and β-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (β-HAD) activities, common markers of total muscle mitochondrial volume and the capacity for FA oxidation, were decreased in muscle from obese individuals (27). This suggested that a decrease in mitochondrial volume was present and appeared to account for the observed reductions in FA oxidation, because isolated mitochondrial palmitate oxidation was not altered in muscle from obese subjects (Figure 1). In addition, mitochondrial FAT/CD36 and FABPpm content did not differ between lean and obese individuals when normalized to mitochondrial protein content (Figure 2). In summary, the mitochondria isolated from obese individuals were not dysfunctional. There simply was less mitochondrial volume and lower rates of whole-muscle FA oxidation.
|
|
|
: 37.6) but there was no mitochondrial dysfunction, so it is possible that the subjects were below this threshold. The obese group displayed reductions in whole-muscle CS and β-HAD activities and reduced whole-muscle FA oxidation rates, indicating that lipid oxidation was compromised. Thus, the current data again suggest that the reductions in FA oxidation that have been associated with obesity result from reductions in mitochondrial content, and not from intrinsic mitochondrial alterations. This is an important distinction because it suggests that interventions are required to increase overall mitochondrial biogenesis, without any "remodeling" of existing mitochondria. Indeed, previous work showed that regular exercise increased CS, β-HAD, and CPTI activities and therefore mitochondria volume in an obese population (28). Associated with these changes were increases in FA oxidation, reductions in total DAG and total ceramide contents, and improved insulin sensitivity (28).
We originally hypothesized that mitochondria from obese individuals would display an impaired ability to oxidize FA. It has been suggested that subsarcolemmal (SS) mitochondria from obese individuals may display a disproportionate impairment in FA oxidation, because a greater reduction in the ratio of electron transport chain activity to mtDNA was observed in this mitochondrial fraction (23). The SS fraction represents only
25% of the total mitochondria in skeletal muscle (29). In our study we pooled the SS mitochondria with the intermyofibrillar (IMF) mitochondria to ensure that adequate protein was recovered for our functional assays (27). Although this approach limited our ability to detect impairments in the SS mitochondria, in the previously mentioned study (23) a significant reduction in the ratio of electron transport chain activity to mtDNA was also observed in IMF mitochondria and at the whole-muscle level. Although this suggested dysfunction in all mitochondria, the current data suggest that mitochondrial dysfunction in FA oxidation is not required for reductions in whole-muscle FA oxidation. It should be noted that only a small fraction of mitochondria were recovered during the isolation procedures (
20%), and therefore it is possible that a metabolic dysfunction was present in the mitochondria that were not recovered. Because the various subcellular mitochondria were pooled in the current study, future research will need to examine the potential differences in the SS and IMF mitochondria of obese individuals.
In the study by our laboratory, obese participants actually displayed a trend (P = 0.12) toward an increase in the capacity of mitochondria to oxidize FA (27). Previously, Bandyopadhyay et al (26) reported that the mitochondrial capacity to oxidize FA in obese patients with type 2 diabetes (BMI: 36.9) was actually increased. Together, these studies suggest that a "reverse continuum" may exist in mitochondrial oxidation with obesity. That is, whereas whole-muscle FA oxidation may decrease with increasing BMI as a result of reductions in mitochondrial content, the capacity of the remaining mitochondria to oxidize FA may actually compensate by increasing oxidation in an undetermined manner to counteract this effect. Although a clear increase in mitochondrial FA oxidation in muscle from obese and diabetic populations has not been clearly established, there is no suggestion of a decrease.
Other evidence that mitochondrial function is normal in obesity
Two additional recent studies that directly measured the oxygen consumption of mitochondria isolated from lean and obese diabetic individuals concluded that there was no mitochondrial dysfunction in skeletal muscle from obese individuals. Boushel et al (30) demonstrated that whole-muscle FA oxidation was impaired with obesity. However, when the data were normalized to CS activity or mtDNA, this finding was lost, again indicating that obese diabetic individuals simply have less mitochondria in their skeletal muscle. Of importance, Boushel et al (30) measured oxygen consumption instead of radioactively labeled substrate consumption, which enables mitochondrial respiration to be measured in state 4 (quiescent) and state 3 (ADP-stimulated) conditions. This provided an indication of the metabolic responsiveness of the mitochondria. These measures provided additional evidence that mitochondria do not have an intrinsic dysfunction, because the respiratory control ratio (RCR, state 3/state 4) was similar between patients with diabetes and lean controls (30). Of interest, in another laboratory, Mogensen et al (31) reported a reduction in oxygen consumption in mitochondria isolated from individuals with type 2 diabetes compared with obese individuals, and associated with this was a reduction in the RCR value. However, these results were only observed when pyruvate and malate were used as substrates. When palmitoylcarnitine was used (the product of CPTI, thereby removing any differences in this enzyme from compromising the interpretation), no dysfunction was observed in oxygen consumption or in the RCR values, again implying normal functioning mitochondria (31).
