| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION |
1 From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (EEZ, SEN, and JMJ). 2 Supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant HD40315) and by Mead Johnson Nutritionals, Evansville, IN, through financial support and donation of the iron-vitamin supplements. The funding sources had no influence on the design or interpretation of the study. 3 Reprints not available. Address correspondence to Ekhard E. Ziegler, Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, A-136 MTF, 2501 Crosspark Road, Coralville, IA 52241-8802. E-mail: ekhard-ziegler{at}uiowa.edu.
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Objective: The study assessed the effect of early iron supplementation of breastfed infants and tested the hypothesis that iron supplementation enhances iron status. Potential adverse effects (tolerance and growth) were monitored.
Design: The prospective, placebo-controlled study involved exclusively breastfed infants who were randomly assigned at 1 mo of age to iron (n = 37) or placebo (n = 38). Iron (7 mg/d as multivitamin preparation with ferrous sulfate) or placebo (multivitamin preparation without iron) was given from 1 to 5.5 mo of age. Complementary foods were allowed at >4 mo. Infants were followed to 18 mo. Blood concentrations of ferritin, transferrin receptor, hemoglobin, and red cell indexes were determined at bimonthly intervals. Stool consistency and color and feeding behavior were recorded.
Results: Iron supplementation caused modest augmentation of iron status during the intervention at 4 and 5.5 mo but not thereafter. Iron supplements were well tolerated and had no measurable effect on growth. One infant developed iron deficiency anemia by 5.5 mo of age. Plasma ferritin and hemoglobin tracked over time.
Conclusion: Early iron supplementation of breastfed infants is feasible and transiently increases iron status but not hematologic status. Iron is tolerated by most infants. The prevalence of iron deficiency anemia is low (3%) among unsupplemented breastfed infants in the first 6 mo of life.
See corresponding article on page 473.
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
0.7 mg/d of absorbed iron (3).
There is evidence that some normal infants are born with diminished iron stores (4–6). Such infants could exhaust their iron endowment and become iron deficient before 6 mo of age. Indeed, Makrides et al (7) reported that in Adelaide, Australia, 1% of 6-mo-old breastfed infants had iron deficiency anemia (IDA), and 15% had iron deficiency (ID). Domellöf et al (8) reported that the prevalence of IDA among 4-mo-old breastfed infants was 1% in Sweden and 3% in Honduras. By 6 mo of age, the prevalence of IDA in Honduras had increased to 18.8%, whereas it was still 1% in Sweden. Similarly, Lind et al (9) found IDA in 2% of 6-mo-old Swedish infants and ID in 9%. In Norway, Hay et al (10) reported the prevalence of "low iron status" to be 4% at 6 mo of age. Lozoff et al (11) reported for Chile that 3.6% of predominantly breastfed infants had IDA at 5–6 mo of age. In Denmark, on the other hand, Michaelsen et al (12) detected no ID with or without anemia at 6 mo of age. ID in young infants that is severe enough to cause anemia carries the risk of impaired neurocognitive development (11, 13).
One strategy for the prevention of ID in breastfed infants could be the provision of iron supplementation beginning at <6 mo of age. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that early iron supplementation augments iron stores in breastfed infants. It would have been desirable to test the hypothesis that iron supplementation prevents ID, but power calculation indicated that study of the required number of subjects was not feasible. In the present placebo-controlled, randomized study, iron supplementation was started at 1 mo of age and was ended at 5.5 mo of age, by which age most breastfed infants receive complementary foods as potential sources of iron. Because iron supplementation has in some studies been shown to have adverse effects on growth (14–17), growth was carefully monitored.
|
SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Enrollment occurred in 2 phases, with an initial phase involving 40 infants (birth dates February to November 1998) and a second phase involving 35 infants (birth dates January to October 2001). The hiatus in enrollment was dictated by the availability of funds. Infants in the initial phase were similar in mean weight (4296 g) and length (53.9 cm) at enrollment to infants in the second phase (mean weight 4512 g, mean length 53.9 cm). Infants in the initial phase had significantly lower PF (unadjusted and adjusted) at most ages than infants enrolled in the second phase. However, there was no phase x treatment interaction on PF.
Sample size
Sample size was determined on the basis of PF concentration, which is proportional to iron stores, the endpoint of primary interest. We reasoned that for early iron supplementation to be clinically useful, it would have to augment iron stores, not only during supplementation but also for some time thereafter. We therefore chose PF concentration at 9 mo of age as the endpoint (ie, 3.5 mo after cessation of supplementation). Our own data (18) indicated that in 9-mo-old infants, PF concentration has an SD of 16.5 µg/L. We considered a PF difference of 12 µg/L to be clinically relevant. To detect a difference of 12 µg/L at 
= 0.05 and β = 0.20, we needed 31 subjects for a 2-sided test. With an estimated attrition rate of 15%, we needed to enroll 74 infants.
Feedings
To be eligible for enrollment at 1 mo of age, infants had to be exclusively breastfed, which was defined as absence of supplemental formula and complementary foods. Vitamin supplements were permitted, but the use of medicinal iron was prohibited at all times. There were otherwise no rules or restrictions regarding the infant's diet. However, to remain in the study, at 4 mo infants had to be predominantly breastfed (defined as <200 mL/d of formula) and at 5.5 mo had to be receiving at least some breast milk. At 4 mo, 7 infants received small amounts of supplemental formula, whereas 3 infants (1 infant at 2 mo, 2 infants at 4 mo) received >200 mL of formula and were dropped from the study. Seven infants received small amounts of infant cereal. At 5.5 mo of age, all of the 63 infants remaining in the study were breastfed, but 17 also received formula and all but 2 received cereal or other complementary foods. At 9 mo, 41 infants were breastfed (14 with supplemental formula and all but 2 with complementary foods) and 20 infants were fed formula but were no longer breastfed. At 12 mo, 26 infants were breastfed, and only 4 of them also received formula; the remaining infants were fed formula (n = 10) or cow milk (n = 20). At 18 mo of age, 10 subjects were still (partially) breastfed.
Subjects
The subjects were term infants of either sex with birth weights of >2500 g who were considered normal by their physicians and the investigators. By chance all were white. The study team was not involved in providing health care to the subjects. However, when abnormal laboratory results were encountered, the subject's parents and physician were notified. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board, and one parent provided written informed consent for each child.
Of 75 infants enrolled at 1 mo of age, 37 (18 females, 19 males) were randomly assigned to iron supplementation and 38 (19 females, 19 males) to placebo (Figure 1). Four infants (3 in the iron supplementation and 1 in the placebo group) were withdrawn within 1 mo of enrollment because the parents felt that the infants did not "tolerate" the study supplement. Intolerance consisted in constipation (one in the iron supplementation and one in the placebo group), vomiting (one in the iron supplementation group), or loose stools (one in the iron supplementation group). Four additional infants dropped out after enrollment because the family moved away (one in the iron supplementation group) or for unknown reasons (1 in the iron supplementation group and 2 in the placebo group). Four infants lost eligibility and were excluded because they were no longer predominantly breastfed (1 in the iron supplementation group at 2 mo and 2 in the placebo group at 4 mo) or because the infant (one in the placebo group) received iron drops prescribed by his physician. Thus, the intervention was completed at 5.5 mo of age by 63 infants (31 in the iron supplementation group and 32 in the placebo group). No data were obtained beyond the point where infants left the study, for whatever reason.
|
7.8% of supplemental iron given between meals in the form of a vitamin–ferrous sulfate preparation. Infants assigned to the placebo group received 0.7 mL of a vitamin preparation (Tri-Vi-Sol; Mead Johnson Nutritionals) daily, which provided the same amounts of vitamins but no iron. The supplements were provided in amber 50-mL bottles that were indistinguishable from one another and were labeled only by code. Droppers calibrated at 0.7 mL were provided. The parents were instructed to give the study supplement once a day by dropper directly into the mouth of the infant and to do so just at the beginning of a feeding. Supplement bottles were weighed before dispensing, and at each visit parents returned used supplement bottles, which were weighed to determine the amount of supplement consumed by the infant.
Procedures
Infants visited the study center every 28 d. Visits occurred within the specified tolerance limits of ±4 d (for infants aged 1–9 mo) and ±7 d (for infants aged 12–18 mo), respectively, with the exception of 14 visits (5 between 1 and 9 mo and 9 between 12 and 18 mo) that occurred outside these limits. At each visit, weight and length were measured using established methods (20) by 2 individuals (out of a pool of 5) trained in anthropometric methods. Length was measured by 2 individuals who each made separate measurements in alternating positions. If their measurements did not agree to 
4 mm, the measurements were repeated until agreement was reached. The average of the 2 measurements was used. Scales were calibrated at regular intervals. Before each visit, parents completed a feeding questionnaire and a stool and behavior questionnaire. The feeding questionnaire asked whether the infant was fed formula or complementary foods and how much of these the infant typically consumed. In the stool questionnaire the parents recorded for each of the 4 preceding days the color, number, and consistency of stools as well as feeding-related behaviors such as spitting up, fussiness, and gas. The questionnaires were checked at the time of the visit for completeness by the nursing staff, and any ambiguities were clarified.
Blood collection and analysis
At selected ages, capillary blood was collected by heel stick by using a disposable spring-loaded device (Tenderfoot; International Technidyne Corporation, Edison, NJ). Approximately 1 mL of blood was collected into heparin-treated tubes. Hemoglobin concentration and red cell indices [mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and red cell distribution width (RDW)] were determined immediately on whole blood by using a Coulter AcT diff Hematology Analyzer (Coulter Corporation, Irving, TX). The blood was then centrifuged, and plasma was used to measure PF concentration (by radioimmunoassay using the Quantimune kit; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA); sTfR concentration was measured by using enzyme immunoassay (Ramco kit, catalog number TF-94; Houston, TX) kit. CRP concentration was determined by a 2-sided enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay developed in our laboratory.
Data analysis
ID was defined as a PF concentration < 10 µg/L and anemia as a hemoglobin concentration < 105 g/L at <9 mo of age and as hemoglobin < 100 g/L at 
9 mo (21).
Statistical analysis was performed on data from the 63 subjects who completed the intervention to 5.5 mo. Because no data were obtained beyond the point where subjects left the study, intention-to-treat analysis was not performed. Data for 3 infants who developed ID in the first year of life were excluded from analysis from the point where treatment with iron or dietary means was initiated. Because there was an inverse correlation of PF with current body weight (but not with birth weight) at all ages except 1 mo, PF values were adjusted for current body weight. And because of a sizable (not significant) difference of PF between groups at 1 mo, PF values were also adjusted for PF at 1 mo. Adjusted and unadjusted PF values showed nonnormal distribution at most ages. Statistical analysis was therefore performed after log transformation, but only nontransformed values with arithmetic means and SDs are shown. PF concentrations and other indicators of iron status were compared between study groups by 2-factor (group, sex) analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedures. Weight and length measurements were corrected to the exact nominal ages by parabolic interpolation. Weight and length attained and gains in weight and length were compared by using ANOVA procedures. Gains in weight and length were also calculated with correction for initial weight and length, respectively, by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Percentiles of weight and length were calculated on the basis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth references (24). Stool and behavior data were expressed as proportions of total observations for each subject. Proportions for study groups were compared by t test. Total number of stools was also compared by t test.
Because ferritin is an acute-phase reactant, during inflammation or infection PF concentration may be elevated and therefore not indicative of iron stores. The presence of ID can thus be masked and the size of iron stores overestimated. Unfortunately, concurrent measurement of CRP is not a reliable means of identifying PF values that are acute-phase elevated. From our longitudinal data, it was evident that PF may sometimes be normal in the presence of elevated CRP, and conversely, PF may be clearly elevated when CRP is normal. Presumably, the explanation is that ferritin rises sooner and remains elevated longer than CRP (22, 23). We therefore classified a PF value as elevated if it was >2-fold the mean of the preceding and subsequent value (or either of these values in the case of PF at 1 and 18 mo). The classification of elevated PF values therefore rested entirely on 2 adjacent PF values and not on CRP.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Feedings
At 4 mo of age, 7 study infants received small amounts (<200 mL/d) of supplemental formula, and 7 received small amounts of infant cereal. At 5.5 mo of age, all of the 63 infants remaining in the study were still breastfed; however 17 also received formula and all but 2 received cereal or other complementary foods. At 9 mo, 20 infants were no longer breastfed and were fed formula, all infants who were breastfed received complementary foods, and 14 received supplemental formula. At 12 mo, 23 infants were breastfed, and only 4 of them also received formula; the remaining infants were fed formula (n = 10) or cow milk (n = 20). At 18 mo of age, 10 subjects were still (partially) breastfed. Compliance with the study intervention was very good. Disappearance of supplements among those who completed the intervention averaged 113% of expected (range: 88–145%) in the iron supplementation group and 112% of expected (range: 89–130%) in the placebo group.
Iron status
Iron status data are summarized in Table 1. During the period 1–9 mo, 7 PF values were classified as elevated and excluded from data analysis, and between 12 and 18 mo, an additional 5 PF values were excluded. Data for PF are shown unadjusted as well as adjusted for current body weight and initial PF. Adjusted PF data are shown in Figure 2 for the 63 infants who completed the study. At 1 mo of age, mean unadjusted PF was somewhat lower (not statistically significant) in the iron supplementation group than in the placebo group. In both study groups, PF showed the expected decline with age. It is evident that iron supplementation slowed down the decline somewhat. The difference between iron supplementation and placebo in unadjusted PF was statistically significant (by ANOVA) at 5.5 and 7.5 mo, whereas the difference in adjusted PF was statistically significant at 4 and 5.5 mo. The age x treatment interaction on adjusted PF was statistically significant at P = 0.001 through 5.5 mo. After 7.5 mo, neither adjusted nor unadjusted PF differed significantly. At 1 mo, unadjusted PF was higher (P = 0.05) in females than in males, and PF remained higher at subsequent ages with the exception of 15 and 18 mo. Overall, the sex-related difference was significant (P = 0.010) for unadjusted PF (not for adjusted PF); there was no sex x treatment interaction on PF at any age.
|
|
Iron deficiency
One infant in the placebo group developed IDA at 5.5 mo of age with the following concentrations: PF of 5 µg/L, sTfR of 9.09 mg/L, and hemoglobin of 93 g/L. This infant at 4 mo of age had a PF of 6 µg/L and hemoglobin of 111 g/L. Because PF measurements were at the time performed in batches, the low PF was not appreciated until after the visit at 5.5 mo. Treatment with ferrous sulfate was initiated, and at 6.5 mo PF was 20 µg/L, sTfR was 6.44 mg/L, and hemoglobin was 101 g/L. At 1 mo of age, this infant had a PF of of 60 µg/L, the lowest value observed in the present study at 1 mo of age, which suggested that this infant may have been born with low iron stores. The pregnancy was uncomplicated, and the mother took vitamin-iron supplements during pregnancy. Birth weight of the female infant was 3076 g, and weight at 5.5 mo was 6410 g. The baby consumed modest amounts of iron-fortified cereal beginning at 4 mo. Another infant in the placebo group was found to be iron deficient at 5.5 mo with a PF of of 6 µg/L, but sTfR was 6.80 mg/L and hemoglobin was 116 g/L. This male infant weighed 4678 g at birth, weighed 9941 g at 5.5 mo of age, and consumed iron-fortified cereal beginning at 4 mo. Treatment with iron was recommended, but the mother declined and elected instead to feed generous amounts of iron-fortified wet-pack cereal. At follow-up 1 mo later, PF was 31 µg/L, sTfR 9.36 mg/L, and hemoglobin 116 g/L.
One infant in the iron supplementation group developed anemia at 9 mo (hemoglobin of 91 g/L). Because PF was 13 µg/L and sTfR 6.89 mg/L, ID seemed to be the cause of the anemia and ferrous sulfate was recommended. The parents instead elected to feed substantial amounts of meat and iron-fortified cereal. One month later, PF was still 14 µg/L but hemoglobin was 104 g/L; 2 mo later, PF was 18 µg/L and hemoglobin was 99 g/L. The infant left the study at this point. At 15 and 18 mo of age, 3 subjects in each study group developed ID without anemia. In each group, one subject had PF < 10 µg/L both at 15 and at 18 mo, and 2 subjects each had PF < 10 µg/L at 18 mo only.
Tracking and relation among iron status indicators
The extent of tracking over age of (unadjusted) PF and hemoglobin was assessed for the entire study population (iron supplementation and placebo groups combined) with the use of linear correlation coefficients. As shown in Table 2, tracking of PF was rather strong. Although correlation coefficients tended to decrease with increasing length of interval, they remained statistically significant throughout. Tracking of hemoglobin was also strong for most intervals beginning at 4 mo but absent for intervals beginning at 1 mo.
|
Stool characteristics
For each infant we obtained 20 d of stool records (4 d preceding each monthly study visit) during the intervention period. There was no difference in consistency and number of stools between iron supplementation and placebo infants at any age. Between 4 and 5.5 mo of age, infants in the iron supplementation group had significantly (P < 0.05) more green and black stools than infants in the placebo group. There were no significant differences in the frequency of regurgitation, fussiness, colic, and gassiness between groups.
Growth
Growth data are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Despite random allocation to study groups, male infants in the placebo group were at birth and enrollment substantially and significantly heavier and longer than infants in the iron supplementation group. The differences persisted at 5.5 mo of age. Although gain in weight was significantly less among females in the iron supplementation group (but not among males in this group) than among females in the placebo group, overall (both sexes) weight gain was not significantly different between iron supplementation and placebo groups. After correction by ANCOVA for initial weight, the difference in weight gain in females was no longer statistically significant. Length was similarly greater in male placebo group infants at enrollment, but differences in gain in length were small and not significant and remained nonsignificant after correction for initial length by ANCOVA. There was no sex x treatment interaction on growth. Mean percentiles for weight and length also show that infants in the placebo group by chance were heavier and longer than infants in the iron supplementation group. Changes in mean percentiles for weight and length between 1 and 5.5 mo did not differ between groups.
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
7.8% of supplemental iron (equal to 0.55 mg/d from intake of 7 mg/d) is absorbed by breastfed infants (19). In the present study, 2 infants (6%) in the placebo group became iron deficient by 5.5 mo of age. This is consistent with the prevalence of ID reported for other industrialized countries (7–10). One of the 2 infants developed IDA at 5.5 mo of age and appeared to have been born with diminished iron stores, as indicated by a PF of 60 µg/L at 1 mo of age. Tamura et al (6) showed that infants born with low PF concentrations are at risk of impaired neurodevelopmental outcome, possibly because of unrecognized ID during early infancy. Georgieff et al (5) reported that such infants are in poor iron status at 9 mo of age. One infant in the iron supplementation group developed probable IDA at 9 mo of age. In the second year of life, 6 infants developed ID that was mild (without anemia) and mostly transient.
An earlier study by Friel et al (25) with a design similar to the present study also reported that iron supplementation of breastfed infants led to a slowing down of the decrease of PF. But contrary to the present study, Friel et al (25) found a significant effect of iron on hemoglobin but not on PF at the end of the supplementation period at 6 mo of age. Also in contrast to the present study, 33% of infants receiving placebo and 7% of infants receiving iron were iron deficient (PF < 12 µg/L) at 6 mo; 14% of infants receiving placebo had IDA at 6 mo.
Given the potential of severe ID to cause long-term behavioral abnormalities (11, 13), efforts to prevent ID among breastfed infants are warranted. Preventive strategies include screening with selective supplementation and universal supplementation. The purpose of the present study was to assess the feasibility and the effectiveness of universal supplementation. ID among breastfed babies has been reported at 4–6 mo of age, but the earliest age at which it can occur in full-term infants is not known. We elected to start iron supplementation at 1 mo of age. Because complementary foods as possible sources of iron are not customarily fed at that early an age, we chose medicinal iron as the source of iron. Iron was given through 5.5 mo of age, an age by which complementary foods have customarily been introduced and are relied on to provide iron to the infant. Because of financial constraints, the present trial was able to assess only the effect of medicinal iron on iron status and not whether it prevents ID or has adverse effects.
The ferrous sulfate–multivitamin preparation was well tolerated by most study infants and was, with the exception of a tendency to more greenish stools, free of side effects. Ferrous sulfate has a metallic taste, and infants are often said to be reluctant to take it. But in our study no mother reported consistent difficulty or inability to administer the study supplements. Although 3 infants (8%) had side effects, the effects were not consistent. The fact that our extensive stool and behavior data showed no differences between iron supplementation and placebo suggests that ferrous sulfate given as part of a multivitamin preparation is tolerated without side effects by the great majority of infants. Dewey et al (15) reported a significant negative effect of iron supplementation on length gain among Swedish infants (but not among Honduran infants) between 4 and 9 mo of age. In young Indonesian children (12–18 mo), Idjradinata et al (14) showed that iron supplementation slowed growth significantly. Iron supplementation of iron-replete, but not of iron-deplete, infants and children was reported by Majumdar et al (16) and by Lind et al (17) to reduce growth. On the other hand, in the study by Dijkhuizen et al (26), iron supplementation between 4 and 10 mo had no effect on growth, but that study did not take into account the initial iron status of subjects. Thus, it appears that the deleterious effects of iron are limited to infants with replete iron stores.
Infants in the present study had replete iron stores, but iron supplementation had no unequivocal effect on growth. In particular, there was no suggestion of an effect on length gain. Subgroup analysis showed that iron supplementation significantly decreased weight gain (but not length gain) of female infants. This leaves open the possibility that Fe has an effect on weight gain in females only. Another possibility is that interpretation of growth data in our male infants was compromised by the high birth weight of these infants, so that an effect may have been concealed in male infants as well as in the combined sexes. Also, the study was powered to detect large effects on iron status and therefore could have missed a modest effect on growth. In the present study, iron was given right before a feeding and not between feedings, which may have limited the amount of iron absorbed. Also, most infants received some other foods (cereal or formula) during the latter part of the intervention period (from 4 to 5.5 mo).
The present study had limitations. Because of limited sample size, the study could not determine whether iron supplementation prevents ID. Also, it had sufficient statistical power only to detect relatively large adverse effects but not modest effects, for example on growth. Infants who left the study early were not monitored, which did not allow for intention-to-treat analysis. The study had a weakness in that by chance there was a substantial difference in weight and length of subjects at birth and throughout the intervention period. This weakened the interpretation of the growth data and may have confounded the iron status data. A strength of the study was that infants were observed longitudinally from 1 to 18 mo of age and that PF was determined at 1 mo, which provided a measure of the iron endowment at birth.
PF showed strong tracking across ages, with significant correlations between values obtained as far apart as 17 mo. Hay et al (10) reported tracking of serum ferritin between 6 and 12 mo (r = 0.34) but not between 6 and 24 mo or between 12 and 24 mo. Hernell and Lönnerdal (27) reported "strong tracking" (no data given) of serum ferritin and other indicators of iron status. Sex-related differences have been described by other investigators. Hay et al (10) reported significantly higher ferritin concentrations at 6 mo in girls than in boys. MCV was also higher in girls than boys at 6, 12, and 24 mo. Domellöf et al (28) reported that girls had higher PF, hemoglobin, and MCV and lower transferrin receptor than boys at 4, 6, and 9 mo of age.
In conclusion, the present study has shown that iron supplementation of breastfed infants from an early age is feasible but is only moderately effective in temporarily preserving the infant's iron endowment. Although there were no adverse effects of iron were detected, the study's power to detect adverse effects was limited. Two infants who did not receive iron became iron deficient by 5.5 mo of age (one with anemia). Whether iron supplementation is effective in preventing ID needs to be studied in a larger cohort. However, because of the low prevalence of early ID, screening with selective treatment would seem to be a more suitable approach to the prevention of ID than universal supplementation.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The authors’ responsibilities were as follows—EEZ and SEN: designed the study; EEZ: supervised the study's execution and the data analysis and wrote the manuscript; SEN: responsible for data management and carried out the data analysis; and JMJ: performed or supervised subject recruitment and all study procedures. No author had a conflict of interest.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
and tumour necrosis factor induce hypoferraemia, ferritin production, and a decrease in circulating transferrin receptors in cancer patients. Eur J Clin Invest 1998;28:520–7..[Medline]Related articles in AJCN:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Eneroth, S. el Arifeen, L.-A. Persson, I. Kabir, B. Lonnerdal, M. B. Hossain, and E.-C. Ekstrom Duration of Exclusive Breast-Feeding and Infant Iron and Zinc Status in Rural Bangladesh J. Nutr., August 1, 2009; 139(8): 1562 - 1567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. E Ziegler, S. E Nelson, and J. M Jeter Iron status of breastfed infants is improved equally by medicinal iron and iron-fortified cereal Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2009; 90(1): 76 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. R Buchanan Screening for iron deficiency during early infancy: is it feasible and is it necessary? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2009; 89(2): 473 - 474. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