It appears that at least 4 publications have now demonstrated that mitochondria isolated from obese (nondiabetic and diabetic) individuals do not contain an inherent dysfunction (26, 27, 30, 31). However, we must remember that the mitochondrial isolation techniques used in 3 of these studies may alter the morphology of mitochondria and that only
20% of the total mitochondria are recovered (26, 27, 31). Therefore, it is possible that a mitochondrial dysfunction affecting FA oxidation may be present in vivo, and newer methodologies will be needed to fully confirm the data supporting the findings that mitochondrial function in the skeletal muscle of obese individuals is normal. However, Boushel et al (30) used a permeabilized-fiber technique that avoids some of these problems and reported similar findings.
| WHY IS MITOCHONDRIAL CONTENT REDUCED IN OBESITY? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The coordination between mtDNA and nuclear DNA transcription is a key component of mitochondrial biogenesis. Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor
coactivator 1
(PGC1
) has been considered the "master regulator" coordinating these events (32), because overexpression of PGC1
results in increases in both nuclear and mitochondrial proteins (33). It has also become apparent that PGC1
coordinates these events by activating downstream transcription factors, including nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF-1) (34) and NRF-2 (35). Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor
coactivator 1 β (PGC1β) has not been studied to the same extent as PGC1
. However, it has also been implicated in the proliferation of mitochondria in skeletal muscle (36) and its overexpression prevented diet-induced insulin resistance (37).
Reductions in PGC1
and PGC1β have been linked to the presence of skeletal muscle insulin resistance because the mRNAs of these proteins were decreased with diabetes (38, 39), and single nucleotide polymorphisms in PGC1
and PGC1β (40, 41) have been reported in obesity and diabetes. However, the picture is not totally clear because reductions in PGC1
and PGC1β expression are not always present with insulin resistance (42), and research in humans has been limited mainly to mRNA data and not protein measurements. The role of PGC1
protein in obesity-related insulin resistance in rodent muscle is also unclear, because ablating PGC1
unexpectedly improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in mice consuming a high-fat diet (43), and overexpressing PGC1
in mice unexpectedly induced insulin resistance (44). This may be attributable to a massive PGC1
up-regulation that increases the accumulation of intramuscular lipids to a greater extent than the increased capacity for their oxidation (45).
Given the prominent roles of PGC1
and PGC1β and their downstream targets [eg, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM)] in regulating mitochondrial biogenesis and the capacity to oxidize FA in muscle, we sought to determine 1) whether PGC1
and PGC1β protein contents are reduced in the skeletal muscle of obese individuals, and 2) whether the protein content of other transcription factors located downstream of PGC1
and β (PPAR
, PPAR
/β, PPAR
, and TFAM) are also reduced in the skeletal muscle of obese individuals.
Of interest, obesity did not alter the skeletal muscle protein content of PGC1
and PGC1β (Figure 4), PPAR
, or TFAM (46). In contrast, there was a significant 22% increase in PPAR
and a nonsignificant 31% increase (P = 0.13) in PPAR
/β. PGC1
was significantly correlated with palmitate oxidation in lean participants, but this relation was lost in obese individuals (Figure 5). In contrast, PGC1β protein content did not correlate with palmitate oxidation in lean and obese individuals.
|
|
protein content did not correlate with PGC1β in lean and obese individuals. PGC1
protein expression did not correlate with PPAR
, PPAR
, or PPAR
/β in lean participants, but did significantly correlate with both PPAR
and PPAR
/β in obese individuals (Figure 6).
|
, PGC1β, PPAR
, PPAR
/β, or TFAM, and that compensatory increases in PPAR
occurred with obesity. In addition, PGC1
correlated with palmitate oxidation in the lean individuals only, and PGC1β correlated with PPAR
and PPAR
/β in lean individuals only. The latter 2 findings suggest that the coordinated regulation of selected transcription factors involved in mitochondrial biogenesis was lost with obesity. The concept that reduced PGC1
expression is the explanation for the observed reduction in FA oxidation with insulin resistance associated with obesity is not supported by these recent data. The PGC1
protein was not reduced in the skeletal muscle of obese individuals, whereas the muscle mitochondrial content was markedly reduced (27). Although these findings contradict much of the literature regarding PGC1
mRNA data, mRNA changes are only weakly associated with changes in PGC1
protein (47) and there is only a modest relation between skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity and PGC1
mRNA (48). In support of our findings, a recent publication reported no change in either PGC1
mRNA or total protein with obesity (49). These observations underscore the complexity of mechanisms that regulate protein expression, including the influence of phosphorylation on increasing PGC1
mRNA stability (50) or activation (51), the ability of other proteins to suppress PGC1
activity (52), and the importance of nuclear import (53). Puigserver and colleagues (54) have proposed a 3-step model of activation that includes PGC1
interacting and docking with transcription factors, undergoing a conformational change that enables binding of additional cofactors, and subsequent induction of transcription. Clearly this is a complex process, and one should use caution when interpreting data that provide insight into only one of these 3 steps. However, the current data suggest that the reduction in mitochondrial content associated with obesity does not involve diminished PGC1
protein, and may be located downstream of PGC1
and involve activation or repression. | CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
or PGC1β in skeletal muscle, and that the PPARs (
and potentially
/β) may be up-regulated in response to the decreases in lipid oxidation associated with obesity. The relation between PGC1
and palmitate oxidation was also lost with obesity, as were the relations among PGC1β, PPAR
, and PPAR
/β. These data suggest that the regulation of PGC1
and PGC1β, and not total protein, is altered with obesity. These findings imply that obese individuals would benefit from interventions that increase the skeletal muscle mitochondrial content and the potential for oxidizing FAs. (Other articles in this supplement to the Journal include references 55 and 56.)
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
relationship with skeletal muscle palmitate oxidation is not present with obesity despite maintained PGC1
and PGC1β protein. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2008;294:E1060–9..This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. R Short Introduction to symposium proceedings: the emerging interplay among muscle mitochondrial function, nutrition, and disease Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 453S - 454S. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. O Holloszy Skeletal muscle "mitochondrial deficiency" does not mediate insulin resistance Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 463S - 466S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. R Lanza and K S. Nair Muscle mitochondrial changes with aging and exercise Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 467S - 471S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |